Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Condominium · 2009
The Argyle
251 7th Street, Brooklyn, NY 11215
Buildings·Condominium

251 7th Street (The Argyle)

251 7th Street, Brooklyn, NY 11215

BBL 3009927501 · BIN 3021564

At a glance
Year built
2009
Type
Condominium
Units
60
Floors
12
Landmark
No
Pets
One dog of 40 pounds or less, plus cats, caged birds and fish, with the written consent of the board or managing agent; no more than two pets per unit without board consent, per Schedule A of the offering plan on file and a 2012 board memorandum
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2009–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,220
Listing discount
0.0%
Recorded sales
120
On record
2009–2026

Fourth Avenue was rezoned in 2003, and The Argyle is what the first cycle produced at its northern end: a twelve-story, sixty-unit condominium on a corner lot, permitted in 2007, finished into the worst sales market in a generation, and closing its first units in May 2009. The building has been trading ever since. ACRIS records roughly 152 deeds across its ninety unit lots between that first closing and mid-2026, which makes this the most-traded address in Gowanus — not because it is the best building on the corridor, but because it is a large, liquid, conventionally financeable condominium in a neighborhood whose other for-sale stock is either brand new, tiny, or both.

The unit count is the first thing to get right, because the public record makes it look bigger than it is. Sixty residential units, one of them the resident manager's apartment. Thirty parking units. City records aggregate those into eighty-nine, and secondary sources have variously published fifty-nine, sixty, eighty-nine and ninety. The audited financial statements settle it. The practical consequence is that a buyer comparing common charges or assessment burden against a "ninety-unit building" is dividing by the wrong number: capital costs here are spread across sixty apartments, not ninety.

The second thing is the tax line, and it is the most consequential fact on this page right now. The building carried a fifteen-year 421-a exemption that began in fiscal 2011/12; city exemption records show no 421-a against the residential unit lots for fiscal 2026/27. That means the abatement that shaped every carrying-cost calculation at this address for fifteen years has just come off. The monthly number a buyer sees today is not the number a 2019 buyer underwrote, and it is not the number an abated Fourth Avenue competitor shows. Model the full carrying cost on the actual bill.

The third is the envelope. Between 2014 and 2017 the condominium levied three special assessments totalling $1,000,141, and in March 2016 it borrowed $150,000 at 6.99 percent over an eighty-six-month term to complete a façade repair and window replacement program. The financial statements on file show engineering services, façade repair and waterproofing, window replacement, electrical and HVAC upgrades and an elevator upgrade running through 2018 and 2019. A building that needs a full window replacement inside its first decade is telling you something about its original construction, and it is the right subject for a buyer's engineer.

Architecture and unit composition

The building occupies a 13,000-square-foot corner lot with a hundred-foot building frontage and rises twelve stories to 120 feet — 55,536 square feet built, of which 51,012 is residential and 4,524 is the ground-level garage. The massing steps back above the eighth floor: the second through fourth floors carry eight or nine apartments each, the fifth through eighth carry four to six, and the top three floors carry three, which is where the balconies and the largest private terraces are.

Residential lines run 1A on the ground floor, then A through J on the lower floors tapering to A through C at the top. The ninth floor is now three apartments rather than four — units 9A and 9D have been combined into a single tax lot. Interior specification, per listing and development records, runs to wide-plank maple flooring, ceiling heights up to roughly nine feet two inches, quartzite counters, bamboo cabinetry, stainless appliances and in-unit laundry. Deep bay windows and balconies alternate across the two street elevations, which is the building's one real architectural gesture and also the main driver of value between otherwise similar apartments.

Exposure behaves the way it behaves everywhere on this corridor: Fourth Avenue is 120 feet wide and carries truck traffic, so avenue-facing rooms take the light and the noise and rear rooms take neither. Confirm which rooms face the avenue, how the private outdoor space is oriented, and whether a deeded parking unit conveys — thirty exist, they are separate tax lots, and the house rules restrict them to vehicles of resident owners and their permitted lessees.

Building operations

The Argyle runs a light staffing model: a live-in resident manager rather than a doorman, with a twenty-four-hour virtual doorman system, an attended package room and cold storage for deliveries. Payroll and the intercom and security system are the two largest recurring line items after utilities in the statements on file, which is consistent with that model and keeps common charges below a full-service peer.

Capital posture deserves attention. At the most recent year-end on file the association held cash in the mid-five figures above $580,000, with roughly $466,000 of that in the reserve account, against sixty apartments. It ran operating deficits in both of the two years covered, with common charges held flat while expenses rose. The statements also disclose, in the standard language, that the governing documents do not require reserve accumulation, that no reserve study has been performed and that no funding plan for future major repairs exists. Read alongside the $1,000,141 of assessments levied between 2014 and 2017 and the façade loan taken in 2016, that is a building that has historically funded capital work by assessment rather than by reserve. Ask for the last three years of statements, the current reserve balance, the assessment history since 2020, and the status of the 2016 loan, which amortized to a final payment in 2023.

The association itself owns Unit 1A, acquired from the developer in August 2012 to house the resident manager, and two parking units acquired in February 2013. The building exceeds 25,000 square feet of floor area, which places it inside the city's building-emissions and energy-benchmarking regimes; ask the managing agent to state the Local Law 97 position in writing.

Policy framework

Purchaser review: Standard condominium right of first refusal — a waiver application rather than a board interview. All common charges must be current before the waiver is considered.

