
- Year built
- 2011
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 147
- Floors
- 96
- Landmark
- No
- Pets
- Permitted under condominium rules
- Subletting
- Permitted under the condominium declaration
- Pied-à-terre
- Allowed
Every recorded sale at this building, 2015–2026
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf
- $4,435
- Avg vs. ask
- -15.9%
- Recorded sales
- 229
- On record
- 2015–2026
432 Park Avenue is the building that defined Manhattan's modern supertall era. When Macklowe Properties and CIM Group topped it out at 1,396 feet in 2014–2015, the building became the tallest residential structure in the Western Hemisphere — a record it held until Central Park Tower surpassed it in 2020. More importantly, 432 Park established the architectural and financial template that subsequent Billionaires' Row supertalls (One57, 111 W 57th, Central Park Tower, 220 CPS) would respond to or refine.
Rafael Viñoly's design was deliberately reductive: a square-tube concrete frame with exposed structural grid and 10-foot by 10-foot square windows, painted white. The simplicity is the architectural argument — every other element of the building reads as a function of the structure. The result is among the most photographed silhouettes in modern Manhattan, recognizable from the Hudson, the Park, Queens, Brooklyn, New Jersey, and anywhere with an upward sight line in Midtown.
The building's role in Billionaires' Row formation is structural. 432 Park demonstrated that the Midtown East corridor — anchored by Park Avenue's traditional luxury identity but reaching architectural altitudes that established towns had never achieved — could command global trophy capital. One57 had broken ground first (2010, completed 2014) but 432 Park's height and architectural distinction elevated the corridor into a category previously occupied only by hotel residences like The Pierre and The Plaza. Within a decade of 432 Park's completion, Billionaires' Row had reshaped New York's skyline and the global ultra-luxury market.
The building has also been the subject of substantial public scrutiny regarding its construction quality and operational reliability. The Sponsor's Twenty-Second Amendment, dated June 11, 2018, certified that there were no lawsuits or administrative proceedings the outcome of which would materially affect the offering — a statement that became dated quickly. In 2021, the condominium board filed suit citing more than 1,500 construction and design defects, including elevator outages, plumbing failures, and noise from building sway during high winds. A separate, more recent lawsuit alleges that nearly 1,900 facade cracks were concealed from buyers during sponsor sales, with damages claims totaling roughly $165 million. The Roebling Report covered this thread of building defects across new-construction Manhattan supertalls and conversions in detail in The Cracks in a $90M Penthouse. Buyers should review current building engineering reports, the board's reserve studies, the status of active litigation, and any anticipated capital assessments during due diligence — and should treat 432 Park as the canonical worked example of why this kind of diligence matters even at the highest price points.
Architecture and unit composition
The tower distributes its 147 original sponsor-offered apartments across three distinct tiers, a configuration that is more nuanced than the "supertall trophy condo" framing suggests and meaningfully shapes what a buyer is actually acquiring:
- Floors 28–29 (Studio tier — 27 units, 342–615 sf). Single-bath studios on the building's lower mechanical/transition floors, sold by Sponsor in the $1.6M–$3.1M range ($4,000–$5,600/sf). These are the building's value-tier inventory and a meaningful entry point for buyers who want a 432 Park address without the eight-figure commitment of the upper tower. They are not, however, the brand-defining apartments — and buyers should understand the configuration before assuming they are getting the same building experience as a 70th-floor 4BR.
- Floor 34 (Reconfigurable — 14 small units or one 8,006 sf full-floor). Originally laid out as 14 small studio-sized residences, the sponsor later offered (per a 2018 amendment) the option to combine them into a single 8,006 sf "white box" full-floor unit at $35,675,000. The unit could be delivered effectively unbuilt, with the buyer responsible for demising walls, finishes, fixtures, and appliances — an unusual posture for new-construction Manhattan trophy condo inventory.
