147 Lafayette Avenue
147 Lafayette Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11238
Fort Greene, Brooklyn
BBL 3021020062 · BIN 3259389
- Year built
- 1860
- Type
- Cooperative
- Floors
- 4
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; in the Fort Greene Historic District
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
- Doorman
- No doorman
Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2024
Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.
- Recent range
- $607K – $999K
- Listing discount
- 5.4%
- Recorded transfers
- 37
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 147 Lafayette Avenue would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
In 1934 a developer named Robert Alfred Shaw looked at a row of 1860s houses on Lafayette Avenue and decided the nineteenth century was over. He hired Horace B. Mann, the head designer of Mann & MacNeille, and Mann did something almost nobody in brownstone Brooklyn does anymore: he took four adjoining rowhouses at 137–145 and combined them into one apartment building, which shares its tax lot and corporation with the smaller house at 147. (Published accounts date the work to 1934; LPC's 1978 Fort Greene designation report dates Mann's alteration to 1938.)
The work was thorough. Stoops came off. Italianate detail came off. Every façade was re-covered in new brick. Sash windows gave way to the wide casements that read as modern in 1934, and a Georgian arched entryway was cut through the row to reach the yards behind. Inside, the houses were gutted and rebuilt as two-and-a-half-room and four-room apartments, though Mann kept enough — wainscoting, woodwork, fireplace openings — to give the new apartments a past, and drew new mantels in the Colonial Revival idiom to match. Behind the buildings he laid out a shared garden modeled on the private communal garden at Sutton Place in Manhattan. On the Carlton Avenue corner he built a new apartment house from scratch, in the same vocabulary, so the group would read as one composition. That corner building is 149 Lafayette Avenue.
The complex was called Carlton Gardens. Later it was the Monaco Apartments. It is now the Lafayette Court Apartments cooperative, and it holds 21 apartments; the ten at 149, which converted separately and operates as its own corporation, bring the Mann group to 31 today.
The reason any of this matters to a buyer is that it inverts the ordinary Fort Greene proposition. Compare this multi-building cooperative with the district’s individual row-house conversions. This is a row of houses that stopped being houses in the 1930s, rebuilt as apartments by an architect with a specific idea about how people should live. Assess the apartments’ actual layouts, the shared garden and its access rights, and the arched entry through the row.
The dates are worth stating carefully because listings routinely get them wrong. The LPC dates the houses c. 1860 and calls them Italianate; the Department of Finance property file agrees on 1860; Finance's transfer records for the same lot carry 1931. Those dates do not yet form a reconciled chronology. LPC dates Mann’s redesign to 1938; the published architectural history reports a project underway in 1934, citing contemporary newspaper coverage. The reason for the 1931 transfer-record year remains unresolved. Obtain the original alteration and occupancy records before assigning each date to a particular milestone.
Architecture and unit composition
Four stories, six buildings, one lot, roughly 19,200 square feet of building above it, and 21 apartments distributed across the row. What you see from Lafayette Avenue is Mann's 1930s brick — flat-fronted where the stoops used to be, with casement windows and the arched opening that leads to the gardens.
The unit stock reflects what Mann built for. The remodeling produced two-and-a-half-room and four-room apartments, whose original room counts do not establish current bedroom counts or layouts, and the Department of Finance count of 21 apartments across six houses puts roughly three or four to a building. Review current floor plans to establish the actual apartment configuration and inspect the party-wall condition: apartments sit against neighbors on both sides across six structures that were joined by alteration rather than built as one.
The rear garden is the feature to see rather than read about. Mann's model was Sutton Place, which is to say a single shared landscape behind a row of buildings rather than individual fenced yards, and whether a given apartment has access to it, looks onto it, or faces Lafayette Avenue instead is the largest exposure variable in the building.
Exterior alterations generally require LPC approval; specified routine maintenance is exempt. That deserves a specific note here because the protected fabric is unusual: the district recognizes Mann's 1930s intervention, not the 1860s brownstone beneath it, so window replacement is a review item and the casements are part of the character. Any seller with a clean Landmarks file on window or façade work should put it in the deal room.
Building operations
This is a small cooperative in six joined nineteenth-century structures, and it should be underwritten as one. Finance's building-class assignment is C6 — a walk-up cooperative — so there is no elevator; confirm staffing and management arrangements with the building.
The capital picture follows from the construction history. Six adjoining party-wall buildings under a single corporation means six roofs or one continuous roof plane depending on how the remodeling handled it, six sets of party walls, a masonry envelope refaced in the 1930s over structure from 1860, and a shared rear garden with its own drainage and maintenance obligations. FISP applies to buildings higher than six stories, so the reported four-story structures do not meet that threshold; exterior maintenance obligations still apply, and façade alterations generally need LPC approval, subject to the actual scope and maintenance exemptions. In a corporation this size, review the reserve, budget, debt and any planned assessments to see how that work would be funded.
Ask for several consecutive years of financial statements, the reserve position, the underlying mortgage terms, and the board's own account of the roof, the envelope and the garden. Ask specifically whether the six buildings share mechanical systems or run separately, because the answer determines how a boiler replacement is scoped and funded.
