Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf ▴2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room ▴2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room ▴18%CPW $355K/room ▾5%Fifth Ave $501K/room ▴19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf ▴24%East Village $1,663/sf ▴10%
Full index →
Condop · 1902
Hudson Court. Landmarks Preservation Commission records also list the name Valencia Court, which was the trade name of the conversion sponsor.
317–319 West 95th Street, New York, NY 10025

Hudson Court (317 West 95th Street)

317–319 West 95th Street, New York, NY 10025

BBL 1012537501 · BIN 1071383

At a glance
Year built
1902
Type
Condop
Units
30
Landmark
No
Financing
Up to 90% per listing records
Flip tax
None documented in the records reviewed. Confirm with the managing agent.
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Hudson Court. Landmarks Preservation Commission records also list the name Valencia Court, which was the trade name of the conversion sponsor. would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

Hudson Court is a prewar condominium in a market made up mostly of prewar co-ops. On the West 90s side streets between West End Avenue and Riverside Drive, most prewar buildings sell as co-op shares. Hudson Court sells as a condominium: a real-property deed, no purchase-approval interview, and financing up to 90%. That ownership form is its structural advantage.

The building began as a seven-story flats building, designed in 1902 by Schneider & Herter for Abraham M. Morgenroth. Schneider & Herter built a large body of tenement and flats buildings across Manhattan around the turn of the century. In the mid-1980s, Valencia Court Associates bought it and did more than a cosmetic conversion. Per the offering plan, the interior was rebuilt as a Class I fireproof building, with a new elevator, new mechanical systems, central air conditioning, and a washer/dryer in every apartment. The result has a prewar street face and a 1980s interior.

The block puts Riverside Park about half a block west. The building shares its block with 222 Riverside Drive and 230 Riverside Drive, both also condominiums.

Architecture and unit composition

The façade is brick and stone in the Beaux-Arts manner. The Landmarks Preservation Commission records it as altered, which is common for a flats building that went through a full-gut 1980s conversion. The lot lies within the Riverside–West End Historic District Extension II. Any exterior work needs a Landmarks Preservation Commission permit, including windows, masonry, the roofline and the entrance.

Per the offering plan, the 30 units are arranged as follows:

  • two units on the ground level, alongside the bicycle and storage room and mechanical space
  • the lobby and four units on the first floor
  • the remaining units on floors two through seven

The plan's engineering report shows how far the conversion went. It cut the building's zoning room count from about 242 rooms to 119, so the renovated building has fewer, larger apartments than the original flats. Unit sizes are set out in Schedule A of the plan. The scanned copy on file does not read reliably, so confirm each unit's square footage from the declaration floor plans or with the managing agent. The garden unit and the two seventh-floor units with roof patios are the building's distinctive apartments, and they trade apart from the rest of the stack.

Building operations

The offering plan budgeted a non-resident, part-time superintendent and lobby receptionists. Current listing records describe a doorman and a live-in superintendent. Confirm the present staffing with the managing agent. It is the largest line in a 30-unit building's budget.

Capital posture, per audited financial statements on file (2019 and 2020):

  • Special assessments: Two, levied from late 2018 through late 2020: about $150,000, then $315,000. The second was extended by four months. Both funded capital projects and reserves.
  • Capital work: The 2020 statements record an elevator modernization and a significant waterproofing program. Earlier capitalized work includes the roof, brick and chimney repairs, the boiler, the fire alarm system, and the central air-conditioning plant.
  • Reserves: Operating cash plus a small dedicated reserve account at year-end 2020. The condominium had not commissioned a reserve study.
  • Currency of the documents: The most recent statements on file are for 2020. Buyers should obtain current statements from the managing agent.

Tax benefits: The DOF roll shows no active J-51 or 421-a benefit on the billing lot or any unit lot. Primary-residence owners may qualify for the co-op/condo tax abatement, so real estate taxes differ between owner-occupants and investors. Check the specific unit's tax bill.