- Floors 35–96 (Brand-defining luxury tier — 122 units). Standard luxury layouts ranging from 1,422 sf 1BRs at the mid-tower to 8,255 sf 6BR full-floor penthouses at the top. Sponsor pricing started at $6.5M (lower-mid tower 1BR) and reached $95M for the 96th-floor 8,255 sf penthouse (originally offered as Apartment 96 FF, 6BR / 7BA / 2 powder rooms / library). Per-square-foot sponsor pricing climbed from approximately $4,300/sf at floor 35 to over $11,500/sf at the topmost penthouse.
In addition to residential inventory, the sponsor offered 58 storage closets ($7.95M total), 17 wine cellars ($5.9M total), 12 office units on floors 18–20 ($35.6M total), and dedicated Retail Unit, Club Unit (the 26,529 sf amenity floor), and Garage Unit commercial sections. Total sponsor offering at completion: 593,351 sf at an aggregate of $3.127 billion — among the largest single-building condominium offerings in U.S. history.
The 10-foot by 10-foot square windows are the building's interior signature. Each window frames a deliberately monumentalized view; the structural grid produces an interior reading that some buyers respond to as architecturally substantial and others find restrictive (the windows do not open, and the structural grid limits placement of interior walls relative to facade alignment). Ceilings are 12.5 feet in primary rooms.
View altitude is exceptional — apartments above the 50th floor command unobstructed sight lines across Central Park (looking northwest), the East River and Queens (looking east), the Empire State and downtown (looking south), and Hudson and New Jersey (looking west). Lower-floor units have more constrained views, with surrounding development visible at closer distances.
Interior finishes are top-tier — limestone, oak, custom millwork — at the price points the building serves. The kitchens and bathrooms are scaled and detailed for high-end use.
Building operations
432 Park operates as a typical luxury condominium with full-time doorman, concierge, valet parking, on-site superintendent, and the broad amenity package noted above. The amenity package is concentrated on the building's 12th-floor "Club Unit" — a 26,529 sf dedicated amenity floor that houses the fitness center, pool, spa, residents' lounge, private dining room, conference room, library, screening room, billiards room, children's playroom, and an outdoor terrace. The plan first accepted for filing on July 17, 2012; the first closing occurred on December 22, 2015.
The initial Residential Board of Managers included four sponsor-affiliated directors and an outside member — a meaningful editorial detail linking the building to the city's brokerage establishment from day one. As of mid-2018, the sponsor was still carrying approximately $276,792/month in aggregate common charges and real estate taxes on its remaining unsold inventory — roughly $3.3M/year — a fact that shaped the building's pricing posture through the 2018–2019 sell-down period.
Per the 2017 Schedule A, base carrying costs (common charges + real estate taxes only, before utilities, insurance, or assessments) ran approximately $46/sf per year across the building's unit classes. A 4,000 sf mid-tower 3BR therefore carried roughly $187,000/year in base costs alone; an 8,055 sf full-floor penthouse, approximately $375,000/year. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was disclosed as a Special Risk in 2018, with the sponsor noting that prior tax projections in the offering plan would no longer be accurate. A permanent Certificate of Occupancy had not been issued as of mid-2018, with the building operating on a temporary C of O.
Common charges and property taxes are substantial. A 3,500 sf 3BR carries common charges in the range of $7,000–$10,000/month plus property taxes that can run $4,000–$10,000/month depending on apartment specifics. Total monthly carry on substantial apartments can exceed $20,000.
The building's mechanical systems have been subject to documented issues across more than a decade of resident occupancy — elevator outages, water intrusion, plumbing failures, audible sway-noise in high winds, and the alleged facade-crack concealment that is now the subject of active litigation. None of this disqualifies the building as a transaction, but it does materially shape the diligence and pricing posture a sophisticated buyer should bring. See The Cracks in a $90M Penthouse for the full Roebling Report analysis, including the comparable defect lawsuits at Hero (LIC), 161 Maiden Lane, Gramercy Square, and 160 Imlay Street.
