Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomFifth Ave $501K/roomBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfHell's Kitchen $1,328/sf ▴0%
Full index →
Condominium · 1909
Iron Lofts, per listing and brokerage records
29 West 21st Street, New York, NY 10010
Buildings·Flatiron·Condominium

29 West 21st Street (Iron Lofts)

29 West 21st Street, New York, NY 10010

Flatiron

BBL 1008237508 · BIN 1015529

ArchitectJames E. Ware
CorridorFlatiron
At a glance
Year built
1909
Type
Condominium
Units
6
Floors
7
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; in the Ladies' Mile Historic District
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
Doorman
Requires confirmation

Iron Lofts, per listing and brokerage records sales history: 6 recorded sales

Own an apartment at Iron Lofts, per listing and brokerage records?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2024–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf, 2026 to date
$1,549
1 sale
Listing discount
4.7%
Recorded sales
6
On record
2024–2026
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Iron Lofts, per listing and brokerage records would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As cited in The Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

Six residences is a small building even by Flatiron standards, and the structure behind those six residences is unusual enough to be the reason to read this page carefully.

The building went up in 1909 as a store-and-loft structure to designs by James E. Ware & Sons — the office whose defining New York commission is The Osborne on West 57th Street, and whose work on the side streets of Ladies' Mile is much less known. LPC designation records describe a neo-Renaissance elevation in buff brick with iron, on a lot of roughly twenty-five and a half feet by ninety-nine. It is a narrow, tall, single-loft building: exactly the kind of structure that produces full-floor residences when it is converted, because there is no room to do anything else.

The conversion itself came in two distinct steps separated by fifteen years, and the gap matters. In November 2007 the sponsor filed for interior demolition; in May 2008 it filed the Alteration Type 1 application to convert the building to residential use, with a full sprinkler replacement and a new boiler following in 2008 and 2009. But the building was not subdivided into condominium units then. It remained a single tax lot — carried by the Department of Finance as a converted elevator apartment building — until August 2022, when the sponsor filed with DOB to create the condominium lots. The declaration is dated April 2023 and was recorded in March 2024, and the first individual closings followed in April 2024.

That sequence explains what a buyer sees in the public record: a building that has been residential since 2009 but whose condominium is barely two years old. All six residential units have now transferred to separate buyers, in closings recorded between April 2024 and March 2026, with the seventh unit lot transferring separately in early 2025. The sellout is complete, and there is no remaining sponsor inventory.

The second structural fact is the landmark status, and it is the one most often missed here. The lot is inside the Ladies' Mile Historic District, designated in 1989 — but PLUTO's historic-district field for this tax lot is empty. The LPC building database keys the district to this exact BBL, and the designated address is recorded as 29 West 21st Street. Any diligence built on PLUTO's landmark field alone will conclude, incorrectly, that this building is unregulated.

Architecture and unit composition

The building is seven stories on a lot of about 2,500 square feet, carrying roughly 13,700 square feet of residential area. That produces one residence per floor through the residential stack — full-floor lofts, with duplex configurations at the top of the building — plus a small commercial component at the base, where DOB filings record restaurant use through the early and mid-2000s.

Because the lot is an interior mid-block site with buildings on both flanks, light comes from the front and rear elevations only. Ceiling heights and window openings are those of a 1909 loft, which is the reason full-floor plates in a building of this width read as generously as they do. The residences carry key-locked elevator access, so each floor opens directly into a single home; there is no public corridor above the ground floor.

One zoning note that is easy to misread: the lot sits in a C6-4A district with a residential floor-area ratio well above what the building actually uses. The building is materially under-built relative to what the zoning would permit. It is also inside a historic district, so any proposal must address LPC review alongside zoning, other permits and property rights. The district designation alone does not establish that unused floor area is impossible to develop.

Building operations

There is no doorman and no staffed lobby. Listing records describe virtual entry service with remote monitoring; this does not establish in-person staff coverage or a staffing budget. Deliveries and access control run through that system.

