Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Flatiron $1,769/sf 3%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1887
The Arlington
62 Montague Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201
Buildings·Cooperative

62 Montague Street (The Arlington)

62 Montague Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201

Brooklyn Heights, Brooklyn

BBL 3002470025 · BIN 3002033

At a glance
Year built
1887
Type
Cooperative
Units
43
Floors
10
Landmark
Designated
Board & building profile
Pets
Pet-friendly per the cooperative's published building information

Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 2026). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.

The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2025

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

2BR median
$1.6M
Recent range
$1.4M – $2.5M
Listing discount
-22.4%
Recorded transfers
30
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Arlington would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

When it opened at the west end of Montague Street in 1888, the Arlington was a genuinely radical building: ten stories of apartments in a neighborhood of four-story row houses, visible — as the Brooklyn Eagle noted at the time — from Wall Street and the ferry. The Eagle's account, reproduced in the building's own offering plan, records the ambition in detail: twenty-nine original apartments with "not a single dark room in the entire building," large family units of drawing room, dining room, library, four bedrooms and eleven closets, nine bachelor flats at the building's center, two elevators (one for tenants, one for servants), a marble-and-iron fireproof staircase, interiors finished by cabinetmakers in rosewood, antique oak, and bird's-eye maple, and frescoed ceilings. For its first two decades it stood among the tallest residential structures in Brooklyn.

The architect matters as much as the height. Montrose W. Morris became Brooklyn's defining apartment-house architect — the Alhambra (1889), the Imperial, the Renaissance — and the Arlington is an early, largely intact major work, a precursor in which the elements of his mature style are already assembled: the rusticated base, the brownstone portico, the projecting metal bay, terra-cotta ornament, and above all the corner turret rising five stories to its peaked slate cap. The building's 2010 façade restoration renewed the decorative program, including the turret's "witch's hat." Within the Brooklyn Heights Historic District — the city's first, designated November 23, 1965 — that exterior is protected permanently.

The building's social history runs deep as well. The cooperative's own building history records Arthur Miller among the residents of the early 1940s, during his Brooklyn Navy Yard years, along with the filmmaker Marie Menken and poet Willard Maas. From the start the Arlington housed the Heights' professional middle class rather than its mansion-dwellers — a building of managers, clerks, writers, and supervisors, which is roughly the constituency its four- and three-room lines serve today.

The 1980 cooperative conversion, sponsored by Monty Realty Co. as a non-eviction plan, preserved this fabric: forty-eight apartments at conversion, sold at share prices that now read as historical artifacts, with the working fireplaces, mantels, and Victorian floor plans documented in the plan itself. What today's buyer purchases is the direct descendant of 1888's experiment — a grand early apartment house one block from the Promenade, at co-op economics.

Architecture and unit composition

The conversion-era layout (per the offering plan) placed two seven-room apartments on the parlor floor and, on each floor from the second through the tenth, two four-room corner lines (A and C) toward Montague Street, two three-room rear lines (D and E), and a center studio (B) — plus the penthouse tucked into the turret, a genuinely singular apartment. City records count 43 units today against the plan's 48, reflecting decades of combinations; verifying the legal configuration of any combined unit is standard diligence here.

Original fabric is the building's currency: working fireplaces in the A, C, and select three-room lines with terra-cotta-lined flues; mantels and hearths in varied Victorian styles; hardwood floors; pressed-tin and plaster ceilings; and the tenth floor's mansard rooms with dormers. The four-room lines carry the classic parlor–dining–bedroom sequence with windowed kitchens. Because the building predates central air and sits in the historic district, cooling is by interior-approved means — the offering plan itself flagged that street-façade masonry cannot be cut for sleeves — and buyers planning renovations should assume LPC and board review for anything touching windows or façade.

The building's structure is documented in the plan's engineering description: brick foundation walls laid in cement, upper walls of hard brick and terra cotta with partition walls up to 28 inches thick, floors on 20-inch iron beams — construction the Eagle admired in 1888 and which remains the reason prewar buyers respond to the building's solidity.

Building operations

62 Montague Street Housing Corporation runs the building with a live-in superintendent, central cellar laundry, bike and private storage, and a roof deck with harbor views (per the cooperative's published building information). A single passenger elevator serves the ten floors — the original servants' car is long gone — and the cellar houses the building systems. No managing agent is publicly documented; management arrangements should be confirmed during diligence. The Roebling Research Library holds the offering plan, amendments, bylaws, proprietary lease, house rules, purchase application, and multi-year financial statements for the building, available to clients during diligence.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$172/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $0

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Unsafe
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as Unsafe — conditions requiring corrective action, which under FISP means a protective sidewalk shed and repairs. Review the subsequent filings, the repair status, and the building’s board and financial materials — we pull the repair scope and funding picture for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
Unsafe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$26,100 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Oct 23, 20253BC
3 BR
$2,535,000+1.8%
Jun 26, 202510C
2 BR · 1 BA
$1,700,000+25.9%
Aug 21, 20242C
2 BR · 1 BA
$1,408,000+22.4%
Dec 20, 20233BC
3 BR · 2 BA
$1,300,000-18.8%
Jun 30, 20205A
2 BR · 1 BA
$985,000+2.1%
Dec 27, 20187ABE
4 BR · 2 BA
$2,995,000+0.0%
Nov 28, 20182ABE
3 BR · 3 BA
$2,950,000-1.5%
May 24, 20184A
1 BR · 1 BA · 850 sf
$899,000$1,058/sf+0.0%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2018): a median $1,063/sf across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2025. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

10C+143%
$700,000 2012$1,700,000 2025
3BC+95%
$1,300,000 2023$2,535,000 2025
2C+73%
$816,000 2014$1,408,000 2024
6ABE · 1,950 sf+70%
$1,642,500 ($842/sf) 2010$2,800,000 ($1,436/sf) 2015
4A · 850 sf+39%
$645,000 2011$899,000 ($1,058/sf) 2018
View all 30 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-00247-0025) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Buy the fabric, budget for the systems. Fireplaces, mantels, tin ceilings, and mansard rooms are the value; kitchens, baths, and electrical capacity vary widely by unit. Price the renovation before you bid, and expect LPC review for anything visible outside.

Confirm the legal unit configuration. With 48 plan units against 43 in city records, combined apartments are common; verify alteration approvals and the share allocation for any combination.

This is a self-contained prewar co-op, with prewar economics. A single elevator, a live-in super, and no amenity floor keep maintenance grounded; the trade is service depth for carrying-cost discipline.

Policy detail lives with the board. Sublet, pied-à-terre, and financing rules are not publicly documented. We confirm current policy directly with the cooperative at offer stage.

The location is the west-end sweet spot. Promenade access without Promenade pricing, Montague Street's retail at the door, and the 2/3 at Clark Street and R at Court Street within a few blocks.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with Morris and 1888. A documented Montrose W. Morris apartment house with an Eagle write-up and a turret is a marketing asset no staging can replicate; use the history.

Photograph the fireplaces and ceilings. Original-fabric details are the differentiator against the Heights' plainer prewar stock; make them the visual argument.

Price to condition honestly. The renovated-versus-estate spread in the Heights remained wide through 2025; an aspirational ask on an unrenovated four-room line will sit.

Prepare the alteration file. Buyers' attorneys will ask about combinations, fireplace status, and LPC sign-offs; a complete file protects the timeline.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering The Arlington, also evaluate:

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at The Arlington?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com