Leasing: Permitted, subject to the board's right of first refusal, with a $500 fee on each lease and each renewal. The sales application acknowledgment also requires prior written board consent to lease the unit or to permit non-family members to reside in it; confirm the current practice with the managing agent before underwriting an investment purchase.

Pied-à-terre and part-time use: Contemplated — the sales application asks purchasers how many days per month they will use the unit.

LLC, trust and foreign purchasers: Permitted under the standard condominium framework, subject to the right of first refusal.

Financing: No board-imposed ceiling applies in a condominium.

Pets: One dog of 40 pounds or less, plus cats, caged birds and fish, with written board or managing-agent consent; two pets maximum without further consent.

House rules of note: Eighty percent of each room's floor area must be carpeted; terraces may not be enclosed, painted or planted beyond a hundred-pound total; no barbecuing except in designated areas; air-conditioning installations require board approval; storage lockers are for normal household items only.

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

421-a Tax Abatement

421-a exemption · benefit ended 2026
Abatement ended
Abatement ended 2026
Benefit ended
2026
Fully taxed since
2026
Program
421-a (15-year)
What this means for you

The 421-a benefit has run its term. Taxes on these units have stepped up toward the full assessed amount, so the low carrying cost this building once carried is no longer available. Price from the current tax bill, and treat any comparable sale made while the abatement was still running as a different asset.

Source: NYC Dept. of Finance property-tax exemption records (421-a), refreshed 2026-09-06 · The Roebling Research Library. Confirm the exact step-up schedule on the building’s DOF tax bill. The benefit last appears on the 2025 assessment roll, which is what dates the end of the term.

Recent sales

The Argyle is the highest-volume address in Gowanus, and that volume is its most useful pricing asset. Sponsor closings ran from May 2009 through the sellout in 2011 into a distressed market, and the building has traded steadily since — a handful of resales most years, with a visible spike in 2020 and 2021. Because this is a condominium with documented offering-plan square footage, dollars per square foot is a real metric here rather than a derived one, which distinguishes it from most of the co-op stock it competes with in the wider borough.

Pricing turns on floor and exposure first, then on private outdoor space, then on whether a deeded parking unit is included — parking trades separately here, and a combined apartment-plus-parking sale is not comparable to an apartment-only sale at the same address. The honest comparison against other Fourth Avenue and Gowanus inventory is now a full carrying-cost comparison rather than a price comparison, because the 421-a benefit has run out at this address and several competitors still carry one. Market statements are indexed to the last complete year. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Aug 18, 20264B
1 BR · 1 BA · 641 sf
$800,000$1,248/sf+10.3%
Jul 31, 20268D
3 BR · 2 BA · 1,239 sf
$1,675,000$1,352/sf+0.0%
May 21, 20266C
1 BR · 1 BA · 695 sf
$725,000$1,043/sfoff-mkt
Feb 5, 20267B
1 BR · 646 sf
$735,000$1,138/sf+0.0%
Dec 9, 202510C
1 BR · 1 BA · 658 sf
$765,000$1,163/sf+2.0%
Dec 4, 20256A
1 BR · 1 BA · 657 sf
$850,000$1,294/sf+0.0%
Jul 21, 20255F
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,129 sf
$1,400,000$1,240/sf+0.7%
Jan 30, 20257E
1 BR · 1 BA · 650 sf
$710,000$1,092/sf-9.6%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,220/sf across 4 sales. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

4H · 1,042 sf+113%
$656,822 ($630/sf) 2009$1,075,000 ($1,032/sf) 2019$1,400,000 ($1,344/sf) 2022
3F · 646 sf+105%
$385,000 ($596/sf) 2010$789,000 ($1,221/sf) 2023
5B · 1,053 sf+91%
$711,756 ($676/sf) 2009$712,500 ($677/sf) 2012$1,250,000 ($1,187/sf) 2017$1,360,000 ($1,292/sf) 2023
5F · 1,129 sf+88%
$745,000 ($660/sf) 2011$1,300,000 ($1,151/sf) 2016$1,400,000 ($1,240/sf) 2025
3G · 976 sf+79%
$681,209 ($698/sf) 2009$1,220,000 ($1,250/sf) 2017
View all 120 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-00992-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

Underwrite the taxes on the current bill, not on a comparable. The 421-a benefit is gone. Run True Monthly Carrying Cost on the specific unit and then run the same exercise on any abated alternative you are considering.

Read the capital history before the offering plan. Three assessments totalling just over $1 million between 2014 and 2017, a façade loan in 2016, and a full window replacement program are the substance of this building's first fifteen years. Ask what remains, what is planned, and what the current reserve is against sixty apartments.

Confirm what conveys. Parking is a separate condominium unit. So is storage in some cases. Do not assume either follows the apartment.

The flood position is a genuine positive here. The lot is outside the mapped special flood hazard area, which is not true of the canal-adjacent blocks two avenues west. Say so, and document it.

What to know if you’re selling

Get ahead of the tax question. A buyer comparing your monthly to an abated building will see a higher number without understanding why. Present the full carrying cost, and present the fact that there is no phase-out ahead — an unabated line is a known quantity.

Lead with liquidity and with the roof. This is the most-traded address in the neighborhood, with a landscaped roof deck, parking, storage, in-unit laundry and a virtual doorman at a common charge no full-service building can match.

Assemble the capital record in advance — statements, assessment history, reserve balance, façade and window documentation, Local Law 97 position. A prepared answer on the 2014–2017 assessments is worth more than a deflected one.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering The Argyle, also evaluate:

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at The Argyle?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Argyle would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.