With six residential units and a commercial component, capital costs for the façade, roof, elevator and boiler follow the declaration’s common-interest allocations; do not assume an equal six-way division or omit the commercial interest. The mechanical systems are relatively young: the sprinkler system was replaced in full in 2008 and the boiler in 2009, and remedial facade repairs were carried out in 2008 and 2009 under a sidewalk shed and pipe scaffold. Even so, a buyer should read the current budget and reserve position, ask about the most recent Local Law 11 filing cycle, and understand that facade work in the Ladies' Mile Historic District carries an LPC review step that adds both time and cost.

Policy framework

Ownership form: Condominium, with no cooperative board approval; confirm the right of first refusal on sale and lease in the declaration and bylaws.

Pets, subletting, pied-à-terre use and financing: Not documented. No offering plan for this building was located in either library, the by-laws are recorded with the declaration, and the house rules are not in the public record. Because the condominium is new, its house rules may still be evolving; confirm each item with the managing agent at offer stage.

Landmark constraint: The lot is inside the Ladies' Mile Historic District. Window replacement, storefront work, rooftop equipment and additions can require LPC review. Some proposals qualify for staff permits and others require a Certificate of Appropriateness; ordinary maintenance can be exempt, while interior work requiring a DOB permit also requires LPC review.

Real estate taxes: The assessment roll shows no exemption; check the unit's bill for any abatement. Because the condominium unit lots were created in 2022 and 2023, their assessment history is short; underwrite from the current bill on the specific unit rather than from a projection.

Monthly carrying charges in recent sales

Common charges + taxes, per room
$1,000 per room a monthMedian of 6 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026
Common charges + taxes, per square foot
$2.45 per square foot a monthMedian of 6 recorded sales since October 2023Source: recorded sales, refreshed October 2026

Common charges plus real estate taxes, combined into one monthly figure the way New York condominium listings show them. Add a mortgage payment for the monthly outlay. A summary of recorded sales, not a current bill; charges change.

Building staffing and amenities

Doorman
Requires confirmationSources differ. Confirm with building management.
Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Compliance status
Below the individual-building threshold

This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 limits apply to a building on its own. It is still covered if it shares a tax lot or condominium board with buildings totaling over 50,000 sq ft; confirm on DOB’s covered-buildings list.

See full Local Law 97 analysis →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. A filed Safe grade is not a guarantee of current condition: owners still maintain the facade and, where required, observe parapets each year. Future inspection timing (Local Law 49 of 2025 changed the cycle framework from October 1, 2026), repair and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
Assessed · 2015–20 to 2020–25
$17,000 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2015–20 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Iron Lofts prices as boutique Flatiron loft product — full-floor and duplex residences valued per square foot, with the premium concentrated in the upper floors and the duplex configuration at the top of the stack. The comparable set is the small conversions on the Flatiron side streets between Fifth and Sixth Avenues, not the larger amenitized condominiums on Fifth Avenue and Park Avenue South, whose operating economics and buyer pools are different.

Two things shape underwriting here. The first is the six-unit denominator: buyers should look at the budget and reserves rather than at the monthly common charge in isolation. The second is that the building has essentially no resale history — every residence was a first sale between 2024 and 2026 — so pricing depends on line-specific and floor-specific analysis against neighboring buildings rather than on an internal building average.

Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Feb 25, 20265
2 BR · 3 BA · 2,082 sf
$3,225,000$1,549/sf-2.1%
Jun 26, 20252
2 BR · 3 BA · 2,082 sf
$2,850,000$1,369/sf-4.8%
Sep 24, 2024PH
3 BR · 3.5 BA · 2,797 sf
$4,300,000$1,537/sf-13.9%
Jun 6, 20243
2 BR · 3 BA · 2,082 sf
$3,195,000$1,535/sf+0.0%
Apr 19, 2024MAIS
2 BR · 2.5 BA · 2,584 sf
$2,850,000$1,103/sf-4.8%
Apr 16, 20244
2 BR · 3 BA · 2,082 sf
$3,100,000$1,489/sf-4.5%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026 to date) cleared a median $1,549/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. Median listing discount 4.7% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00823-7508; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at Iron Lofts, per listing and brokerage records and nearby.

Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with Iron Lofts, per listing and brokerage records and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like Iron Lofts, per listing and brokerage records. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 29 West 21st Street, also evaluate:

More Flatiron buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Flatiron — read The Roebling Team Guide to Flatiron.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at Iron Lofts, per listing and brokerage records?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com