Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Condop · 1939
The 110 Condominium
110 East 87th Street, New York, NY 10128

110 East 87th Street (The 110 Condominium)

110 East 87th Street, New York, NY 10128

Carnegie Hill, Upper East Side

BBL 1015157501 · BIN 1047972

At a glance
Year built
1939
Type
Condop
Units
67
Floors
13
Landmark
No
Amenities
Doorman, live-in superintendent, common laundry, resident storage, landscaped roof terrace, per management-sourced and listing records
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2025

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,244
Listing discount
1.5%
Recorded sales
70
On record
2004–2025

Carnegie Hill is one of the most heavily landmarked residential districts in Manhattan, and the two things that follow from that — no new construction, and a shortage of condominium inventory in a neighbourhood of cooperatives — are the whole argument for this building. It is a 1939 prewar house with real Art Deco detail, in the middle of the Park-to-Lexington blockfront, where you buy by deed rather than by board interview.

The undesignated status is the structural oddity and it is worth understanding precisely. LPC's building database covers block 1515 sparsely: 1045 Park, 1049 Park, and 1055 Park Avenue (which also carries 100–104 East 87th Street) are inside the Park Avenue Historic District. Lot 7501 — this building, immediately east of the last of them — is not. Nor does it fall inside the Expanded Carnegie Hill Historic District, whose boundary sits north and west. The building occupies an undesignated gap between two districts. Practically, that means facade work, window replacement and terrace alterations here run through the Department of Buildings and the condominium board, not through a Certificate of Appropriateness. That is a real and underappreciated advantage over the cooperatives on either side of it.

The architecture is late Deco rather than the 1920s neo-Renaissance that dominates the surrounding blocks: red brick with terra-cotta trim, a steel frame with self-supporting non-bearing exterior walls, and stepped setbacks at the eleventh floor and the penthouse that carve terrace space around almost the whole perimeter at those levels. The terraced upper floors are the building's scarce product. Apartments below them retain the prewar planning of their period — entry foyers, windowed kitchens, casement windows, beamed ceilings in much of the stock.

Architecture and unit composition

The building rises thirteen stories on the Department of Finance's record, with the top two levels stepped back on nearly every elevation. The engineer's inspection report in the plan documents describes a conventional 1930s steel frame with concrete floors and curtain-type masonry walls, with a rear yard on the southern lot line and side yards. The facade projections noted in the survey — roof coping, stone trim, pilasters, window sills and a stone base — are the Deco ornament that survives at street level.

The unit mix runs from studios and one-bedrooms through larger family layouts and the terraced upper-floor homes, plus a "Tower" unit named as such in the condominium's own documents. Three units at the base are carried by the Department of Finance in the professional/office condominium class and function as commercial or medical space, which is why the residential count of 64 and the total unit-lot count of 67 differ. A superintendent's unit sits outside the 67.

Because the conversion was a 1985 rental-to-condominium and not a gut renovation, apartment condition varies more widely here than in new-development inventory. Some homes have been fully rebuilt since the conversion and some have not been touched since it. That dispersion is the single largest driver of price within the building and it does not show up in any building-level statistic.

Building operations

A full-service prewar condominium: attended lobby with doorman coverage, a live-in superintendent, common laundry, resident storage, and a landscaped roof terrace that is the building's principal shared amenity. Common charges are modest relative to full-amenity new construction because the amenity program is modest — there is no fitness centre, garage or staffed package room in the plan documents on file.

Capital posture is the item to diligence. The financial statements on file document an assessment-funded facade and waterproofing programme in the 1990s, funded through installment assessments layered onto common charges, and the condominium's operating history since has been conventional. Those documents are decades old now; the current budget, reserve position, and Local Law 11 facade cycle status should be requested from the managing agent for any live transaction, and a masonry building of this age with terraced setbacks will have a recurring facade obligation.

The tenure question, settled

A prewar Upper East Side building carrying a condominium building class is exactly the profile that turns out to be a condop, and the class code alone cannot tell you which. Here is what the record actually shows.

The declaration on file establishes The 110 Condominium under Article 9-B of the New York Real Property Law, dated August 23, 1985 and recorded November 21, 1985. ACRIS records unit transfers at this address as SC — single residential condominium unit — against 67 individually numbered tax lots, not as cooperative share transfers. The Department of Finance carries each of those 67 lots separately, assessed and billed on its own, with 64 in the residential condominium class and three in the professional/office condominium class. The Department of Buildings names the owner on filings at the address as "110 Condominium."

This is fee-simple condominium ownership. There is no cooperative corporation sitting between the buyer and the unit, no proprietary lease, and no share allocation. A buyer here takes a deed.

The for-sale test is equally clean. The FY2027 assessment roll shows 63 distinct owners across the 67 unit lots — individuals, family trusts and a handful of single-unit LLCs. No entity holds the building. That was not always true: the amendments on file show the sponsor's successor holding twenty units, roughly 31 percent of the common interest, in the mid-1990s. Thirty years of resales have dispersed that position almost entirely.

Policy framework

Ownership form: Condominium. Purchases clear through the board's right of first refusal rather than a cooperative approval, which produces shorter and far more predictable closing timelines. There is no board interview and no financial package in the cooperative sense.

Pied-à-terre, LLC, trust and foreign ownership: Permitted under the standard condominium framework. Confirm any house-rule limits with the managing agent.

Subletting: Permitted under the standard condominium framework, and the condominium charges a sublet fee — it appears as a standing revenue line in the financial statements on file. Minimum lease terms and the current fee should be confirmed.

