Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Condominium · 2018
204 Forsyth Street
204 Forsyth Street, New York, NY 10002

204 Forsyth Street

204 Forsyth Street, New York, NY 10002

Lower East Side

BBL 1004227503 · BIN 1090468

At a glance
Year built
2018
Type
Condominium
Units
11
Floors
7
Landmark
No
Pets
Not addressed in the plan sections on file — confirm the house rules with the managing agent
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2012–2023

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,556
Listing discount
5.7%
Recorded sales
18
On record
2012–2023

The Lower East Side produced a great deal of new condominium construction between 2013 and 2019, and most of it was built to a formula: maximize unit count, minimize unit size, structure the capital stack around a tax abatement. 204 Forsyth was built the other way. Eleven residences in 19,000 square feet works out to well over 1,700 square feet per home, and the plan is one and two apartments per floor rather than four or five. Then it was sold without an abatement, at full taxes, from day one.

That combination is the building's whole thesis, and it produces a specific kind of buyer outcome. The units are large — two-bedroom half floors from roughly 1,500 square feet, a full-floor three-bedroom near 3,000, a penthouse with almost 2,000 square feet of roof. The monthly carrying cost is high relative to sticker price, because the tax line is the real tax line rather than a temporary one. And there is no cliff coming. Buyers who underwrote 421-a inventory elsewhere in the neighborhood are, in many cases, five to ten years into watching their taxes step up; buyers here have never had that exposure. When comparing carry across Lower East Side condominiums, this is the single most important variable, and it is the one most often missed.

The site history is worth stating plainly because it explains the building's massing. The Nativity Mission Center opened here in 1948, became a full middle school in 1971, and its model was subsequently replicated in more than sixty underserved communities across the country. Its five-story building was demolished in 2013. Because the lot carries no landmark designation — verified against the Landmarks Preservation Commission's own database rather than PLUTO's unreliable historic-district field — the replacement could be built to the C4-4A envelope, seven stories at essentially the full 4.0 floor-area ratio, on a nearly 50-foot frontage.

The Forsyth Street position is the other half of the value. Sara D. Roosevelt Park runs the length of the block opposite, which buys west-facing residences an open outlook that is not, in this part of the city, easy to buy. Buyers should nonetheless read the lot-line disclosure below before assuming that every window in the building is permanent.

Architecture and unit composition

Seven stories on a 49-foot frontage, built to the C4-4A envelope with a curb cut and two parking spaces at grade — unusual on a Lower East Side infill lot, and a scarce asset in resale.

The offering plan's Schedule A sets out the composition precisely:

  • Unit 1 — 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, approximately 2,682 square feet, with a 1,075-square-foot rear yard, a 75-square-foot roof terrace and 538 square feet of cellar areaways as limited common elements
  • Floors 2 through 5 — two residences per floor, each 2 bedrooms and 2 baths at roughly 1,520 to 1,550 square feet. The four residences on floors 3 through 5 in each line carry 70-square-foot balconies
  • Unit 6 — a full-floor 3-bedroom, 3.5-bath residence of approximately 2,963 square feet, with two 70-square-foot balconies and a 94-square-foot terrace
  • Unit PH — 2 bedrooms, 2.5 baths, approximately 2,593 square feet, with terraces of 366 and 291 square feet and a 1,983-square-foot roof area
  • Two parking space units, each with a stated allocation of 324 square feet and 153 square feet of actual vehicle space

One naming note that trips up buyers pulling records: the offering plan designates the paired residences on floors 2 through 5 as the A and B lines. The recorded deeds and unit-lot schedule use N and S — 2N, 2S, 3N, 3S and so on. They are the same apartments.

Two disclosures in the plan deserve emphasis, because they are the kind of thing that surfaces late in diligence when it should surface early.

Lot-line windows. The plan identifies specific windows as lot-line windows that could be permanently sealed if a new building rises within sixty feet on the adjacent parcel: one north-facing second-bedroom window in each of the A-line residences on floors 2 through 5; one south-facing second-bedroom window in each B-line residence on those floors; two windows in Unit 6 (master bathroom facing north, third bedroom facing south); and four in the penthouse — two in the master bedroom and one in the kitchen facing north, one in the second bedroom facing south. The plan further provides that the cost of any required sealing may fall on the affected unit owner rather than on the condominium. Any buyer in these lines should have counsel look at the neighboring lots' development capacity.

Stated square footage. Schedule A's figures are measured from the exterior face of the exterior walls and include a pro rata allocation of common hallway space — 123.5 square feet for each residence on floors 2 through 5, 75.4 for Unit 6, 269 for the penthouse. The plan states expressly that this allocated area is not inside the apartment and that the usable volume is meaningfully less than the stated dimension. Underwrite from the floor plan, not from the headline number.

Building operations

The amenity program is scaled to eleven residences: an attended lobby, a fitness room, bicycle storage, and a recreation room in the cellar available to all residents. Washers and dryers are in-unit. Electricity and gas are separately metered to each residence and are not carried in common charges.

