Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1909
38 West 26th Street
38 West 26th Street, New York, NY 10010
Buildings·Flatiron·Cooperative

38 West 26th Street

38 West 26th Street, New York, NY 10010

NoMad

BBL 1008270068 · BIN 1015631

CorridorFlatiron
At a glance
Year built
1909
Type
Cooperative
Units
17
Floors
12
Landmark
No
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2024

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,164
Listing discount
7.3%
Recorded sales
13
On record
2004–2024

Seventeen apartments in twelve stories on a sixty-foot lot, a block north of Madison Square Park. That ratio is the building. This is a 1909 commercial loft converted to cooperative ownership in the mid-1980s and never subdivided down to conventional apartment scale: floor plates run the full width of the lot, and the largest homes here are among the largest loft apartments in NoMad. The corporation's name, 12 Lofts Realty, records what the conversion produced — one loft per floor.

What makes the building worth a second look now is zoning rather than architecture. The lot sits inside the area rezoned under the Midtown South Mixed-Use Plan, approved by the City Council in 2025, which mapped paired manufacturing-and-residence districts across NoMad and permitted office-to-residential conversion as of right. For decades this stretch was a residential island inside a manufacturing zone — legal, but hemmed in by neighbors who could not convert. The plan changes the character of the surrounding blocks over the coming decade, and the comparable set with it.

The building is not landmarked, and the geography invites confusion on that point. The Madison Square North Historic District runs across this tax block along the Broadway and Fifth Avenue frontages, not the West 26th Street mid-block. LPC's database records eight designated lots on this block; this is not one of them. No LPC review on windows, storefront or roof-level work — a real cost and schedule advantage over the designated buildings a hundred feet east, and an equally real loss of protection against what the neighbors do.

Architecture and unit composition

Twelve stories of beige brick on a sixty-foot mid-block lot, with a two-story rusticated base carrying the commercial space and a cornice at the top. The interest is inside. Recorded unit designations run from a full second floor through half-floor A and B lines in the middle of the building to a combined penthouse at the top — the pattern of a conversion that began with one loft per floor and was reshaped over forty years by owners buying next door and above. Ceiling height, window wall and multiple exposures define the format; the sixty-foot frontage gives the front line real light and the rear line a mid-block outlook. With no landmark designation, alterations are governed by DOB and the house rules rather than by LPC, which materially shortens timelines on window and facade work compared with the designated blocks nearby.

Building operations

Seventeen apartments cannot support a large staff, and this is not a full-service building. The commercial base generates income to the corporation, which matters at this unit count — a restaurant lease and a wall sign are meaningful line items in a seventeen-unit budget, and they cut both ways.

The underlying financing is in the public record. A June 2019 consolidation set the building loan at $2.5 million; in May 2021 the corporation consolidated again to $4.0 million, with $1.5 million of new money advanced at that closing. For seventeen units that is meaningful leverage and usually indicates a capital program — the 2020 roof replacement and vault waterproofing are the visible candidates. The audited financial statements will show what it funded and where reserves stand; we obtain them for clients at offer stage rather than characterizing them from recorded documents.

The loft history

Built in 1909 as commercial loft space and worked as such for three-quarters of a century. The alteration recorded against the tax lot in 1984 is the conversion. DOB's online filing record begins after that, so the conversion job itself is not retrievable from open data — it will be in the offering plan, along with the sponsor and the unit count as offered. Three findings from the records that are retrievable:

No J-51. DOF's historical J-51 file, covering 1968 through 2018, contains no J-51 exemption or abatement for this tax lot — unusual for a 1984 loft conversion, and notable because three other lots on this same block took J-51 benefits between 1980 and 1998. Either the conversion was structured without one or it was recorded against a different lot number before a merger. Ask the managing agent and check the offering plan.

No joint living-work quarters for artists designation. Nothing in the DOB occupancy record carries a JLWQA restriction; filings classify the residential occupancy as RES and R-2. If a JLWQA certification requirement existed at conversion it is not in the public record.

Interim Multiple Dwelling status under Article 7-C could not be confirmed or ruled out. A 1909 NoMad loft occupied residentially in the late 1970s is precisely the stock the Loft Law was written for, so the question is fair. But the Loft Board's registration file is not published as open data, and nothing in the DOB, DOF or ACRIS record indicates Loft Board coverage. Put the question to the managing agent in writing.

