Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomFifth Ave $501K/roomBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfHell's Kitchen $1,328/sf ▴0%
Full index →
Condominium · 2004
The Sedona
270 West 19th Street, New York, NY 10011
Buildings·Chelsea·Condominium

270 West 19th Street (The Sedona)

270 West 19th Street, New York, NY 10011

Chelsea

BBL 1007687504 · BIN 1013887

CorridorChelsea
At a glance
Year built
2004
Type
Condominium
Units
14
Floors
7
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; not in a historic district
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission and City Planning records, updated February 2026
Leasing by owners
Permitted with conditions
Pets
Pets permitted with conditions; species not stated
Washer/dryer
Permitted
Doorman
No doorman

The Sedona sales history: 27 recorded sales

Own an apartment at The Sedona?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2005–2024

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf, 2022
$2,076
floor-adjusted, 1 sale
Listing discount
-0.9%
Recorded sales
27
On record
2005–2024
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Sedona would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As cited in The Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

West 19th Street between Seventh and Eighth is one of the more finely grained blocks in Chelsea — tenements, small prewar apartment houses, a few converted lofts, and a handful of small twenty-first-century infill buildings squeezed onto single lots. The Sedona is one of the infill buildings, and it is worth understanding as a specific product rather than as a generic new condominium: fourteen residences, two per floor, on a 40-foot lot, delivered in 2005–06 with the low-overhead operating model that a building of that size can actually sustain.

Its origin story is a useful piece of Chelsea history in miniature. In November 2001 the prior owner filed to add three stories to the vacant three-story commercial building on the site and convert the upper floors into ten apartments — the classic early-2000s vertical-enlargement play. That scheme never completed. The property changed hands in January 2003, the enlargement application was formally withdrawn in August 2004, the old building came down under a demolition permit that same year, and a seven-story, fourteen-unit ground-up building went up in its place, signed off in May 2006. Buyers occasionally hear this building described as a loft conversion. It is not. The offering plan is explicit that the site held a vacant commercial building that was cleared, and the DOB record confirms the demolition and the new-building job.

The other structural fact is the tax history. The sponsor applied for a Section 421-a exemption, and the plan's own projections show construction-period benefits in 2003/04 and 2004/05 followed by a full exemption of the assessment increase in 2005/06 and 2006/07. That benefit is gone. There is no exemption of any kind on this parcel today, but absence of an exemption on the assessment roll does not establish bill-level abatements or fixed future taxes. Check the unit bill and model changes in assessments, tax rates, charges and any other benefits.

Architecture and unit composition

The building is seven stories on a 40-foot lot roughly 124 feet deep, with a bulkhead above carrying the elevator machine room, the stair, and two dormers. Fourteen residences on seven floors means two apartments per floor — A and B lines throughout, 1A and 1B at the base with the A residence extending into the cellar, up to 7A and 7B at the top. The top-floor pair carry the private outdoor space: a front roof terrace assigned exclusively to one and a terrace assigned exclusively to 7B. Everyone else shares the common roof terrace, which the offering plan describes as reachable by both the elevator and the stair — a small detail that matters more than it sounds, because roof access by stair only is what makes common terraces go unused.

Every residential unit was delivered with washer and dryer hook-ups, though the sponsor did not supply the machines. The ground floor carries a 665-square-foot commercial unit, a separate condominium unit that was not offered for sale in the original plan and has been held separately from the residences ever since.

Building operations

This is a self-service building by design. There is no doorman. The plan budgets a visiting, part-time, non-union superintendent whose cost is shared across the residential and commercial units in proportion to common interest, and the common areas are a vestibule, a lobby, a package room, one elevator, a cellar storage room and the roof terrace. Two gas-fired boilers serve the whole building, commercial unit included.

Review the actual fixed-expense base and current budget before comparing common charges with Chelsea’s amenitized inventory. The offsetting consequence is that a fourteen-unit denominator absorbs a facade cycle, a boiler replacement or an elevator modernization with far less cushion than a large building. The building passed its twentieth year in 2026, which is roughly when the first significant capital cycle arrives. A sidewalk shed was permitted at the address in 2017. Ask for the current reserve balance, the assessment history, and the Local Law 11 facade cycle status before contract.

Policy framework

Ownership form: Condominium. Transfers close through the Board of Managers' right of first refusal rather than a cooperative-style approval. The offering plan's by-law language is unusually plain about it: a unit may be sold to anyone without restriction or limitation, subject only to the board's right to take the unit at the same price and terms.

Pied-à-terre, subletting, LLC, trust and foreign ownership: The August 2026 management schedule reports leasing subject to an application for board approval and a $1,000 fee per 12-month lease period charged to the unit owner. Reconcile that schedule with the current declaration and house rules, and confirm pied-à-terre and entity permissions separately.