Recent sales
432 Park's pricing across 2024–2026 is best read as a market reset rather than a market: every annotated full-bedroom sale has closed materially under ask, often by double-digit percentages. The defining loss in the period is 84A at $13.5M (May 2024), sold by Interactive Brokers founder Thomas Peterffy — a roughly 37% loss against Peterffy's 2016 acquisition basis of $21.39M. 36A at $10.7M (Aug 2024) cleared 27.5% below the $14.75M last ask; 52C at $14.65M (Aug 2025) and 52B at $8.7M (Mar 2026) both closed 13% under ask. The headline-scale Unit 78 trophy closed Feb 2026 at $52.5M — meaningful concession from the $59.5M ask but still consistent with the building's tower-tier pricing. The lone unit closing closer to ask is 38C at $7.225M (-6%, Dec 2024). The studio-tier base building behaves separately: 29E at $3.02M ($7,177/sf) shows the smaller-residence pricing band remains intact. For buyers, the building's mechanical and legal context (see the linked Roebling Report on the cracks litigation) is shaping these discounts — not the apartments themselves.
Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Apartment-level facts are independently verified before publishing; sale prices reflect the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2026 | 52B | 2 BR · 2.5 BA · 2,224 sf Closed March 17, 2026 at $8.7M — 12.98% under the $9.995M last asking. | $8,697,500 | $3,911/sf | -13.0% |
| Feb 17, 2026 | 78 | 4 BR · 4.5 BA · 8,280 sf Closed Feb 17, 2026 at $52.5M — discount from $59.5M last asking. public listing data flagged 'can't find government record'; verified against NYC ACRIS by recorded date + price match. | $52,500,000 | $6,341/sf | -11.8% |
| Aug 28, 2025 | 52C | 3 BR · 3.5 BA · 3,576 sf Closed Aug 21, 2025 at $14.65M — 12.80% under the $16.8M last asking. | $14,650,000 | $4,097/sf | -12.8% |
| Jan 13, 2025 | 38C | 2 BR · 2.5 BA · 2,100 sf Closed Dec 12, 2024 at $7.225M — 6.11% under the $7.695M last asking. | $7,225,000 | $3,440/sf | -6.1% |
| Oct 28, 2024 | 29E | 1 BA · 421 sf · private outdoor Studio configuration on the building's 28th-29th floor band (the smaller-residence base of 432 Park, below the tower). Closed Oct 24, 2024 at $3.02M (~$7,177/sf — consistent with 432 Park studio pricing). | $3,021,034 | $7,176/sf | +0.7% |
| Aug 2, 2024 | 36A | 3 BR · 4.5 BA · 4,003 sf Closed Aug 1, 2024 at $10.7M — 27.46% under the $14.75M last asking. | $10,700,000 | $2,673/sf | -27.5% |
| Jul 25, 2024 | 28L | 342 sf | $1,350,000 | $3,947/sf | off-mkt |
| Jul 17, 2024 | 37B | 3 BR · 4.5 BA · 4,003 sf | $11,293,070 | $2,821/sf | -27.1% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $4,435/sf across 1 sale. Sales close on average -15.9% below ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Other recent transfers
| Date | Unit | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | 33C | $1,500,000 |
| Feb 12, 2026 | 33G | $2,850,000 |
| Jan 23, 2026 | 41FG | $8,200,000 |
| Dec 17, 2025 | 54D | $1,595,000 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | 54J | $3,800,000 |
| Nov 10, 2025 | 39E | $1,550,000 |
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01292-7502) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What to know if you’re buying
Understand which tier you're actually buying. The 432 Park offering plan organizes the building into three structurally distinct tiers — value-tier studios on floors 28–29, the reconfigurable floor 34, and the brand-defining luxury tier from floor 35 upward. A buyer at $2.5M in the studio tier is acquiring a 500-something-square-foot single in a mechanical/transition floor configuration; a buyer at $20M+ in the mid-tower is acquiring a substantial 3–4 BR with the architectural and view characteristics the building is known for. The carrying-cost math is comparable on a per-square-foot basis (~$46/sf base), but the apartment experience is materially different. Match the floor and configuration to the intended use.
