Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf ▴2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room ▴2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $478K/room ▴19%CPW $355K/room ▾5%Fifth Ave $501K/room ▴19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf ▴24%FiDi $1,172/sf ▾2%
Full index →
Condominium · 1997
Parkside Palace Condominium
134 South 9th Street, between Bedford and Driggs Avenues, Williamsburg, Brooklyn
Buildings·Condominium

134 South 9th Street

134 South 9th Street, between Bedford and Driggs Avenues, Williamsburg, Brooklyn

BBL 3021477505 · BIN 3059679

At a glance
Year built
1997
Type
Condominium
Floors
6
Landmark
No
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2005–2025

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$672
Recorded sales
15
On record
2005–2025
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Parkside Palace Condominium would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

134 South 9th Street is a six-story condominium dating to 1997 on Williamsburg's south side. Its 36 residences include a substantial range of interior sizes, with recorded transactions spanning apartments below 850 square feet and larger homes above 1,200 square feet. Individual owners hold the residential lots, and no single owner controls more than two apartments.

The building belongs to the neighborhood's earlier modern condominium stock, predating much of the later waterfront construction. It sits on South 9th Street between Bedford and Driggs Avenues, with the Marcy Avenue subway station nearby. Elevator access serves the upper residential floors.

The ownership structure is established, but turnover is limited. Two recorded sales in 2025 followed a gap of several years in the arm's-length transaction history. The property has no current building-wide tax benefit, making its ordinary Class 2 tax obligation part of the carrying-cost comparison.

Architecture and unit composition

The property contains one six-story residential building. Its condominium apartments are classified as elevator residences, and the residential tax roll comprises 36 separate unit lots. The overall count is therefore an apartment count, with individual ownership interests attached to each home.

The sale history demonstrates considerable variation in interior area. Smaller recorded apartments fall in the roughly 750-to-850-square-foot category, while several larger homes fall around 1,175 to 1,450 square feet. That range means a sale on one floor cannot stand in for all the homes on another floor without accounting for size.

The two most recent transactions involved homes of materially different area. The larger apartment required more total capital, while the smaller one traded at a stronger rate relative to its interior area. Neither result supports assigning a fixed premium to a floor level across the building.

The building's existing floor-area ratio exceeds the residential allowance shown for its mapped R6 district. Its current mass therefore represents more floor area than a simple reading of that residential allowance would suggest. The zoning comparison is a description of the existing property, not a measure of additional space available for construction.

Building operations

The condominium is held through individually taxed residential lots. The largest single owner on the DOF roll holds two of the 36 apartments, about six percent. The ownership group is consequently dispersed despite the small number of recent open-market transactions.

All residential lots are in Class 2. No building-wide abatement is shown, and the class has no statutory annual assessment-growth cap. Owners carry their individual property-tax obligations alongside common charges for the condominium's shared responsibilities.

Elevator access is part of the building's basic service structure. The property has operated as an individual-ownership condominium for decades, with apartment transfers documented in city sales records. Its long ownership history and modest annual turnover distinguish it from a building still in its first sponsor sellout.

Recent sales

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSF
Jun 17, 20253A
1,232 sf
$992,500$806/sf
Jan 31, 20254F
834 sf
$711,775$853/sf
Dec 22, 20212D
1,175 sf
$881,000$750/sf
Nov 27, 20192B
1,318 sf
$836,000$634/sf
Feb 17, 20096E
1,307 sf
$350,000$268/sf
Nov 6, 20085C
758 sf
$250,000$330/sf
Mar 27, 20083E
1,247 sf
$490,000$393/sf
Jun 9, 20051A
1,447 sf
$375,000$259/sf

Market read. Most recent trades (2025) cleared a median $672/sf across 2 sales.

View all 15 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-02147-7505) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with Parkside Palace Condominium and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings likeParkside Palace Condominium. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

Comparable buildings

  • Bedford Court — A Williamsburg condominium of similar residential scale from the same broad development period.
  • 42–52 Broadway — A nearby six-story condominium with a smaller residential count and a Broadway address.
  • The Smith Gray Building — A condominium of similar scale whose conversion architecture provides a different interior and exterior character.
  • 564–580 Park Plaza Condominium — A larger south Williamsburg condominium from the early-2000s development period.
  • 525–535 Park Plaza Condominium — A nearby condominium with a larger ownership group and greater building height.

More Williamsburg buildings

The neighborhood

For the full neighborhood — its buildings, character, and market — read The Roebling Team Guide to Williamsburg.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at Parkside Palace Condominium?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com