Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1890
113 Prince Street (Tri-Prince, Inc.)
113 Prince Street, New York, NY 10012

113 Prince Street (Tri-Prince, Inc.)

113 Prince Street, New York, NY 10012

SoHo

BBL 1005140037 · BIN 1077767

At a glance
Year built
1890
Type
Cooperative
Units
4
Floors
6
Landmark
No
Pets
Not documented in public records or in the by-laws — governed by house rules. Confirm with the managing agent
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2005–2025

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,420
Listing discount
7.0%
Recorded sales
20
On record
2005–2025

Three matched cast-iron fronts, built together in 1890–91 by Cleverdon & Putzel for the developer Frank Seitz, running continuously along the north side of Prince Street. The façade reads as one building because it was designed as one; the LPC record notes for each address that it shares a common elevation with the other two. Behind it are three separate structures with their own stairs, their own elevators and their own party walls, joined at the openings, and a cooperative corporation that has held all of it since 1971.

That date is the point. Tri-Prince, Inc. was incorporated on 1 March 1971 to buy the land and the three buildings, and it issued stock to the loft occupants who were already living in them. The offering plan on file records the whole transaction: $127,000 in cash, a $200,000 mortgage at 8 percent, a gross purchase of $327,000. The architect's report attached to that plan, prepared in 1975, describes a building with no certificate of occupancy, whose "existing legal use" was factory, whose upper floors were "all currently occupied as Joint Living/Work Quarters for Artists," and whose ground floor held a sign company, a food store and a cardboard box company. There was an open Department of Buildings violation for occupying the premises without the certificate of occupancy required by the very alteration — ALT 328/71 — Convert building to Joint Living/Work Quarters for Artists — that was supposed to legalize the use. This is the actual documentary record of how SoHo became residential, and it is unusually intact here.

Fifty-five years on, the building trades as what it became: sixteen large loft apartments, one to a floor per building on most levels, owned by shareholders in a corporation with no staff, no amenities and an unusually small share count. Only 180 shares are issued across seventeen units. Maintenance is billed per share at $360 a month, which means a ten-share apartment — the by-law maximum for any combined unit above the ground floor — carries $3,600 a month before assessments. The share structure is worth understanding before making an offer, because it is the arithmetic that governs every monthly number in the building.

The dominant economic fact here is the tax bill. In 2024 the cooperative's real estate taxes were $737,937 against total revenues of $976,305. Taxes were roughly three-quarters of every dollar the corporation spent. The by-laws require the holder of the ground-floor units to pay the corporation 11 percent of the total real estate tax every six months — which is exactly the "special assessment, real estate taxes" line in the financial statements, and it means the sixteen residential shareholders carry the remaining 89 percent of a $738,000 bill. A building with almost no staff, almost no debt and almost no services still costs what it costs, because SoHo land is what it is.

Architecture and unit composition

The three buildings are, per the offering plan's architect's report, wood-joist construction on brick bearing walls with a central column line running down each section — cast-iron columns on the lower floors, yellow pine on the fifth and sixth. The brick walls vary from 28 inches thick at the base to 12 inches above. The front wall is cast iron with brick backing between sills and lintels, with decorative cast-iron spandrels and columns making up the elevation. A sheet-metal cornice survives on 113; the cornices on 117 and 121 were removed and the parapets cemented over. Three fire escapes remain on the front façade, two on the rear.

Floor plates above the first floor run 99'4" by 81'6" — roughly 8,095 gross square feet per floor across all three buildings, or about 2,500 square feet per building per floor. The first floor extends further to the rear at 8,765 square feet, and the cellar is built full on the site with a sidewalk vault under Prince Street.

The unit arrangement follows the three-building geometry exactly. Each upper floor in the west and centre buildings is a single independent live-work loft. In the east building, the second, third and sixth floors are single lofts, while the fourth and fifth are divided into three: a front duplex spanning both floors, plus an independent rear loft on each. Sixteen apartments in total, and the recorded share transfers track it — units appear in ACRIS as 2W, 2E, 3, 3C, 4C, 4ER, 4/5EF, 5C, 5ER and 6E, with the "4/5EF" designation naming the east-building duplex the offering plan describes.

The by-laws forbid further subdivision and cap any combined unit above the ground floor at ten shares. Whatever the building is today, it cannot be made denser, and the large lofts cannot be assembled into something larger than the cap allows.

