63 Cooper Square
63 Cooper Square, New York, NY 10003
BBL 1004637501 · BIN 1006698
- Year built
- 1984
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 36
- Floors
- 6
- Landmark
- No
- Pets
- Pet-friendly
- Subletting
- Permitted
- Pied-à-terre
- Allowed
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 63 Cooper Square would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
63 Cooper Square sits at one of the most consequential crossroads in downtown Manhattan — the point where the Bowery, Astor Place, St. Marks Place, and NoHo all meet at Cooper Square. This is the geographic seam between the East Village, a few steps from the 6 train at Astor Place, and within a short walk of Cooper Union, Astor Place, and the retail-and-nightlife density of the lower Bowery.
The building's structural identity is unusual for the block. Cooper Square and the surrounding streets are dominated by 19th-century masonry and prewar tenement stock; 63 Cooper Square is a ground-up 1984 condominium — a genuine 1980s building, not a prewar conversion. That construction vintage produces a specific inventory. A portion of the units facing Cooper Square are double-height duplex lofts with living volumes of roughly 20 feet, an idiom that reads as authentic loft space rather than a marketing gesture. The lobby carries the industrial-chic language of the era, and select units carry private terraces.
The building is compact — 36 residential units across 6 stories — and that boutique scale organizes the buyer proposition. 63 Cooper Square is not a doorman tower. It runs a video/virtual doorman rather than a full-time staffed lobby, and the amenity program is deliberately limited: elevator, laundry, roof deck, live-in super. There is no gym and no parking. In exchange, the building offers the two things that matter most to the downtown loft buyer: condominium ownership — with the financing, subletting, and pied-à-terre latitude that comes with it — and genuine loft-scale volume at a price point materially below the larger amenitized condominiums nearby.
Architecture and unit composition
63 Cooper Square was built in 1984 as a ground-up condominium, with the first sales cycle running from approximately 1986. It is a 1980s masonry building of 6 stories, sited on the east side of Cooper Square across the range 63–69 — which is why the same building is marketed under both the 63 Cooper Square and 65 Cooper Square addresses.
The inventory is where the building distinguishes itself. A portion of the units facing Cooper Square are configured as double-height duplex lofts, with living volumes of roughly 20 feet — the kind of vertical space that defines the downtown loft typology. The lobby carries an industrial-chic character consistent with the building's 1980s vintage, and select units carry private terraces. The building holds 36 residential units in total (37 including the commercial unit), a boutique scale that keeps the building intimate and the common-charge base compact.
Because the building is not landmarked — it sits outside the NoHo Historic District, on the east side of Cooper Square — interior and exterior work is not subject to the LPC review that governs the protected blocks nearby. Buyers should confirm the specific configuration, ceiling heights, and terrace access of any given unit at the apartment level, since the loft duplexes and the flat units read very differently.
Building operations
63 Cooper Square operates as a condominium. The building runs a video/virtual doorman rather than a full-time staffed lobby — a deliberate decision consistent with the building's boutique scale and one that materially shapes the common-charge structure. A live-in superintendent manages day-to-day operations. The elevator, central laundry, and roof deck are the principal amenity infrastructure. There is no fitness center and no parking.
The condominium's policy framework is buyer-friendly in the way condominiums typically are: the building is pet-friendly, subletting is permitted, and no pied-à-terre restriction was found. As a condominium, the ownership form gives buyers the financing latitude, right-of-first-refusal (rather than board-interview) transfer process, and investor flexibility that a cooperative does not.
Common charges, assessments, and real estate taxes should be confirmed at the apartment level with the managing agent; building-level common-cost figures are not published in aggregated form.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $13,232/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $31
- Modeled exposure split equally across 36 units (the city tax-lot count). Not an assessed amount; co-op shareholders are typically charged by share allocation.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
Recent sales
Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2024 | 6B | 640 sf | $970,000 | $1,516/sf |
| Aug 12, 2019 | 6C | 660 sf | $1,230,000 | $1,864/sf |
| Nov 30, 2011 | 6B | 640 sf | $680,000 | $1,063/sf |
Market read. Most recent trades (2024) cleared a median $1,516/sf (recorded) across 1 sale.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00463-7501). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with 63 Cooper Square and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 63 Cooper Square. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
The condominium ownership form is the core advantage. As a condominium, 63 Cooper Square gives buyers the financing flexibility, the right-of-first-refusal transfer process (rather than a cooperative board interview), and the subletting and pied-à-terre latitude that a downtown co-op typically restricts. For investors and pied-à-terre buyers, this is the structural feature that makes the building work.
The loft duplexes are a distinct sub-inventory. The double-height duplex units facing Cooper Square — roughly 20-foot living volumes — trade differently from the flat units. Buyers seeking genuine loft-scale space should target that specific inventory; buyers seeking a straightforward one-bedroom should underwrite the flat-unit tier.
The video doorman is structural, not incidental. The building runs a video/virtual doorman rather than a full-time staffed lobby, and there is no gym and no parking. Buyers who require staffed-lobby service or on-site amenities should weigh this; buyers who prioritize value, condominium flexibility, and a boutique building culture will find the service tier is precisely what keeps common charges accessible.
The location is the trade-off and the appeal. Cooper Square, where the Bowery, Astor Place, St. Marks, and NoHo meet, is one of the most trafficked crossroads downtown — steps from the 6 train, dense with retail and nightlife. Buyers should walk the block at different hours to confirm the energy suits them.
Verify the operational baseline at offer stage. Common charges, assessments, real estate taxes, and the specific configuration and terrace access of any given unit should all be confirmed with the managing agent and the offering plan during due diligence.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the condominium form and the loft volume. The two features that distinguish 63 Cooper Square from the surrounding prewar stock are the condominium ownership structure and the double-height loft duplexes. Marketing copy should foreground both — the financing and subletting flexibility for the buyer pool, and the genuine loft-scale volume for the duplex units.
Position the boutique scale and the crossroads location as the value proposition. The video doorman, the compact 36-unit scale, and the limited amenity program are not gaps — they are the cost structure that keeps the building accessible relative to the larger amenitized downtown condominiums. Frame the Cooper Square crossroads, the 6 train at Astor Place, and the NoHo edge as the location argument.
Price to the specific unit type. The loft duplexes and the flat units carry materially different $/sf profiles; building-level averages compress across the two. Reference the closest recent recorded comparable on the specific unit type being sold.
Closing timelines are condominium-standard. The condominium transfer process runs on a right-of-first-refusal basis rather than a board interview, which typically compresses timelines relative to a cooperative. Confirm the waiver process and pacing with the managing agent.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 63 Cooper Square, also evaluate:
- Nearby East Village and NoHo condominiums of comparable boutique scale along and near the Bowery, Astor Place, and Cooper Square.
- Loft-conversion condominiums in NoHo and the surrounding East Village blocks, where double-height volume and condominium ownership overlap.
- Ground-up 1980s and later condominiums in the East Village / NoHo corridor offering condominium financing and subletting flexibility at a boutique scale.
More East Village buildings
- 50 Avenue A (Hearth House) — 1920 condop
- 51 St. Marks Place — 1920 co-op
- 52 East 4th Street (52E4) — 2007 condominium
- 64 East 1st Street — 2015 condominium
- 72 East 3rd Street — 1900 condominium
- 75 First Avenue — 2020 condominium
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across East Village — read The Roebling Team Guide to East Village.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at 63 Cooper Square?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.