Manhattan condos $1,629/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops $283K/room 5%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $478K/room 19%CPW $350K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,272/sf 24%Tribeca $1,941/sf 2%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1925
355 Riverside Drive
355 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10025

355 Riverside Drive

355 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10025

Upper West Side

BBL 1018920064 · BIN 1057291

At a glance
Year built
1925
Type
Cooperative
Landmark
No
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2025

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

3BR median
$2.2M
Recent range
$365K – $3.3M
Listing discount
0.0%
Recorded transfers
35

355 Riverside Drive carries a distinction few apartment houses can claim: it was designed by William Tuthill, the architect of Carnegie Hall. That pedigree shows in the building's careful detailing — a two-story limestone entrance surround dressed with urns, sconces, and fluted pilasters, set into a warm red-brick elevation with decorative spandrels — and it places the building in the more distinguished tier of Riverside Drive's pre-war stock.

The location is the other half of the argument. Standing at the corner of West 108th Street, the building faces Riverside Park and the Hudson directly, and many of its forty residences capture the sweeping park-and-river outlook that defines the Drive. This is the open-sky, water-view side of the Upper West Side — quieter and more residential than the avenues to the east, with the park as a permanent front yard.

The building was built as a rental in 1925 and converted to cooperative ownership in 1983, and it has operated as a co-op ever since — a stable, well-kept pre-war house with the generous proportions of its era and one of the best natural settings in upper Manhattan.

Architecture and unit composition

Tuthill's design is restrained but unmistakably considered. The red-brick mass is anchored by a limestone base and crowned by detailing that elevates it above the plainer apartment houses of the period — the kind of touches one would expect from the man who gave the city Carnegie Hall. The two-story entrance surround, with its urns and sconces, gives the building a dignified arrival sequence; the fluted pilasters and decorative spandrels carry that intent up the facade.

The forty apartments reflect 1925 planning at its most livable: generous room dimensions, high ceilings with detailed moldings, and many homes with windowed kitchens — a pre-war amenity that still commands a premium. The defining feature of the better units is the outlook: west-facing rooms over Riverside Park and the Hudson, with the long light and open horizon that no interior renovation can replicate. As at any building converted from rental stock, individual apartments range from original to fully renovated, but the floor plans and the views are the durable assets.

Building operations

355 Riverside runs as a full-service cooperative on a sensible footing. A doorman covers the lobby from 8 a.m. to midnight, with a live-in superintendent maintaining the building — a staffing model that delivers attentive service while keeping maintenance reasonable for a forty-unit pre-war building. The shared amenities are genuinely useful: a private wraparound garden that wraps the corner, a central laundry room, bicycle storage, and private storage.

On house rules, the cooperative permits pets with board approval but does not allow pied-à-terre ownership — it is a building of full-time residents, which suits its family-and-professional profile and the stability that comes with owner-occupancy. Buyers planning to make the apartment a primary home will find the policy set straightforward; those seeking a part-time second residence should look elsewhere on the Drive.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$13,893/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $29
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent). Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library.

See the full facade history →

Management & transfer contacts

Managing agent
Flip tax
7.5% of net profit (seller)
Sublet policy
Allowed; must live in building 1yr, up to 2yrs sublet in any 5yr period; sublet fee 20% of monthly maintenance
Pied-à-terre
Not allowed
Notable fees
Max financing 80%; move-in/out deposits $500 each
Transfer facts compiled by The Roebling Team · as of 2026-07. Confirm current policies and fees with the managing agent before contract.

Recent sales

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Apartment-level facts are independently verified before publishing; sale prices reflect the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Oct 21, 202512W
4 BR · 3 BA
$3,285,000-6.1%
Feb 23, 20238E
3 BR · 3 BA
$1,625,000+8.7%
Oct 14, 20214E
1 BR · 1 BA · 755 sf
$715,000$947/sf-2.7%
Feb 7, 20207NW
3 BR · 2.5 BA
$3,100,000-5.9%
Feb 7, 20207W
3 BR · 2.5 BA
$3,100,000-11.3%
Nov 16, 201812W
4 BR
$3,500,000-2.8%
Jul 20, 2018PHW
1 BR
$995,000+0.0%
Jan 9, 20186W
3 BR
$3,150,000+0.0%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2021): a median $947/sf across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2025. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

4E · 755 sf+53%
$466,440 ($617/sf) 2012$715,000 ($947/sf) 2021
6W+32%
$2,382,000 2012$3,150,000 2018
7W+19%
$2,595,000 2006$3,100,000 2020
5E+0%
$1,910,756 2015$1,910,757 2015
12W-6%
$3,500,000 2018$3,285,000 2025
View all 35 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01892-0064) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

This is a cooperative purchase, so prepare for a board package and interview, and note that the building requires full-time residency — pied-à-terre purchases are not permitted, though pets are allowed with approval. For an owner-occupant, those rules are unremarkable; they simply confirm the building's stable, primary-home character.

The decision that matters most here is exposure. A west-facing apartment with park and river views is a fundamentally different — and more valuable — asset than an interior unit at the same address, and the premium is justified by scarcity. Evaluate the specific apartment's light, view, and condition closely, and weigh the building's pre-war pedigree and corner setting as long-term value drivers. We help buyers compare exposures within the building and against the broader Riverside Drive market before committing.

What to know if you’re selling

The pitch is location, view, and provenance. A Tuthill-designed pre-war cooperative on the park, at a prominent Riverside Drive corner, with direct Hudson outlooks from its west-facing homes, is a distinctive and marketable combination. For view apartments, the river-and-park exposure is the headline; for all units, the building's full-service operation, wraparound garden, and architectural pedigree reinforce the case.

Positioning should benchmark to the Riverside Drive pre-war cooperative tier rather than to the interior side streets, and should foreground exposure — buyers shopping the Drive are paying for the view, and the marketing should make that value explicit. Presentation matters: a well-staged apartment that shows its light and outlook to full effect will outperform, and pricing should reflect the specific home's exposure and condition rather than a generic building number.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 355 Riverside Drive, also evaluate these nearby Riverside Drive cooperatives:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Riverside Drive — read The Roebling Team Guide to Riverside Drive.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

Considering a move at 355 Riverside Drive?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 355 Riverside Drive would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.