Policy framework

  • Right of first refusal: Per the offering plan, a unit owner must give the Board of Managers 30 days' notice of the terms of any bona fide sale or lease. If the board does not act in that window, its right lapses. The plan exempts leases to a spouse, adult child, parent or parent-in-law.
  • Leasing: Permitted, subject to the right of first refusal. Leases use the standard Real Estate Board of New York form unless the by-laws provide otherwise.
  • Financing: Up to 90% per listing records.
  • Washer/dryer: Installed in each unit at conversion. Air conditioning is central and metered to each unit by BTU meter (a meter that measures how much chilled water each unit draws).
  • Pets, flip tax, house rules: Not documented in the records reviewed. Get them from the managing agent.

Recent sales

Hudson Court sells as a condominium, so the right measure is dollars per square foot. It trades at a premium to prewar co-op stock of similar size nearby. In practice, that premium buys the deed, the higher financing ceiling and the lighter approval process. Sales are thin in a 30-unit building, a handful a year. ACRIS records them going to separate, unrelated buyers. Pricing should be read unit by unit. The garden and roof-patio units, renovation condition, and floor height drive most of the spread.

ACRIS shows the sponsor selling from 1988. A run of referee's deeds followed in 1993–94, indicating that unsold sponsor units were foreclosed on in the early-1990s downturn. Those units then resold individually through the mid-1990s. Today no sponsor inventory remains. DOF records each of the 30 unit lots under a separate owner, and none is classed as a condominium rental. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

F7+55%
$825,000 2007 → $1,280,000 2010
C5+16%
$640,000 2007 → $745,000 2021
HG+5%
$1,165,000 2021 → $1,225,000 2026
C4+4%
$730,000 2014 → $514,725 2016 → $760,000 2016
D7+3%
$765,000 2016 → $786,888 2026

Recent closings at this building, sourced from NYC Department of Finance records. Apartment-level detail (line, condition, asking-price context) verified upon consultation request.

DateUnitPrice
Aug 20, 2026F2$1,180,000
Aug 6, 2026HG$1,225,000
Aug 11, 2026D5$723,000
Jul 23, 2026D7$786,888
Oct 28, 2024F6$1,260,000
Aug 22, 2023E3$1,160,000
View all 25 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01253-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price.

What would buying here cost?

At the recent median sale of $1.18M (5 transfers since 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $24,775 to close, or 2.1% of the price.

  • Mansion tax: $11,800
  • No mortgage recording tax or title insurance on a co-op purchase
  • Attorneys, lender, building fees and filings: $12,975

Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with Hudson Court. Landmarks Preservation Commission records also list the name Valencia Court, which was the trade name of the conversion sponsor. and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings likeHudson Court. Landmarks Preservation Commission records also list the name Valencia Court, which was the trade name of the conversion sponsor.. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

This is a condominium, not a condop. A prewar building on a condominium lot raises the question of a co-op wrapper. ACRIS answers it: each unit is conveyed by deed on its own lot. Board review is limited to the 30-day right of first refusal.

Ask for the capital history since 2020. The 2018–2020 assessments paid for the elevator and waterproofing. Ask what has been done since, what is planned, and whether any assessment is pending. Also get the building's Local Law 11 façade cycle status.

Check the tax bill for your use. Owner-occupant and investor tax bills differ because of the primary-residence abatement. Model your own carry with the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator.

Mansion tax may apply. At about the $1 million threshold, the 1% mansion tax applies. Run the figures through the Mansion Tax Calculator.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the ownership form. A prewar condominium with 90% financing, in-unit laundry and central air draws buyers who would otherwise be shopping co-ops. Market it against that stock.

Have the building paperwork ready. In a small condominium, buyers' lenders and attorneys will ask for recent financials, the assessment history and insurance. Having them ready shortens the process.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering Hudson Court, also evaluate:

More Riverside Drive buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Riverside Drive — read The Roebling Team Guide to Riverside Drive.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at Hudson Court. Landmarks Preservation Commission records also list the name Valencia Court, which was the trade name of the conversion sponsor.?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com