In-unit washer/dryer: Permitted; hook-ups were installed in every residential unit at construction.

Working capital contribution: Two months of common charges at closing under the original plan. Confirm the current resale contribution, and any flip tax, with the managing agent.

Pets and flip tax: August 2026 management schedule reports pets permitted subject to Rule 13 of the house rules; confirm its current terms. The materials reviewed do not establish a current flip tax; request the operative resale fee schedule.

Real estate taxes: The assessment roll shows no remaining exemption. Check the specific unit's tax bill for any abatement.

Application and transaction fees

Fees below are from building management's published schedule, as of August 2026. They are shown as published, item by item; no total is added because the total depends on the transaction. Deposits are listed apart from nonrefundable charges.

Purchase

6 items

Fees and charges

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Application FeePaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $650Refundable Non-refundable
Credit Check FeePer applicantRequiredPaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $150 per adult applicant/occupant. International credit checks may cost more. Please contact the Property Management for information in the name or price of the fee.Refundable Non-refundable
Move In FeePaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $400Refundable Non-refundable
Move Out FeePaid by SellerWhen With the applicationAmount $400Refundable Non-refundable

Deposits

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Move In DepositPaid by BuyerWhen With the applicationAmount $1,000Refundable Refundable
Move Out DepositPaid by SellerWhen With the applicationAmount $1,000Refundable Refundable

Rental or lease

9 items

Fees and charges

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Move Out FeePaid by LandlordWhen With the applicationAmount $400Refundable Non-refundable
Application Processing FeeIncludes one free credit checkPaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $600Refundable Non-refundable
Credit Check FeePer applicantPaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $20 per additional applicant after applicant one (1) and any adult occupant. International credit checks may cost more. Please contact the Property Management for information.Refundable Non-refundable
Move In FeePaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $400Refundable Non-refundable
Sublet FeePaid by LandlordWhen Upon approvalAmount $1,000 per 12-month Lease PeriodRefundable Not stated

Deposits

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Move Out DepositPaid by LandlordWhen With the applicationAmount $1,000Refundable Refundable
Move In DepositPaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $1,000Refundable Refundable
Key DepositPaid by TenantWhen Upon approvalAmount $100Refundable Refundable

Lease renewal

Fees and charges

ItemPaid byWhenAmountRefundable
Application FeePaid by TenantWhen With the applicationAmount $300Refundable Non-refundable

Management updates its schedule without a public filing. The date is when management last updated the page, not when a rule changed. Confirm the current schedule with management before you apply.

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.

Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Sublet and pied-à-terre policy

A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.

Leasing by owners
Permitted with conditionsApplication required for Board approval. Fee: $1,000 per 12-month lease period charged to Unit Owner.Source: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
Pied-à-terre ownership
Not verified

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Pets and in-unit washer/dryer

Pets
Pets permitted with conditions; species not statedPlease see Rule #13 in House Rules document for information.Source: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026
In-unit washer/dryer
PermittedSource: building management's published schedule, as of August 2026

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Building staffing and amenities

Doorman
No doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Package room
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
Amenities noted
Roof deck, storageSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Compliance status
Below the individual-building threshold

This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 limits apply to a building on its own. It is still covered if it shares a tax lot or condominium board with buildings totaling over 50,000 sq ft; confirm on DOB’s covered-buildings list.

See full Local Law 97 analysis →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the inspector (QEWI) identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The reviewed ACRIS records show individual closings to separately named purchasers beginning in November 2005 and running through February 2006, with most recorded in about a hundred days. Names and closing dates alone do not establish purchaser independence or absorption relative to competing inventory. The building has traded steadily since: most residences have changed hands at least once, several twice, and the resale record now runs continuously from 2006 to 2026.

One structural feature of the ownership is worth flagging for diligence. The original developer group retained two residences and the ground-floor commercial unit rather than selling them, and those three units stayed inside the sponsor's family entities until a transfer recorded in 2026 moved them to differently named ownership entities. Those names alone do not establish whether the purchasers were unrelated to the sponsor. A separate residence has been held by an investment entity since the original 2005 closing. Sponsor-affiliated and investor-held units affect owner-occupancy ratios, and owner-occupancy ratios affect condominium warrantability for conventional financing. Any buyer financing a purchase here should have their lender pull a current condominium questionnaire early rather than late.

