Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomFifth Ave $501K/roomBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfMidtown East $1,279/sf ▾9%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1928
The Gramercy Arms
102 East 22nd Street, New York, NY 10010
Buildings·Gramercy·Cooperative

102 East 22nd Street (Gramercy Arms)

102 East 22nd Street, New York, NY 10010

Gramercy Park

BBL 1008770084 · BIN 1018008

CorridorGramercy
At a glance
Year built
1928
Type
Cooperative
Units
92
Floors
10
Landmark status
Requires confirmation
City records and our profile differ. Confirm with building management.
Subletting by shareholders
Permitted with conditions
Maximum financing
80% of the purchase price
Flip tax
2% of the purchase price, paid by the seller

The Gramercy Arms sales history: 100 recorded transfers

Own an apartment at The Gramercy Arms?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

1BR median, 2023–2026
$735K
8 qualifying sales
Recent range
$668K – $2.5M
Listing discount
2.5%
Recorded transfers
100
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Gramercy Arms would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As cited in The Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

The Gramercy Arms is the practical entry point to the Gramercy Park blocks: ninety-two apartments in an Art Deco house of 1928, one block north of the park, at a scale and a price band that the park-front cooperatives do not offer. It is a working building rather than a trophy — and that is the reason it turns over often enough to have a real comparable set, which the twenty-unit Gramercy houses do not.

The architecture is better than the building's low profile suggests. Architectural records credit the design to Sugarman & Berger and describe the signature: polychromatic glazed terra-cotta panels set below the second, fifth, seventh and ninth floors, bold three-story terra-cotta piers anchoring a red-brick base, and an entrance approached through a forecourt rather than directly off the sidewalk — a courtyard the cooperative rebuilt in 2015 with a new accessible ramp, reconstructed stair, new drains and replaced windows and doors, and one of the few genuinely distinctive arrival sequences on the block.

The defining internal dynamic is combination. The DOB record for this building is, more than anything else, a twenty-five-year sequence of apartments being merged: 9I into 9A in 2000, two units in 2001, 4D and 4E in 2003, 8A and 8B in 2003, 5B and 5C in 2005, 9B and 9C in 2006, 11A and 11B in 2007, 5D and 5E in 2010, 6B and 6C in 2011, 9ABC reconfigured in 2019, 2AB with 2C and 4F with 4G both in 2021. The original plan was built out with small apartments; two generations of owners have been assembling them into larger ones. That is why the sale record shows a wide spread — a stack of modest one-bedroom trades alongside a much smaller number of large combined homes — and why floor plans in this building vary more than the uniform facade implies.

Do not confuse this building with its neighbors. 139 East 23rd Street is on tax block 879, a different block. The name is also shared: "Gramercy Arms" is also used for 145 East 15th Street, a 248-unit 1959 cooperative several blocks south. Two unrelated corporations, two unrelated buildings, one name. Verify by BBL.

Architecture and unit composition

Ten stories of red brick over a terra-cotta base, with a setback penthouse level above, on a hundred-foot frontage. The Art Deco program is concentrated in the polychrome terra-cotta bands and the three-story piers; interiors retain the prewar vocabulary of the period — beamed ceilings, hardwood floors, arched openings, entry galleries.

Roughly 68,000 square feet of residential area across ninety-two apartments works out to about 740 square feet of gross residential area per apartment, an allocation rather than a measured size, but consistent with a building of studios, one-bedrooms and small two-bedrooms, lettered A through I on most floors. What has changed is the top of the range. Two decades of combinations have produced a second tier of larger homes — 9ABC, 11A/11B, 2AB, the paired D/E and B/C lines on several floors — and those trade at a multiple of the small-line pricing. Penthouse-level apartments carry terraces; a 2010 filing records exterior masonry repair at the terrace of 11E, and a 2017 filing added side-mounted guardrails at the main roof parapet.

