87 Hicks Street
87 Hicks Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201
Brooklyn Heights, Brooklyn
BBL 3002260006 · BIN 3001689
- Year built
- 1889
- Type
- Cooperative
- Units
- 20
- Floors
- 5
- Pets
- Not documented in the materials reviewed — confirm against the current house rules
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; in the Brooklyn Heights Historic District
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
- Subletting by shareholders
- Permitted with conditions
- Doorman
- No doorman
- Subletting
- Board consent by resolution, or on refusal by written consent/vote of shareholders owning at least 66-2/3% of outstanding shares; consent may be arbitrarily refused within the bounds of law; board may impose conditions and charge reasonable legal and managing-agent expenses
Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 1984 plan documents). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.
Every recorded sale at this building, 2006–2026
Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.
- Recent range
- $430K – $430K
- Listing discount
- 0.4%
- Recorded transfers
- 16
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 87 Hicks Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
87 Hicks is the small end of the Brooklyn Heights cooperative market, and it is a clean example of what that end actually consists of: an 1889 walk-up on a Fruit Streets corner block, nineteen apartments, no elevator, a part-time superintendent in the conversion budget, and current staffing and maintenance to establish from present service contracts and accounts. Buildings like this are how people who are not buying a Promenade floor-through get into the historic district.
The paperwork is a period document of the 1980s conversion wave at its most ordinary. Urban Associates 1982-II — a partnership run by two principals out of a 60 East 42nd Street office, working through a Great Neck management company — bought the building from private owners in December 1982 and brought a non-eviction plan two years later, on October 26, 1984. Every apartment was rent stabilized; one was empty. Shares were priced to insiders at $187.50 apiece against a total purchase price of $1,742,008, and the plan projected the sponsor's profit at roughly $452,000. That is the whole story: a small Brooklyn rental building, a leveraged sponsor, statutory tenant protections, and a shareholder corporation at the end of it.
The plan also captures the physical scale. The share schedule runs a garden level of three apartments and four upper floors of A, B, C and D lines. The apartments are small — most are two- or three-room layouts, and the plan's own footnote records that every apartment except one contains exactly one bathroom. The exception is a garden-level unit of about five and a half rooms with two baths, the building's largest apartment and still its outlier.
For buyers, this is a walk-up purchase in the district's best-located quiet pocket, priced accordingly. For sellers, the case rests on the block, the historic district, and the running cost of a building with almost no staff.
Architecture and unit composition
Five stories of 1889 masonry inside a designated historic district, with a garden level opening below the stoop line. The 1984 share allocation ran from 166 shares on the smallest fourth-floor C-line unit to 471 on the garden-level two-bath apartment, and the concentration of value is tight: most units sat between 230 and 300 shares. Two- and three-room apartments dominate, which in current market terms means studios, junior one-bedrooms and one-bedrooms, with the occasional two-bedroom created by combination or by reading a three-room layout generously.
Assess condition-related price differences and the available same-line comparable sales from dated records; the small unit count establishes neither. Original detail — mantels, casings, floors — survives in some units and has been stripped in others. Assess condition, usable light, floor and layout together without assigning an untested rank.
Exterior alterations generally require LPC approval, including window replacement and through-wall air-conditioner installations described in the plan’s special risks; some maintenance is exempt and qualifying work can receive staff approval. Price Landmarks review into a renovation schedule rather than the contingency.
Building operations
87 Hicks Street Tenants Corp. has operated the building since the mid-1980s closing. This is a shareholder-run walk-up: no elevator to modernize, no doorman payroll, no lobby to renovate. The conversion budget's staffing line — a single part-time non-resident superintendent for ten hours a week — is the clearest statement of the operating philosophy, and while current staffing should be confirmed, buildings of this scale in the district generally continue in that register.
The trade is that capital work lands harder when it comes. A nineteen-unit corporation spreads a façade cycle, a roof or a boiler across a small share base, and assessments are the normal mechanism. The co-op's financial statements in The Roebling Research Library show how the board has handled that historically — reserve levels, assessment frequency and maintenance trajectory are the three numbers to trace. Review façade, roof and boiler condition and the actual funding plan. The reported five-story building is below the ordinary FISP threshold of more than six stories; confirm DOB scope before requesting a cycle filing.
Policy framework
Resale and subletting: Board consent by resolution, or on refusal by vote or written consent of holders of at least 66⅔ percent of shares. The plan expressly permits arbitrary refusal within the bounds of law, allows the board to condition a sublet consent, and permits recovery of the corporation's legal and managing-agent costs from the applicant.
Undesirability: The proprietary lease permits termination on a determination by two-thirds of shareholders that a lessee's tenancy is undesirable — standard prewar co-op language, rarely invoked, worth knowing.
