Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $433K/room ▴3%CPW $482K/roomFifth Ave $529K/roomBillionaires' Row $3,350/sfHell's Kitchen $1,391/sf ▾1%
Full index →
Condominium · 1909
The Silk Building
14 East 4th Street, New York, NY 10012
Buildings·NoHo·Condominium

The Silk Building

14 East 4th Street, New York, NY 10012

NoHo

BBL 1005317501 · BIN 1008529

At a glance
Year built
1909
Type
Condominium
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; in the NoHo Historic District
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
Pets
Pets permitted; species and limits not stated
Doorman
Full-time doorman

The Silk Building sales history: 93 recorded sales

Own an apartment at The Silk Building?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf, 2026 to date
$1,901
1 sale
Listing discount
4.0%
Recorded sales
93
On record
2003–2026
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Silk Building would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As seen inThe Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

Few downtown addresses carry the cultural weight of 14 East 4th Street. Built in 1909 to designs by Clinton & Russell for the 694 Broadway Company as a silk-trade loft in the Italian Renaissance palazzo idiom, the building was reborn in the 1980s as one of the first true luxury loft condominiums in NoHo — and quickly became a magnet for the music and entertainment world, with a celebrated record store anchoring its ground floor during the MTV era and a roster of high-profile residents over the decades. That history is the building's calling card, but the architecture and the apartments are what hold value.

NoHo is one of Manhattan's smallest and most protected neighborhoods, a pocket of cast-iron and masonry lofts bounded by Greenwich Village, the East Village, and SoHo. Within it, 14 East 4th Street offers something genuinely scarce: a full-service, doormanned condominium with authentic loft proportions in a corridor where most buildings are smaller, self-managed conversions. The combination of scale, staffing, and pedigree sets it apart.

For buyers, the appeal is the floor plan. These are real lofts — wide, light-filled, often duplexed or triplexed — rather than the reconfigured pre-war layouts found uptown, and they sit inside a condominium structure that offers the ownership flexibility serious downtown buyers want.

Architecture and unit composition

Clinton & Russell — among the most prolific commercial architects of early-twentieth-century New York — gave the building a dignified masonry façade with decorative friezes that nod to its silk-trade origins, details preserved in the lobby through the conversion. At 12 stories, it reads as a substantial NoHo loft block rather than a tower, in keeping with the historic district around it.

The 56 residences are defined by their generous scale and loft character. Many homes feature ceiling heights from roughly 10 to 12 feet, oversized windows, and wood-burning fireplaces, with a number of units configured as duplexes and triplexes. Kitchens and baths across the building reflect the high-specification renovations buyers expect at this level — premium appliance suites and stone finishes are common in renovated homes. The result is a building where individual apartments vary widely in layout and finish, which makes unit-by-unit underwriting essential and rewards a buyer who understands the stock.

Building operations

The Silk Building runs as a full-service condominium: a 24-hour doorman and concierge, a live-in superintendent, a landscaped common roof deck with skyline views, a bike room, and laundry on each floor. As a condominium, there is no co-op-style board admissions process — purchases clear through a right-of-first-refusal rather than an interview; confirm financing and leasing rules in the declaration and bylaws. Pets are welcome. The building's NoHo Historic District location means any exterior change runs through Landmarks review, which protects the streetscape and the façade buyers are paying for.

Pets and in-unit washer/dryer

Pets
Pets permitted; species and limits not statedSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
In-unit washer/dryer
Not verified

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.

Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Monthly carrying charges in recent sales

Common charges + taxes, per room
$754 per room a monthMedian of 9 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Common charges + taxes, per square foot
$2.32 per square foot a monthMedian of 9 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Common charges alone, per square foot
$1.04 per square foot a monthMedian of 12 listings since October 2023 that give the annual taxSource: listing records, refreshed October 2026
Real estate taxes alone, per square foot
$1.38 per square foot a monthMedian of 12 listings since October 2023 that give the annual taxSource: listing records, refreshed October 2026

Common charges plus real estate taxes, combined into one monthly figure the way New York condominium listings show them. Add a mortgage payment for the monthly outlay. The split into common charges and taxes comes from the listings that also give the annual tax, a different sample, so the two lines need not add up exactly to the combined median; a tax abatement can hold taxes below the full amount until it expires. A summary of recorded sales and listings, not a current bill; charges change.

