Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Condominium · 2006
The Gramercy 145
145 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Buildings·Gramercy·Condominium

145 Lexington Avenue (The Gramercy 145)

145 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10016

Kips Bay

BBL 1008857502 · BIN 1087927

CorridorGramercy
At a glance
Year built
2006
Type
Condominium
Units
12
Floors
13
Landmark
No
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2009–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,280
Listing discount
7.2%
Recorded sales
24
On record
2009–2026

The Gramercy 145 is a twelve-apartment building, one residence per floor, on a 25-foot-wide Lexington Avenue lot. That is the whole thesis. In a stretch of Rose Hill dominated by tenement conversions, small prewar walk-ups and one or two larger postwar rentals, a purpose-built 2006 condominium where every apartment runs the full width and depth of the floor plate is a genuinely scarce product — full-floor living, with light on the avenue and on the rear, at a price point far below the full-floor inventory of the trophy corridors.

It is also, structurally, a very small building, and buyers should underwrite it as one. Twelve apartments carry the entire cost of an elevator, a facade, a roof, a boiler and a superintendent. There is no commercial income, no garage and no ancillary revenue of any kind; every dollar of the operating budget comes from twelve monthly common-charge bills. The building's own reporting on file bears this out: the annual operating budget runs to a few hundred thousand dollars, the reserve position has been thin, and the board has funded work through direct assessment rather than out of accumulated reserves. A six-month assessment ran from October 2022 through March 2023, billed alongside common charges at roughly a month's charge and a quarter per unit. That is not a distress signal — it is how twelve-unit buildings pay for things — but it is the carrying-cost reality a buyer inherits.

The third fact that matters is the tax posture, and it is the one most often misunderstood at this address. The building was completed under a ten-year 421-a exemption that began in tax year 2011 and has since run all the way off. Department of Finance exemption detail shows the benefit at zero by fiscal 2021 and no exemption recorded against any of the twelve unit lots thereafter. Whatever the tax line looked like in the first decade of the building's life, it is now a full, unabated class-2 assessment, and any carrying-cost analysis should be run against the current bill on the specific unit rather than against an older listing sheet.

Architecture and unit composition

The building is a thirteen-story masonry infill tower on a narrow avenue lot, built to the street wall with a canopied entrance marquee — the marquee was filed as a separate permit in 2008, five feet four inches wide and thirteen feet high. Above the ground floor, the plan is the simplest one available to a narrow-lot developer and the most valuable to a resident: one apartment per floor, roughly 1,280 gross square feet on average, with an avenue exposure at the front and a rear exposure at the back, and no shared corridor beyond the elevator landing.

The apartments are numbered 1 through 12 rather than by floor, which is worth knowing when reading paperwork: the condominium's unit numbers and the tax lots (1101 through 1112) run in the same order. Unit sizes and finishes vary, and the assessed values on the tax roll spread widely enough across the twelve lots to suggest meaningful differences in size and floor level between the lower apartments and the upper ones.

Facade maintenance has been active rather than deferred. A 2020 alteration filing covered repointing of open joints between brick and stone window sills and replacement of cracked brick on the west elevation — routine work for a masonry building entering its second decade, and the kind of item that should be traced through the building's current facade reports at diligence.

Building operations

Operations are deliberately lean. There is a superintendent on payroll and no doorman; day-to-day management is outsourced to a small property-management firm; the elevator, intercom, fire-alarm monitoring and pest control are all on service contracts. Utilities billed at the association level are limited to common electricity, water and sewer, and telephone and internet for the building systems.

Two operational facts from the reporting on file are worth carrying into diligence. First, the association recovered a substantial insurance reimbursement for a water-damage claim in late 2022 — water intrusion has been a live issue at this building and its history should be traced. Second, the building completed its Local Law 152 gas-piping inspection in December 2022, which puts it on the standard four-year cycle for that requirement.

Policy framework

The Gramercy 145 is a condominium, so the ownership form itself supplies most of the answer: purchases are subject to a board right of first refusal rather than to approval, and the structural questions a cooperative buyer worries about — financing ceilings, post-closing liquidity, pied-à-terre bans — generally do not arise. What the board does control is the alteration agreement, the application package and the house rules, and none of those are published. In a building this small, obtain them from the managing agent before contract rather than at closing; a twelve-unit board can be considerably more particular in practice than the ownership form implies.

Local Law 97

Compliance status
Not subject to Local Law 97

This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 emissions caps apply. No regulatory capital pressure from this law specifically, current or 2030.

See full Local Law 97 analysis →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2027
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The building trades as a full-floor alternative in a neighborhood that otherwise sells by the room. Comparable analysis here should be run against other small, full-floor-plate condominiums in Rose Hill and lower Murray Hill on a dollars-per-square-foot basis, and should be adjusted for two things this building does not offer: staff and amenity. There is no doorman, no gym, no roof deck and no garage, and pricing should reflect that against the amenitized new-development inventory a few blocks north and west. Against that, the value of an entire floor — two exposures, no shared corridor, no neighbor above the living room and below the bedroom on the same floor — is real and holds up in resale. Because the 421-a benefit is gone, the tax line on any unit is now a permanent, fully phased-in cost rather than a step-up schedule, which simplifies the underwriting considerably. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Jun 25, 20263
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,432 sf
$1,832,500$1,280/sf-0.7%
May 9, 20243
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,423 sf
$1,575,000$1,107/sf-21.2%
Feb 22, 20247
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,400 sf
$1,600,000$1,143/sf-22.9%
Oct 26, 20225
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,423 sf
$1,840,000$1,293/sf-7.8%
Sep 14, 20226
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,420 sf
$1,851,000$1,304/sfoff-mkt
Aug 4, 20218
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,423 sf
$1,800,000$1,265/sf-5.0%
Jul 28, 20214
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,423 sf
$1,633,000$1,148/sf-9.2%
Jan 10, 20201
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,472 sf
$2,037,500$1,384/sf-7.2%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,280/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 7.2% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

1 · 1,472 sf+30%
$1,568,105 ($1,065/sf) 2009$2,037,500 ($1,384/sf) 2020
2 · 770 sf+21%
$848,925 ($1,103/sf) 2009$1,030,000 ($1,338/sf) 2014
3 · 1,432 sf+17%
$1,570,800 ($1,104/sf) 2009$2,155,000 ($1,514/sf) 2013$1,575,000 ($1,107/sf) 2024$1,832,500 ($1,280/sf) 2026
4 · 1,423 sf+2%
$1,598,850 ($1,124/sf) 2009$1,875,000 ($1,420/sf) 2018$1,633,000 ($1,148/sf) 2021
7 · 1,400 sf-16%
$1,900,000 ($1,357/sf) 2018$1,600,000 ($1,143/sf) 2024
View all 24 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00885-7502) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 145 Lexington Avenue, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Gramercy — read The Roebling Team Guide to Gramercy.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at The Gramercy 145?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Gramercy 145 would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.