187 Hicks Street (Florence Court)
187 Hicks Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201
Brooklyn Heights, Brooklyn
BBL 3002360018 · BIN 3001826
- Year built
- 1900
- Type
- Cooperative
- Units
- 29
- Floors
- 7
- Landmark
- Designated
- Financing
- Not documented as a percentage; refinancing requires the corporation's attorney to review the Recognition Agreement at a documented $250 fee
- Subletting
- Board approval under the proprietary lease; no term cap or surcharge documented
- Pets
- House rules require the Lessor's express written permission for any bird or animal, revocable at any time; dogs carried or leashed in public portions
Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 2017 (policy memorandum)). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.
Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026
Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.
- 2BR median
- $1.4M
- Recent range
- $1.4M – $2.6M
- Listing discount
- 0.0%
- Recorded transfers
- 33
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Florence Court would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
Florence Court is the most architecturally consequential small cooperative in central Brooklyn Heights, and its history is better than its present-day profile suggests. Frank Lowe designed it in 1900 for Louis J. Horowitz, on the site of the McLean mansion at the corner of Hicks and Pierrepont, and it opened as one of Brooklyn's most exclusive apartment hotels — sold out, by Brownstoner's account, before it opened its doors.
The original program was serious. Apartments ran to seven rooms plus baths. Residents had long-distance-capable telephones, electricity, hot water, and a private mail chute at a moment when none of those were assumptions. The top floor held a private dining facility with restaurant service, reachable by a dedicated house telephone system; the reception floor carried reading and writing rooms and a Turkish smoking room; two ground-floor spaces served as doctors' offices with their own street access. The Hicks Street elevation still shows what that ambition looked like in masonry: French Renaissance Revival with decorative buttresses, bridging elements, and Beaux-Arts ornament, wrapping a corner and running the better part of a block. Horowitz went on to run the Thompson-Starrett Company, which built the Woolworth Building; Florence Court is where a career that ended at the top of American construction was still working at the scale of a single Brooklyn corner.
The site is unusual and worth understanding before you buy. The building occupies the northeast corner of Hicks and Pierrepont and runs 141 feet 11 inches north along Hicks to Love Lane — the interior lane that, as the sponsor's engineer noted in 1978, is not a mapped street. Love Lane is private, and receives no city snow removal, street cleaning, or trash collection. That is charm and it is also an operating fact, and it is one reason this pocket of the Heights — Love Lane, College Place, the rear of the Henry Street blockfront — feels sealed off from the neighborhood around it.
Florence Court's conversion came early. The 1978 plan allocated 1,947 shares over 29 apartments for $1,695,000 in cash plus $378,000 of assumed mortgage debt; the A-line apartments in that schedule are five rooms and two baths priced between roughly $55,000 and $65,000 — figures that read now as a snapshot of the Heights at the bottom of the 1970s. By the standards of a district where most buildings converted between 1982 and 1986, a 1978 plan means nearly five decades of shareholder operation and a long, readable financial history.
Architecture and unit composition
Seven stories over a basement, with an elevator machine room and stair penthouse above, on a lot that fronts three streets. Construction is Class 3 non-fireproof: brick and stone bearing walls carrying interior I-beams and cast-iron columns, with wood joist floors from the second floor through the seventh and at the roof. Every elevation is finished in stone and brick except the east, which is plain brick — the difference between the public faces on Hicks, Pierrepont, and Love Lane and the working rear.
The 1968 Certificate of Occupancy governs the building as a thirty-family Class A multiple dwelling with 30 simplex apartments and 139 residential rooms. The 1978 plan offered 29 of them across 1,947 shares, and the Department of Finance carries 29 today. The alteration record — filings in 1916, 1919, 1923, 1942, 1965, 1966, and 1968 — explains the gap between the seven-room apartment-hotel suites of 1900 and the mix that exists now: seven decades of subdivision and reconfiguration before a single share was ever sold. Layouts vary meaningfully from line to line as a result, and floor plans in this building repay close reading rather than assumption.
Windows and all other exterior work run through the Landmarks Preservation Commission under the 1965 district designation. The house rules impose an 80 percent floor-covering requirement outside kitchens, pantries, baths, closets, and foyer, and confine construction to weekdays between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Building operations
Florence Court Corporation has run the building since the 1979-era closing. The conversion-year documents describe an operation built around an elevator service contract, a burner maintenance contract, #6 oil heat at roughly 36,600 gallons a year, and laundry equipment owned by a concession rather than by the corporation. Current arrangements should be confirmed; the point of the historical figures is the shape of the operating model, which is a small elevator building with contracted services rather than a staffed full-service house.
The co-op's later shareholder policy memoranda show how the corporation runs today. Alteration scopes are reviewed by management and the corporation's attorney at a documented hourly rate, with the building's architect consulted where the work warrants and field inspections and plan review billed to the shareholder. Improper disposal of construction refuse is treated as a default under the proprietary lease and carries a documented $300-per-incident fine. These are the marks of a board that manages renovation risk in an old non-fireproof building with wood joists — the right instinct, and something a buyer planning a gut renovation should price into both the budget and the timeline.
