240 Park Avenue South, 240 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10003, Manhattan — Condominium, 2007
Buildings·Flatiron·Condominium

240 Park Avenue South

240 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10003

CorridorFlatiron
At a glance
Year built
2007
Type
Condominium
Floors
17
Landmark
No
Amenities
24-hour doorman and concierge, live-in resident manager, fitness center of roughly 1,500 square feet, residents' library/entertainment suite, landscaped outdoor terrace, children's playroom, sauna; no garage and no balconies — verify the current amenity program directly
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2008–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,829
Listing discount
6.2%
Recorded sales
107
On record
2008–2026

240 Park Avenue South is one of the few buildings on the avenue's residential stretch that was designed from the ground up as a luxury condominium rather than carved out of a loft or office building — and it was designed by Charles Gwathmey, whose curved-glass corner at 19th Street remains the block's most recognizable architectural gesture. Where the surrounding Flatiron and Gramercy inventory is dominated by conversions with inherited floor plates, 240 was purpose-built in 2006–07: pre-cast stone facade, 10-to-11-foot ceilings, loft-scaled windows with deliberate wall space between them. Gwathmey framed the design explicitly as "a contemporary version of a masonry building" — a counterargument, at the height of the glass-tower era, in favor of walls you can hang art on.

The development documentation is on file with us and settles the building's facts. The condominium offering plan — sponsor 240 Park Avenue South LP c/o Tessler Developments, filed August 22, 2006 — offered 52 residential units including a resident manager's unit, plus one commercial unit, for a total offering of $145,125,000. The plan also carried two provisions buyers should understand today: anticipated 421-a tax benefits, which have since burned off, and a sponsor right to rent rather than sell units, a disclosure standard to the era that resolved as the building sold through.

Two decades on, the building's market position is straightforward: a full-service, amenity-complete boutique condominium of roughly 50 residences at one of the best-connected corners in Manhattan — Union Square's full subway complex, Gramercy Park two blocks east, the Flatiron office and restaurant core to the north. Within its corridor it trades as the design-pedigree alternative: newer than the lofts, smaller and quieter than the towers, with the only Gwathmey Siegel residential facade on Park Avenue South.

Architecture and unit composition

The building rises 17 stories, organized around its rounded corner — curved glass bays stacked above a limestone base — with the long elevation running west along East 19th Street. Residences run one- to three-bedrooms from about 805 to 2,700 square feet, roughly three to four per floor, many with the curved bay window walls as the living-room centerpiece; select upper units carry terraces, including a wraparound at the A-line setback levels. The two full-floor penthouses are the trophy inventory: the 17th-floor penthouse spans the entire floor with private roof access, and a free-form rooftop infinity pool was built at the penthouse level — a genuine rarity in a building of this scale. Kitchens and baths were delivered to a single sponsor specification (granite, Sub-Zero and Miele equipment, carved-stone vanities); nearly twenty years in, renovation condition now varies by unit and should be priced line by line.

Building operations

Full-service: 24-hour doorman and concierge, live-in resident manager, the fitness center, residents' library/entertainment suite, landscaped terrace, children's playroom, and sauna. There is no on-site garage and no balconies on most lines. The ground-floor commercial unit is separately owned under the condominium structure — standard for the avenue, but your attorney should review the commercial unit's rights and cost allocations in the by-laws. The offering plan, declaration, and by-laws are on file in The Roebling Research Library and available to clients during diligence.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

Safe to live in today — but the last inspection flagged repairs that are due on a deadline, so facade work and its cost are coming. Whether that’s a real concern depends on the scope, the timing, and how the building plans to pay for it — reserves or an assessment — which is exactly what we’d dig into for you.

Inspection history
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
On record
$21,000 in filing penalties
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeGood for ~5 years — no facade assessment on the horizon.
SWARMPSafe now, repairs due on a deadline — budget for the work or a possible assessment.
UnsafeActive hazard: sidewalk shed and repairs now. Expect disruption and an assessment.

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent). Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Apartment-level facts are independently verified before publishing; sale prices reflect the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Apr 8, 20265A
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,581 sf
$2,875,000$1,818/sf-4.1%
Sep 9, 202510B
3 BR · 3 BA · 2,125 sf
$3,300,000$1,553/sf+3.1%
Jul 9, 20256A
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,581 sf
$2,750,000$1,739/sfoff-mkt
May 30, 20258D
1 BR · 1 BA · 805 sf
$1,415,000$1,758/sf-8.7%
Oct 18, 20244A
5 BR · 4 BA · 2,125 sf
$5,875,000$2,765/sf-16.0%
Feb 7, 202412A/D
3 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,386 sf
$3,710,000$1,555/sf-7.1%
Oct 12, 20239A
5 BR · 4.5 BA · 3,715 sf
$8,600,000$2,315/sfoff-mkt
Nov 23, 202214C
2 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,471 sf
$1,999,999$1,360/sfoff-mkt

