Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Flatiron $1,769/sf 3%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1906
The Nottingham
33 East 30th Street, New York, NY 10016
Buildings·Flatiron·Cooperative

The Nottingham at 33 East 30th Street

33 East 30th Street, New York, NY 10016

NoMad

BBL 1008600027 · BIN 1016961

CorridorFlatiron
At a glance
Year built
1906
Type
Cooperative
Units
43
Floors
9
Landmark
No
Pets
Pets permitted
Subletting
Subject to cooperative board policy; confirm at offer stage
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

1BR median
$575K
Recent range
$335K – $1.4M
Listing discount
4.7%
Recorded transfers
68
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Nottingham would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

The Nottingham at 33 East 30th Street is an early-20th-century prewar cooperative in NoMad, the district north of Madison Square Park that has become one of Manhattan's most desirable central neighborhoods. Built in 1906 on the 30th Street block between Madison Avenue and Park Avenue South, the building was designed by architects Snelling & Potter and developed by the Amsterdam Building Co. It holds 43 apartments across nine floors, plus a commercial space, and operates today as a cooperative under the 35 East Tenants Corp.

The building's appeal is the combination of period architecture and a now-central NoMad location. NoMad's transformation over the past two decades — driven by hotels, restaurants, and a dense, walkable street life — has made early-prewar buildings like this one increasingly sought-after by buyers who want character, central convenience, and proximity to Madison Square Park, the Flatiron and NoMad dining scene, and the principal transit lines.

For buyers, The Nottingham offers what the well-located prewar co-op does best: refined period architecture and a sense of place, in the cooperative ownership structure, at a price point that sits below the area's new development. It is a building with genuine architectural pedigree in a neighborhood whose desirability has risen sharply.

Architecture and unit composition

The 1906 building is a prewar apartment house in the refined Madison Square idiom of its period, designed by architects Snelling & Potter for the Amsterdam Building Co. Built in concrete and steel, it rose to nine stories where traditional construction of the era would have capped the building at eight. The building's masonry facade and proportions reflect the early-20th-century apartment-house vocabulary of the area.

In residential cooperative use, the building offers the apartment configurations of a purpose-built prewar building — a range that, at this vintage and apartment count, runs from smaller prewar lines to larger configurations. With 43 units across nine floors, the building is mid-density, consistent with a 1906 apartment-house design, and apartments reflect the layouts, ceiling heights, and detail of the period as preserved or renovated over time.

Apartment-level features — floor, exposure, light, layout, ceiling height, and renovation condition — vary unit by unit and are the primary drivers of value. Evaluate each home on its specific configuration.

Building operations

The Nottingham operates as a self-contained residential cooperative under the 35 East Tenants Corp. As a prewar elevator building, it carries the operating profile typical of the early-prewar co-op: a resident or live-in superintendent, central building services, a commercial component that contributes to the building's income, and governance through the cooperative board and proprietary lease.

The building's policies on pets, financing percentages, subletting, pied-à-terre use, and alterations are set by the board and the proprietary lease, and the building's commercial income, reserve position, and capital history are central to underwriting any purchase. Prospective buyers should confirm the current rules, the building's financial profile, any assessments, and the status of building systems directly against current materials during due diligence; board specifics should be confirmed at offer stage.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$16,772/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $33

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$10,000 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Sales at The Nottingham are best read on a co-op basis — on price per room and on apartment-specific configuration rather than on a single price-per-square-foot figure. The building sits in the accessible-to-mid tier of NoMad prewar co-op pricing: smaller prewar units transact in the lower end of the area's co-op range, with larger lines higher, and the building as a whole prices below the area's new-development condominiums while carrying the appeal of genuine period architecture.

Value tracks the usual co-op variables — floor, exposure, light, layout, apartment size, ceiling height, and renovation condition — with a character premium attaching to homes that retain period detail. Larger, higher, better-lit, recently renovated homes command the building's premium. Because the building's apartments span a range of sizes, pricing any individual home requires reading both in-building history and the broader NoMad prewar co-op market. Recent specific transactions should be confirmed against current public records at the time of any inquiry.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Aug 13, 20263A
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,360 sf
$1,400,000$1,029/sf-11.1%
Aug 11, 20269C
1 BR · 1 BA
$615,000-5.4%
Jun 12, 20256D
1 BR · 1 BA
$320,000-13.5%
Aug 21, 20244
1 BA
$335,000+0.0%
Aug 14, 20243E
1 BR · 1 BA
$510,000-4.7%
Aug 9, 20246E
1 BR · 1 BA
$575,000-4.0%
Apr 15, 20249A
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,400 sf
$1,425,550$1,018/sf-4.6%
Aug 2, 20227C
1 BR · 1 BA
$551,250-5.0%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,067/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 3.7% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

8A · 2,000 sf+54%
$1,750,000 ($875/sf) 2015$2,699,888 ($1,350/sf) 2019
2D+26%
$265,000 ($815/sf) 2012$335,000 2020
9C+24%
$495,000 2014$515,000 2019$560,000 2021$615,000 2026
9D+20%
$297,000 2014$355,000 2021
6E+12%
$512,000 2008$575,000 2024
View all 68 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00860-0027) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

This is a period prewar co-op — price and underwrite on rooms, character, and condition. Value is a function of room count, layout, light, ceiling height, and renovation condition. Build comparables on a price-per-room basis.

Confirm the board's financing, sublet, and pied-à-terre policies before you commit. These materially affect both your purchase and your future flexibility. Confirm at offer stage.

Diligence the finances, including the commercial income. Review the most recent financial statements, the reserve position, any assessments, and how the building's commercial space contributes to its budget — and the status of building systems in a 1906 structure.

NoMad is central and lively. The location pairs Madison Square Park proximity and excellent transit with a dense restaurant and hotel district. Visit at multiple times to confirm fit.

Closing timelines are co-op-standard. Plan for board application and approval, and a longer timeline than a comparable condominium purchase.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the period architecture and the NoMad location. The building's structural selling points are genuine early-prewar character — a 1906 Snelling & Potter apartment house — paired with a now-central NoMad address. Apartment-specific marketing should foreground the home's period detail, exposure, light, and renovation condition.

Price on apartment-level comparables. Triangulate recent comparable co-op sales in the building and across the NoMad prewar market on a price-per-room basis.

Prepare the buyer for board review. Cooperative purchase requires board application and approval; a well-prepared package and a financially qualified buyer are central to a clean closing.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering The Nottingham, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Flatiron — read The Roebling Team Guide to Flatiron.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at The Nottingham?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com