66 East 11th Street (Delos Residences)
66 East 11th Street, New York, NY 10003
Greenwich Village
BBL 1005627503 · BIN 1009106
- Year built
- 1929
- Type
- Condop
- Units
- 1201
- Floors
- 8
- Landmark
- No
Every recorded sale at this building, 2014–2020
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf
- $1,820
- Recorded sales
- 9
- On record
- 2014–2020
66 East 11th Street is a six-residence conversion of an eight-story parking garage, carried out between 2011 and 2014 by a sponsor affiliated with Delos Living. It is not a loft conversion, and treating it as one leads a buyer to the wrong diligence questions. The city's file is unambiguous: the alteration application filed in July 2011 records the existing occupancy as B-2 — a garage — with a single dwelling unit, converting to R-2 with six. There were no residential tenants in the building before the conversion, and consequently no artist certification, no Loft Board history, and none of the tenancy overhang that shapes buildings on either side of it in this part of the Village.
What the building has instead is a wellness specification. The sponsor is the developer behind the WELL Building Standard, and 66 East 11th was its first residential application of it: the sponsor's own materials and the design press describe more than fifty engineered features, among them building-wide purified air and water, circadian lighting, posture-supporting flooring, sound-attenuating insulation, and vitamin-C infused shower filtration. That specification is the building's defining commercial argument, and it is also a maintenance question — filtration, purification and lighting systems of this kind carry replacement and servicing costs that a conventional building does not have. The current budget is the place to test how those costs are being carried.
The economics are unusually concentrated. Seven units, six of them residential, means each residence carries a common interest in the double digits — roughly 11.6 to 11.8 percent for each of the four full-floor apartments, roughly 25.6 percent for the townhouse triplex and roughly 26.6 percent for the penthouse triplex, with the garage unit at about 1.3 percent. In a building this small there is no dilution: any capital assessment lands on six owners, and a single owner's default is a material event for the others. Buyers used to the arithmetic of a hundred-unit condominium should recalibrate.
The conversion signed off with DOB in November 2014, the tax lot subdivision creating lots 1201 through 1207 completed in April 2014, and the condominium declaration was recorded on 27 March 2014.
Architecture and unit composition
The building is eight stories and 85 feet tall, and the conversion did not change either figure — the alteration application records existing and proposed height and zoning floor area as identical at 29,702 square feet. The work was an interior reconstruction inside a retained garage shell, accompanied by partial structural demolition, a new sprinkler and standpipe system, a rebuilt mechanical and plumbing plant, and a builder's pavement plan for the 43-foot frontage.
The residential plan is simple and unusually generous. Four of the six residences are single-floor plates of approximately 3,663 square feet. The townhouse occupies three levels — a cellar level, a first floor of roughly 1,871 square feet and a second floor of roughly 2,441 square feet — with its own relationship to the street. The penthouse occupies three levels as well: seventh-floor and eighth-floor plates plus an enclosed solarium. The garage unit is a separate condominium unit and was offered separately under the plan; it has since traded together with the townhouse, so a buyer should verify which units are in fact appurtenant to which before assuming parking comes with an apartment.
Interiors were renovated repeatedly after the sellout. DOB records apartment-level alteration work in 2015 and 2016, work at the seventh and eighth floors and the roof terrace in 2020, and a substantial renovation of the townhouse unit across cellar, first and second floors filed in December 2019. Condition therefore varies materially by residence.
Building operations and capital position
Façade repairs were filed and signed off in 2022 under a Type 2 alteration; sidewalk shed and pipe scaffold permits appear in 2004, 2013 and 2014. Nothing in the public file indicates an open façade obligation as of this writing, but the building's cyclical façade inspection cycle should be confirmed directly — an eight-story masonry building carries a periodic inspection requirement, and in a six-owner condominium the cost of a remediation cycle is concentrated rather than spread.
The offering plan projected first-year common charges for the building of roughly $35,600 a month in aggregate — approximately $4,136 to $4,147 a month for each of the four full-floor residences, roughly $9,100 for the townhouse, roughly $9,460 for the penthouse and roughly $463 for the garage unit. Those are 2013 projections and are more than a decade stale; they are useful only as a baseline for how the burden is distributed. What the charges actually cover — and in particular how the wellness plant is funded and reserved for — is not documented in the material reviewed for this profile and should be pulled from the current budget and the most recent financial statements.
Tax position: no abatement, and nothing to burn off
There is no 421-a and no J-51 at 66 East 11th Street, and there never was. Two independent records agree. The Department of Finance assessment roll shows an exempt total of zero on every one of the seven unit lots through the most recent roll year available in the city's published data. And the offering plan's Schedule A projects full, unabated real estate taxes from the first year of condominium operation — roughly $3,133 to $3,140 a month for each full-floor residence, against projected annual taxes for the whole building of approximately $373,000.
The practical consequence is favourable in one respect and unfavourable in another. There is no abatement expiry to model, no step schedule, and no year in which the carrying cost jumps — the position a buyer sees is the position that has always existed. But it also means the building has never enjoyed a subsidised entry price, and the tax line is a full share of the monthly carry rather than a temporary discount. Run the actual current tax bill for the specific unit rather than any projection. The True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator is the right tool for this building precisely because the tax line is not going to move.
