200 Central Park South
200 Central Park South, New York, NY 10019
BBL 1010300029 · BIN 1024918
- Year built
- 1963
- Type
- Cooperative
- Units
- 309
- Floors
- 35
- Landmark
- No
- Flip tax
- 2% of the sale price, paid by the seller.
- Financing
- Up to 75% financeable (25% minimum down).
- Subletting
- Permitted only with Board approval after three years of ownership (1–2 year terms) — a restrictive, limited policy.
- Pied-à-terre
- Permitted.
- Washer / dryer
- In-unit permitted with Board approval (drip pan and water-sensor alarm required).
- Pets
- Permitted with Board approval — maximum two per apartment; new dogs must obtain an AKC Canine Good Citizen certificate.
- Co-purchasing
- Co-purchasing permitted for immediate family (Board approval).
- Smoking
- Non-smoking policy adopted 2018 (NYC Local Law 47).
- Alterations
- Prior written Board consent required (not to be unreasonably withheld).
Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 2026). Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.
Every recorded sale at this building, 2002–2026
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf
- $1,480
- Listing discount
- 4.2%
- Recorded sales
- 291
- On record
- 2002–2026
200 Central Park South is the largest pre-220-CPS Park-facing cooperative on Central Park South — a 1963 post-war modernist tower designed by Wechsler and Schimenti for the developer Bernard Spitzer. Where the rest of Central Park South in the 1960s was anchored by pre-war and early-mid-century buildings (the Plaza, Hampshire House, Essex House, 240 CPS, the St. Moritz/Ritz-Carlton), 200 CPS introduced a deliberately modernist vocabulary to the corridor: a 35-story curved facade banded by horizontal balconies, a curtainwall-and-balcony composition that read as architectural rather than historical.
The critical reception was mixed and substantial. Robert A. M. Stern's New York 1960 described 200 CPS as "a kind of aggressive, self-referential Modernism that had hitherto been largely absent from Manhattan" — a backhanded characterization that captures the building's confrontational architectural posture. For residents and buyers, that posture became part of the building's identity. Where 220 Central Park South (Stern, 2018) explicitly pulled pre-war classical vocabulary into supertall scale, 200 CPS made the opposite argument: that modern Manhattan should look like modern Manhattan.
Bernard Spitzer sponsored the building's cooperative conversion in 1984, and the building has operated as a 309-unit co-op since. The scale is meaningful — 309 apartments places 200 CPS among the larger Park-facing cooperatives in Manhattan, comparable in size to the major CPW co-ops (the Beresford has 175, the San Remo 122, the Eldorado 200). The buyer profile and operational posture reflect this scale: less institutional curation than the tier-one Gold Coast co-ops, more accessible per-square-foot pricing, broader inventory turnover.
For buyers who want Park-facing positioning at price points materially below 220 CPS (sponsor pricing starting around $4,500/sf and topping above $15,000/sf), 200 CPS is a structurally important comparison. The building's modernist posture, balconied apartments, and post-war policy framework (subletting permitted, 2% seller-paid flip tax, no cash-only requirement) put it in a different category from the pre-war tier-one buildings — and a different category from the modern supertalls.
Architecture and unit composition
The 309 apartments span studios, 1BRs, 2BRs, and larger configurations across 35 floors. The curved-facade design produces a range of exposures and balconied configurations; the building's flank along Central Park gives many apartments direct or partial Park views, while interior apartments have city-facing exposures.
Balconies are a defining unit feature — the horizontal banding of the facade produces balcony access from a substantial share of the apartments. This is unusual in Manhattan tier-one inventory (most pre-war co-ops have no balconies; most modern supertalls have terraces only at specific units) and is a meaningful selling feature for buyers who value outdoor space.
Apartment configurations and finishes vary substantially across the building's 60+ years and the renovation histories of individual units. Buyers should evaluate apartments individually; the building's scale produces meaningful unit-to-unit heterogeneity.
Building operations
200 CPS operates as a full-service cooperative with full-time doorman, concierge, live-in superintendent, included parking, and bike storage. Property management is handled by Management (a affiliate).
The building's policy framework reflects its post-war scale and its accessibility-tier position in the CPS corridor. Financing is not explicitly prohibited (unlike the tier-one Gold Coast cash-only buildings). Subletting is permitted with a 10% sublease fee on monthly maintenance. The 2% flip tax is seller-paid.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- Per unit / month range
- —
Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent). Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library.
