Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1890
520 LaGuardia Place
520 LaGuardia Place, New York, NY 10012

520 LaGuardia Place

520 LaGuardia Place, New York, NY 10012

Greenwich Village

BBL 1005370033 · BIN 1008646

At a glance
Year built
1890
Type
Cooperative
Units
14
Floors
7
Landmark
No
Amenities
Elevator, laundry room, basement storage. No doorman
Pets
Permitted upon board approval, per management-sourced records
Financing
80 percent maximum on a sale (20 percent minimum down), per management-sourced records; refinances are considered case-by-case
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$2,143
Listing discount
1.6%
Recorded sales
28
On record
2004–2026

This is a genuine loft building — not a prewar apartment house with loft styling, and not a new building in a loft idiom. Cleverdon & Putzel built it in 1890 as stores and lofts for Patrick H. McManus, on the corner of what was then South Fifth Avenue and Bleecker Street, in the Romanesque Revival vocabulary that firm used across the neighborhood: brick with terra cotta, brownstone and cast iron, arched openings, and a heavy commercial base. A seventh floor was added later. The residential conversion came around 1968–1969, at the front edge of the movement that turned lower Manhattan's manufacturing stock into housing, and it produced fourteen apartments — two per floor, north and south — inside a 22,390-square-foot building.

That arithmetic is the whole proposition. Roughly 1,600 gross square feet per apartment, two units to a landing, and a corner site with light on two elevations produces half-floor lofts with the proportions that later conversions rarely achieved because later conversions were sliced finer. The building could not be rebuilt at anything like this size today: it stands at a floor-area ratio of 6.89 in an R7-2 district that allows 3.44 for residential use. The square footage is a grandfathered asset.

The second structural fact is the designation. The building is inside the South Village Historic District, designated December 17, 2013 — one of the last large districts LPC mapped, and one that closed off the demolition and enlargement pressure the blocks around Bleecker Street had been absorbing. That confers permanence on the streetscape and, on the other side of the ledger, imposes LPC review on any visible exterior work: windows, storefront, cornice, façade repair. It matters here because this building has an active façade program history, and because at this end of the Village buyers routinely mis-identify which district they are in. Several converge nearby. This lot is South Village, verified against LPC's own building database rather than against PLUTO's district field.

The location is the third fact and needs little argument: a block south of Washington Square Park, inside NYU's academic core, with Bleecker Street's retail at the door and the A/C/E, B/D/F/M and 6 all within a short walk.

Architecture and unit composition

The elevation is late-19th-century commercial masonry — running-bond brick with terra cotta and brownstone trim over a cast-iron base, wrapping the Bleecker Street corner. Interiors are what a 1968-era conversion of an 1890 loft produces: column-and-beam structure, high ceilings, deep floor plates, exposed brick and beams in many apartments, and window walls on two exposures for corner units. Two apartments per floor means each has a north or south orientation across the full building depth. A lot-line window was added under a 2012 alteration, which is worth noting for any buyer relying on secondary light: lot-line windows are permitted by grace of the neighboring lot's current condition and can be lost to a neighboring development.

Fourteen units means the corporation is small, the share allocation matters, and a single vacancy or a single assessment moves the building's economics more than it would in a large house. That is the trade for the space.

Building operations and capital history

Operations are minimal by design: one elevator, a laundry room, basement storage, and no doorman. Fourteen shareholders cannot carry a staffed lobby, and the maintenance reflects it.

The capital record from Department of Buildings filings shows a building that has kept up with its obligations rather than deferred them:

  • 2001 — gas boiler replaced.
  • 2008 — lobby renovated: new tile, new railings, new finishes.
  • 2012 — façade repairs behind a sidewalk shed; separately, a lot-line window installed with structural work.
  • 2018 — two new gas risers installed inside new fire-rated enclosures, the standard response to Local Law 152 gas-piping inspection findings.
  • 2019–2020 — a full Façade Inspection Safety Program cycle: brick replacement, new flashing, replacement feature stone and coping stones, with a material hoist permitted in March 2020. This is the most substantial exterior work in the building's modern record, and for an 1890 masonry corner building in a historic district it is expensive work.

A buyer's attorney should pull the current audited financials, the underlying mortgage and its maturity, the reserve position, and any assessment history tied to the 2019–2020 façade cycle. We do not currently hold financial statements for this building in The Roebling Research Library, and no offering plan for the conversion was located in either library.

Policy framework

Per management-sourced records, current as of the most recent published update:

  • Financing up to 80 percent of purchase price on a sale. Twenty percent down. For a Greenwich Village loft cooperative this is at the permissive end of the range and materially widens the buyer pool relative to houses that cap at 50 or 65 percent. Refinances are handled case-by-case.
  • Subletting is permitted, with a monthly sublet fee equal to 7 percent of the rent charged to the subtenant. The corporation runs a full subtenant application with its own processing and credit-check fees and move-in and move-out deposits.
  • Pets are permitted upon board approval.
  • In-unit washers and dryers are permitted — not a given in a building of this age, and a real point of difference against prewar co-ops nearby.
  • No percentage flip tax is documented. The published schedule shows a flat $1,250 transfer fee paid by the shareholder at closing, alongside a buyer application fee, per-adult credit check, refundable move-in and move-out deposits, a power-of-attorney review fee where applicable, and a recognition agreement fee if the purchaser is financing.
  • Board minutes are made available for review through the management portal on request by counsel.

Pied-à-terre purchase does not appear in the corporation's published policy set; listing records describe it as considered case-by-case. That is exactly the kind of term that is decided by the sitting board rather than by a document, and it should be confirmed with the managing agent before an offer is structured.