Alterations: Corporation consent required, not to be unreasonably withheld, with the shareholder bearing interior repair and decoration costs. LPC approval governs exterior work including windows.
Pets, pied-à-terre, washer-dryer, financing minimums and flip tax: Not documented in the materials reviewed. Get the current answers from management in writing before contract.
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Subletting by shareholders
- Permitted with conditionsBoard consent by resolution, or on refusal by written consent/vote of shareholders owning at least 66-2/3% of outstanding shares; consent may be arbitrarily refused within the bounds of law; board may impose conditions and charge reasonable legal and managing-agent expensesSource: The Roebling Research Desk's building record, 1984
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- No doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- Requires confirmationCity records and our profile differ.
- Amenities noted
- Laundry roomSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 limits apply to a building on its own. It is still covered if it shares a tax lot or condominium board with buildings totaling over 50,000 sq ft; confirm on DOB’s covered-buildings list.
See full Local Law 97 analysis →Recent sales
Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2026 | 2B | 1 BR · 1 BA | $430,000 | -10.2% | |
| Aug 12, 2021 | 1D | 1 BR · 1 BA | $380,000 | -4.8% | |
| Jul 23, 2021 | 3C | 1 BR | $335,000 | -4.3% | |
| Apr 21, 2021 | 1C | 1 BR | $305,000 | -1.6% | |
| Oct 17, 2019 | 2D | 1 BR · 1 BA | $410,000 | +2.8% | |
| Jun 15, 2018 | B | 4 BR · 1,222 sf | $1,195,000 | $978/sf | +0.0% |
| Mar 23, 2018 | 2 | 1 BR | $402,000 | +0.8% | |
| Mar 23, 2018 | 2A | 1 BR · 1 BA | $402,000 | +0.8% |
Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2018): a median $978/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2026. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-00226-0006). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 87 Hicks Street and nearby.
Buying here? Co-op closing costs typically run 2 to 3% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with 87 Hicks Street and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 87 Hicks Street. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Reconcile the unit count and your share allocation. The plan covered 19 apartments; DOF shows 20. Your attorney should confirm the specific unit's shares, the current certificate of occupancy and any combination or subdivision history.
Price the walk-up honestly. Five stories with no elevator affects resale to a real segment of the buyer pool. It also keeps your maintenance low. Decide which side of that you are on before you bid.
Ask about assessments. In a nineteen-unit corporation, capital work may be funded through maintenance, an assessment or borrowing. The history of those assessments is a useful read on the board's financial management; review it with the current budget and audited statements.
Landmarks governs your windows. Exterior alterations, including window replacement and through-wall air-conditioner installation, generally need LPC approval; confirm any maintenance exemption and staff-review eligibility. Build that into any renovation timeline.
Get policy answers in writing. Pets, subletting practice, financing minimums and any flip tax postdate the plan documents. Management's current answers control.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the block. Fruit Streets quiet, two blocks to the Promenade, two to the Clark Street express. On a walk-up listing, location does more work than any interior feature.
Document the renovation. In a building where condition sets the spread, permits, Landmarks-clean alteration files and a clear record of what was done are price-makers rather than paperwork.
Show the carrying cost. Low maintenance is this building's competitive answer to the district's full-service co-ops. Put the monthly number in front of buyers early and let it argue for you.
Price against the district's walk-up set. The right comparables are small Heights co-ops of similar scale and staffing — not the Montague corridor's elevator buildings.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 87 Hicks Street, also evaluate:
- 66 Orange Street — 1912 conversion co-op around the corner at similar scale, with an elevator and courtyards
- 130 Hicks Street — small co-op further south on the same street
- 145 Hicks Street — larger Hicks Street co-op; the full-service alternative on the same corridor
- 8 Old Fulton Street (Brooklyn City Railroad Company Building) — eleven-unit conversion co-op at the district's north edge; the smallest-scale comparable
- 54 Orange Street — Fruit Streets co-op one block east
- 72 Orange Street — moderate-scale Fruit Streets peer
- 149 Willow Street — twenty-unit 1889 co-op two blocks west, converted in the same era
- 15 Clark Street — prewar elevator co-op at the express-train corner
- 35 Clark Street — prewar co-op peer on the Clark Street corridor
More Brooklyn Heights buildings
- 80 Pierrepont Street — co-op
- 85 Joralemon Street, 85 Joralemon Street · Brooklyn Heights — 1879 condominium
- 87 Columbia Heights — 1916 co-op
- 9 Garden Place — 1845 co-op
- 9 Pierrepont Street — 1856 co-op
- 90 Furman Street (Pierhouse) — 2013 condominium
The neighborhood
For the full neighborhood — its buildings, character, and market — read The Roebling Team Guide to Brooklyn Heights.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at 87 Hicks Street?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com