661 Amsterdam Avenue (The Clayton)Recorded sales & closing prices
661 Amsterdam Avenue / 175 West 92nd Street, New York, NY 10025
72 recorded transfers, 2005–2026. Sortable and searchable below.
- Studio
- $499K
- 2BR
- $1.27M
- Recent range
- $481K – $2.92M
- Listing discount
- 0.0%
- Monthly carry/sf
- $1.64
- Recorded transfers
- 72
Not enough recent activity to price (shown for completeness, not quoted): 1BR — last traded 2022; 3BR — last traded 2018; 4BR+ — last traded 2025.
The complete recorded-sale history for The Clayton, compiled from NYC Department of Finance transfer records and verified listing data, then enriched apartment-by-apartment by The Roebling Team research desk. Priced by apartment type — the honest unit for a co-op, where square footage isn’t officially recorded.
Latest closings
The line premium — where you sit sets the price
Same-2BR prices, time-controlled to today’s dollars, split by line — exposure, light, and layout vary stack to stack within a building.
Bar = today’s 2BR price for that line; right column = premium vs. an average 2BR.
And by floor
Same 2BR, time-controlled to today — higher floors, higher clears.
The 2BR trajectory
Every recorded 2BR. The building trades thinly year to year, so the story is the long arc, not any single year: 2BRs have moved from roughly $915K in the mid-2000s to about $1.27M today.
Each dot is one recorded sale, by close date and price; the line is the median for each year. Click any dot to jump straight to that sale below.
Lines that traded more than once
The building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment — recorded prices, exact.
Every recorded sale
Sort any column; filter by unit or keyword. Prices are the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance.
| Apartment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | 1E | 2 BR · 2 BA · 5 rm | $1,270,000 | -1.9% |
| Jun 16, 2025 | 2D | Studio · 1 BA · 2.5 rm | $540,000 | +2.9% |
| Jan 21, 2025 | 5GH | 5 BR · 3 BA · 11 rm | $2,925,000 | -2.3% |
| Jun 27, 2024 | 4C | Studio · 1 BA · 2.5 rm | $499,000 | +0.0% |
| Mar 20, 2024 | 4B | 2 BR · 2 BA | $912,500 | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | 3F | Studio · 1 BA · 2.5 rm | $481,000 | +0.4% |
| Jul 26, 2023 | 5D | Studio · 1 BA · 2.5 rm | $499,000 | +0.0% |
| Mar 20, 2023 | 5E | 2 BR · 5 rm | $1,273,208 | +1.9% |
| Feb 9, 2023 | MAIS | 3 BR · 2 BA · 5.5 rm | $1,427,500 | -4.5% |
| Sep 14, 2022 | 4G | $750,000 | — | |
| Aug 25, 2022 | 6E | 2 BR · 2 BA · 4.5 rm | $1,285,000 | -4.8% |
| Aug 19, 2022 | 1G | 1 BR · 1 BA | $750,000 | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | 4E | $975,000 | — | |
| Sep 1, 2021 | 3B | $1,420,000 | — | |
| May 10, 2021 | 2B | 2 BR · 2 BA · 5 rm | $1,200,000 | +9.6% |
| Apr 29, 2021 | 4A | $850,000 | — | |
| Apr 27, 2021 | 5B | 2 BR · 2 BA · 4.5 rm | $1,175,000 | +0.0% |
| Jan 15, 2021 | 3A | 1 BR | $525,000 | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | 3DE | 3 BR · 6 rm | $2,365,000 | -5.2% |
| May 18, 2018 | 6B | 2 BR · 2 BA · 4 rm | $1,130,000 | -5.4% |
| Apr 13, 2018 | 3A | 1 BR | $510,000 | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | 2A | $375,000 | — | |
| Mar 2, 2017 | 3C | $565,000 | — | |
| Aug 12, 2016 | 1E | 2 BR · 4 rm | $1,175,000 | +2.2% |
| Jul 14, 2016 | 2C | $545,000 | — | |
| Feb 10, 2016 | 5D | Studio · 2.5 rm | $460,000 | -3.2% |
