Manhattan condos $1,629/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops $283K/room 5%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $478K/room 19%CPW $350K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,272/sf 24%Tribeca $1,941/sf 2%
Full index →
1095 Park Avenue, 1095 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10128, Manhattan — Cooperative, 1930
Buildings·Park Avenue·Cooperative

1095 Park Avenue

1095 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10128

Carnegie Hill, Upper East Side

BBL 1015170069 · BIN 1048101

At a glance
Year built
1930
Type
Cooperative
Units
68
Floors
18
Landmark
Designated
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 1995–2025

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

3BR median
$5.2M
Recent range
$750K – $5.5M
Listing discount
3.7%
Recorded transfers
47

1095 Park Avenue is among the architecturally consequential late-pre-war Schwartz & Gross Park Avenue commissions and one of the corridor's substantial mid-size pre-war cooperatives. Completed in 1930 — at the immediate close of the pre-Depression Park Avenue building cycle — the 18-story building was developed by the Tishman family, the Julius Tishman & Sons firm that was among the more prolific Park Avenue developers of the late pre-war period and that subsequently developed 888 Park (Schwartz & Gross 1925–26, also on the existing site profile inventory).

Schwartz & Gross's body of Park Avenue work is the most prolific of the 1920s Park Avenue residential firms. 1095 Park sits at the late-cycle end of this body of work — the firm's final substantial Park Avenue commission of the pre-Depression era. The architectural register is consistent with the firm's mid-to-late-1920s vocabulary: red brick over a two-story limestone base, articulated by a bandcourse above the fourth floor, limestone quoins between the third and fourth floors, masonry quoins above, a decorative frieze, and an ornamental balcony below the fifth floor. The 68-apartment scale (originally 67 in the offering plan) produces a mid-size cooperative configuration. The two-wing two-per-landing planning configuration distributes apartments across the building's two structural wings, producing the apartment-level architectural variation characteristic of pre-Depression Park Avenue construction. Many apartments are configured at 5 to 8 rooms — substantial scale at the upper end of the typical pre-war Park Avenue apartment range.

The 1951 cooperative conversion places 1095 Park among the earlier post-war Park Avenue cooperative conversions.

Architecture and unit composition

The 68 cooperative apartments distribute across the building's 18 stories at approximately two apartments per landing in two structural wings. Apartment-level features carry the architectural fabric characteristic of Schwartz & Gross's 1930 design — substantial ceiling heights, formal entry galleries, library-living combinations, and the staff-wing infrastructure characteristic of pre-Depression Park Avenue luxury construction.

Recent transactions documented through public records include Unit 3A at $2,895,000 (September 2025), Unit 11D at $5,500,000 (August 2024), Unit PHA at $1,900,000 (April 2024), and Unit 4A at $2,695,000 (January 2024). Unit 6D was recently listed by at $5,350,000. public records data places building average sale price at approximately $4.8 million on recent transactions, with average $/sf at approximately $1,200.

Building operations

1095 Park operates as a full-service cooperative with full-time doorman and live-in superintendent. The amenity infrastructure includes a fitness center (the lobby and amenity renovations were designed by Ethelind Coblin Architect), bike room, and storage bins. Specific cooperative policy details (financing maximum, flip tax structure, pet policy, pied-à-terre allowance, sublet duration limits) should be verified directly with management.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
On record
$750 in filing penalties
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent). Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library.

See the full facade history →

Management & transfer contacts

Managing agent
Flip tax
2.5% of purchase price (eff. Jan 1, 2026)
Sublet policy
Not allowed
Pied-à-terre
Allowed
Transfer facts compiled by The Roebling Team · as of 2026-07. Confirm current policies and fees with the managing agent before contract.

Recent sales

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Apartment-level facts are independently verified before publishing; sale prices reflect the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Sep 29, 20259C
3 BR · 4 BA
$3,900,000-16.9%
Sep 17, 20256D
3 BR · 3.5 BA
$5,150,000-3.7%
Aug 27, 20243A
2 BR · 3 BA
$2,895,000+7.4%
Apr 10, 202411D
3 BR · 3.5 BA · 3,000 sf
$5,500,000$1,833/sf-6.0%
Jan 4, 2024PHA
2 BR · 2.5 BA
$1,900,000-29.5%
Aug 23, 20234A
2 BR · 3 BA
$2,695,000+0.0%
Sep 26, 202214B
3 BR · 3.5 BA
$4,995,000+0.0%
Jun 7, 202216D
2 BR · 2.5 BA
$4,500,000-1.6%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2024): a median $1,699/sf across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2025. Median listing discount 4.8% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

14D · 3,000 sf+59%
$4,650,000 2004$7,375,000 ($2,458/sf) 2014
11D · 3,000 sf+38%
$3,999,000 ($1,333/sf) 2004$5,500,000 ($1,833/sf) 2024
16C+20%
$5,600,000 2014$6,700,000 2017
PHA-32%
$2,800,000 ($1,556/sf) 2004$1,900,000 2024

Other recent transfers

DateUnitPrice
Apr 13, 20065B$2,950,000
View all 47 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01517-0069) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

The Schwartz & Gross architectural pedigree is real. Among the firm's final substantial Park Avenue commissions of the pre-Depression era; the architectural composition is consistent with the firm's mid-to-late-1920s vocabulary.

The 1930 vintage represents the close of the pre-Depression Park Avenue building cycle. Among the final pre-war Park Avenue cooperatives.

The 68-apartment mid-size scale produces a specific cooperative culture. Mid-size by Park Avenue standards; the institutional culture is calibrated correspondingly.

The Park Avenue Historic District protection applies. Designated LP-2547 by the NYC LPC on April 29, 2014.

The Ethelind Coblin lobby and amenity renovations are real. Documented contemporary capital project work at the building.

Recent comparable closings span a broad range. From $1.9 million through $5.5 million across the building's apartment inventory.

Verify operational specifics during due diligence. Specific board approval framework, financing structure, flip tax, sublet policies, current capital project pipeline, and the LL11 façade cycle on the 1930 vintage should be reviewed.

Closing timelines are cooperative-standard. Plan for 6–10 weeks from contract through board approval to closing.

What to know if you’re selling

Marketing should emphasize the Schwartz & Gross architectural credential and the Tishman family developer pedigree. Both are structural identity features.

The public records 70 rating and public records are real institutional credentials. Specific architectural detailing documented in architectural records's December 2011 review.

Pricing should reference recent comparable closings. The $5,500,000 August 2024 closing on Unit 11D provides recent upper-tier reference.

Closing timelines are cooperative-standard.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 1095 Park Avenue, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Park Avenue — read The Roebling Team Guide to Park Avenue.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

Considering a move at 1095 Park Avenue?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 1095 Park Avenue would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.