Building operations

Tri-Prince runs lean, and the financial statements show exactly how lean. There are no employee wages in the expense schedule at all — the corporation pays a management fee of $19,200 a year and no payroll. There is no doorman, no concierge and no live-in superintendent. Repairs and maintenance ran $73,169 in 2024 and $110,511 in 2023, with elevators, boiler and sprinkler as the recurring items and a $33,517 major elevator repair in 2023.

The mechanical inheritance is old and specific. Two manually operated passenger elevators serve the centre and east buildings, one installed under a 1931 application and one upgraded under a 1920 application; the west building's elevator was decommissioned and its shaft floored over. Central steam heat reaches all three buildings from a single gas-fired boiler and a shared riser system. The buildings have been sprinklered since 1962. None of this is a defect — it is a building of a certain age operating within its means — but a buyer should understand that elevator and boiler capital events at Tri-Prince are funded by sixteen apartments with no reserve study behind them.

That last point deserves emphasis. The 2024 statements are a review, not an audit, and the accountant's report specifically notes that the required supplementary information about future major repairs and replacements departs from the accounting standard because a significant portion of the common-property components was not included. Note 9 of the statements says plainly that the corporation has not conducted a study to determine the remaining useful lives of common-property components, and that when funds are required it will borrow, use cash, raise maintenance, pass assessments or defer the work.

The financial posture reads accordingly. Cash of $356,565 at the end of 2024, an accumulated deficit of $773,269, and an operating result of negative $85,844 for the year. Maintenance rose 12 percent in 2023 and 9 percent in 2024. Two special assessments were running in both years — a general assessment of $123,661 in 2024 and $150,447 in 2023, plus the separate real-estate-tax assessment. The underlying mortgage is small at $1.2 million but is interest-only and matures on 1 October 2030 with the full principal due, into a rate environment nobody can forecast. None of this is alarming for a small SoHo loft co-op. All of it is the sort of thing a buyer should read before, not after, an accepted offer.

The ground-floor units, and why they matter

The three ground-floor stores — units 1W, 1C and 1E — are a single commercial interest held outside the residential shareholder group. The by-laws name Soho Development Corp, the original shareholder, as the holder of those proprietary leases, and give it an unusual set of protections: the ground-floor provisions cannot be amended without its consent for as long as it holds the shares. In exchange the ground-floor units pay maintenance at a rate 50 percent greater than other lessees, contribute to capital assessments on the same basis as everyone else, and pay the corporation 11 percent of the total real estate tax every six months. The cooperative holds a right of first refusal on any sale or sublease of those units, exercisable within twenty days of notice.

The by-laws also police what can go into them. No adult uses; no alcohol or bulk food sales, cooked or raw, for on-site or off-site consumption; no dancing, live or recorded musical performance, cabaret or performance space; no events drawing large crowds; and no business whose predominant activity happens after 9 p.m. Any sublessee must run a regular exterminator programme, install ventilation for odours and fumes, and install sound-deadening on the ceiling if it plays background music. This is a residential building that wrote its retail policy into its constitution, and it is one reason the ground-floor tenancy has stayed a quiet-retail mix.

In December 2025 the ground-floor shares were transferred from Soho Development Corp to a successor entity, and the retail space at all three addresses was master-leased under a recorded lease. The cooperative's own financial statements show no commercial rental income, so the economics of that lease accrue to the commercial shareholder rather than to the corporation. A buyer should ask the managing agent how the right of first refusal was handled, whether the ground-floor maintenance and tax-contribution obligations transferred unchanged, and what the new retail tenancy will be. It is the most consequential thing to happen to this building's balance sheet in years, and it happened outside it.

Policy framework

Ownership form: Cooperative. You buy shares in Tri-Prince, Inc. and a proprietary lease to a specific loft. Transfers are subject to board approval and to the terms of the proprietary lease.

Flip tax: 3 percent of the gross sale price, paid by the seller, fixed in Section 5.06.1 of the by-laws. This is not a board-set fee that can be waived — it is a condition of transfer.

Subletting: Board consent plus the written consent of all contiguous shareholders. Two consecutive years of primary residence before a first application. No sublease longer than one year. No more than two consecutive years of sublet in any five-year period, and never more than three residential units sublet building-wide at once. Sublet fee of 10 percent of gross monthly rent, payable monthly with maintenance. Applications due 45 days ahead with the proposed subtenant's financial statements, bank statements and tax returns, and the board may interview the subtenant and impose conditions. Unauthorized subletting carries a fine of three times monthly maintenance per month.