| Feb 3, 2016 | 5G | $850,000 | — | |
| Oct 1, 2015 | 3A | 1 BRnon-market transfer (excluded from $/sf & trends) | $329,000 | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | 4C | Studio · 1 BA · 2 rm | $450,000 | +0.0% |
| Nov 4, 2014 | 3DE | 3 BR · 6.5 rm | $1,930,000 | -15.5% |
| Oct 11, 2013 | 4B | 2 BR · 2 BA · 5 rm | $960,000 | +9.7% |
| Aug 14, 2013 | 2B | 2 BR · 4 rm | $1,075,000 | +8.0% |
| Aug 6, 2013 | 4FG | 3 BR · 6 rm | $1,425,000 | +1.9% |
| Jun 17, 2013 | 4A | $720,000 | — | |
| Aug 21, 2012 | 3G | 1 BR · 3 rm | $750,000 | +0.0% |
| Aug 9, 2012 | 1GE | 2 BR · 6 rm | $915,000 | -8.4% |
| Jun 29, 2012 | 5D | Studio | $380,000 | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | 2D | 1 BR · 3 rmnon-market transfer (excluded from $/sf & trends) | $387,500 | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | 1A | 2 BR · 4 rm | $585,000 | -1.7% |
| Dec 13, 2010 | 4H | 1 BR · 4 rm | $710,000 | -7.2% |
| Sep 13, 2010 | 5AH | 3 BR · 7 rm | $1,535,000 | -4.1% |
| Sep 3, 2010 | 6A | $720,000 | — | |
| Jan 28, 2010 | 5B | 2 BR · 5 rm | $860,000 | -4.3% |
| Aug 6, 2009 | 3A | 1 BR · 3 rm | $635,000 | -2.2% |
| Jun 24, 2008 | 6D | Studio · 2 rm | $469,000 | +0.0% |
| Feb 12, 2008 | RES | $392,789 | — | |
| Feb 12, 2008 | RES | $392,790 | — | |
| Sep 6, 2007 | RES | $390,322 | — | |
| Sep 6, 2007 | RES | $390,323 | — | |
| Jun 25, 2007 | 4C | Studio · 2 rm | $450,000 | +0.0% |
| Jun 22, 2007 | RES | $450,000 | — | |
| May 7, 2007 | 1G | 1 BR · 4 rm | $685,000 | +0.9% |
| Apr 18, 2007 | RES | $614,657 | — | |
| Apr 18, 2007 | RES | $614,658 | — | |
| Apr 18, 2007 | RES | $614,896 | — | |
| Feb 13, 2007 | RES | $999,250 | — | |
| Jan 16, 2007 | 3F | Studio · 4 rm | $425,000 | -2.3% |
| Sep 15, 2006 | 3H | 1 BR · 3 rm | $730,000 | +1.5% |
| Jan 26, 2006 | RES | $785,000 | — | |
| Dec 30, 2005 | RES | $385,000 | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | 2A | $700,000 | — | |
| Oct 19, 2005 | RES | $735,000 | — | |
| Aug 2, 2005 | 2D | 1 BR | $450,000 | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | RES | $725,000 | — | |
| Apr 13, 2005 | RES | $831,458 | — | |
| Apr 13, 2005 | RES | $831,459 | — | |
| Dec 28, 2004 | 4E | $530,000 | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | RES | $855,000 | — | |
| Aug 31, 2004 | 2D | 1 BRnon-market transfer (excluded from $/sf & trends) | $100,000 | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | RES | $1,200,000 | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | RES | $555,000 | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | RES | $505,000 | — |
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01223-7501) and verified listing data. Co-op apartments are priced by unit type (bedroom count) rather than per square foot — square footage isn’t officially recorded for co-ops, and room counts carry some agent-entry inconsistency, so bedroom type is the reliable spine. Non-arms-length transfers and storage/parking are excluded; line and floor premiums are time-controlled to today’s pricing. Where transaction volume is too thin to support a figure, none is shown.
Put this data to work.
Know what’s fair before you offer — we’ll show you where each line trades, the building’s discount-to-ask pattern, and where the value sits right now.
Price to the building’s real trajectory, not a guess — we’ll position your line against its true comps to maximize the outcome.