Building operations

Institutionally financed. The exterior record shows filings for masonry reconstruction in 2006, facade repairs with sidewalk shed and pipe scaffold in 2012, exterior brick repair in 2014, further masonry wall repairs in 2015, the courtyard reconstruction and accessible ramp in 2015, a lobby renovation with new lighting, finishes and entry doors in 2016, roof-parapet guardrails in 2017, ordinary facade maintenance in 2020, and a further shed and scaffold cycle running 2020 into 2021. Completion, sign-offs and current condition need confirming in recent engineering reports and board materials.

The underlying mortgage is in the public record and has grown with the capital program. The corporation placed $2,650,000 plus a $500,000 line with a cooperative lender in May 2005, consolidated to $3,250,000 in June 2013, and consolidated again to $3,800,000 in August 2019 with a new gap note of roughly $805,500. Spread across ninety-two apartments, the August 2019 consolidated amount is about $41,300 per apartment; that is a recorded figure as of 2019, not a current balance, so the maturity, rate and any later borrowing matter: get them. The audited financial statements will show reserves, the maintenance base and any assessment history, and we obtain them for clients at offer stage rather than characterizing them from recorded documents.

Sponsor-affiliated shares appear to remain. ACRIS records share transfers out of an entity carrying the sponsor's name — Gramercy Concourse LLC — as recently as April 2019 and November 2024. Thirty-seven years after conversion, that suggests a residual block of unsold shares still working its way out, which is common in 1980s conversions and carries specific consequences: possible rent-regulated holdover tenancies, a different voting posture, and lender scrutiny of sponsor concentration. Ask the managing agent directly how many unsold shares remain and how many apartments are rented.

Tax history: the J-51 series, and its burn-off

This lot has an unusually long J-51 record, and all of it is spent.

  • An initial benefit with an initial year of 1967, twelve-year term at a 75 percent abatement rate, against $17,800 of certified alteration cost — capital work done while the building was still a rental.
  • A benefit with an initial year of 1983, ninety percent rate, against $33,200 of cost, exhausted in tax year 1994.
  • A benefit with an initial year of 1990 — the cooperative's post-conversion capital program — ninety percent rate, against $103,500 of certified cost, running fourteen years and exhausted in tax year 2001.
  • A final benefit with an initial year of 1997, ninety percent rate, against $13,400 of cost, exhausted in tax year 2007.

The J-51 benefit has run out. The last J-51 credit against this lot was taken in 2007. The modest exemption still carried on the current roll — roughly $217,000 against a total assessment near $10.9 million — appears in DOF's exemption detail as individual benefit lines held in the cooperative corporation's name rather than as a building-wide abatement, which is how shareholder-level exemptions are recorded on a co-op lot. The roll does not show bill-level abatements, so confirm the cooperative's current tax bill before treating the maintenance you are shown as unsubsidized.

Policy framework

Only part of this building's policy stack is published. Building management's published schedule, as of August 2026, reports financing up to 80% of the purchase price, a 2% flip tax paid by the seller and conditional subletting (see the policy panel on this page); the board's current written policy governs. The 1987 offering plan is not in our library. Confirm those terms and obtain the rest from the managing agent, in writing, before offering: financing ceiling and minimum down payment; post-closing liquidity requirement, usually a multiple of maintenance plus debt service and often the binding test rather than debt-to-income; sublet policy — seasoning, term cap, fee, renewal practice, which in a building with this much turnover is a live question; flip tax — existence, base, rate, and which side pays; pied-à-terre policy, and how it has been applied in practice rather than how it reads; and trust, LLC and co-purchase rules. The recorded transfer history shows shareholders conveying into revocable trusts in 2021, 2023 and 2026, and estates conveying to beneficiaries, so trusts and estate transfers are evidently workable — but the board's current written policy governs. The board package and interview are the gate; budget six to ten weeks from accepted offer to closing.

If a combination is part of your plan, ask the same questions again in that context. Two dozen combinations have been approved here since 2000, which is strong evidence the board entertains them, but the alteration agreement, the engineering requirements and the board's current appetite are things to establish before you buy two apartments.

