230 East 18th Street
230 East 18th Street, New York, NY 10003
BBL 1008980039 · BIN 1019569
- Year built
- 1945
- Type
- Cooperative
- Units
- 16
- Floors
- 4
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; in the Stuyvesant Square Historic District
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
- Subletting by shareholders
- Permitted with conditions
- Dogs and cats
- Permitted with conditions
- Flip tax
- Tiered or formula; see fees
Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2024
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf, 2023
- $1,000
- floor-adjusted, 1 sale
- Listing discount
- 2.5%
- Recorded sales
- 25
- On record
- 2003–2024
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 230 East 18th Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
This is a 16-apartment cooperative living inside three mid-nineteenth-century row houses, and almost everything that makes it unusual follows from that fact. LPC's building database records 228, 230 and 232 East 18th Street as three Greek Revival houses of about 1850, developed by Lewis Rutherford, each with a remodeled façade. They were at some point joined behind those façades into a single multiple dwelling. City records date the building to 1945, which is the date of that combination, not of construction — a distinction that matters, because a buyer reading the year-built field will underwrite a post-war building and walk into a pre-Civil-War one.
The consequences are architectural and structural at once. The recorded 21,000 square feet across four floors and sixteen apartments is aggregate building area, not measured apartment interiors or evidence of a neighborhood size ranking. The row-house geometry supports varied configurations: apartments that run through the depth of a house, duplexes stacked across floors, first-floor homes carried down into the basement level with their own garden relationship. Department of Buildings alteration filings for this address describe exactly that inventory — a duplex spanning the third and fourth floors, a first-floor apartment continuing into the basement, and separate basement apartments.
The landmark position is the other structural fact, and it is the one most often stated incorrectly. The lot is a contributing property in the Stuyvesant Square Historic District, designated in September 1975, with the designation notice recorded against the lot in April 1976. It is not in the Gramercy Park Historic District, which sits on a different set of blocks — the two districts are close neighbors in this part of the East Teens and are routinely confused. The practical effect is the same either way: exterior work, windows, ironwork and any street-facing alteration require an LPC permit in addition to a DOB permit, which lengthens capital projects and constrains what a shareholder can change at the façade line.
What the building does not carry is complexity in its capital structure. The cooperative refinanced in May 2026 into a modest first mortgage with a small line of credit alongside it. Spread across sixteen apartments that is very light building-level debt, and it is the single most useful number a buyer can hold in mind when comparing monthly maintenance here against larger, more heavily leveraged Gramercy co-ops.
Architecture and unit composition
The three houses occupy a 75-foot frontage on an 80-foot-deep lot, with the building itself running 54 feet deep — leaving rear yard behind. Four stories, no setback, a continuous street wall of the kind that defines the blocks around Stuyvesant Square. The façades were remodeled at some point before designation, and LPC's records flag that remodeling on all three houses as well as the added basement entrances at Nos. 228 and 232, so what a buyer sees is a nineteenth-century structure wearing a later face.
Inside, the apartments follow row-house logic rather than apartment-house logic. Ceiling heights, window proportions, fireplaces and floor plates vary meaningfully house to house and floor to floor, and the duplex and garden-level homes are genuinely different products from the single-floor apartments. There is no line system to reason from. Every apartment in a building of this kind has to be evaluated on its own plan, its own light and its own condition, and comparables drawn from within the building will be thin by definition.
Recent renovation filings for this address include a roof replacement in 2020 and a façade rehabilitation programme carried out in the mid-to-late 2000s with sidewalk sheds and pipe scaffold in 2007 and 2008 — useful maintenance history, but not proof that this stated four-story building is subject to FISP. DOB generally applies that program above six stories; verify actual height and coverage while reviewing current façade condition and repair plans.
Building operations
This is a self-contained small house rather than a full-service building. The house rules on file describe a central laundry with designated hours, a trash room and refuse flue, and a superintendent who directs disposal. There is no documented doorman or concierge, and the rules are the rules of a building where shareholders and staff know one another: no group tours or auctions in an apartment without consent, no obstruction of halls or stairs, quiet hours running from eleven at night to nine in the morning, and floor-covering over at least three quarters of any floor above a neighbour.
Governance is correspondingly close. The board interviews every subtenant, approves every sublease and every renewal, and reserves the right to amend the house rules by resolution. Buyers used to the anonymity of a 200-unit co-op should read that as a feature or a constraint depending on temperament, but should not mistake it for informality.
Policy framework
Ownership form: Cooperative. A purchaser buys shares in 230 East 18th Street Corporation and takes a proprietary lease, whose term now runs to 30 September 2050 following a 1993 extension approved by shareholder consent.