See the full facade history →Recent sales
Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Apartment-level facts are independently verified before publishing; sale prices reflect the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | 24A | 3 BR · 2.5 BA · 2,100 sf Closed Mar 2, 2026 at $4.2M — 12% over the $3.75M asking. A 24th-floor A-line three-bedroom at 2,100 sqft = ~$2,000/sqft. Cleared meaningfully above ask, demonstrating renewed strength in the trophy-tier upper-floor segment at this CPS coop. | $4,200,000 | $2,000/sf | +12.0% |
| Mar 3, 2026 | 11K | 1 BA · 650 sf Closed Feb 26, 2026 at $875K — 5.81% under the $929K asking. An 11th-floor K-line studio at 650 sqft = ~$1,346/sqft. Entry-tier price band at 200 CPS. | $875,000 | $1,346/sf | -5.8% |
| Feb 12, 2026 | 3F | 1 BR · 1 BA · 950 sf | $970,000 | $1,021/sf | -2.9% |
| Feb 4, 2026 | 3Q | 1 BR · 1.5 BA · 1,042 sf | $1,465,000 | $1,406/sf | -2.0% |
| Jan 12, 2026 | 7D | 1 BR · 2 BA · 1,050 sf | $2,500,000 | $2,381/sf | off-mkt |
| Jan 16, 2026 | 14A | 3 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,740 sf · private outdoor Closed Dec 11, 2025 at $2.9M — 3.17% under the $2.995M asking. A 14th-floor A-line three-bedroom at 1,740 sqft = ~$1,667/sqft. | $2,900,000 | $1,667/sf | -3.2% |
| Sep 16, 2025 | 5M | 1 BR · 1.5 BA · 1,100 sf | $1,295,000 | $1,177/sf | -7.2% |
| Jun 27, 2025 | 18B/C | 3 BR · 3 BA · 2,350 sf Closed Jun 13, 2025 at $6M — 6.25% under the $6.4M asking. An 18th-floor B/C-line combination at 2,350 sqft = ~$2,553/sqft. Mid-floor trophy three-bedroom configuration. | $6,000,000 | $2,553/sf | -6.3% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,480/sf across 4 sales. Median listing discount 4.2% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
Other recent transfers
| Date | Unit | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2026 | 11G | $1,675,000 |
| Mar 1, 2024 | 6P | $990,000 |
| Sep 15, 2022 | 18E | $920,000 |
| Apr 13, 2022 | 11P | $1,150,000 |
| Mar 24, 2022 | 6M | $995,000 |
| Aug 4, 2021 | 21F | $605,000 |
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01030-0029) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What to know if you’re buying
This is a different category from tier-one Gold Coast pre-war co-ops. 200 CPS is post-war, larger-scale, modernist, and structurally more accommodating. Buyers comparing it directly to 740 Park or 998 Fifth are mismatching categories. The right comparisons are post-war CPS inventory and other large Park-facing co-ops with comparable scale and policy frameworks.
Subletting is permitted. With the 10% monthly maintenance sublease fee, the building accommodates limited rental use. This is a meaningful flexibility for buyers who may need to sublet temporarily or who value the option even if they don't intend to use it.
The 2% seller-paid flip tax is reasonable for the category. On a $5M apartment, that's $100,000 of seller-side closing cost. Sellers should model this into pricing.
Board approval applies but follows post-war co-op norms. Strong financial profile is the central criterion; the institutional culture is less rigorous than the tier-one pre-wars. Approval rates are higher.
Balconied apartments are a meaningful feature. Buyers who value outdoor space will find 200 CPS one of the few Park-facing options. The balconies are functional and visible.
View permanence is excellent. Central Park anchors the corridor; the surrounding development envelope is largely built out.
Carrying cost is materially lower than 220 CPS or the modern supertalls. Monthly maintenance + RE tax on a 2BR Park-facing apartment typically runs $4,000–$8,000/month — a meaningful differential vs. the $12,000–$25,000/month carrying costs at 220 CPS for comparable square footage.
What to know if you’re selling
Pricing requires apartment-level comparable analysis. The building's 309-unit scale produces meaningful variation — view (Park-facing vs. interior), floor (high vs. low), exposure (north vs. south vs. east vs. west), balcony access, renovation status, and configuration all matter.
Marketing typically combines public listing and direct broker outreach. Public channels are standard for smaller inventory; private network outreach matters more for Park-facing and larger units.
The seller-paid flip tax affects net proceeds. Model the 2% into pricing strategy from the listing decision.
Closing timelines are co-op standard. 6–10 weeks from contract signing to closing.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 200 Central Park South, also evaluate:
- 210 Central Park South — neighboring post-war Park-facing co-op; comparable era and scale at a smaller unit count
- 220 Central Park South — Stern 2018 supertall condominium; materially different price point and program
- 240 Central Park South — pre-war (1940); art deco; smaller scale
- 150 Central Park South (Hampshire House) — 1937 pre-war Park-facing co-op
- [160 Central Park South (Essex House residential)](/buildings/essex-house) — Park-facing hotel/condo
- The Eldorado (300 CPW) — pre-war Park-facing on CPW; comparable scale at a different submarket
- The Beresford (211 CPW) — pre-war Park-facing on CPW; comparable scale
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Central Park South — read The Roebling Team Guide to Central Park South.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
Considering a move at 200 CPS?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 200 CPS would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.