New York City's Local Law 58 of 2026 now governs the timing of cooperative board applications citywide: the corporation must acknowledge a completed application in writing within 15 days and must render a decision within 45 days of that acknowledgment, with one permitted 14-day extension. Build those dates into the contract.

Local Law 97

Compliance status
Not subject to Local Law 97

This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 emissions caps apply. No regulatory capital pressure from this law specifically, current or 2030.

See full Local Law 97 analysis →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
SWARMP
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$11,750 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Apartments transfer as cooperative share assignments — ACRIS records 26 property-type SP share transfers on this tax lot alongside assignments and powers of attorney, confirming that individual apartments trade to individual buyers rather than sitting inside a single ownership.

The building trades as a South Village half-floor loft: priced on volume, ceiling height and light rather than on services, and compared against the Thompson Street and Sullivan Street stock to the west and the SoHo cast-iron conversions to the south. The permissive financing ceiling, the sublet allowance, the in-unit laundry permission and the absence of a percentage flip tax together give it a policy stack that is unusually friendly for a downtown co-op, and that shows up in absorption. Against it: no doorman, one elevator, fourteen shareholders carrying the capital load of an 1890 landmarked masonry building. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Mar 19, 20262N
2 BR · 2 BA
$2,250,000-2.0%
Feb 4, 20266N
3 BR · 2 BA
$2,460,000-1.6%
Jan 15, 20264S
3 BR · 2 BA · 1,400 sf
$2,025,000$1,446/sf+3.8%
Dec 11, 20246N
3 BR · 2 BA
$2,500,000+4.4%
Sep 23, 2024PH7N
3 BR · 2 BA · 1,500 sf
$2,300,000$1,533/sf-19.3%
Jul 18, 20243SOUTH
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,400 sf
$2,275,000$1,625/sf-0.9%
Oct 12, 2023PH7S
3 BR · 2 BA
$2,750,000-3.5%
Oct 6, 20237S
3 BR · 2 BA
$2,750,000-3.5%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $2,143/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 1.6% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

2N+96%
$1,150,000 ($767/sf) 2004$1,560,000 ($1,040/sf) 2009$2,080,000 2021$2,250,000 2026
7S+48%
$1,852,520 ($1,323/sf) 2012$2,540,000 ($1,814/sf) 2016$2,750,000 2023
6S+12%
$1,575,000 2009$1,765,000 2012
1S · 1,440 sf+7%
$1,025,000 ($712/sf) 2006$1,100,000 ($764/sf) 2009
View all 28 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00537-0033) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Diligence the façade and the reserves together. A fourteen-unit corporation completed a full FISP cycle in 2019–2020 on a landmarked 1890 corner building. Ask what it cost, how it was funded, whether an assessment ran, and what the next cycle's engineering report says. In a building this small, that answer is the answer.

Confirm the unit count and your share allocation. City records say 14; three DOB filings from 2019–2020 say 12. Get the corporation's current share schedule.

The policy stack is the value. Eighty percent financing, permitted subletting, permitted in-unit laundry, and a flat transfer fee rather than a percentage flip tax is a rare combination downtown. Verify every one of those with the managing agent in writing — they are board positions, not statutes, and boards change them.

You are in a historic district. Anything visible from the street — windows, storefront, façade — runs through LPC. Price the calendar as well as the cost into any renovation plan.

Ask about the Washington Square Village garden. Listing records describe shareholders receiving a key to the private garden ("Key Park") across LaGuardia Place. We have not been able to verify that in a primary source; treat it as a question for the managing agent rather than as a documented amenity.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the policy stack, not the square footage. Every downtown loft claims the square footage. Very few can offer 80 percent financing, permitted sublets, in-unit laundry and no percentage flip tax in the same building. Put that on the first page.

Get ahead of the operating profile. No doorman, one elevator, fourteen shareholders. Buyers coming from full-service buildings need to understand that maintenance is low because the building does little — and that this is a choice, not a deficiency.

Document the capital work. The 2019–2020 façade program, the 2018 gas risers, the 2012 façade cycle and the 2008 lobby all survive attorney diligence and answer the question every buyer's counsel asks about a 136-year-old masonry building.

Price to the loft comparables, not the neighborhood average. Half-floor lofts with two exposures are a narrow, well-defined product. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator against condition before setting the number.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 520 LaGuardia Place, also evaluate:

  • 552 LaGuardia Place — the 1982 cooperative four doors north; the newer alternative on the same block
  • 200 Mercer Street — 1870s loft conversion cooperative; the closest like-for-like in era, structure and half-floor format
  • 140 Thompson Street (The West Broadway Arches) — 1885 loft building converted under a 1978 plan; the South Village loft alternative
  • 10 Bleecker Street — 1893 cooperative by John R. Williams; the same vintage a few blocks east
  • 105 Wooster Street — SoHo cast-iron loft condominium; the no-board-approval alternative in the same product type
  • 177 Thompson Street — 1903 Bernstein & Bernstein building in the South Village Historic District
  • 131 Thompson Street — turn-of-the-century South Village building; the smaller-scale alternative
  • 181 MacDougal Street — Morris Adjmi new construction, 2023–2025; the new-development alternative in the same few blocks
  • 209 Sullivan Street — 1892 Calvert Vaux schoolhouse converted to condominium in 2014; the boutique conversion alternative

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Greenwich Village — read The Roebling Team Guide to Greenwich Village.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at 520 LaGuardia Place?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 520 LaGuardia Place would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.