90 Riverside DriveRecorded sales & closing prices
90 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10024
73 recorded transfers, 2003–2026. Sortable and searchable below.
- 2BR
- $2.23M
- 3BR
- $4.8M
- Recent range
- $2M – $6M
- Listing discount
- 3.9%
- Recorded transfers
- 73
Not enough recent activity to price (shown for completeness, not quoted): 4BR+ — last traded 2024.
The complete recorded-sale history for 90 Riverside Drive, compiled from NYC Department of Finance transfer records and verified listing data, then enriched apartment-by-apartment by The Roebling Team research desk. Priced by apartment type — the honest unit for a co-op, where square footage isn’t officially recorded.
Latest closings
The line premium — where you sit sets the price
Same-3BR prices, time-controlled to today’s dollars, split by line — exposure, light, and layout vary stack to stack within a building.
Bar = today’s 3BR price for that line; right column = premium vs. an average 3BR.
And by floor
Same 3BR, time-controlled to today — higher floors, higher clears.
The 3BR trajectory
Every recorded 3BR. The building trades thinly year to year, so the story is the long arc, not any single year: 3BRs have moved from roughly $3.1M in the mid-2000s to about $4.8M today.
Each dot is one recorded sale, by close date and price; the line is the median for each year. Click any dot to jump straight to that sale below.
Lines that traded more than once
The building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment — recorded prices, exact.
Every recorded sale
Sort any column; filter by unit or keyword. Prices are the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance.
| Apartment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | 9A | $2,700,000 | — | |
| May 21, 2026 | PHC | 1 BR · 1 BA | $792,000 | -6.7% |
| Mar 10, 2026 | 14A | 3 BR · 2.5 BA | $4,800,000 | -3.9% |
| Feb 2, 2026 | 16E | 2 BR · 3 BA | $2,225,000 | -1.1% |
| Dec 16, 2025 | PHA | 3 BR · 3.5 BA | $10,995,000 | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | 7E | 3 BR · 2.5 BA | $2,500,000 | +0.2% |
| Aug 15, 2024 | 1B | 4 BR · 3 BA | $2,025,000 | -5.8% |
| Mar 8, 2024 | 10B | 3 BR · 3.5 BA | $5,995,000 | -11.2% |
| Sep 18, 2023 | 12C | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,995,000 | -9.1% |
| Feb 16, 2023 | 7B | 3 BR · 3 BA | $2,800,000 | -3.3% |
| Nov 3, 2022 | 14F | 3 BR · 2 BA | $1,800,000 | -2.7% |
| Nov 3, 2022 | 15A | $4,000,000 | — | |
| Sep 8, 2022 | 3D | 3 BR · 2.5 BA | $2,875,000 | -2.5% |
| Jul 11, 2022 | 6G | 3 BR · 2.5 BA | $4,100,000 | +1.2% |
| Jul 7, 2022 | 15G | 3 BR · 3 BA | $4,105,000 | +5.4% |
| Jun 2, 2022 | 7AA | 4 BR · 2.5 BA | $3,750,000 | -6.1% |
| Oct 7, 2021 | 2A | 3 BR · 3.5 BA | $3,065,000 | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | 15E | 2 BR · 2.5 BA | $2,550,000 | -5.6% |
| Jun 23, 2021 | 1C | 3 BR · 2 BA | $1,460,000 | -2.6% |
| Jun 15, 2021 | 6D | 3 BR · 3 BA | $2,800,000 | -15.0% |
| May 26, 2021 | 8F | 2 BR · 2.5 BA | $1,975,000 | -12.2% |
| May 5, 2021 | 15C | 3 BR · 2 BA | $1,740,000 | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | 9C | 3 BR · 2 BA | $1,475,000 | -1.3% |
| Dec 30, 2019 | 2C | 3 BR · 2 BA | $1,575,000 | -12.3% |
| Aug 19, 2019 | 9E | $2,700,000 | — | |
| Dec 18, 2018 | 2D | 2 BR · 2.5 BA | $2,545,000 | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | 5C | $1,655,000 | — | |