Landmark, loft and tenancy status
Three findings, each verified by tax lot rather than assumed:
Not landmarked. LPC's building database returns no record for block 562, lot 7503, or for the pre-conversion base lot 16. DOB's alteration application independently records the property as not landmarked. Exterior work here does not require an LPC permit.
No Loft Law or Interim Multiple Dwelling status. DOB's Loft Board flag on the conversion application is negative, and the pre-conversion occupancy was a garage with one dwelling unit — there was no residential loft tenancy to protect. The building is outside the Loft Law entirely.
No Joint Living-Work Quarters for Artists occupancy. There is no JLWQA certification in the record. The conversion proceeded as a straightforward change of occupancy to R-2.
A note on a neighbour, because the addresses invite confusion: 67 East 11th Street sits on the opposite side of East 11th Street, on block 563, and is an entirely separate building with a separate history and its own profile at 67 East 11th Street. Nothing established about that building applies here.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- Per unit / month range
- —
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
Recent sales
The sponsor sold out. All six residences and the garage unit were conveyed to unrelated purchasers between May 2014 and December 2017, and the building has traded on the resale market since — the penthouse changed hands again in December 2020, and financing was recorded against the townhouse-annex residence as recently as 2026. No sponsor inventory remains.
Worth noting for the record: the offering plan carried the standard special-risk disclosure that the sponsor retained an unconditional right to rent rather than sell units, which if exercised would have left purchasers unable to gain board control. In the event it was not exercised, and the building is fully in owner hands.
Pricing at the building is driven almost entirely by the distinction between the four full-floor plates and the two triplexes, and secondarily by renovation vintage, which varies widely given the volume of post-sellout apartment work in the DOB file. With six residences there is no meaningful internal comparable set, so pricing has to be argued against the wider Village full-floor and boutique-conversion market rather than against the building's own history. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2020 | PH | 4 BR · 5 BA · 7,693 sf | $14,000,000 | $1,820/sf | off-mkt |
| Dec 18, 2017 | TH1Sponsor Sale | 3 BR · 4.5 BA · 6,704 sf | $9,000,000 | $1,342/sf | -5.3% |
| Nov 29, 2016 | 1 | 3 BR · 3,663 sf | $8,000,000 | $2,184/sf | off-mkt |
| Aug 8, 2016 | 3 | 3 BR · 3,663 sf | $8,000,000 | $2,184/sf | -3.0% |
| Aug 8, 2016 | THASponsor Sale | 3,663 sf | $8,000,000 | $2,184/sf | off-mkt |
| Mar 24, 2016 | PHSponsor Sale | 4 BR · 7,693 sf | $26,122,156 | $3,396/sf | -14.4% |
| Jun 17, 2014 | 2Sponsor Sale | 3 BR · 3,663 sf | $5,854,937 | $1,598/sf | off-mkt |
| May 1, 2014 | 1Sponsor Sale | 3 BR · 3,663 sf | $10,000,000 | $2,730/sf | off-mkt |
Market read. Most recent trades (2020) cleared a median $1,820/sf across 1 sale.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00562-7503) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What to know if you’re buying
Read the budget before anything else. Six residential owners carry the entire plant, including the wellness infrastructure. Ask specifically how filtration, purification and lighting systems are reserved for and what their replacement cycle is.
The tax line is permanent. There is no abatement, so there is no future step-up — but there is also no discount. Model the full tax from day one.
Storage is a licence. Five storage spaces were offered under licence, not as deeded units. Confirm what you are actually acquiring and whether it transfers.
Confirm what the garage unit is attached to. It is a separate condominium unit that has traded alongside a residence. Do not assume parking conveys.
Confirm the policy stack directly. Pet, pied-à-terre, sublet, financing and right-of-first-refusal terms live in the declaration and by-laws; current house rules were not available for this profile. Get them from the managing agent before you sign.
Verify condition unit by unit. The DOB file shows repeated apartment-level renovation from 2015 through at least 2020. Two residences in this building can be a decade apart in condition.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the wellness specification and the plate. A 3,663-square-foot full-floor residence in the Village is scarce; the WELL specification is genuinely differentiating and should be documented rather than asserted.
Be direct about the tax position. Buyers at this level will find it. Framing an unabated, stable tax line as certainty is stronger than leaving it to be discovered.
Prepare the building file in advance. With six owners and no offering-plan policy summary in general circulation, a seller who arrives with the current budget, recent financials and the house rules removes the single largest source of buyer hesitation.
Closing is condominium-paced. Right of first refusal rather than board approval; 30 to 45 days is typical.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 66 East 11th Street, also evaluate:
- 55 East 11th Street — full-floor loft cooperative on the same street, one block east; the co-op alternative to this plate
- 67 East 11th Street — directly opposite on block 563; a much larger conversion with a different structure and history
- 16 East 11th Street — small Greenwich Village cooperative west of Fifth; the prewar alternative
- 63 University Place — The Albert, on the same block, at East 10th; a large prewar conversion cooperative
- 64 University Place — immediate boutique condominium neighbour
- 832 Broadway — Broadway loft conversion a block east; comparable ceiling heights and plate logic
- 10 East 12th Street — full-service Village condominium one block north
- 40 University Place — boutique University Place conversion in the same micro-market
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Greenwich Village — read The Roebling Team Guide to Greenwich Village.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.
Considering a move at Delos Residences?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Delos Residences would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.