Manhattan condos $1,629/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops $283K/room 5%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $478K/room 19%CPW $350K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,272/sf 24%Hudson Yards $1,450/sf 2%
Full index →
Aspen · The Roebling Index

Aspen, on and off the record.

Ninety-two percent of the land around Aspen belongs to the federal government, and the transfer tax that measures the market has run continuously since 1979. Aspen's top increasingly trades off the MLS — so the single-family median we lead with counts the off-market sales above $10 million that the listing service never records, not just the listed market. The gap between the two, +32.6% in 2025, is the off-market share of the top end.

Median, 2025
$17.5M
Price / sq ft, 2025
$3,472
Federal land
92%
Seasonal units
24.4%
The cycle

Forty years against a fixed boundary.

The long view is the county repeat-sales index, which compares homes to their own earlier sales and so is unaffected by which properties happen to trade in a given year. It shows the 2008 peak, a drawn-out 34% drawdown to 2013 — later than Miami or the Hamptons, because resort markets clear slowly — and then a long climb well above the prior peak. It is an index, not a price: it has no dollar sign.

198619932000200720142021
Aspen / Pitkin County home-price index · FHFA repeat-sales · through 2025 · The Roebling Research Desk
Median, 2025
$17.5M

Single-family, counting the off-market sales above $10M that never reach the MLS — the way the market actually traded at the top.

Recorded (MLS), 2025
$13.2M

The listed market alone — the consistent 14-year spine, unbroken since 2012. The distance up to the full median is the off-market share.

Price / sq ft, 2025
$3,472/sf

Single-family per-foot, off-market included.

Condo median, 2025
$3.45M

The recorded condominium median — a separate, deeper market than the single-family trophy tier.

$/sf · Past year
+14.2%
$/sf · Since 2022
+10.0%
$/sf · Since 2021
+76.2%
The off-market wedge

The gap between the two Aspens.

Aspen's largest trades increasingly close privately, above $10 million, and never reach the multiple-listing service. That leaves two honest single-family medians for the same year: the recorded MLS figure, and a wider figure that includes those off-market sales. We headline the wider one — leaving those trades out understates the very part of Aspen that sets the market — but the two are never spliced and neither is averaged into the other. The distance between them is published as its own measure, because that distance is the off-market share of the Aspen top end.

In 2021 the two were 2.4% apart. From 2022 the gap opens — and by 2025 the wider median, at $17.5M, sits +32.6% above the recorded MLS median of $13.2M. That wedge is a better number than either series alone.

2021
+2.4%
$9.7M incl. off-market
$9.47M recorded MLS
2022
+20.2%
$15.6M incl. off-market
$13M recorded MLS
2023
+10.0%
$13.2M incl. off-market
$12M recorded MLS
2024
+7.2%
$13.4M incl. off-market
$12.5M recorded MLS
2025
+32.6%
$17.5M incl. off-market
$13.2M recorded MLS
A geological ceiling

Fixed land, a tax that counts it.

A hard supply ceiling and a transfer tax that measures it. Aspen has levied a real-estate transfer tax since 1979 and now runs 1.5% combined; in 2024 it raised $23.9 million on 638 free-market transactions. That is a market where the number of deals is small, the average deal is enormous, and the constraint is geological rather than economic.
92% federal

Ninety-two percent of the land around Aspen is public — US Forest Service, BLM and protected open space. The buildable base cannot expand, so demand meets a fixed supply.

$23.9M tax

Aspen's 1.5% combined transfer tax raised $23.9 million in 2024 on 638 free-market deals — a continuous, public measure of a market where the number of trades is small and the average trade is enormous.

5 lots, $13.4M

Five vacant lots sold inside the city in 2024 at a $13.41 million average. When the houses are gone, the land itself becomes the trade — the 2023–2026 story.

24.4% seasonal

Nearly a quarter of the roughly 13,400 housing units are held seasonally, tightening what actually reaches the market in any given year.

The turning points

Forty years, in five moments.

  1. 1989
    The transfer tax that defines the market

    Aspen's 1.0% housing real-estate transfer tax takes effect on 1 July 1989, layered on the 0.5% Wheeler Opera House RETT first levied in 1979. Forty-five years of continuous transaction-tax data is, in effect, forty-five years of dollar-volume data — and the reason the constraint is visible at all.

