Ruppert Yorkville Towers (1601–1641 Third Avenue)
BBL 1015367501 · BIN 1086170
- Year built
- 1974
- Type
- Condominium
- Amenities
- 24-hour doorman and concierge service at each tower, on-site garage, commercial fitness center at the base, landscaped terrace with grills, private playground, bike room, central laundry
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; not in a historic district
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission and City Planning records, updated February 2026
- Leasing by owners
- Permitted with conditions
- Dogs
- Not permitted
- Cats
- Not stated
- Washer/dryer
- Requires confirmation
- Our building profile and the source for this line differ. Confirm with building management.
- Doorman
- Full-time doorman
Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Recorded sales
- 177
- On record
- 2003–2026
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Ruppert Yorkville Towers would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
Ruppert Yorkville Towers is the structural anchor of upper Yorkville's condominium market and one of the most consequential ownership stories in the neighborhood: a four-tower, roughly 1,258-unit Mitchell-Lama complex that privatized in 2003 into what The New York Times covered as one of the largest condominium conversions in New York City history. The complex occupies two full Third Avenue blockfronts between East 90th and East 92nd Streets — land that until the mid-1960s held the Jacob Ruppert Brewery, whose owner also owned the Yankees during the Babe Ruth era. The brewery's demolition created the Ruppert Brewery urban-renewal area, and the towers that rose on it in 1974–75 were the project that, in the assessment of contemporary critics, pulled the new East Side skyline north of 86th Street.
The architecture deserves more credit than large 1970s housing usually gets. Davis, Brody & Associates — the firm whose Waterside Plaza earned New York Times critical praise for "breaking the mold" of the city's flat-topped brick slabs — gave the towers their signature sculpted massing: chamfered corners, stepped crowns, and deep-set windows in dark brick, a "new brutalist" profile that reads as deliberate architecture rather than commodity housing. The towers' scale buys what post-war Yorkville rarely offers: high-floor, open-sky exposures in every direction — Central Park and reservoir views to the west on upper floors, river glimpses east, and protected light over the low-rise Carnegie Hill blocks.
The 2003 privatization is the market fact that defines the complex today. When the owners exited Mitchell-Lama in January 2003, the conversion was negotiated rather than fought to the end: sitting tenants could buy at a discount to market or remain as renters under a protection-and-subsidy framework, and the sponsor funded the condominium's statutory reserve — $11.7 million — at the first closing, per the offering-plan amendment on file in The Roebling Research Library. The result is a fully market-rate condominium with an unusually deep mix: owner-occupants, investors (the sublet policy is among the most flexible on the Upper East Side), and a legacy cohort of pre-conversion renters whose units return to the market over time. For buyers, the complex functions as the value-tier, full-service condominium entry to the Carnegie Hill / Yorkville seam — condo mechanics, utilities-inclusive carrying costs, and tower views at pricing well below the neighborhood's newer condominium stock.
Architecture and unit composition
The four addresses pair into two blocks: Ruppert Towers at 1601 and 1619 Third Avenue (90th to 91st) and Yorkville Towers at 1623 and 1641 Third Avenue (91st to 92nd), rising roughly 34 to 42 stories over shared landscaped grounds, retail at the avenue, and a large below-grade garage. The roughly 1,258 residences run from studios through three-bedrooms, many with the stepped-plan corner exposures the Davis Brody massing produces; upper-floor west-facing lines clear Carnegie Hill to Central Park and reservoir views. Apartments were built to sturdy 1970s middle-income specifications — rational layouts, real foyers, generous closets — and the resale market divides cleanly between renovated units and originals priced to renovation math. Combination units exist throughout.
Building operations
Each tower operates full-service — 24-hour doorman and concierge, live-in superintendency, and a large porter staff across the complex — under unified condominium governance and a single managing agent. The amenity set is practical rather than resort-tier: on-site garage, commercial fitness center at the base of the complex, landscaped terrace with grills, playground, bike storage, and central laundry. Common charges have historically bundled heat, electricity, and hot water per listing records; verify current inclusions and compare total common charges, taxes and separately billed expenses with specific alternatives, counting each utility once. The offering plan and amendments are on file in The Roebling Research Library; current financial statements and house rules should be obtained through the managing agent during diligence.
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Leasing by owners
- Permitted with conditionsBoard approvalSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Pets and in-unit washer/dryer
- Dogs
- Not permittedSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Cats
- Not statedThe source permits pets without naming cats.Source: The Roebling Team's building profile
- In-unit washer/dryer
- Requires confirmationOur building profile and the source for this line differ. Confirm with building management.
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- Full-time doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Concierge
- YesSource: recent listing records
- Live-in superintendent
- YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
- Amenities noted
- Fitness room, garage, bike storage, laundry roomSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $1,111,779/yr
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $1,651,930/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $168 – $249
- Modeled exposure split equally across 553 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; condominium owners are typically charged by each unit's common-interest percentage.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the inspector (QEWI) identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
Recent sales
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Recent closings at this building, sourced from NYC Department of Finance records. Apartment-level detail (line, condition, asking-price context) verified upon consultation request.
| Date | Unit | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026 | 23F | $1,200,000 |
| Dec 12, 2025 | 21H | $1,310,000 |
| Oct 30, 2025 | 16K | $1,275,000 |
| Sep 10, 2025 | 17J | $750,000 |
| Sep 3, 2025 | 11J | $906,000 |
| Aug 19, 2025 | 21F | $1,150,000 |
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01536-7501; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at Ruppert Yorkville Towers and nearby.