The building is fully sprinklered with an automatic smoke, heat and carbon monoxide detection system and a standpipe, all filed and signed off in conjunction with the new-building application. It received its final certificate of occupancy in October 2018 and has operated under it since.

One item from the plan belongs in front of every buyer: the sponsor established no reserve fund separate from the working capital fund, and the plan states in terms that in the absence of a reserve, significant repairs or replacements are likely to be funded through increased common charges or special assessments. That was a 2014-era disclosure about a then-new building; eight years into occupancy the relevant question is what reserve the board has since built. Ask for the most recent financial statements and the reserve balance before contract.

Policy framework

This is a straightforward condominium and it behaves like one. Purchase by an LLC or trust, purchase as a pied-à-terre, purchase by a foreign buyer, and subletting are all permitted without a board approval process. What governs instead is a right of first refusal: a unit owner intending to sell or lease must give the board written notice with a fully executed contract or lease, and the board has twenty days to elect to take the deal on the same terms. If it declines or is silent, the owner has thirty days to close. Transfers by gift, will or intestacy, and transfers by or to a mortgagee, are exempt.

The sponsor's original control provisions ran until the later of 50 percent of common interests conveyed or the fifth anniversary of the first closing. The first closing was in July 2018, and all eleven residences and both parking units have long since conveyed to unrelated owners, so the initial control period has run.

Pet rules, alteration procedure and any resale capital contribution are not in the plan sections on file. Confirm all three with the managing agent.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$2,543/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $19

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The building trades as large-format Lower East Side new construction rather than as boutique-scale inventory, and it prices on square footage, outdoor space and the park outlook. The full-floor and penthouse residences carry the building's premium, with the penthouse's roof area and Unit 1's rear yard functioning as separate value components rather than as amenities. The half-floor residences on floors 2 through 5 are the volume product and set the building's per-foot reference. Against the Chrystie Street and Bowery condominiums a block west, 204 Forsyth trades on space and permanence of carry rather than on amenity depth. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Apr 28, 20233S
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,542 sf
$2,400,000$1,556/sf-12.7%
Jun 3, 20223N
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,549 sf
$2,722,500$1,758/sf-6.1%
Oct 25, 20212N
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,418 sf
$2,250,000$1,587/sf-10.0%
May 28, 2019PH
2 BR · 2.5 BA · 2,593 sf
$7,600,000$2,931/sf-4.9%
Mar 12, 2019
1 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,843 sf
$6,000,000$2,110/sf-13.0%
Aug 16, 20184NSponsor Sale
2 BR · 1,418 sf
$3,360,225$2,370/sfoff-mkt
Jul 16, 2018MAISSponsor Sale
3 BR · 2,758 sf
$4,033,500$1,462/sf-10.3%
Jul 13, 20181Sponsor Sale
2,758 sf
$4,107,111$1,489/sfoff-mkt

Market read. Most recent trades (2023) cleared a median $1,556/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 5.7% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

PH · 2,593 sf+2%
$7,475,000 ($3,024/sf) 2017$7,600,000 ($2,931/sf) 2019
3N · 1,549 sf-4%
$2,850,000 ($1,840/sf) 2018$2,722,500 ($1,758/sf) 2022
3S · 1,542 sf-16%
$2,850,000 ($1,848/sf) 2018$2,400,000 ($1,556/sf) 2023
View all 18 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00422-7503) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

Model the tax line honestly, then use it. No abatement means the monthly number you see is the number for good. Against abated Lower East Side inventory this looks expensive on day one and better every year after. Run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator side by side with any abated comparable before deciding which is actually cheaper over your hold period.

Check the lot line before you fall in love with a bedroom. The plan names the windows. Have your attorney check the development capacity of the adjacent lots, and understand that sealing costs may fall on you rather than on the building.

Ask for the reserve. The sponsor funded no separate reserve fund. Eight years of operation should have produced one; the financial statements will say.

Price the outliers separately. Two deeded parking space units are a scarce Lower East Side asset with their own resale market, and Unit 1 — with a 1,075-square-foot rear yard and 538 square feet of cellar areaways — is not a comparable for the floor-through residences above it.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with size and outlook. Eleven residences in 19,000 square feet is the differentiator against every four-and-five-units-per-floor building nearby. Say the number.

Turn the tax posture into an argument. No abatement, no step-ups, no expiry. In a neighborhood full of buildings whose taxes are climbing, that is a selling point rather than a defect — but only if you make it explicitly.

Get ahead of the lot-line disclosure, and document the reserve. The windows are in the offering plan and a buyer's attorney will find them; arriving there first costs nothing. A well-capitalized eleven-unit condominium is easy to underwrite, an opaque one is not — provide the statements.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 204 Forsyth Street, also evaluate:

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at 204 Forsyth Street?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 204 Forsyth Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.