75 Greene Avenue
75 Greene Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11238
Fort Greene, Brooklyn
BBL 3021217501 · BIN 3059486
- Year built
- 1930
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 22
- Floors
- 7
- Landmark
- Designated
- Subletting
- Standard condominium form - the board holds a right of first refusal rather than approving purchasers. No leasing terms documented in the amendments held in the library; confirm minimum lease term and any leasing cap with management
Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 2018-2019 plan and amendments). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.
Every recorded sale at this building, 2019–2025
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf
- $1,562
- Listing discount
- 0.6%
- Recorded sales
- 27
- On record
- 2019–2025
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 75 Greene Avenue would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
For most of the twentieth century the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn ran its administration out of a seven-story Colonial Revival office building on the corner of Greene and Clermont, three blocks from Fort Greene Park. The LPC's Fort Greene Historic District records date it to 1930 and describe its original use in four words: religious, chancery, Roman Catholic. Next door on Clermont the diocese added a second chancery building in 1938, designed by Henry V. Murphy, who drew a great deal of Brooklyn's Catholic architecture in that period. Department of Buildings files show the diocese still maintaining the complex in 2004, repointing brick and replacing the roof behind a 183-foot sidewalk shed.
The diocese sold in 2012. Douglaston Development assembled the campus, took the chancery through a full Alteration Type 1 that changed its occupancy from commercial to residential, and put 22 apartments inside a building that had never held a single one. Levine Builders performed the work. The offering plan was accepted for filing on March 30, 2018, declared effective on January 10, 2019 with four units in contract, and closed its first sales that September. Alongside the chancery, four twenty-foot-wide townhouses were built on the campus edges at 71 Greene Avenue and 370, 372 and 374 Clermont Avenue.
The result is a building type Fort Greene has very little of. The district's condominium inventory is otherwise made up of converted chapels, small infill and row houses cut into two or three units. This is a purpose-built institutional office building with seven-story floor plates, tall windows on a Colonial Revival elevation, and interior structure that produced apartments with proportions no brownstone can reproduce. The conversion kept the façade — it had no choice, inside a historic district — and rebuilt everything behind it.
The floor stack tells you how the building lives. Four apartments per floor on floors one through four; two per floor on five, six and seven. That means the upper third of the building is half-floor apartments with the light of a corner unit on both flanks, and the lower two-thirds is a conventional four-per-floor plate. The line that runs through it is worth stating plainly to any buyer: the top three floors are a different product from the bottom four, and they price like one.
The building's other defining fact is fiscal. Schedule A projects real estate taxes at full assessment with no exemption, and for several apartments the tax line exceeds the common charge line. A conversion of an existing 1930 building did not qualify for the new-construction abatement that shaped carrying costs at nearly every other 2019-vintage Brooklyn condominium. Buyers who anchor on a comparable building's monthly number and then discover the difference here will be surprised twice. Better to model it correctly from the first showing.
Architecture and unit composition
Seven stories and 85 feet in a district of three- and four-story row houses, with roughly 27,900 square feet of building on a 7,186-square-foot lot. The elevation is the diocese's — brick, Colonial Revival in the LPC's classification, with the horizontal discipline of a 1930 institutional building rather than the vertical rhythm of the houses around it. Zoning on the lot is R6B, the contextual district that keeps the neighboring blocks low; the chancery predates it and stands taller than anything that could be built there now.
Inside, 22 apartments run from roughly 600 square feet at the smallest one-bedroom to about 1,900 square feet at the largest three-bedroom. The distribution is deliberate: A, B, C and D lines on the lower four floors, A and B only on floors five through seven. Several apartments carry private outdoor space. The finishes specified at the 2019 launch ran to marble kitchen backsplashes, dark wood floors, Bertazzoni and Bosch appliances, marble-tiled bathroom walls with heated floors, and custom vanities. The rooms that photograph are the ones where the original structure is still doing work — high ceilings and exposed beams in the sponsor's own description.
The eighteen storage units deserve their own paragraph because they are not a building amenity. Each was sold as a separate condominium unit with its own tax lot, common interest, common charge and real estate tax line, priced between about $8,000 and $16,500. Some apartments were sold with one, some were not, and several storage units traded separately after closing. Before an offer, establish whether a storage unit is included, whether it conveys, and what it adds to the monthly.
Because the building sits inside the Fort Greene Historic District, any exterior alteration runs through the Landmarks Preservation Commission. That applies to windows, to the courtyard elevations, and to anything visible from a public thoroughfare. A seller with clean Landmarks files should say so; a buyer contemplating a terrace change should assume review.
Building operations
A 22-unit condominium with a real amenity package is an unusual operating problem: the fixed cost of a fitness center, a landscaped courtyard, a package room and a video doorman with valet service is spread across a very small number of units. That shows up in common charges, and it means the amenity program is a genuine value question rather than a given. It also means service events — a courtyard drainage problem, a gym equipment cycle, an elevator modernization — arrive as a meaningful per-unit number rather than as a rounding error.