Transfer fee: A transfer fee exists and is likewise carried as a revenue line in the condominium's financial statements. The amount is not published.

Pets: Not documented in the records available to us. Confirm in the house rules.

Real estate taxes — the J-51 history, with dates. The Department of Finance's historical J-51 file records a benefit on this property initiated in 1978 with a twelve-year exemption term and a 90 percent abatement, granted against a rental-era rehabilitation. After the 1985 condominium conversion the residual benefit was apportioned across the individual unit lots; by the 1986 through 1988 tax years the abatement had been reduced to a few dollars per lot, and the twelve-year exemption term ran out at the start of the 1990s. There is no live J-51 today, and there never was a 421-a. Current exemption records show only personal STAR-type exemptions on individual units. Underwrite full unabated taxes on the specific unit; there is no benefit left to expire and no step-up ahead of you.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$10,200/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $13

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2025–30
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Safe
2030–35
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2032
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2025–30
$28,500 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2025–30. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The building trades steadily rather than in bursts — roughly three to six recorded deeds a year across 67 unit lots for most of the past two decades, which is healthy turnover for a building this size and produces a usable same-building comparable set. That is unusual in Carnegie Hill, where much of the surrounding stock is closely held cooperative inventory that trades far more thinly.

Pricing should be read on a per-square-foot basis against Upper East Side prewar condominium product, not against the Carnegie Hill cooperative stock that surrounds it, whose economics and buyer pool are different in kind. Within the building, the two variables that matter most are renovation state — which varies enormously in a 1985 conversion — and whether the apartment carries terrace access at the eleventh floor or the penthouse, which is a genuinely scarce feature on the block. The absence of any tax abatement means the headline price and the true monthly carrying cost track each other closely here, which is not the case in the abated new construction a buyer may be comparing against. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Nov 12, 20252C
1 BR · 1 BA · 900 sf
$1,225,000$1,361/sf+0.0%
Jul 28, 20255C
2 BR · 1 BA · 1,170 sf
$1,287,500$1,100/sf-6.4%
Jul 9, 20255E
581 sf
$685,000$1,179/sfoff-mkt
Dec 20, 202412A
2 BR · 1 BA · 892 sf
$1,250,000$1,401/sf-3.8%
Dec 20, 20249B
1 BR · 1 BA · 800 sf
$1,200,000$1,500/sf+0.0%
Dec 10, 20241C
1,001 sf
$472,500$472/sfoff-mkt
Sep 6, 20241E
1 BR · 1 BA · 604 sf
$455,000$753/sfoff-mkt
Feb 9, 20248F
1 BA · 507 sf
$700,000$1,381/sf+0.0%

Market read. Most recent trades (2025) cleared a median $1,244/sf across 3 sales. Median listing discount 1.5% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

PH · 1,950 sf+90%
$2,100,000 ($1,077/sf) 2004$3,495,000 ($1,792/sf) 2006$3,695,000 ($1,895/sf) 2007$3,999,000 ($2,051/sf) 2016
2C · 900 sf+81%
$675,000 ($750/sf) 2005$1,100,000 ($1,222/sf) 2021$1,225,000 ($1,361/sf) 2025
4F · 507 sf+76%
$390,000 ($780/sf) 2005$690,500 ($1,381/sf) 2015$685,000 ($1,351/sf) 2018
7A · 892 sf+59%
$627,000 ($703/sf) 2004$785,000 ($880/sf) 2007$999,000 ($1,120/sf) 2023
9B · 800 sf+45%
$825,000 ($1,031/sf) 2007$1,200,000 ($1,500/sf) 2024
View all 70 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01515-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

This is a real condominium and the diligence is a deed diligence. No board package, no interview, no financing ceiling. What replaces them is a title search, a review of the declaration and by-laws, and a hard look at the building's budget and reserves — which in a 1939 building with a 1985 conversion is where the risk actually lives.

Read the facade and Local Law 11 file first. A terraced masonry building of this age has a permanent facade obligation, and the documents on file record an assessment-funded facade programme in an earlier cycle. Ask for the current cycle status and any pending assessment before you sign.

Underwrite full taxes. The J-51 is long gone and there is no other benefit. That is straightforward, but a buyer cross-shopping abated new construction elsewhere in Manhattan will find the monthly number here reads higher relative to price than it does there.

Landmark status cuts in your favour, unusually. This lot sits outside both surrounding historic districts. Window replacement and exterior work do not require LPC review. If you are comparing against a designated cooperative a block away, that is a material difference in renovation cost and timeline. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator accordingly.

Condition dispersion is the whole game. Some apartments here are unrenovated since 1985. Price the renovation honestly rather than the address.

Check the unit's class. Three of the 67 lots are professional/office units, not residences. Confirm which class the specific lot carries before you underwrite it as a home.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with tenure and with the absence of a board. In a Carnegie Hill market dominated by cooperatives, "deed, no board approval, no financing ceiling, no interview" is the shortest and strongest sentence in the listing.

Say the building is not landmarked. Buyers assume everything in Carnegie Hill is. The verified answer — outside both the Park Avenue and Expanded Carnegie Hill districts — is a selling point, and it is checkable.

Correct the unit count and the floor count. Market records circulate 69 units and twelve stories. The condominium's own statements say 67 units plus a superintendent's unit, and the Department of Finance says thirteen stories.

Present the tax position rather than letting it surface late. There is no abatement and no J-51 remaining. Pairing the full tax number with the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator up front produces better outcomes than an attorney finding it in week three.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 110 East 87th Street, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper East Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper East Side.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at The 110 Condominium?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The 110 Condominium would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.