Board package and interview: Required. In a sixteen-apartment corporation the board is small, its members are neighbours, and the review is personal. Expect a full financial disclosure, references, and an in-person interview. Build the timeline into the contract.
Financing ceiling and post-closing liquidity: Not published anywhere on the public record and not stated in any document on file. Small pre-war co-ops in this district commonly cap financing well below condominium norms and set a post-closing liquidity standard expressed in months or years of maintenance. Both figures, along with any debt-to-income standard, must come from the managing agent before an offer is priced. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator against whatever standard the agent confirms.
Subletting: Permitted with board approval on a one-year lease renewable for one further year, with a board interview of the subtenant and both a processing fee and a monthly surcharge, per the rules on file. This is a residence-first policy, not an investor policy.
Pied-à-terre and non-resident ownership: The occupancy rule on file requires the owner or an approved subtenant to reside in the unit, with an exemption for immediate family as defined in the proprietary lease. Treat pied-à-terre purchase as unavailable unless the managing agent confirms otherwise in writing.
Trusts, LLCs, co-purchase, guarantors and gifts: Not addressed in any document on file. Small boards treat each of these case by case, and a trust or LLC purchase in a building of this size should be raised with the managing agent before a contract is signed, not after.
Pets: Dogs only by express written permission of the corporation, in each instance. Do not assume a dog will be permitted.
Flip tax: 1 percent of the purchase price, joint and several between seller and buyer, per the 1990 lease amendment on file. Sellers should assume they will negotiate over who bears it.
Real estate taxes: No J-51 and no other building-wide abatement. Maintenance is the whole monthly number; there is no step-up or burn-off schedule to model.
Application and transaction fees
Fees below are from building management's published schedule, as of September 2026. They are shown as published, item by item; no total is added because the total depends on the transaction. Deposits are listed apart from nonrefundable charges.
- Terms
- 1 percent of the total purchase price, per an amendment to the proprietary lease on file effective 18 May 1990. It is the joint and several obligation of the seller and the buyer, and does not apply to a transfer resulting from an uncured default or to a transfer by a holder of unsold shares
Source: The Roebling Team's building profile
Purchase
6 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $750 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Co-op Processing Fee | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $250 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Credit Report FeePer applicantRequired | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $75 per applicant | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Closing Fee | Paid by Buyer | When At closing | Amount $750 | Refundable Not stated |
Deposits
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Move-In Deposit | Paid by Buyer | When At closing | Amount $500 | Refundable Refundable |
| Move-Out Deposit | Paid by Seller | When At closing | Amount $500 | Refundable Refundable |
Sublet
5 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Subtenant | When With the application | Amount $750 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Credit Check FeePer applicantRequired | Paid by Subtenant | When With the application | Amount $75 per person | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Monthly Sublet Fee | Paid by Shareholder | When Upon approval | Amount $250 | Refundable Not stated |
Deposits
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Move-Out Deposit | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Refundable |
| Move-In Deposit | Paid by Subtenant | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Refundable |
Refinance
1 item
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $400 | Refundable Non-refundable |
Management updates its schedule without a public filing. The date is when management last updated the page, not when a rule changed. Confirm the current schedule with management before you apply.
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Subletting by shareholders
- Permitted with conditionsBoard approvalSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Pets and in-unit washer/dryer
- Dogs and cats
- Permitted with conditionsRestrictive. Per the house rules on file, no dog may be kept or harbored in the building unless expressly permitted in writing by the corporation in each instance. Cats are not addressed in the rules on file — confirm with the managing agentSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- In-unit washer/dryer
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.
Building staffing and amenities
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
- Amenities noted
- Laundry roomSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 limits apply to a building on its own. It is still covered if it shares a tax lot or condominium board with buildings totaling over 50,000 sq ft; confirm on DOB’s covered-buildings list.
See full Local Law 97 analysis →Recent sales
The building trades as a small-house Gramercy cooperative — family-sized apartments in a landmarked row-house group, priced against the pre-war co-op stock of the East Teens and Twenties rather than against new-construction condominiums two blocks north. On a per-room basis it sits in the middle band for the district: below the Gramercy Park–facing keyed-park buildings, above the Third Avenue walk-up stock, and closest in character to the converted houses and small pre-war co-ops on East 17th, 18th and 19th Streets.