The physical asset is a 1930 masonry building that was substantially rebuilt behind a retained façade between roughly 2014 and 2019. Diligence should treat it as two ages at once. The mechanical systems, elevator, roof and interiors date from the conversion and are now entering the window where first-generation equipment starts to require attention. The envelope, structure and street façade are ninety-five years old and subject to Landmarks review whenever they need work, with FISP cycles running against them.
Ask for several consecutive years of financial statements, the reserve position, the sponsor's punch-list and warranty history from the 2019 closings, and the building's Landmarks permit record. Ask specifically what the sponsor retained and what was replaced in the envelope, because the answer determines whose problem the next façade cycle is.
Policy framework
Ownership form: Condominium. The board exercises a right of first refusal on sales rather than approving purchasers, which is the structural argument for this building in a neighborhood dominated by cooperatives.
Tax status: No construction-period exemption is recorded for the condominium's unit lots, and the offering plan projected full real estate taxes. Pull the current bill for the specific unit and model True Monthly Carrying Cost against it.
Storage units: Separately deeded condominium units with their own common charges and taxes. Confirm inclusion and conveyance in the contract.
Landmarks: Exterior work, windows included, requires Landmarks Preservation Commission approval.
Pets, leasing terms, flip tax and financing minimums: Not documented in the plan amendments held in The Roebling Research Library. Request the current by-laws, house rules and purchase application before you rely on any assumption.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- Per unit / month range
- —
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
Recent sales
Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2025 | 2D | 1 BR · 1 BA · 641 sf | $987,500 | $1,541/sf | -0.8% |
| May 24, 2024 | 1C | 2 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,675 sf | $2,050,000 | $1,224/sf | -6.8% |
| Aug 7, 2023 | 5B | 3 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,740 sf | $3,030,000 | $1,741/sf | +1.0% |
| Dec 20, 2022 | 2B | 3 BR · 2 BA · 1,494 sf | $2,300,000 | $1,539/sf | -8.0% |
| Apr 7, 2021 | 1B | 2 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,917 sf | $1,577,850 | $823/sf | -9.8% |
| Aug 3, 2020 | 1C | 2 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,675 sf | $1,625,000 | $970/sf | -4.1% |
| May 15, 2020 | 1D | 1 BR · 1 BA · 609 sf | $801,210 | $1,316/sf | +0.3% |
| Apr 15, 2020 | 3C | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,332 sf | $1,680,112 | $1,261/sf | +1.8% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2025) cleared a median $1,562/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 0.6% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-02121-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What to know if you’re buying
Run the tax number first. The plan projected full real estate taxes with no abatement, and on some lines the tax exceeds the common charge. This is the difference between this building and most 2019-vintage Brooklyn condominiums, and it is the difference that shows up every month.
Know which part of the building you are buying. Floors one through four hold four apartments each; floors five through seven hold two. Those are two different products at two different price points.
Confirm the storage unit in writing. Eighteen storage units were sold as separate condominium units with their own charges and taxes. Do not assume one comes with the apartment.
Ask what the conversion touched and what it kept. Systems, elevator and interiors date from 2019 and are entering their first replacement window; the façade and structure date from 1930 and carry Landmarks review with them.
Get the current governing documents. Pets, leasing terms and any transfer fee are not documented in the amendments reviewed for this page. Request the by-laws, house rules and purchase application.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the history, and make it specific. The Chancery of the Diocese of Brooklyn, built in 1930, inside the Fort Greene Historic District, converted to 22 residences in 2019. That is a documented narrative with LPC records behind it, and there is nothing else like it in the neighborhood.
Handle the tax question before the buyer does. Provide the current bill and a clean carrying-cost breakdown. A sophisticated buyer will price the full tax line either way; disclosing it early keeps it from becoming a renegotiation.
Say whether a storage unit conveys, in the first line of the listing. It is a separate deed, it changes the monthly, and leaving it ambiguous costs showings.
Foreground the ownership form and the amenity package. Condominium mechanics, right of first refusal, ordinary financing, a fitness center, a landscaped courtyard and doorman service — in a district where the alternative is a walk-up co-op with a part-time superintendent.
Comp against boutique conversions, not new construction. The right set is small historic-district condominium conversions in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Brooklyn Heights, not the new-development towers on the Downtown Brooklyn edge.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 75 Greene Avenue, also evaluate:
- 264 Cumberland Street (The Sanctuary) — thirteen units in a converted Fort Greene chapel and rectory; the closest building-type comparable in the district
- 415 Carlton Avenue (Fort Greene Partnership Homes) — the neighborhood's other condominium option, at walk-up scale and a very different price point
- 58 Strong Place (The Landmark at Strong Place) — Cobble Hill's converted-church condominium; the same adaptive-reuse argument in another brownstone district
- 550 Vanderbilt Avenue — Prospect Heights new-development condominium; the contrast that shows what an abatement does to a monthly number
- 147 South Oxford Street — Fort Greene elevator co-op nearby; the ownership-form comparison in one decision
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at 75 Greene Avenue?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.