
- Year built
- 2007
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 18
- Floors
- 11
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; not in a historic district
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission and City Planning records, updated February 2026
- Leasing by owners
- Permitted with conditions
- Pets
- Pets permitted; species and limits not stated
- Doorman
- Full-time doorman
Every recorded sale at this building, 2011–2026
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf, 2026 to date
- $1,745
- floor-adjusted, 1 sale
- Listing discount
- 4.2%
- Recorded sales
- 40
- On record
- 2011–2026
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 245 Tenth Avenue would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
This is one of the buildings that established what West Chelsea would look like. It was filed in April 2006, ten months after the Special West Chelsea District rezoned the neighborhood around a derelict elevated rail viaduct that had not yet been converted to a park, and it was designed by Della Valle Bernheimer as an argument rather than a product: a corner block of stainless steel, its panels randomly stamped in a diamond pattern, its windows placed without a grid, massed as two perpendicular rectangles that shift against each other near the base. On a street of masonry warehouses and glass gallery boxes, it does not look like anything else.
The building's second structural argument is density. Eighteen residences across eleven floors means two homes per floor through most of the stack — half-floor and full-floor plates with exposed concrete, ebonized oak, ceilings near nine feet eight inches, and two penthouses with wood-burning fireplaces and private terraces. The second floor is given over to a residents' lounge and terrace that functions as a private pocket park at the level of the High Line itself, which is a more valuable amenity in this location than any gym. The ground floor is two commercial condominium units in gallery use. The building is, in miniature, the West Chelsea proposition: art at the base, park at the second floor, eighteen apartments above.
Its history is less tidy than its facade, and buyers should know it. The offering plan was dated December 8, 2006, at the top of the cycle. The building completed into 2009 and the plan's Seventh Amendment, filed in July 2009, is captioned post-closing. Then the market broke. The Eighth Amendment, in March 2011, disclosed a forbearance agreement with the project's lender; the sellout resumed and the great majority of the residential units closed to individual buyers between October 2011 and 2013. By December 2012 the sponsor held one unsold unit, was current on its obligations to the condominium, and did not control the board. The condominium has operated independently and traded normally ever since, with a steady record of resales through 2026. The distress was the sponsor's and it is long resolved — but it is the reason the recorded sales history begins two years after the building opened, and anyone reading the ACRIS record without that context will misread it.
The third thing worth knowing is the tax posture, and it is the one that changes the monthly number. The residences carried a ten-year 421-a exemption — Department of Finance exemption code 5110, the ten-year, no-cap variant — that first appeared on the 2011/12 assessment roll and stepped down across the rolls that followed. No exemption remains on any lot in this building in the current assessment data. The benefit has burned off. Underwrite full unabated taxes.
Architecture and unit composition
The lot is a corner parcel of 6,332 square feet, roughly forty feet on Tenth Avenue by one hundred feet on West 24th Street, and the massing works that geometry hard: two perpendicular volumes sharing an edge, with a slight outward bulge near the base. Because it is a corner, the residences get two exposures where an interior West Chelsea lot would give one — and because the High Line runs directly past the Tenth Avenue frontage, the lower and middle floors look onto a public park rather than a street wall. Note also that the building did not use its envelope: residential FAR in this C6-3 district is 7.52 and the building was constructed at 6.44.
The facade is the building's signature and its maintenance question. Randomly stamped stainless-steel panels with irregular window placement is a rain-screen assembly, not masonry; it does not weather like brick and it is not repaired like brick. Ask for the facade's inspection and repair history and the current Local Law 11 cycle status, and read them against the reserve.
Residences run half-floor and full-floor. Recorded unit designations pair a floor number with an east or west orientation — the east line looks over Tenth Avenue and the High Line, the west line into the block — with two penthouses at the top carrying wood-burning fireplaces, additional ceiling height and private outdoor space. Interior specification per architectural and market records includes exposed concrete structure and columns, ebonized oak flooring, Sub-Zero and Thermador appliances, RIFRA cabinetry and fixtures, and radiant-heated stone bathroom floors. Because the sellout ran across four years and the resale market has been active for more than a decade, renovation condition varies widely by apartment; the building average tells you very little about any particular unit.
Building operations
A small full-service condominium with an institutional managing agent. The audited financial statements on file in The Roebling Research Library cover the building's earlier operating years and establish the shape of its finances: an eighteen-residence budget carrying a corner building with a stainless-steel rain-screen facade, an elevator, a second-floor amenity terrace, and a commercial component at the base. Each purchaser contributed two months' common charges to the working capital fund at closing, per the offering plan.