Short-term rentals: Prohibited outright. The by-laws bar accommodating transients, defined as anyone renting for less than one month, and bar sub-sublets.

Alterations: No structural addition, alteration or improvement affecting common elements or building-wide systems without prior written board consent. Exterior work also requires a Landmarks permit.

Insurance: Shareholders must carry renter's/owner's liability insurance naming the corporation as additional insured; sublessees must carry not less than $2 million.

Arrears: Late fee of 3 percent per month after the tenth. Two months' non-payment suspends voting rights; three months puts the shareholder in default and exposes the proprietary lease to termination.

Financing ceiling, post-closing liquidity, debt-to-income standard, pied-à-terre, pets, and LLC or trust ownership: None of these are published, and none appear in the by-laws. They are board practice, and they must come from the managing agent. See the buying section.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Recent sales

The building trades as full-floor SoHo loft cooperative product — large plates, high ceilings, cast-iron frontage, no services — and the recorded share transfers are the only reliable read on it, because there are so few of them. Over the last two decades the cooperative has recorded a steady trickle of SP share transfers between separate, unrelated individuals, which is the definitive confirmation that this is an owner-occupied cooperative rather than a rental holding. Activity has clustered in recent years around the four-million mark for the larger lofts, with the east-building duplex at the top of the range and the smaller rear lofts materially below it.

Because maintenance is billed per share and the share count is tiny, per-room pricing conventions do not translate cleanly here. The correct approach is to price per square foot against SoHo loft cooperatives with comparable plates and comparable service levels, then adjust hard for three things: the 3 percent flip tax, which comes out of the seller's proceeds and should be built into any net-sheet from the first conversation; the live assessments, which sit on top of a maintenance figure that has already risen 12 percent and 9 percent in consecutive years; and the sublet restrictions, which remove this building entirely from the investor pool and narrow the buyer set to owner-occupants. Index any market statement to the last complete year rather than to partial-year activity, which in a sixteen-unit building can be a single sale. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Do not conflate this building with 34 Prince Street, which sits on block 494 and is a separate building with a separate ownership structure, or with the other Prince Street addresses in SoHo and NoLIta. Comparables here have to be pulled by tax lot.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Oct 8, 20252
2 BR · 1 BA · 2,500 sf
$3,550,000$1,420/sf-10.1%
Jun 26, 20256E
2 BR · 2 BA
$4,000,000-10.9%
Dec 12, 20235C
2 BR · 3 BA · 2,400 sf
$3,590,000$1,496/sf-21.9%
Mar 3, 20224
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,900 sf
$4,500,000$2,368/sf+0.0%
May 13, 20214ER
1 BR · 2 BA · 1,350 sf
$1,580,000$1,170/sf+0.0%
Nov 18, 20205ER
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,400 sf
$1,820,000$1,300/sf-4.0%
Jun 25, 20193
1 BR · 1 BA · 2,350 sf
$3,750,000$1,596/sf-16.7%
Jun 6, 20173C
2 BR · 2,500 sf
$5,000,000$2,000/sf+0.1%

Market read. Most recent trades (2025) cleared a median $1,420/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 7.0% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

3C · 2,500 sf+61%
$3,100,000 ($1,240/sf) 2012$5,000,000 ($2,000/sf) 2017
5 · 2,500 sf+15%
$2,750,000 ($1,100/sf) 2008$2,750,000 ($1,100/sf) 2010$3,150,000 ($1,260/sf) 2010

Other recent transfers

DateUnitPrice
Apr 13, 20064E$745,000
View all 20 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00514-0037) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.

What to know if you’re buying

Ask for the financing ceiling in writing before you offer. No maximum financing percentage, minimum down payment, debt-to-income standard or post-closing liquidity requirement appears anywhere in the by-laws or in any document on file. In a small, self-managed-scale SoHo loft cooperative these standards are set by board practice and can be strict. Get them from the managing agent at the outset and run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator against the actual numbers rather than against an assumption.

Build the board package for a small board. Three to five directors, all shareholders, serving without compensation, in a sixteen-apartment building where everyone knows everyone. Expect a full financial package, references, and an interview. Small boards are not necessarily harder, but they are personal, and a package that is complete and unambiguous the first time matters more than in an institutional building.

Read the sublet rules as a resale constraint, not just a use constraint. Two years of primary residence before you may apply, board plus contiguous-shareholder consent, one-year maximum sublease, two years out of any five, and a hard building-wide cap of three sublet units at once. If your plan involves ever renting the apartment, this building will probably not accommodate it — and the same rules narrow the buyer pool when you eventually sell.