Diligence is the entire game here. This is the most consequential buying consideration at 432 Park and the central thesis of The Cracks in a $90M Penthouse: construction risk is not limited to lower-end or rushed projects. A multi-pronged diligence process is appropriate at any new-construction or recently-converted Manhattan trophy address, and especially here. Specifically:
- Review the offering plan and building history. Understand how the building was put together — who developed, designed, and constructed it; the construction sequencing; any amendments and special-risks disclosures. The original 432 Park offering plan is part of the public record and should be reviewed alongside subsequent amendments.
- Hire an experienced home inspector. Even in new construction — especially in new construction — an inspector can flag workmanship issues, deferred maintenance, or sponsor-era shortcuts that material disclosures may have missed.
- Research developer reputation. Macklowe Properties' and CIM Group's records — including the ongoing 432 Park litigation — are part of the relevant background. Past lawsuits, missed deadlines, and quality complaints are all material.
- Read recent board minutes and reserve studies. Anticipated capital assessments, current litigation funding posture, and major mechanical-system planning all surface here.
The square windows are an architectural commitment. Some buyers respond strongly; others find the configuration restrictive. View the apartment in person at multiple times of day. The windows do not open.
Condo flexibility is real. 30–45 day closings; foreign buyers welcome; pied-à-terre and investment use permitted under the declaration; subletting allowed.
Mansion tax cliff effects are major. At 432 Park pricing, multiple cliff thresholds ($5M, $10M, $15M, $20M, $25M) routinely apply. Run pricing through the Mansion Tax Calculator.
Carrying cost is material. Model the full monthly carry (common charges + property taxes + utilities + insurance) carefully — at 432 Park the total monthly nut on a substantial apartment can exceed $20,000 before utilities.
What to know if you’re selling
Marketing requires global reach. The buyer pool is international; access to Asian, Middle Eastern, European broker networks is material to selling at the building's price points.
Building issues are part of the buyer's diligence. Sellers should be prepared with current information on engineering reports, capital assessments, and any active litigation. Transparency tends to support pricing; opacity tends to compress it.
Pricing requires building-specific context. Comparable sales at 432 Park are meaningful but heterogeneous — view altitude, floor count, and apartment configuration drive substantial pricing variation.
Closing timelines are condo-fast. 30–45 days from contract to closing.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 432 Park Avenue, also evaluate:
- 220 Central Park South — Stern's 2018 limestone supertall on CPS, architecturally heavier, generally pricier
- Central Park Tower (217 W 57th) — 2020 Extell supertall, taller (1,550 ft), broader amenity
- One57 (157 W 57th) — 2014 Extell, earlier supertall, lower altitude, smaller amenity
- 111 West 57th (Steinway Tower) — 2021 JDS, slimmest skyscraper, very small unit count, distinctive
- 53 West 53rd (MoMA Tower) — 2019 Jean Nouvel, supertall over MoMA, smaller and very architectural
- 520 Park Avenue — Stern's 2018 Park Avenue trophy condo, smaller scale, classical detailing
The Roebling Team at 432 Park Avenue
The Roebling Team at Compass specializes in Central Park West, the Upper East Side, and the broader Park-facing Manhattan market — including the modern supertall corridor. We publish this building profile because trophy condo buyers and sellers deserve building-specific intelligence — architecture, operational reality, transactional mechanics, and the realities of pricing at the apartment level — not generic market commentary.
If you're considering a purchase or sale at 432 Park, a 30-minute consultation is the right starting point. We'll bring the full context this page provides plus the transactional specifics your situation requires — financial structuring, due diligence priorities, comparable analysis at the apartment level, and the pacing strategy that fits your timeline.