Two structural items to underwrite. First, the commercial units are a material share of the building and the declaration's common-interest schedule governs how expenses and capital costs are allocated between the residential and commercial components — read it against the current budget. Second, the building is now approaching twenty years old, which is when facade sealants, roofing and building systems begin to come due. Request the current budget, the reserve balance, the assessment history and the Local Law 11 status; the statements we hold are historical and will not answer the 2026 questions.
Development rights and the High Line
The Special West Chelsea District, adopted in 2005, created a transfer mechanism that let owners along the viaduct sell development rights into designated receiving sites — the machinery that paid for much of the park's construction and reshaped the neighborhood's skyline. Because 245 Tenth Avenue sits directly on the corridor, the question of what the site did with its development rights is a fair one, and the recorded answer is specific.
ACRIS shows three declarations of development rights recorded against the site's base tax lot in January 2005 and a fourth in December 2005, together with a zoning instrument filed in April 2005 and the two deeds — January 2005 and January 2006 — that assembled the parcel. The development rights were declared and the zoning lot established during the same period the rezoning was moving through approval. Separately, the air-rights instruments recorded on this tax block under the Special West Chelsea District's transfer machinery are recorded against other lots on the block, not against this one, and we located no High Line transfer-corridor purchase and no recorded park easement attributable to this lot. A buyer's attorney should read the 2005 development-rights declarations and the zoning lot documents directly rather than relying on this summary; they govern what can and cannot be built on the shared zoning lot.
Policy framework
Ownership form: Condominium. Transfers close through the board's right of first refusal rather than a cooperative approval, and recorded deeds include purchases in trust and in entity name. Pied-à-terre, LLC, trust and foreign ownership all sit inside the standard framework.
Pets: Up to two animals per residential unit under the rules and regulations annexed to the offering plan, with the board authorized to set type, size and weight limits. Animals must be carried or leashed in common areas.
Subletting: Permitted subject to the by-laws' consent and minimum-term provisions. The house rules allow guests to occupy a unit for up to thirty days without triggering those provisions, on notice to the managing agent, and the board reserves the right to impose further restrictions on short-term occupancy. No transient, hotel or motel use.
Alterations and decorating: Both are governed by written agreements with the board, with refundable security deposits — documented on file at $5,000 for alterations and a lower figure for decorating work. Confirm current amounts and lead times before budgeting a renovation.
Storage: Storage units are appurtenant to residences and transfer automatically with the unit.
Flip tax: No resale capital contribution appears in the records reviewed. Confirm with the managing agent before pricing a sale.
Real estate taxes: No exemption remains. The ten-year 421-a that ran from the start of the sellout has expired, and residences are fully taxable. Model the current bill for the specific unit rather than a projected schedule.
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Leasing by owners
- Permitted with conditionsBoard approvalSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Pets and in-unit washer/dryer
- Pets
- Pets permitted; species and limits not statedLimits statedSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- In-unit washer/dryer
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- Full-time doormanSource: recent listing records
- Concierge
- YesSource: recent listing records
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
- Amenities noted
- StorageSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $4,848/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $22
- Modeled exposure split equally across 18 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; condominium owners are typically charged by each unit's common-interest percentage.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
421-a Tax Abatement
- Last year of benefit
- FY2021
- Fully taxed from
- FY2022 (2021–22)
- Program
- 421-a (10-year)
The 421-a benefit has run its term. Taxes on these units have stepped up toward the full assessed amount, so the low carrying cost this building once carried is no longer available. Price from the current tax bill, and treat any comparable sale made while the abatement was still running as a different asset.
Source: NYC Dept. of Finance property-tax exemption records (421-a), refreshed 2026-09-06 · The Roebling Research Library. Confirm the exact step-up schedule on the building’s DOF tax bill. Years shown are NYC tax years, which start July 1 — FY2022 runs July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022. The benefit last appears on the 2021 assessment roll, which is what dates the end of the term.
The 421-a Expiration Wave — our study of when these benefits expire citywide, and what the resale record shows about pricing as they do.
Recent sales
Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | 9 | 2,149 sf | $3,700,000 | $1,722/sf | off-mkt |
| Apr 23, 2026 | 5W | 3 BR · 3 BA · 2,400 sf | $3,700,000 | $1,542/sf | -4.5% |
| Jul 1, 2025 | 9W | 3 BR · 3 BA · 2,243 sf | $4,975,000 | $2,218/sf | off-mkt |
| Apr 27, 2023 | 4E | 1 BR · 2 BA · 1,496 sf | $2,225,000 | $1,487/sf | -5.3% |
| Mar 25, 2022 | 6W | 3 BR · 3 BA · 2,469 sf | $3,950,000 | $1,600/sf | +0.0% |
| Jun 10, 2021 | PHE | 3 BR · 2.5 BA · 3,023 sf | $6,000,000 | $1,985/sf | -33.3% |
| Oct 1, 2019 | 5E | 1 BR · 2 BA · 1,499 sf | $2,275,000 | $1,518/sf | -7.1% |
| Aug 7, 2019 | 2E | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,489 sf | $1,990,000 | $1,336/sf | -7.4% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2026 to date) cleared a median $1,745/sf (floor-adjusted) across 1 sale. Floor-adjusted means each sale is restated to a constant mix of floors, so the figure can differ from the plain median of the sales listed above. Median listing discount 4.2% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00696-7502). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 245 Tenth Avenue and nearby.