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,829/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 6.2% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

17PHC · 3,813 sf+98%
$8,072,999 ($2,053/sf) 2008$16,000,000 ($4,196/sf) 2014
5D · 805 sf+50%
$1,099,710 ($1,366/sf) 2008$1,655,000 ($2,056/sf) 2015
6B · 2,139 sf+49%
$3,353,097 ($1,568/sf) 2008$3,175,000 ($1,494/sf) 2011$4,995,000 ($2,335/sf) 2015
12B · 2,139 sf+47%
$3,299,130 ($1,542/sf) 2008$4,837,500 ($2,262/sf) 2014
7D · 805 sf+39%
$1,176,079 ($1,461/sf) 2008$1,570,000 ($1,950/sf) 2014$1,640,000 ($2,037/sf) 2018

Other recent transfers

DateUnitPrice
Jan 16, 20139AB$8,450,000
Jan 4, 20134C$2,350,000
6A$3,150,000
View all 107 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00848-7505) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

This is new-construction stock, not a conversion. No inherited loft quirks, no land-lease, no sponsor-era rent-stabilized tenancy questions — a clean 2007 condominium structure. The diligence focus shifts to the usual condo questions: financials, reserve posture, the commercial unit's allocations, and any facade or mechanical cycles approaching at the 20-year mark.

The 421-a era is over — underwrite real taxes. Early resale listings in buildings of this vintage often anchored buyer expectations to abated carrying costs. The exemption schedule has expired; run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator on current assessed taxes, not historical listing data.

Line selection is the whole game. The curved-corner bays at the A-lines, the terraced setback units, and the penthouses are distinct products from the mid-floor interior lines. Same-line closed history — not building-average pricing — is the correct anchor, and we maintain it by line.

Amenity expectations should be calibrated to boutique scale. The program is complete for ~50 units — fitness center, library suite, terrace, playroom, sauna — but there is no pool (outside the penthouse's private one), no garage, and no spa floor. Buyers cross-shopping new Flatiron towers should weigh intimacy and Gwathmey provenance against amenity breadth.

Verify the policy stack against the by-laws. Leasing terms, pet policy, entity and trust purchases, and any transfer fees are governed by the condominium documents — on file with us — and current board resolutions. Confirm at offer stage.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the architecture. A named Charles Gwathmey building is a marketing asset most Park Avenue South conversions cannot match. The curved-glass corner, the masonry thesis, the art-wall window spacing — state it specifically; the design-literate Flatiron buyer responds to precision.

Position between the lofts and the towers. Your buyer is cross-shopping prewar loft conversions (character, but compromise floor plates) and newer glass condos (amenities, but scale and anonymity). 240's pitch is the middle path: purpose-built systems and service at boutique scale.

Mansion tax thresholds shape offers at nearly every price point here. Run the Mansion Tax Calculator at the intended ask and price with the cliffs in mind.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 240 Park Avenue South, also evaluate:

  • 260 Park Avenue South — the neighboring full-block condo conversion; the prewar-envelope alternative one block north
  • 50 Gramercy Park North — boutique Gramercy condominium with park-key cachet; the service step-up
  • 45 East 22nd Street — the Flatiron supertall; the new-tower alternative at a higher price point
  • 21 East 26th Street — boutique Madison Square Park condominium
  • 15 Union Square West — glass-over-cast-iron boutique condo on the square
  • 121 East 22nd Street — newer Gramercy condominium; the closest new-construction peer east of the avenue
  • One Madison (23 East 22nd Street) — slender Flatiron tower; the view-driven alternative
  • 141 Fifth Avenue — domed Flatiron conversion; the landmark-envelope comp

The Roebling Team at 240 Park Avenue South

The Roebling Team at Compass works the Flatiron and Gramercy corridors as a core practice area. We publish this building profile because 240 Park Avenue South buyers and sellers deserve building-specific intelligence — sponsor documentation, line-level pricing logic, and corridor comparables — not generic neighborhood commentary.

If you're considering a transaction at 240 Park Avenue South, a 30-minute consultation is the right starting point.

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Flatiron — read The Roebling Team Guide to Flatiron.

Considering a move at 240 Park Avenue South?

Get the full picture on this building.

The full comp set, a private valuation of your line, or current and off-market availability — sent to you directly.

Or schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A broker’s honest answer to three questions — what your apartment would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — for your apartment at 240 Park Avenue South, in this market. Put together by a person, not an algorithm.