Application and transaction fees

Fees below are from building management's published schedule, as of August 2026. They are shown as published, item by item; no total is added because the total depends on the transaction. Deposits are listed apart from nonrefundable charges.

Flip tax (transfer fee on resale)
Terms
2% of the Purchase Price
Rate
2% of the purchase price
Paid by
Seller

Source: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026

Purchase

7 items

Fees and charges

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Application Processing FeePaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $600Refundable Non-refundable
credit check feePer applicantPaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $125.00 per personRefundable Non-refundable
Move In FeePaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $200Refundable Non-refundable
Move Out FeePaid by SellerWhen With the applicationAmount $200Refundable Non-refundable
Closing Legal Fee to Coop AttorneyPaid by SellerWhen At closingAmount To be determinedRefundable Not stated

Deposits

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Move-in DepositPaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $1,000Refundable Refundable
Move Out DepositPaid by SellerWhen With the applicationAmount $1,000Refundable Refundable

Sublet

7 items

Fees and charges

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Move Out FeePaid by ShareholderWhen With the applicationAmount $200Refundable Non-refundable
Sublet FeeRecurringPaid by ShareholderWhen With the applicationAmount Year 1 - 20% of the annual maintenanceRefundable Non-refundable
Application Processing FeePaid by SubtenantWhen With the applicationAmount $600Refundable Non-refundable
credit check feePer applicantPaid by SubtenantWhen With the applicationAmount $125.00 per personRefundable Non-refundable
Move In FeePaid by SubtenantWhen With the applicationAmount $200Refundable Non-refundable

Deposits

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Move Out DepositPaid by ShareholderWhen With the applicationAmount $1,000Refundable Refundable
Move-in DepositPaid by SubtenantWhen With the applicationAmount $1,000Refundable Refundable

Refinance

4 items

Management's “less refinance” schedule

Fees and charges

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
credit check feePer applicantPaid by ShareholderWhen With the applicationAmount $125 per applicantRefundable Non-refundable
Refinance Application Processing FeePaid by ShareholderWhen With the applicationAmount $450Refundable Non-refundable

Management's “more refinance” schedule

Fees and charges

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
credit check feePer applicantPaid by ShareholderWhen With the applicationAmount $125 per applicantRefundable Non-refundable
Refinance Application Processing FeePaid by ShareholderWhen With the applicationAmount $450Refundable Non-refundable

Management updates its schedule without a public filing. The date is when management last updated the page, not when a rule changed. Confirm the current schedule with management before you apply.

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.

Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Financing and purchase requirements

Maximum financing
80% of the purchase priceSource: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026

Sublet and pied-à-terre policy

A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.

Subletting by shareholders
Permitted with conditionsSubject to board approval. One (1) year max at one given time. (see sublet package for the complete sublet policy)Source: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
Pied-à-terre ownership
Not verified

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Monthly carrying charges in recent sales

Maintenance, per room
$415 per room a monthMedian of 8 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026

Maintenance as recorded with each sale. A co-op's maintenance already covers the building's real estate taxes and the building's own mortgage, if it has one; add your own loan payment for the monthly outlay. A summary of recorded sales, not a current bill; charges change.

Building staffing and amenities

Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
Amenities noted
GardenSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$57,576/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $52
Modeled exposure split equally across 92 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; co-op shareholders are typically charged by share allocation.

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. A filed Safe grade is not a guarantee of current condition: owners still maintain the facade and, where required, observe parapets each year. Future inspection timing (Local Law 49 of 2025 changed the cycle framework from October 1, 2026), repair and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The Gramercy Arms trades as the volume market for the Gramercy Park blocks. Turnover is high by prewar co-op standards — dozens of recorded share transfers over the past decade — which gives buyers and sellers something the smaller Gramercy houses cannot offer: a deep in-building comparable set, line by line. Pricing sorts into two distinct pools. Single-line apartments in the studio-to-one-bedroom range clear in one band; combined homes on the D/E, B/C and penthouse lines clear in another several times higher. Comping across those pools produces nonsense, and it is the most common valuation error made in this building.