Underwrite the 3 percent flip tax from day one. It is in the by-laws, it is paid by the seller, and it will be your cost when you exit. Fold it into your hold-period math now.

Understand the share arithmetic. Maintenance is per share — $360 a month at the current rate — and combined units above the ground floor are capped at ten shares. Ask exactly how many shares are allocated to the specific apartment, because that number, not the square footage, sets your monthly.

Look hard at the tax line and the assessments. Real estate taxes were $737,937 in 2024 against $976,305 of total revenue, with the ground floor contributing 11 percent and residential shareholders carrying the rest. Two assessments were running in both 2024 and 2023, and maintenance rose 12 percent and then 9 percent. Ask what the assessments fund, when they end, and what the board expects for the next two years.

Ask about the 2030 mortgage maturity. The underlying loan is small at $1.2 million but is interest-only and the full principal is due on 1 October 2030. Ask what the board's refinancing plan is and what a higher coupon would do to maintenance.

Ask whether a reserve study exists. As of the 2024 statements it did not, and the accountant flagged the omission. With two pre-war elevators, a shared boiler, a landmarked cast-iron façade across three buildings and sixteen apartments to fund it, the absence of a capital plan is the risk to price.

Get the certificate of occupancy and the JLWQA position in writing. The building's residential use was created under a 1971 joint living-work quarters alteration, and the by-laws still describe the upper floors as artists' live-work quarters. Since December 2021 there is a defined path to convert to conventional residential use, but it is a process with a cost. Ask what the current certificate of occupancy says, whether the cooperative has pursued conversion, and what your lender makes of the answer.

Ask what happened with the ground floor in December 2025. The commercial shares changed hands and the retail was master-leased. Ask how the cooperative's right of first refusal was addressed, whether the 11 percent tax contribution and the 150 percent maintenance rate carried over unchanged, and what is going into the stores.

What to know if you’re selling

Net-sheet the flip tax first. Three percent of gross is the largest single line on your closing statement after brokerage, and it is fixed by the by-laws. Sellers who discover it late reprice late. Run the Seller Closing Cost Calculator with it built in.

Prepare the financial story before you list. A buyer's attorney will read the same 2024 statements we have: an accumulated deficit, an operating deficit, two live assessments, consecutive double-digit and high-single-digit maintenance increases, no reserve study, and an interest-only balloon in 2030. Every one of those has a reasonable explanation in a sixteen-unit building with no staff and a $738,000 tax bill. Having the explanation, the assessment end dates and the board's capital plan ready converts a hard diligence conversation into a short one.

Sell to an owner-occupant, and qualify early. The sublet rules and the unpublished financing standards mean this building has no investor bid and a narrow qualified pool. Screening for cash position, primary-residence intent and board-package readiness before accepting an offer saves far more time than it costs.

Lead with the plate and the provenance. A full floor behind an 1890 Cleverdon & Putzel cast-iron front, in the original SoHo–Cast Iron Historic District, in a building whose own offering plan documents the artists' loft conversion that made SoHo what it is — that is a specific and defensible story. The Roebling Research Library holds the offering plan, by-laws and financial statements for this building and we make them available to serious buyers' counsel.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 113 Prince Street, also evaluate:

  • 477 Broome Street — twenty-unit SoHo loft cooperative; the closest peer by structure, scale and share ownership
  • 33 Greene Street — cast-iron Greene Street loft cooperative; the direct SoHo co-op comparison
  • 70 Greene Street — classic iron-front Greene Street loft conversion
  • 92 Greene Street — SoHo cast-iron loft building with full-floor residences
  • 105 Wooster Street — boutique SoHo loft building around the corner
  • 139 Wooster Street — SoHo loft conversion with full-floor lofts and a comparable denominator
  • 160 Wooster Street — the larger, more serviced SoHo alternative
  • 115 Mercer Street — SoHo loft building of similar vintage one block east
  • 351 West Broadway — four-unit SoHo loft condominium commissioned by the same developer a year earlier; the condominium comparison
  • 42 Wooster Street — fourteen-residence SoHo loft condominium; the serviced condominium alternative
  • 11 Prince Street — Prince Street alternative in a different structure and tenure

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Greenwich Village — read The Roebling Team Guide to Greenwich Village.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at 113 Prince Street (Tri-Prince, Inc.)?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 113 Prince Street (Tri-Prince, Inc.) would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.