Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf ▴2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room ▴2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room ▴18%CPW $355K/room ▾5%Fifth Ave $501K/room ▴19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf ▴24%East Village $1,663/sf ▴10%
Full index →
Condominium · 1891
1 Mount Morris Park West (The Mount Morris Park West Condominium)
1 Mount Morris Park West, New York, NY 10027
Buildings·Harlem·Condominium

1 Mount Morris Park West (The Mount Morris Park West Condominium)

1 Mount Morris Park West, New York, NY 10027

BBL 1017207501 · BIN 1053327

CorridorHarlem
At a glance
Year built
1891
Type
Condominium
Units
36
Landmark
Designated
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 1 Mount Morris Park West (The Mount Morris Park West Condominium) would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

For about two decades this was the most conspicuous derelict row in landmarked Harlem. The nine houses on Mount Morris Park West between 120th and 121st Streets were seized by the State in the 1960s for an urban renewal project that never went ahead. The 1971 designation report places most of the district inside the Milbank-Frawley Circle Urban Renewal Area. Around 1981 the State planned a mental health center on part of the row, and several fronts were stripped before the community stopped it. The State later placed a minimum-security prison in the corner building at No. 10 and in 1990 proposed extending it into the empty houses. Neighbors called the row "the Ruins." The New York Times reported in April 1998 that Empire State Development had chosen a development team for a roughly $6 million restoration.

Recorded documents show how the row passed out of public ownership. In 1999 the State conveyed the parent lot to the Urban Development Corporation (now Empire State Development), and a State development entity conveyed it on to the Harlem Community Development Corporation. In 2001 it went to HCDC's housing development fund company. The condominium declaration was recorded in September 2003 and sponsor closings began that November. The apartments were sold by lottery administered by HCDC, at prices well below the open market.

The ownership form is what makes this building useful now. In the historic district, a buyer usually has to choose between a whole townhouse, a floor in an informally divided house, or a co-op. Here the rowhouse fabric comes as 36 individually deeded condominium apartments, with deed-based transfers, no board interview, and park frontage on every house.

Architecture and unit composition

The row is two speculative groups of the Harlem boom. Joseph M. DeVeau built Nos. 6–9 in 1891–92; Walter F. Kilpatrick followed with Nos. 1–5 in 1894. LPC records do not name an architect for either group. The designation report's list of architects working in the district — Lamb & Rich, George F. Pelham, James E. Ware, Thom & Wilson and others — should not be read as an attribution for these houses. LPC notes a 1950s alteration at No. 4.

Treat the fronts as partly reconstructed. Sources differ on what was lost around 1981. The Times account says three houses were demolished for the abandoned mental-health project; the development archive says three facades were removed. LPC still records nine houses on the lot, so the 2003 program rebuilt those fronts within the district. Which three is not documented in what we reviewed. Buyers who care about original fabric should ask the managing agent or check LPC permit history for the specific house.

The 36 apartments are numbered by house and letter. Apartment 5A is in No. 5, and each house has an A, B, C and D. PLUTO's floor area works out to roughly 1,100 gross square feet per apartment, on a 20-foot rowhouse floor. Layout, exposure and renovation vary by house and by level; front rooms face the park and rear rooms face the block interior. DOB filings from 2011 and 2016 show individual owners relocating kitchens and reworking baths, so the stock is no longer uniform. Whether the row has an elevator is not firmly documented in public records; assume walk-up until the managing agent confirms otherwise.

Building operations

One condominium, nine houses. The houses share one declaration, one board, one budget and one BIN, and DOB treats them as a single building. Common charges therefore pay for nine roofs, nine facades and nine sets of stoops and areaways. On a landmarked row of 1890s masonry, that is the long-run cost to understand. Exterior work needs LPC approval. The row also has 180 feet of sidewalk and park-facing façade, and a City revocable consent on the sidewalk is recorded in the condominium's name. Ask for the reserve position, recent façade and roof work, and any planned assessment before contract.

J-51 — both parts have ended. The 2003 conversion earned a J-51 benefit, the City's tax incentive for rehabilitating residential buildings. The Department of Finance carried both parts on every unit lot:

  • Exemption: the 14-year, non-government-financed J-51 exemption (DOF code 1920). Benefit start 2007, base year 2001. It had phased to zero by the fiscal 2021/22 roll and no longer appears.
  • Abatement: a J-51 abatement at 90 percent of certified reasonable cost, over a 20-year window from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2026. On the unit lot we sampled it was worth roughly $1,600 a year off the tax bill. The fiscal 2027 roll carries no J-51 on any of the 36 unit lots.

A buyer comparing tax bills should use fiscal 2027 figures or later; earlier bills understate the current tax. Personal exemptions on individual unit lots, such as senior-citizen or veteran exemptions, do not transfer to a buyer.

Affordability program history. The 2003 program was State-sponsored, through HCDC and Empire State Development. It was not an HPD program or a Mitchell-Lama, and the condominium is not an HDFC cooperative. ACRIS shows resales at open-market levels starting in 2005. We found no recorded regulatory agreement or resale restriction against the unit lots. Any owner-occupancy or resale covenant attached to the original lottery sales would sit in the sponsor deeds or the offering plan, and none appears in what we reviewed. Have title confirm this for the specific unit.

Recent sales

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

4A+13%
$950,000 2015 → $1,075,000 2024
8A-9%
$689,000 2006 → $630,000 2012

Recent closings at this building, sourced from NYC Department of Finance records. Apartment-level detail (line, condition, asking-price context) verified upon consultation request.

DateUnitPrice
Jan 31, 20251A$1,300,000
Aug 12, 20244A$1,075,000
Aug 29, 20236D$1,299,000
Mar 26, 20198B$880,000
Oct 10, 20171C$1,227,000
Aug 14, 20154A$950,000
View all 10 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01720-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price.

Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with 1 Mount Morris Park West (The Mount Morris Park West Condominium) and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like1 Mount Morris Park West (The Mount Morris Park West Condominium). Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

Price the tax bill without the abatement. Listing records built on pre-2026 tax bills understate carrying cost. Ask for the fiscal 2027 bill for the specific unit lot.

Read the reserve study against the envelope. Nine 1890s houses with partly rebuilt fronts, in a historic district, make façade, roof, parapet and stoop work the main capital exposure. Ask for the last five years of board minutes and the current budget.

Confirm vertical access and laundry by apartment. Most units are walk-ups. Washer/dryer connections were installed at conversion, but whether a unit has a machine depends on the owner.

Check title for legacy lottery covenants. We found nothing recorded against the units, but the original sales ran through a State program. Your attorney should confirm the chain back to the 2003–2005 sponsor deed.

Use the right address. The same apartment may appear under 1, 1–9, or its own house number in listing and public records. The billing lot is block 1720, lot 7501, and your unit lot is in the 1001–1036 range.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the history and the frontage. The State-sponsored restoration of "the Ruins" in a 1971 landmark district, with park frontage on all nine houses, is a better story than any finish list. Tell it plainly.

Give buyers the post-abatement tax bill upfront. It removes a late-stage surprise and makes the carrying cost comparison with co-ops honest.

Price to the house and the level. Same-house comparables are the best evidence. Level, light and renovation quality separate apartments that are otherwise similar.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 1 Mount Morris Park West, also evaluate:

More Harlem buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Harlem — read The Roebling Team Guide to Harlem.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at 1 Mount Morris Park West (The Mount Morris Park West Condominium)?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com