  2. 2008–2013
    A five-year drawdown

    The cycle peaks in 2008 and troughs in 2013 — down about 34%, and later than Miami or the Hamptons because resort markets clear slowly. 2011 alone falls 13.5%.

  3. 2020–2021
    The year the inventory disappeared

    The recorded single-family median gains 52.6% in 2020 alone, from $5,725,000 to $8,737,500. The valley records 747 combined Aspen and Snowmass unit sales in 2021 against 345 in 2022 — a market that transacted twice in one year what it would manage the next, and then stopped.

  4. 2022
    Off-market becomes the market

    From 2022 the record begins folding in off-market Pitkin County sales above $10 million, because leaving them out had stopped being defensible. This is a methodology break, not a price move, and it is the single most important footnote in the Aspen data: the inclusive series puts the 2025 single-family median at $17.5 million, the recorded MLS series at $13.2 million. Both are correct.

  5. 2023–2026
    Land, not houses

    Five vacant lots trade in Aspen in 2024 at a $13.41 million average and a $12.0 million median. The city collects $23.9 million of transfer tax on 638 free-market deals. The market gets fewer, bigger, and increasingly about the dirt.

Places on record

The neighborhoods, honestly labelled.

Place-level detail is the thinnest layer of the record — most Aspen neighborhoods rest on a single publisher and a reading a few years old, so these are directional, not a current quote. Each figure is shown for the year it was actually published. The immediate Aspen neighborhoods link through to their write-ups; the wider Aspen–Snowmass and down-valley places are carried for context and are separate markets.

Within Aspen
$4.14M 2020
1y +158.9%’16 +212.6%
$4.75M 2016
1y −38.1%’16 0.0%
$4.68M 2021
1y +25.2%’17 +74.2%
$19.9M 2021
1y +26.6%’17 +72.7%
$1.14M 2021
1y +14.9%’17 +13.2%
West Aspen
$3.68M 2021
1y −0.1%’17 +55.4%
The wider Aspen–Snowmass market
Snowmass Village
$1.05M 2020
1y −25.0%’16 +43.8%
Basalt
$858K 2021
1y +5.0%’17 +58.8%
Mclain Flats
$10.8M 2021
1y +12.8%’17 +47.0%
Old Snowmass
$2.76M 2021
1y −20.9%’17 +2236.2%
Woody Creek
$9.21M 2021
1y +127.7%’17 +233.5%
Read alongside

The record, and the decisions it informs.

Sources & method

The Roebling Research Desk maintains this record from published market reports and public data — the Pitkin County FHFA repeat-sales index for the forty-year cycle; a market series that folds in off-market Pitkin County sales above $10 million (recorded in the public deed record but never on the MLS) for the single-family median, per-foot and dollar-volume reads we lead with; the recorded MLS series carried alongside as the consistent spine; the condominium figures; the county's transfer-tax records; and federal land and Census figures for the scarcity context. Counting the off-market top is how the national brokerage reports effectively work too — they draw from recorded deeds, not just the listing service.

Every figure is shown as published for its stated year, with the base year noted wherever a change starts later than its label. Nothing is averaged across sources, chained to look longer than any one record, interpolated or estimated. The recorded and inclusive medians are carried as two honest series and the gap between them is published as its own measure — it is never spliced into a single number. Place-level figures rest on the thinnest layer of the record and are shown as directional, with a quiet single-source marker where a neighborhood rests on one publisher.

Buying or selling in Aspen?

The recorded market is only half of Aspen — the trades that set the top increasingly close off the MLS. A Compass Aspen specialist fills in what the public record can’t: the off-market comparable, the parcel and jurisdiction, and the closing and transfer-tax math. A 30-minute consultation gets you the framework and the right introduction.

Corey Cohen
Corey Cohen
Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
Schedule a consultation →
A note on representation

The Roebling Team at Compass executes transactions directly in Manhattan. For Aspen buyers and sellers, we collaborate with Compass agents in Aspen via referral — clients work with the best on-the-ground representation while keeping the analytical framework consistent across markets. This calculator is an informational research tool, not solicitation of representation.

For trans-market clients (Manhattan + Aspen portfolios) or to discuss your specific transaction, schedule a consultation. Where appropriate, we’ll introduce you to a vetted Compass agent in the local market.