Building staffing and amenities

Doorman
Full-time doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Concierge
YesSource: recent listing records
Attended lobby
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Live-in superintendent
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
Amenities noted
Roof deck, bike storageSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$90,507/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $135
Modeled exposure split equally across 56 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; condominium owners are typically charged by each unit's common-interest percentage.

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed October 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the inspector (QEWI) identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$2,500 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed October 2026.

See the full facade history →

Management & transfer contacts

Managing agent
Policies and fees
Min Down Payment: 10%
Transfer facts compiled by The Roebling Team · as of 2026-07. Confirm current policies and fees with the managing agent before contract.

Recent sales

Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Feb 3, 2026802
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,186 sf
$2,255,000$1,901/sf-4.0%
Dec 1, 20251111
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,200 sf
$2,290,000$1,908/sf-3.4%
May 2, 2025815
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,115 sf
$2,037,500$1,827/sf-7.4%
Nov 4, 20241124
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,453 sf
$2,700,000$1,858/sf-1.8%
Oct 11, 20241113
2 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,851 sf
$3,100,000$1,675/sf-11.3%
May 8, 2024808
3 BR · 3 BA · 2,063 sf
$2,740,000$1,328/sf-2.1%
Feb 5, 2024815
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,115 sf
$1,846,000$1,656/sf-5.3%
Dec 21, 20231127
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,550 sf
$2,425,000$1,565/sf-1.0%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026 to date) cleared a median $1,901/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. Median listing discount 4.0% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

1102 · 1,243 sf+223%
$750,000 ($681/sf) 2006 → $2,425,000 ($1,951/sf) 2016
1111 · 1,200 sf+131%
$990,000 ($914/sf) 2004 → $2,290,000 ($1,908/sf) 2025
802 · 1,186 sf+88%
$1,200,000 ($1,000/sf) 2007 → $2,255,000 ($1,901/sf) 2026
608 · 1,324 sf+80%
$1,150,000 ($885/sf) 2008 → $1,325,000 ($1,019/sf) 2012 → $2,075,000 ($1,567/sf) 2017
823 · 1,132 sf+58%
$1,250,000 ($1,104/sf) 2004 → $1,325,000 ($1,170/sf) 2010 → $1,495,000 ($1,321/sf) 2013 → $1,975,000 ($1,745/sf) 2018
View all 93 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00531-7501; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

Rents · The Roebling Index

Closed rents at The Silk Building, last 36 months

$83median rent per sq ft per year
SizeLeasesMedian / month
2 bedroom3$8,000
3 bedroom2$15,497

5 closed leases, October 2023 to September 2026. Most recent lease April 2025. Sizes with fewer than 2 leases are not shown. Compiled by The Roebling Team at Compass from closed leases.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

The figures above are the building's closed leases. Enter your apartment and I'll send you what yours would rent for, from comparable leases at The Silk Building and nearby.

What would buying here cost?

At the recent median sale of $2.27M (4 sales in the past 24 months, since October 31, 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $95,173 to close, or 4.2% of the price.

  • Mansion tax: $28,406
  • Mortgage recording tax: $32,809
  • Title insurance: $10,226
  • Attorneys, lender, building fees, reserves and filings: $23,731

Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with The Silk Building and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Silk Building. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

Underwrite the specific apartment. Because layouts range from single-floor lofts to multi-level homes with fireplaces and private outdoor space, value here is driven by floor, exposure, ceiling height, and the quality of the most recent renovation far more than by a single price-per-foot figure. As a condominium, there is no board interview; confirm financing, pied-à-terre and trust or LLC purchase rules in the declaration and bylaws. Buyers should read the offering plan and recent financials to understand common charges, the reserve, and any planned capital work — standard diligence for a century-old masonry building, where façade and roof maintenance are ongoing.

What to know if you’re selling

The Silk Building sells itself on a combination almost no NoHo competitor can match: authentic loft volume, a recognizable name, and full-service staffing inside a protected historic district. The marketing job is to present the specific home's scale and light — ceiling heights, window lines, fireplaces, outdoor space — and to benchmark against the building's own recent closings and the best loft condominiums in NoHo and SoHo, not against pre-war uptown stock. Because each unit is distinct, accurate positioning and staging that reads the loft volume correctly are what separate a strong result from an average one.

Comparable buildings

If you're weighing 14 East 4th Street, also consider these downtown lofts and conversions:

More NoHo buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across NoHo — read The Roebling Team Guide to NoHo.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at The Silk Building?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com