Establish turnover and holding periods from dated transfers, separating estate and family transfers from arm’s-length sales; sixteen apartments alone does not establish thin activity. When recent in-building comparables are insufficient, compare suitable neighboring properties while distinguishing duplex, garden-level and single-floor plans. Pricing has to be built from the specific plan outward. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2024 | 1C | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,805,000 | -2.4% | |
| Mar 31, 2023 | 1E | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,700 sf | $1,700,000 | $1,000/sf | -8.1% |
| Mar 29, 2023 | 1F | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,275,000 | -13.6% | |
| Feb 8, 2023 | 1A | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,955,000 | -2.0% | |
| Sep 15, 2021 | B | 1 BR · 1 BA | $1,300,000 | +0.0% | |
| Jul 26, 2016 | 1B | 3 BR · 1,676 sf | $2,340,000 | $1,396/sf | +0.6% |
| Dec 5, 2014 | 1A | 2 BR · 1,500 sf | $1,675,000 | $1,117/sf | -6.7% |
| Mar 19, 2013 | B | 1 BR | $1,125,000 | -13.1% |
Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2023): a median $1,000/sf (floor-adjusted) across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2024. Median listing discount 2.5% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00898-0039). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 230 East 18th Street and nearby.
Buying here? Co-op closing costs typically run 2 to 3% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with 230 East 18th Street and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 230 East 18th Street. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Do not underwrite the year-built field. City records say 1945; LPC's own survey says c. 1850. This is a row-house conversion. Party walls, floor framing and sound transmission behave like a nineteenth-century house, the age of the plumbing risers and other systems has to be established rather than assumed, and an inspection scoped for a post-war building will miss things.
The landmark designation is real and it is Stuyvesant Square, not Gramercy Park. Exterior alterations, including non-visible work, generally need LPC permission; some ordinary maintenance is exempt, and interior work requiring a DOB permit also needs LPC permission. Scope and LPC rules determine the permit route. Review façade condition and planned repairs, and establish FISP applicability to this stated four-story property before requesting a cycle filing.
Get the financing and liquidity standards in writing before you offer. Nothing about this board's underwriting is published. In a building this small the standard can be materially tighter than the district norm, and finding that out after a contract is signed is expensive.
Understand the residence requirement. The occupancy rule on file is unusually direct: the owner or an approved subtenant must live in the apartment. If the purchase is a pied-à-terre, a parent-for-child purchase, or an eventual rental, resolve it with the managing agent first.
Verify the fee stack. The 1 percent flip tax is documented. The sublet processing fee, the monthly sublet surcharge and the move-in deposit are documented as of 2009 and may have moved since. Confirm all of them, and run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator on the specific apartment.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the house, not the year built. The building's advantage is that it is three Greek Revival houses in a designated district with apartments that no purpose-built co-op on the block can offer. Listing and valuation data built on the 1945 record misdescribes the building; correct the construction history in the marketing and price against sales of comparable row-house apartments.
Document the capital position. The May 2026 refinancing left the corporation with modest first-mortgage debt and a small credit line — a strong story for a buyer's attorney. Have the current financial statements and the refinancing terms ready.
Qualify buyers against the board's actual standard, not the market's. A small board with an interview requirement and undisclosed underwriting will reject a buyer who looks fine on paper elsewhere. Screening early protects the deal timeline.
Be direct about the sublet and occupancy rules. Investor-minded buyers are not the pool for this building. Marketing it to them wastes a contract cycle.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 230 East 18th Street, also evaluate:
- 233 East 17th Street — the same tax block and the same historic district; the closest like-for-like on landmark position
- 117 East 18th Street — small pre-war co-op on the same street, west of Irving Place
- 157 East 18th Street — boutique pre-war building on the block between Irving Place and Third Avenue
- 211 East 18th Street — immediate neighbour on the same block; the nearest scale comparison
- 112 East 19th Street — converted house of similar vintage one block north; the row-house alternative, and a useful illustration of how narrowly the district lines are drawn here, since that lot is undesignated
- 132 East 19th Street — a contributing property in the Gramercy Park Historic District; useful for seeing how the two districts differ in practice
- 105 East 19th Street — small pre-war co-op one block north
- 230 East 15th Street (The Rutherford) — larger full-service alternative at the southern edge of the district
- 130 East 18th Street (Gramercy Plaza) — the doorman-building alternative on the same street
- 230 East 20th Street (The Modern at Gramercy Square) — a different building on a different block; the new-construction condominium alternative for buyers who want financing flexibility instead of share ownership
More Gramercy buildings
- 224 East 17th Street — 1855 co-op
- 224 East 18th Street — 1869 co-op
- 230 East 15th Street (The Rutherford) — 1959 co-op
- The Modern at Gramercy Square, 230 East 20th Street — 2016 condominium
- 233 East 17th Street — 1877 condominium by Charles Coolidge Haight
- 234 East 23rd Street — 2015 condominium by Hill West Architects
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Gramercy — read The Roebling Team Guide to Gramercy.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at 230 East 18th Street?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com