Against the park-front cooperatives one block south, the discount is real and is a function of address, scale and finish rather than of building quality. Against the Third Avenue and East 23rd Street postwar stock, the premium is prewar detail, the courtyard entrance and the Gramercy address. With the J-51 series fully exhausted, maintenance figures compare directly to peers without adjustment. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricevs. Ask
Aug 18, 20267F
1 BR · 1 BA
$815,000-1.2%
Jul 31, 20269H
2 BR · 1 BA
$1,238,250-2.9%
Jun 10, 20264H
2 BR · 1 BA
$1,200,000+0.0%
May 16, 20252I
1 BR · 1 BA
$700,000-2.1%
May 7, 2025PHB
2 BR · 2 BA
$2,050,000+17.1%
Nov 14, 20247D
1 BR · 1 BA
$765,000-2.5%
Jul 16, 20243D
1 BR · 1 BA
$725,000+0.0%
Feb 9, 20249C
3 BR · 3 BA
$2,550,000-10.5%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2023): a median $1,074/sf (floor-adjusted) across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2026. Median listing discount 2.3% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

7F+87%
$435,000 2003 → $850,000 2013 → $815,000 2026
3D+82%
$399,000 ($638/sf) 2004 → $585,000 ($936/sf) 2009 → $725,000 2024
1C+79%
$400,000 2004 → $520,000 2014 → $715,000 2022
7AB+60%
$995,000 ($948/sf) 2010 → $1,525,000 ($1,452/sf) 2017 → $1,595,000 2022
2F+55%
$469,000 2006 → $530,000 2012 → $641,125 2017 → $725,000 2021
View all 100 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00877-0084). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at The Gramercy Arms and nearby.

What would buying here cost?

At the recent median sale of $1.01M (6 transfers in the past 24 months, since October 22, 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $22,403 to close, or 2.2% of the price.

  • Mansion tax: $10,075
  • No mortgage recording tax or title insurance on a co-op purchase
  • Attorneys, lender, building fees and filings: $12,328

Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with The Gramercy Arms and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Gramercy Arms. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

Ask about unsold shares before anything else. Sponsor-named share transfers appear in the record as recently as November 2024. The count of remaining unsold shares and rented apartments affects your lender, the board's economics and the building's regulatory posture.

Comp within your pool. A combined 9ABC and a single-line studio are the same building and not the same market. Insist on line-level comparables.

The J-51 series is gone, and that is good news. The last credit was taken in 2007. There is no burn-off ahead. Confirm the current maintenance and run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator against it.

Underwrite the underlying mortgage and the facade cycle together. $3.8 million consolidated in August 2019, against a documented and ongoing Local Law 11 program. Get the maturity, the rate, the reserve balance and the most recent facade filing status from the financials.

It is not landmarked, and neither is most of this block. The Gramercy Park Historic District line clips only the corner. Window replacement and exterior work go to DOB, not to LPC — a meaningful cost and timeline difference from the park-front buildings.

Verify the BBL. 139 East 23rd Street is a different tax block. A separate cooperative several blocks south also uses the name Gramercy Arms. Check block 877, lot 84 on the contract.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the courtyard and the terra cotta. The forecourt entrance and the polychrome Art Deco banding are the building's differentiators against the postwar inventory a few blocks east, and buyers respond to them in person more than in photographs.

Price to your line, and prove it. With this much in-building turnover you can support an asking price with the building's own record. Do that rather than reaching for park-front comparables.

Say the abatement history is closed. "Last J-51 credit taken in 2007, nothing pending" is a clean answer to the question every prewar co-op buyer asks.

Document the capital record. Courtyard reconstruction, lobby renovation, repeated facade cycles and roof guardrails are all in the DOB file. Provide the financials and let a buyer's attorney verify them.

If your apartment is a combination, market the plan, not the letters. Buyers do not know what 5DE means. They know what a real two-bedroom with a dining room means.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 102 East 22nd Street, also evaluate:

More Gramercy buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Gramercy — read The Roebling Team Guide to Gramercy.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at The Gramercy Arms?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com