The governing documents available for this review were limited. There is no offering plan for Lafayette Court in The Roebling Research Library, and the house rules, sublet policy, pet policy, transfer fee and financing minimum are not documented anywhere reviewed for this page. The library gap does not establish whether documents can be obtained elsewhere. It does mean a buyer should request the full package — proprietary lease, by-laws, current house rules, purchase application, and two or three years of financials — before making assumptions about how the building operates.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- No doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- NoSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
- Amenities noted
- GardenSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 limits apply to a building on its own. It is still covered if it shares a tax lot or condominium board with buildings totaling over 50,000 sq ft; confirm on DOB’s covered-buildings list.
See full Local Law 97 analysis →Recent sales
Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2024 | 1A | 2 BR · 1 BA | $999,000 | -13.1% | |
| Jan 10, 2023 | 3E | 1 BR · 1 BA | $606,700 | -6.5% | |
| Mar 18, 2022 | H | 2 BR · 1 BA | $1,268,818 | +18.0% | |
| Jul 16, 2021 | G | 2 BR · 1 BA | $1,075,000 | +0.0% | |
| Mar 12, 2021 | 5F | 1 BR · 1 BA · 400 sf | $525,000 | $1,313/sf | +0.0% |
| Mar 1, 2021 | 3 | 2 BR · 1 BA | $830,000 | -7.7% | |
| Feb 25, 2021 | 3C | 2 BR · 1 BA | $830,000 | -10.7% | |
| Aug 12, 2020 | B | 3 BR · 2 BA · 1,400 sf | $1,900,000 | $1,357/sf | +0.0% |
Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2021): a median $1,313/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2024. Median listing discount 0.1% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-02102-0062). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 147 Lafayette Avenue and nearby.
Buying here? Co-op closing costs typically run 2 to 3% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with 147 Lafayette Avenue and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 147 Lafayette Avenue. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
You are buying one apartment in a six-building corporation. The tax lot runs 137 through 147 Lafayette Avenue and the shares, board and maintenance are shared across all of it. Read the building as a group, not as an address.
Keep the dates attributed. LPC describes the original Italianate houses as c. 1860 and Mann’s redesign as 1938; a published architectural history reports work underway in 1934. Finance’s property file says 1860 and its transfer records say 1931. The basis of 1931 and the distinct remodeling milestones need original-record reconciliation.
Ask about the garden. Mann laid it out on a Sutton Place model and it is the building's only real amenity. Establish whether your apartment has access, a view, or neither.
Request the entire governing package. We did not locate an offering plan in the research library, and the reviewed materials do not establish current pet, sublet, transfer-fee or financing rules. Get the proprietary lease, by-laws, current house rules and purchase application in writing.
Review capital funding across six buildings. Twenty-one shareholders, a landmark masonry envelope refaced in the 1930s over 1860s structure, and a shared garden. Review the current budget, audited statements, reserve, debt and any assessments to see how capital work is funded.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the Mann story and document it. Four 1860s rowhouses combined and remodeled in the 1930s by Horace B. Mann of Mann & MacNeille for Robert Alfred Shaw, alongside the smaller house at 147, refaced in brick with casement windows and a Georgian arched entry, with a communal garden modeled on Sutton Place. That is a listing narrative with a published architectural history behind it.
Name the district and the date. Fort Greene Historic District, designated September 26, 1978. It is the shortest strong sentence available.
Say which house and which exposure, early. Buyers self-select between garden-facing and Lafayette-facing apartments. Making them work it out during a showing costs offers.
Have the diligence package ready before you list. Provide the proprietary lease, by-laws, current rules and three years of financial statements early so buyers can review the corporation’s actual requirements and finances.
Comp inside the district, at the right scale. Fort Greene and Clinton Hill co-ops of ten to forty units in landmarked buildings, adjusted for the walk-up and for the garden.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 147 Lafayette Avenue, also evaluate:
- 149 Lafayette Avenue — the corner building Mann built new alongside this row; ten units, same architect, same year, separate corporation
- 159 Lafayette Avenue — twin 1897 flats buildings run as one co-op a block east; the closest peer for scale and street
- 60 South Oxford Street — ten-unit row-house co-op on a signature district block; the single-building alternative
- 147 South Oxford Street — 21-apartment elevator co-op south of Fulton; same unit count, no district address, elevator access
- 264 Cumberland Street (The Sanctuary) — the district's boutique condominium, for buyers weighing ownership form
- 372 DeKalb Avenue (Clinton Mews) — Clinton Hill's low-rise cooperative alternative
More Fort Greene buildings
- 123 Fort Greene Place — condominium
- 130 St. Edwards Street (Kingsview Homes) — 1957 co-op
- 144 Vanderbilt Avenue — 2023 condominium
- 147 South Oxford Street — 1930 co-op
- 149 Lafayette Avenue — 1938 co-op
- 151 Lafayette Avenue — 1874 co-op
The neighborhood
For the full neighborhood — its buildings, character, and market — read The Roebling Team Guide to Fort Greene.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at 147 Lafayette Avenue?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com