Manhattan condos $1,629/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops $283K/room 5%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $478K/room 19%CPW $350K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,272/sf 24%Flatiron $1,769/sf 3%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1964
Chelsea Lane
16 West 16th Street, New York, NY 10011
Buildings·Flatiron·Cooperative

16 West 16th Street (Chelsea Lane)

16 West 16th Street, New York, NY 10011

Flatiron

BBL 1008170029 · BIN 1078651

ManagementAKAM
CorridorFlatiron
At a glance
Year built
1964
Type
Cooperative
Units
489
Floors
14
Landmark
No
Amenities
Renovated lobby, planted interior courtyard, central laundry with app service, on-site full-service garage, bike room, private storage; no fitness center or roof deck per listing records
Pets
Permitted
Financing
80 percent maximum (20 percent minimum down) per listing records — liberal for a co-op; verify current requirements
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

1BR · combo median
$849K
Recent range
$445K – $2.2M
Listing discount
2.0%
Recorded transfers
495

Chelsea Lane is the volume co-op of the lower Fifth Avenue seam — a 489-unit, two-building Philip Birnbaum complex from 1964 occupying a through-block parcel between Fifth and Sixth Avenues, one of the largest residential footprints anywhere in the Flatiron–Village–Chelsea triangle. Architectural records rank it among the biggest buildings in the district, and that scale is the market thesis: full doorman service, a garage, and a policy framework far more liberal than the neighborhood's pre-war co-ops, at the most accessible attended-building pricing on the blocks around Union Square.

The location does the heavy lifting. The building sits two blocks from the Union Square Greenmarket and the N/Q/R/4/5/6/L interchange, a block from the F/M and 1/2/3 at Sixth Avenue, and within a few minutes' walk of the Flatiron office core, the Village, and Chelsea's gallery and retail spine. When the surrounding district became one of the city's centers of publishing, advertising, and photography in the late 1980s and 1990s, the building's 1984 cooperative conversion had already positioned it as the area's natural ownership entry point — a role it still plays for first-time buyers, parents purchasing with children, and pied-à-terre owners.

Structurally, the two-slab configuration matters more than the white-brick facade suggests. The buildings face each other across a planted interior courtyard, so a large share of apartments look onto quiet greenery rather than the street — unusual for the district — and the through-block lot keeps the complex's light envelope in its own hands. Select lines carry private terraces and balconies, the premium product in the building.

Architecture and unit composition

Birnbaum's plan is pragmatic post-war housing at its most efficient: two parallel 14-story slabs, north and south, with unit numbers suffixed N and S, separated by the landscaped courtyard. The roughly 489 apartments run from studios through convertible one-bedrooms, true one- and two-bedrooms, and combined units, with three-bedroom configurations appearing through combinations. Layouts deliver the vintage's virtues — defined foyers, real closets, eat-in or pass-through kitchens in many lines — and renovation grade varies widely across the stock. Courtyard-facing units trade on quiet and green outlooks; upper-floor south and north exposures pick up open light; terrace and balcony lines carry the premium. Views are an amenity here only selectively — buyers chasing skyline panoramas should calibrate expectations, and price accordingly.

Building operations

Full-service at high volume: 24-hour doorman, live-in superintendent, and a full-time maintenance staff, with a renovated lobby, central laundry with app service, on-site full-service garage, bike room, and storage. There is no fitness center or roof deck — the courtyard is the amenity centerpiece — and the building's nearly 500-unit scale spreads staffing and capital costs across a deep shareholder base, which has historically supported competitive maintenance levels for the service tier. Current financial statements and house rules should be reviewed during diligence; we source them for clients at offer stage.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$33,771/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $6
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent). Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library.

See the full facade history →

Management & transfer contacts

Managing agent
Flip tax
Yes
Sublet policy
Allowed
Pied-à-terre
Allowed
Notable fees
Min Down Payment: 20%
Transfer facts compiled by The Roebling Team · as of 2026-07. Confirm current policies and fees with the managing agent before contract.