At the recent median sale of $3.7M (3 sales since 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $154,439 to close, or 4.2% of the price.
- Mansion tax: $55,500
- Mortgage recording tax: $53,419
- Title insurance: $16,650
- Attorneys, lender, building fees, reserves and filings: $28,870
Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.
Keep up with 245 Tenth Avenue and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 245 Tenth Avenue. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
The abatement is gone. Residences carried a ten-year 421-a that has fully expired. If you are comparing this building against abated West Chelsea inventory, you are comparing two different monthly numbers. Run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator with the actual current bill.
Read the sellout history before you read the comps. The recorded sales record starts in late 2011 for a building that completed in 2009, because the sponsor went through a lender forbearance in the interim. That gap is a financing story, not a building-quality story, and any analysis treating the 2011–2013 closings as the building's delivery will misdate it.
Underwrite the facade. A stamped stainless-steel rain screen on a twenty-year-old corner building is not a masonry maintenance problem. Ask for the inspection history, the repair record, the current Local Law 11 cycle and the reserve balance, in that order — and remember that elevator, roof, facade, terrace and systems costs all divide across eighteen apartments.
Read the commercial allocation. Two ground-floor commercial units are a meaningful share of the building. Have your attorney read the declaration's common-interest schedule against the current budget to understand what residential owners actually carry, and read the 2005 development-rights declarations that govern the zoning lot.
Test the High Line exposure at the right hour. Direct park adjacency is the building's best feature and its most specific liability: the viaduct is heavily trafficked, and sightlines into lower- and middle-floor east-facing rooms are real. Walk the park past the building before committing to a line.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the architecture and the corner. Della Valle Bernheimer's stamped-steel elevation is one of the few genuinely recognizable buildings on the corridor, and two-per-floor corner plates with High Line frontage are not reproducible.
Get ahead of the tax number. A buyer will find the expired abatement. Presenting the current bill up front, alongside the carrying-cost analysis, is worth more than any amount of positioning.
Document the capital record and price line by line. Facade, roof, elevator and assessment history are the questions serious counsel will ask of a twenty-year-old boutique building; we provide the documents we hold in the Research Library to buyers' counsel during diligence. And because east and west lines, half-floors and penthouses vary widely in condition, comparable selection within the building matters more here than the building average.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 245 Tenth Avenue, also evaluate:
- 500 West 25th Street (The Emerson) — eight-residence condominium on the same tax block and the same park frontage; a separate condominium and the closest direct comparison
- 231 Tenth Avenue (Vesta 24) — 2004 boutique condominium one block south with a wood-wrapped facade and a common patio over the park; the nearest peer by scale and vintage
- 503 West 24th Street (The Getty Residences) — Peter Marino's five full-floor residences above gallery and foundation space; the trophy tier on the same street
- 508 West 24th Street — boutique condominium on the same block front west; a design-led alternative at a different scale
- 514 West 24th Street (The Fitzroy) — new-construction boutique condominium on the same street; the later-vintage alternative
- 200 Eleventh Avenue (The Sky Garage) — the corridor's other single-idea building; comparable unit count, entirely different amenity thesis
- 100 Eleventh Avenue — Jean Nouvel's curtain-wall condominium two blocks west; the design-forward alternative at higher density
- 520 West 19th Street — High Line-adjacent condominium to the south; similar park exposure, different plan type
- 555 West 23rd Street — large full-amenity West Chelsea condominium; the high-service alternative for buyers weighing amenities against floor size
- 420 West 25th Street — smaller Chelsea condominium a block north; the value comparison off the park
More Chelsea buildings
- 240 West 23rd Street (The Arcadia) — 1899 co-op
- 241 West 19th Street — condominium
- 245 Seventh Avenue — 1911 condominium
- 245 West 14th Street (Village Green West) — 2013 condominium by Kutnicki Bernstein Architects
- 246 West 16th Street (The Grid) — 1920 condominium
- 246 West 17th Street — condominium
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Chelsea — read The Roebling Team Guide to Chelsea.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at 245 Tenth Avenue?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com