The co-op's audited financial statements in The Roebling Research Library run from the late 1990s forward. For a 1900 masonry building, the recurring items to review are the FISP/Local Law 11 façade cycle — with the ornamental Hicks Street elevation making that cycle more expensive than a plain wall would be — the elevator's modernization history, and the age of the heating plant.
Policy framework
Alterations: Detailed scope of work submitted to management; management and the corporation's attorney determine whether a decorating agreement or an extensive alteration agreement applies; review is billed to the shareholder at documented hourly rates, with field inspections and plan review priced separately and a retainer due at the start of each review. Construction refuse must be disposed of by the shareholder; failure is a lease default carrying a $300 fine per incident.
Refinancing: Shareholders submit a comparison of existing and proposed loan terms — principal, rate and whether variable, term, and monthly payment. The corporation's attorney reviews the Recognition Agreement at a $250 fee.
Open houses and showings: Two weeks' advance notice to management through the broker; a $100 fee for lobby supervision; all visitors escorted in and out of the building; no open-house signage on the entry doors or the sidewalk.
Pets: Express written permission from the Lessor for any bird or animal, revocable at any time; dogs carried or leashed in public portions. The written rule is the restrictive standard form — ask how the board applies it.
Quiet hours and floor covering: No disturbing noise between 11:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.; construction weekdays only, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; 80 percent floor covering required in each room outside kitchens, pantries, baths, closets, and foyer.
Subletting, flip tax, financing minimums, pied-à-terre, washer-dryer: Not documented in the materials reviewed. Each should be confirmed against the current house rules, the purchase application, and board policy.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $12,068/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $35
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2025–30. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
Recent sales
Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | A | 1 BR · 1 BA | $695,000 | +0.0% | |
| Feb 25, 2025 | 4C | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,400,000 | -6.4% | |
| Feb 4, 2025 | 3D | 3 BR · 2 BA | $2,468,000 | +0.0% | |
| Jul 30, 2024 | 3C | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,400,000 | +0.0% | |
| Mar 22, 2024 | 5D | 3 BR · 2 BA | $2,400,000 | +6.7% | |
| May 10, 2023 | 6D | 3 BR · 2 BA | $2,565,000 | -1.3% | |
| Sep 22, 2021 | 4A | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,249 sf | $1,320,000 | $1,057/sf | -5.0% |
| Jul 14, 2021 | 5C | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,375,000 | +0.0% |
Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2021): a median $1,057/sf across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2026. Median listing discount 1.6% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-00236-0018) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What to know if you’re buying
Read the specific floor plan, not the building average. Seventy years of alterations preceded the 1978 conversion. Apartment-to-apartment variation in this building is real, and comparing on rooms alone will mislead you.
Understand what non-fireproof, wood-joist construction means for your renovation. The board's alteration process is deliberate and billed to the shareholder, with attorney and architect review. Budget the professional fees and the calendar, not just the contractor.
Love Lane is private. No city snow removal, street cleaning, or trash collection on that frontage. It is a large part of the charm and a small part of the cost.
Ask for the façade file. An ornamented 1900 masonry elevation on three street frontages is more expensive to maintain than a flat wall. The FISP history and the next cycle's scope are the documents that matter.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the history, because it is documented. A 1900 apartment hotel by Frank Lowe for Louis J. Horowitz — the future head of the firm that built the Woolworth Building — on the McLean mansion site, sold out before it opened, with a top-floor dining room and a Turkish smoking room. Almost no comparable co-op has a provenance this specific.
Plan the marketing around the open-house rule. Two weeks' notice, a lobby-supervision fee, escorted visitors, and no signage. That changes how you run first weekend, and it rewards appointment-based, well-prepared showings over volume.
Sell the pocket. Love Lane and College Place are among the most distinctive addresses in Brooklyn Heights, and buyers who have not walked them do not know they exist.
Position against the district's small prewars. The right comparison set is the twenty-five- to forty-unit prewar cooperatives of central Brooklyn Heights, where Florence Court's architecture is the differentiator and its service model is in line.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering Florence Court, also evaluate:
- 160 Henry Street — the prewar elevator co-op sharing the same block, running the Henry Street frontage from Pierrepont to Love Lane
- 161 Henry Street — Schneider & Herter's 1905 Beaux-Arts co-op one block east; the closest peer in vintage and architectural ambition
- 9 College Place (Love Lane Mews) — condominium on the interior lanes, immediately north
- 145 Hicks Street — larger Hicks Street co-op on the same side of the street, north of Love Lane
- 153 Henry Street — prewar co-op peer opposite the foot of Love Lane
- 35 Pierrepont Street — prewar co-op on the same Pierrepont corridor, toward Willow Street
- 130 Hicks Street — Hicks Street co-op one block north, postwar construction at comparable scale
- 115 Willow Street — small prewar co-op two blocks west, for buyers weighing quiet against corner presence
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at Florence Court?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.