The visible record since is straightforward: individual loft renovations from the early 2000s; a boiler replaced in 2004; facade restoration in 2008 and 2017; a roof deck removed under a violation in 2011; a wall advertising sign structure permitted in 2011; roof replacement and sidewalk-vault waterproofing in 2020. The significant filing is the 2013 alteration that changed the use, egress and occupancy of the cellar and first floor to build out an eating-and-drinking establishment. That job was still running on temporary certificates of occupancy as of the last one published, in August 2020. A buyer's attorney should establish whether a final certificate has since issued. It is a normal condition in a small building with a restaurant tenant and normally resolved — but it should be checked rather than assumed.

Policy framework

None of this building's house policies are published, and in a seventeen-unit co-op they are unusually consequential, because one board's practice governs a handful of transactions a year. Obtain the following from the managing agent, in writing, before offering: financing ceiling and minimum down payment (small loft co-ops commonly cap below 80 percent); post-closing liquidity requirement, usually a multiple of maintenance plus debt service and frequently the binding test; sublet policy — seasoning, term cap, fee, renewal practice, which small buildings often restrict tightly; flip tax — existence, base, rate, and which side pays; pied-à-terre policy, and how it has actually been applied; and trust, LLC and co-purchase rules. The recorded transfer history shows several shareholders moving shares into revocable and irrevocable trusts over the past decade, which suggests trusts are workable — but the board's current written policy governs, not the precedents. Expect a thorough board package and a real interview; budget six to ten weeks from accepted offer to closing.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$40,186/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $197

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$5,400 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The building trades as large-format NoMad loft co-op stock: half-floor and full-floor lofts with high ceilings and wide window walls, in share ownership, on a block now zoned for residential use rather than merely tolerating it. Turnover is low — seventeen apartments produce a handful of trades a year, sometimes fewer, with estates and long-hold owners accounting for a meaningful share. That thinness cuts both ways: comparable sets are shallow and pricing is negotiated rather than indexed, but the scarcity of the format supports value. Pricing tracks floor, full-floor versus half-floor, exposure and condition, with combined units at the top carrying a premium that has no in-building comparable. The usual co-op-to-condo discount is partly offset by the absence of any NoMad condominium offering equivalent floor plates. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Oct 28, 2024PH12AB
3 BR · 2 BA · 5,500 sf
$6,400,000$1,164/sf-8.5%
Dec 27, 202311B
2 BR · 2 BA · 4,000 sf
$3,230,000$808/sf-17.2%
Jun 13, 202310B
2 BR · 2 BA
$1,875,000+0.0%
Nov 8, 20192
5 BR · 3 BA · 5,000 sf
$3,700,000$740/sf-22.9%
Oct 26, 20167B
3 BR
$4,320,000-0.7%
Dec 10, 201311A
1 BR · 1,400 sf
$1,625,000$1,161/sf+30.0%
Jul 30, 20097A
1 BR · 1,760 sf
$1,100,000$625/sf-7.9%
Jun 9, 20045A
2 BR · 2,000 sf
$1,275,000$638/sf+0.0%

Market read. Most recent trades (2024) cleared a median $1,164/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 7.3% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

View all 13 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00827-0068) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Resolve the certificate of occupancy on the ground-floor build-out. Temporary certificates were still being renewed as recently as 2020 on the restaurant conversion. Have your attorney confirm the current status before contract — this is the most concrete diligence item in the building.

Underwrite the underlying mortgage honestly. $4.0 million across seventeen apartments is real leverage. Get the maturity, the rate, the amortization, and what the 2021 new money paid for.

Ask about the J-51 that isn't there. No J-51 appears on this lot in DOF's file. Confirm whether the conversion carried one, and under what lot.

Treat the rezoning as a two-sided fact. The Midtown South plan legitimizes residential use here and will bring new housing to the surrounding lots. It will also bring construction. Walk the block on a weekday morning.

No landmark protection, in both directions. You will not need LPC approval for window or facade work. Neither will your neighbors.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the floor plate. No NoMad condominium sells a comparable loft. Square footage, ceiling height and window wall are the pitch; the co-op structure is what you explain afterward.

Get ahead of the certificate-of-occupancy question. If a final certificate has issued on the ground-floor work, produce it. If it has not, know the answer before a buyer's attorney finds it.

Document the capital work. The 2020 roof and vault waterproofing and the 2021 financing tell a story of a building that spends on itself. Provide the financials and let them.

Use the rezoning as a forward argument. The Midtown South plan is a dated, publicly approved change to this block's future, and that case survives scrutiny.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 38 West 26th Street, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Flatiron — read The Roebling Team Guide to Flatiron.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at 38 West 26th Street?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 38 West 26th Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.