| Aug 8, 2018 | 10G | 4 BR | $3,795,000 | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | 16B | 4 BR | $4,575,000 | -7.6% |
| Aug 17, 2017 | 11C | 2 BR | $1,800,000 | -7.7% |
| Aug 17, 2017 | 10B | 4 BR | $6,300,000 | -3.1% |
| May 19, 2017 | 4C | 3 BR | $1,699,000 | -2.9% |
| Sep 8, 2016 | 12C | 2 BR | $1,995,000 | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | 6B | $4,600,000 | — | |
| Jan 13, 2015 | 12E | $3,300,000 | — | |
| Sep 10, 2014 | 11F | 3 BR | $3,015,000 | +16.2% |
| Apr 10, 2014 | 2G | 4 BR · 2.5 BA | $4,050,000 | +1.3% |
| Apr 10, 2014 | PHC | 1 BR · 1 BA | $950,000 | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | PHB | 4 BR | $6,795,000 | -9.3% |
| Jun 21, 2013 | 2C | 3 BR · 2 BA | $1,850,000 | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | 10C | 2 BR | $1,600,000 | -3.0% |
| Oct 25, 2012 | 16C | 2 BR | $1,562,500 | -2.0% |
| Jun 7, 2012 | 14D | $2,850,000 | — | |
| Mar 29, 2012 | 1C | 3 BR · 2 BA | $1,200,000 | -11.1% |
| Aug 4, 2011 | PHA | 3 BR | $5,900,000 | -1.6% |
| Jul 29, 2011 | 2F | 3 BR | $1,550,000 | — |
| May 10, 2011 | 5F | 3 BR | $1,750,000 | -2.5% |
| Apr 25, 2011 | 7B | 3 BR · 3 BA | $1,325,000 | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | 6D | 2 BR | $2,200,000 | +4.8% |
| Aug 24, 2010 | 4C | 3 BR | $1,250,000 | -7.4% |
| May 24, 2010 | 15C | 2 BR | $1,575,000 | — |
| May 20, 2010 | 2E | 2 BR | $1,950,000 | -9.3% |
| Apr 7, 2010 | 3F | 2 BR | $1,725,000 | -1.4% |
| Apr 7, 2010 | 15D | 2 BR | $2,400,000 | +4.6% |
| Mar 12, 2010 | 6A | 2 BR | $3,650,000 | -8.6% |
| Jan 19, 2010 | 12B | 4 BR | $6,125,000 | +2.2% |
| Mar 10, 2009 | 11E | 2 BR | $2,275,000 | -17.3% |
| Jan 22, 2009 | 16G | 3 BR | $3,500,000 | +2.9% |
| Dec 18, 2008 | 15F | 2 BR | $1,530,000 | -14.8% |
| Aug 15, 2008 | 2C | 3 BR | $1,500,000 | +0.3% |
| Jul 3, 2008 | 3D | 2 BR | $2,600,000 | -5.5% |
| Jun 14, 2007 | 1A | 3 BR | $3,200,000 | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | 3C | 2 BR | $1,375,000 | +2.2% |
| Jul 19, 2006 | 3D | 2 BR | $2,295,000 | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | 12C | 2 BR | $1,535,000 | -2.5% |
| Feb 23, 2006 | 11F | 3 BRnon-market transfer (excluded from $/sf & trends) | $1,860,000 | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | 8G | 3 BR | $3,475,000 | +3.0% |
| Mar 29, 2005 | 6E | 3 BR | $2,187,500 | -6.9% |
| Mar 1, 2005 | 11F | 3 BR | $1,800,000 | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | 6G | 3 BR | $3,100,000 | -7.5% |
| Aug 20, 2004 | 15C | 2 BR | $1,265,000 | -0.8% |
| Jul 29, 2004 | 1A | 3 BR | $2,495,000 | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | 16B | 4 BR | $3,995,000 | — |
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01244-0063) and verified listing data. Co-op apartments are priced by unit type (bedroom count) rather than per square foot — square footage isn’t officially recorded for co-ops, and room counts carry some agent-entry inconsistency, so bedroom type is the reliable spine. Non-arms-length transfers and storage/parking are excluded; line and floor premiums are time-controlled to today’s pricing. Where transaction volume is too thin to support a figure, none is shown.
Put this data to work.
Know what’s fair before you offer — we’ll show you where each line trades, the building’s discount-to-ask pattern, and where the value sits right now.
Price to the building’s real trajectory, not a guess — we’ll position your line against its true comps to maximize the outcome.