Recent sales

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Apartment-level facts are independently verified before publishing; sale prices reflect the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Jun 9, 20267RN
1 BA
$700,000+0.1%
Nov 10, 202514BS
1 BA
$705,000-2.8%
Nov 4, 20251DS
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,100 sf
$1,690,000$1,536/sf-3.4%
Sep 26, 202512VN
1 BR · 1 BA · 586 sf
$700,000$1,195/sf-3.4%
Sep 25, 20253RN
1 BR · 1 BA
$822,000+3.4%
Aug 11, 20258LS
1 BA
$698,000-1.0%
Jun 11, 202510LS
1 BR · 1 BA · 600 sf
$717,500$1,196/sf-1.0%
Jun 9, 20258DN
1 BR · 1 BA
$1,375,000-8.0%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2025): a median $1,179/sf across 3 sales. The building has traded as recently as 2026. Median listing discount 1.2% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

5GS+117%
$369,000 ($615/sf) 2005$799,000 2018
3MN+116%
$439,000 2009$950,000 2022
8TN+109%
$670,000 ($788/sf) 2005$1,400,000 2025
8GN · 600 sf+98%
$391,000 2004$665,000 2015$775,000 ($1,292/sf) 2019
2LS+88%
$403,000 2005$699,000 2016$759,000 2021

Other recent transfers

DateUnitPrice
Apr 19, 20112FN$259,000
Dec 10, 20093MN$439,000
Mar 25, 20086NW$664,000
Mar 25, 20085GN$399,000
Jul 14, 20038JN$749,000
View all 495 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00817-0029) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

This is the district's liberal co-op. Eighty percent financing, pieds-à-terre, guarantors, co-purchasing, and parents buying for children are all permitted per management-sourced records — a policy stack closer to condo flexibility than to the surrounding pre-war boards. For buyers who keep getting filtered out of stricter buildings, this is the structural answer. Confirm current terms with the managing agent before offering.

The sublet policy has real value. Two years of ownership, then up to five years of board-approved subletting, gives owners an exit ramp most neighborhood co-ops deny. Investors should still note this is a co-op, not a condo — the board approves every tenant.

Shop the line, not the listing. With two buildings, N and S stacks, courtyard and street exposures, and six decades of renovation cycles, nominally similar units price very differently. Same-line closed history is the only honest anchor, and we maintain it unit by unit.

Budget against the amenity gap. No gym, no roof deck. If those matter, price in a third-party membership — the maintenance savings relative to amenity-heavy buildings typically covers it. Run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator on the specific unit.

Verify the fee stack. The flip tax is not firmly documented in public records; confirm its existence and structure, along with current sublet fees and garage rates, before contract.

What to know if you’re selling

Market the policy framework, explicitly. Your buyer pool includes pied-à-terre purchasers, parents buying for children, and 80-percent financers who cannot transact in most surrounding co-ops. State the permissions in the marketing — it measurably widens demand.

Position against both neighborhoods. The building reads "Chelsea" in name and "Flatiron/Union Square" in listing taxonomy. In practice your buyer is searching the Village, Flatiron, Chelsea, and Gramercy simultaneously; comp accordingly rather than confining the analysis to one label.

Condition honesty wins at this volume. With this much concurrent and historical inventory, overpricing an estate-condition unit against renovated comps fails quickly. Price to the renovation math — run the Renovation Cost Calculator against your asking strategy — and renovated units should document the work and clear at the premium.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 16 West 16th Street, also evaluate:

  • 2 Fifth Avenue — the Village's flagship large post-war co-op at Washington Square; the prestige step-up in the same format
  • The Victoria (7 East 14th Street) — large 1960s full-service co-op on Union Square; the closest like-for-like scale-and-vintage comparison
  • Butterfield House (37 West 12th Street) — the Village's celebrated 1962 co-op; the design-pedigree alternative at a higher tier
  • 20 East 9th Street — post-war full-service co-op in the heart of the Village
  • 45 Fifth Avenue — lower Fifth Avenue co-op alternative blocks south
  • 24 Fifth Avenue — pre-war full-service alternative on lower Fifth for buyers weighing vintage against policy flexibility
  • 33 Fifth Avenue — pre-war lower Fifth co-op; the character play at the same crossroads
  • London Terrace Towers (465 West 23rd Street) — Chelsea's full-block 1930 complex; the west-side volume alternative with amenity depth

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Flatiron — read The Roebling Team Guide to Flatiron.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

Considering a move at Chelsea Lane?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Chelsea Lane would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.