Pricing at The Sedona is best analyzed per square foot against small Chelsea condominium inventory of similar vintage and service level, and adjusted for the two variables that dominate here: floor, and whether the residence carries private outdoor space. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Mar 2, 2022PHASponsor Sale
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,525 sf
$3,295,000$2,161/sf+0.0%
Feb 8, 20227A
1,525 sf
$3,370,000$2,210/sf—
Dec 13, 20211B
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,370 sf
$2,750,000$2,007/sf+3.8%
Sep 5, 20195B
1 BR · 2 BA · 1,100 sf
$1,850,000$1,682/sf-5.1%
Dec 29, 20173B
2 BR · 1,085 sf
$2,050,000$1,889/sf+0.0%
May 29, 20143B
2 BR · 1,085 sf
$1,825,000$1,682/sf+4.3%
Jul 11, 20121B
1 BR · 1,370 sf
$1,925,000$1,405/sf-3.5%
Oct 14, 20111A
1 BR · 1,375 sf
$1,275,000$927/sf-8.9%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2022): a median $2,076/sf (floor-adjusted) across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2024. Median listing discount -0.9% over ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

7A · 1,525 sf+95%
$1,725,933 ($1,132/sf) 2006 → $3,370,000 ($2,210/sf) 2022
3B · 1,085 sf+87%
$1,094,619 ($1,009/sf) 2005 → $1,300,000 ($1,198/sf) 2006 → $1,825,000 ($1,682/sf) 2014 → $2,050,000 ($1,889/sf) 2017
5B · 1,100 sf+52%
$1,216,808 ($1,106/sf) 2005 → $1,337,500 ($1,216/sf) 2011 → $1,850,000 ($1,682/sf) 2019
4B · 1,085 sf+24%
$1,216,808 ($1,121/sf) 2005 → $1,507,000 ($1,389/sf) 2007
4A · 1,415 sf+8%
$1,451,006 ($1,025/sf) 2005 → $1,570,000 ($1,110/sf) 2011
View all 27 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00768-7504; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at The Sedona and nearby.

Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with The Sedona and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like The Sedona. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

Do not confuse this address with the other 19th Street buildings we cover. 217 West 19th Street sits on Block 769, 139 West 19th on Block 795, and 142 West 19th on Block 794. The Sedona is on Block 768, lot 7504, with its own condominium declaration and its own economics. Comparables drawn across those blocks are not interchangeable.

It is new construction, not a conversion. The prior building on the site was demolished in 2004. Any inspection, insurance or renovation assumption based on prewar loft construction will be wrong.

Underwrite from the current bill. The 421-a benefit has fully expired, so no phase-out step-up remains. Future bills still change with assessments, tax rates and any other benefits; confirm the apartment's current bill.

Pull the condominium questionnaire before you commit. Investor-held and sponsor-affiliated units in a fourteen-unit building move the owner-occupancy percentage quickly. Confirm your lender's threshold and the building's current ratio before waiving your financing contingency.

Fourteen units, one elevator, twenty years old. Ask for the reserve balance, the last three years of budgets, any assessment history, and the current Local Law 11 status. The first big capital cycle is arriving now.

No doorman, part-time superintendent. That is the trade for the common-charge level. If package handling and full-time coverage matter to you, this is the wrong building — and it is easier to resolve at a showing than after closing.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with carrying cost. Compare actual common charges and the current tax bill with larger Chelsea condominiums; the reported expired 421-a exemption does not by itself establish a lower monthly total. Present the total carry, not the price alone, and run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator.

Outdoor space is the building's premium. The private terraces on the top floor and the common roof terrace are the features that separate this building from its infill peers on the block. Photograph and market them properly.

Have the financing package ready. Because the owner-occupancy question is live in a small building, having the current questionnaire, budget and reserve figures assembled at listing helps the lender begin its review.

Price line by line. With two residences per floor and only fourteen in total, a building average is close to meaningless. The A and B lines differ, and the top floor is a different product entirely.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering The Sedona, also evaluate:

  • 210 West 19th Street — 1939 building converted to condominium in 1985, on the same block; the prewar conversion alternative
  • 217 West 19th Street — The Dance Building, a 2002–03 mixed-use new construction across the street on Block 769; the closest peer by vintage
  • 241 West 19th Street — 2006–07 ground-up condominium; the same delivery window nearby on West 19th Street
  • 251 West 19th Street — The Chelsea 19, a 1910 loft converted to condominium in 2002; the loft alternative on the same street
  • 130 West 19th Street — Chelsea House, a 2005 condominium; the larger, serviced new-construction alternative of the same year
  • 121 West 19th Street — 1903 loft converted to condominium in 2005; prewar plates at a similar vintage of conversion
  • 142 West 19th Street — 142Flatiron, 2021 ground-up construction on Block 794; the modern alternative at a higher price tier
  • 139 West 19th Street — 1909 prewar loft cooperative on Block 795; the co-op alternative with different financing and approval rules
  • 140 Seventh Avenue — Chadwin House, a 1962 building converted to condominium, on the same tax block
  • 192 Eighth Avenue — 1910 building substantially rebuilt 2016–2020; the boutique alternative on the avenue

More Chelsea buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Chelsea — read The Roebling Team Guide to Chelsea.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at The Sedona?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com