At the recent median sale of $1.03M (10 sales in the past 24 months, since October 25, 2024), a buyer putting 25% down would pay about $46,854 to close, or 4.6% of the price.
- Mansion tax: $10,280
- Mortgage recording tax: $14,842
- Title insurance: $4,626
- Attorneys, lender, building fees, reserves and filings: $17,106
Assumes a resale (the seller pays transfer taxes), a $4,500 attorney fee and a mortgage on the rest.
Keep up with Ruppert Yorkville Towers and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like Ruppert Yorkville Towers. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
The complex is fully market-rate condominium — the Mitchell-Lama chapter is history, not present tense. The 2003 conversion ended income restrictions for purchasers; you buy and sell on ordinary condominium mechanics. The legacy renter cohort affects building texture and the pace of sponsor-controlled inventory, not your title or resale rights.
The sublet policy is a structural feature. Investor-friendly subletting (one-year minimum leases per listing-documented terms) makes this one of the most flexible large condominiums on the Upper East Side — relevant whether you intend to rent the unit out or simply want exit optionality. Verify current rules and fees with the managing agent.
Underwrite the utilities-inclusive carry. Common charges that include heat, electricity, and hot water are not directly comparable to common charges that don't. Run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator on a like-for-like basis before judging the monthlies.
Price the view stack, not the average. With four towers and dozens of lines, building-average pricing is close to meaningless. High-floor west park views, open east river glimpses, and low-floor avenue exposures are different products. Insist on same-line comparables.
Review operations at the complex’s actual scale. More than 1,200 residences do not establish liquidity, pricing efficiency or staffing adequacy. Review qualifying sales, current staffing schedules, elevator service, budgets, capital plans and board communications with counsel.
Two house rules will decide this building for some buyers: no dogs, and no in-unit washer/dryer. Both are documented in the condominium's own sale-application package on file with us, and neither appears in ordinary listing material. If either is disqualifying, resolve it before you spend money on diligence. A disability-related assistance animal is handled as a reasonable-accommodation request, not under the pet rule.
Do not build anything on PLUTO's numbers for the Yorkville block. City data reports 710 units and no year built for Block 1537, Lot 7501. That lot is two towers: 1623 Third Avenue has 384 apartments and 1641 Third Avenue has 326, and both were completed in 1974–75. Ask for the unit-lot schedule rather than trusting an aggregated figure.
A third of the Yorkville apartments are still sponsor-held. Roughly 128 of 384 unit lots at 1623 and 108 of 326 at 1641 remain with the sponsor entity as legacy rental units. That is not a defect — the complex is fully market-rate, and whether and when those units are sold is the sponsor's decision — but it does mean the resale supply picture in these two towers is different from a fully sold-out condominium.
Transit and corridor: the Q at 96th Street and Second Avenue and the 4/5/6 at 86th changed this corridor's connectivity; the 92nd Street Y and Whole Foods at 87th are the daily-life anchors.
What to know if you’re selling
Differentiate inside the complex. At any moment you are likely competing with other units in your own building. Renovation quality, line, floor, and staging are the separators; pricing against the building's active inventory — not just closed history — is essential.
Market the structural facts. Condo flexibility, utilities-inclusive monthlies, the investor-open sublet policy, and the Davis Brody view architecture are the assets that survive buyer diligence. State them plainly.
Know your buyer pools. The complex draws two distinct pools — primary-residence value buyers priced out of Carnegie Hill co-ops and investors underwriting rental yield. Each responds to different positioning; we market to both deliberately.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering Ruppert Yorkville Towers, also evaluate:
- 180 East 88th Street — the architectural new-development contrast four blocks south; the step-up tier
- 1628 Second Avenue — boutique Yorkville condominium alternative at smaller scale
- 131 East 93rd Street — the Carnegie Hill boutique alternative at the corridor's seam
- Carnegie Park, 200 East 94th Street — the closest like-for-like: large-scale post-war tower converted to condominium, with a fuller amenity program
- The Monterey, 175 East 96th Street — large full-service residential comparison at the corridor’s northern end; confirm its ownership form and construction history
- Astor Terrace, 245 East 93rd Street — 1980s full-service condominium peer one avenue east
- The Waterford, 300 East 93rd Street — 1980s tower condominium peer with similar view economics
- One Carnegie Hill, 215 East 96th Street — residential alternative with an amenity program; confirm ownership form, construction history and access terms
- 200 East End Avenue — the post-war co-op alternative for buyers comparing ownership structures across Yorkville
More Upper East Side buildings
- The Newbury (1659 Second Avenue) — 1971 co-op
- 1681 Second Avenue — 1966 co-op
- East River Tower (1725 York Avenue) — 1971 co-op
- Chartwell House (1760 Second Avenue) — 2001 condominium by H. Thomas O'Hara Architects
- 1776 Second Avenue (The Waterford) — 1987 condominium by Beyer Blinder Belle
- 1838 Second Avenue — 1987 condominium
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Upper East Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper East Side.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at Ruppert Yorkville Towers?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com