Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,623/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $272K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $452K/room ▴3%CPW $484K/roomFifth Ave $550K/roomBillionaires' Row $3,350/sfTribeca $1,928/sf ▴1%
Full index →
Condominium
96 Rockwell Place
96 Rockwell Place, between Fulton Street and Lafayette Avenue · Fort Greene
Buildings·Condominium

96 Rockwell Place

96 Rockwell Place, between Fulton Street and Lafayette Avenue · Fort Greene

Fort Greene, Brooklyn

BBL 3021067501 · BIN 3059160

At a glance
Type
Condominium
Amenities
Attended lobby, fitness room, bicycle storage and private storage
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; not in a historic district
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission and City Planning records, updated February 2026
Washer/dryer
Permitted
Doorman
Full-time doorman

96 Rockwell Place sales history: 66 recorded sales

Own an apartment at 96 Rockwell Place?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2009–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf, 2026 to date
$1,089
floor-adjusted, 1 sale
Listing discount
0.2%
Recorded sales
66
On record
2009–2026
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 96 Rockwell Place would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As seen inThe Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

96 Rockwell Place combines an old piano warehouse with a substantial upper-story addition. The conversion took a six-story industrial structure and approximately doubled its height, creating 37 condominium residences. Its through-block property also has frontage at 55 Flatbush Avenue.

The project reached completion in 2009, and individual condominium sales began that year. Market-rate residences made up the principal residential offering. High ceilings and loft proportions survive as part of the building's identity, while the newer upper floors introduce a different structural origin within the same condominium.

The inventory includes studios, one-bedrooms and two-bedrooms, with larger penthouse configurations at the top. Many standard apartments fall in a relatively compact band, while the larger two-bedroom layouts offer substantially more living area. Some homes have balconies.

Architecture and unit composition

The original warehouse forms the lower portion of the building, with the addition rising above it. The conversion's architect was Franke, Gottsegen, Cox Architects. The project retained the industrial base while fitting modern residential layouts into both the older shell and the new upper structure.

Ceilings generally range from approximately ten to twelve feet. Wide wood floors, open living areas and large windows contribute to the loft character. The residential plans include compact homes in the roughly 700-square-foot range, larger one-bedroom configurations and two-bedroom homes around 1,166 square feet.

The two-bedroom inventory has a substantially different footprint from the smaller studios and one-bedrooms. Balconies occur in selected apartments, and the penthouse inventory adds larger interior and outdoor configurations. In-unit washers and dryers are part of the residential equipment.

The building's two frontages and vertical addition create differences in outlook as well as height. A home in the original warehouse and one in the upper addition can have different proportions despite belonging to the same condominium. The room layout and actual exposure establish the useful comparison.

Building operations

The common amenities include an attended lobby, fitness room, bicycle storage and private storage. The property has one commercial tax lot in addition to the residential unit lots. Its tax benefits include both residential programs and a separately identified commercial program.

The J-51 benefit began in 2014 with a 14-year term, the commercial ICIP/ICAP benefit in 2009 with a 25-year term, and the Article XI benefit in 2013 with a 39-year term. All remain active on the 2027 roll. The commercial benefit should not be treated as a residential apartment's exemption, and the Article XI benefit applies only to the building's designated affordable rental units, not to its market-rate condominium homes generally.

Pets and in-unit washer/dryer

Pets
Not verified
In-unit washer/dryer
PermittedSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.

Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Building staffing and amenities

Doorman
Full-time doormanSource: recent listing records
Concierge
YesSource: recent listing records
Attended lobby
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
Amenities noted
Fitness room, bike storage, storageSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$20,579/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $46
Modeled exposure split equally across 37 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; condominium owners are typically charged by each unit's common-interest percentage.

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed October 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2025–30
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. A filed Safe grade is not a guarantee of current condition: owners still maintain the facade and, where required, observe parapets each year. Future inspection timing (Local Law 49 of 2025 changed the cycle framework from October 1, 2026), repair and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Safe
2030–35
Due
Next window (projected)
by Feb 2032
Assessed · 2015–20 to 2025–30
$57,000 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2015–20 to 2025–30. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed October 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Apr 9, 20265B
1 BR · 1 BA · 721 sf
$785,000$1,089/sf+8.3%
Sep 26, 20235C
1 BA · 736 sf
$670,000$910/sf-2.8%
Sep 23, 20227C
2 BR · 1,166 sf
$1,345,000$1,154/sf—
Mar 30, 20225B
1 BR · 1 BA · 721 sf
$675,000$936/sf-2.9%
Mar 29, 202210C
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,166 sf
$1,450,000$1,244/sf+0.0%
Feb 11, 2022C9
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,166 sf
$1,300,000$1,115/sf-7.1%
Sep 27, 20214D
1 BR · 1 BA · 773 sf
$745,000$964/sf-0.5%
Mar 23, 20217B
1 BA · 714 sf
$637,500$893/sf-1.9%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026 to date) cleared a median $1,089/sf (floor-adjusted) across 1 sale. Floor-adjusted means each sale is restated to a constant mix of floors, so the figure can differ from the plain median of the sales listed above. Median listing discount 0.2% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

10B · 717 sf+118%
$381,000 ($534/sf) 2011 → $830,000 ($1,158/sf) 2018
8A · 787 sf+94%
$442,750 ($563/sf) 2011 → $860,000 ($1,093/sf) 2020
7C · 1,166 sf+92%
$700,000 ($600/sf) 2011 → $1,345,000 ($1,154/sf) 2022
9A · 787 sf+89%
$455,000 ($578/sf) 2011 → $860,000 ($1,093/sf) 2019
5C · 736 sf+86%
$360,000 ($489/sf) 2011 → $670,000 ($910/sf) 2023
View all 66 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-02106-7501; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

Rents · The Roebling Index

Closed rents at 96 Rockwell Place, last 36 months

$61median rent per sq ft per year
SizeLeasesMedian / month
1 bedroom4$3,972

5 closed leases, October 2023 to September 2026. Most recent lease September 2025. Sizes with fewer than 2 leases are not shown. Compiled by The Roebling Team at Compass from closed leases.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

The figures above are the building's closed leases. Enter your apartment and I'll send you what yours would rent for, from comparable leases at 96 Rockwell Place and nearby.

Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with 96 Rockwell Place and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 96 Rockwell Place. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

Comparable buildings

  • 1 Hanson Place: A nearby historic conversion with condominium ownership and a much taller building form.
  • Skytrack Condominium: A lower-rise conversion for comparing loft-style condominium layouts.
  • 497 Pacific Street: A much smaller prewar condominium close to the same Downtown Brooklyn–Boerum Hill market.
  • 75 Greene Avenue: A lower-rise Fort Greene condominium with an older building envelope.
  • Wyckoff House: A prewar condominium of comparable residential scale in a lower building.

More Fort Greene buildings

The neighborhood

For the full neighborhood — its buildings, character, and market — read The Roebling Team Guide to Fort Greene.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at 96 Rockwell Place?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com