Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Flatiron $1,769/sf 3%
Full index →
Condominium · 2007
125 North 10th Street
125 North 10th Street, Brooklyn, NY 11249
Buildings·Condominium

125 North 10th Street

125 North 10th Street, Brooklyn, NY 11249

Williamsburg, Brooklyn

BBL 3022977502 · BIN 3397613

At a glance
Year built
2007
Type
Condominium
Units
86
Floors
6
Landmark
No
Pets
Not documented in the material we can verify; confirm the current house rules with management
Board & building profile
Flip tax
None documented; a one-time non-refundable working capital contribution equal to two months of then-current common charges is due from every new owner on acquisition of title, including on resale
Subletting
Permitted under standard condominium rules; transfers subject to the board's right of first refusal
Pied-à-terre
Permitted (standard condominium)

Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 2020). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.

The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2009–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,437
Listing discount
0.0%
Recorded sales
212
On record
2009–2026
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 125 North 10th Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

125 North 10th Street belongs to the first real wave of Northside condominium construction — the buildings that went up on the interior blocks between Bedford Avenue and the water in the two or three years after the 2005 Greenpoint-Williamsburg rezoning, before the waterfront towers arrived and reset what a Williamsburg condominium was supposed to include. The 2005 action is remembered for what it did on Kent Avenue: high-density residential zoning on the former industrial waterfront, an esplanade requirement, and an inclusionary housing framework that produced most of the neighborhood's affordable stock. Inland its effect was quieter, taking blocks like North 10th between Berry and Bedford from mixed manufacturing-and-residential to the mid-rise density that produced buildings exactly like this one.

The result is a building sized to its street rather than its skyline: six stories, roughly 110,000 square feet, built as two connected structures operating as one, with 86 residences over a below-grade garage. The architecture — by Scarano Architects, a firm attached to an enormous share of Brooklyn's 2004–2008 residential output — is quiet, gridded and light-toned, with balconies and generous window openings rather than any historicist gesture toward the warehouses two blocks west.

The reason the building has held its position for nearly two decades has less to do with architecture than with what came with it. Fifty-one parking spaces, twenty-seven cabanas and eight storage lockers were built into a condominium of 86 apartments — a ratio inland Williamsburg has essentially never replicated, because the land economics after 2010 stopped supporting it. On the Northside, where street parking is a standing problem, deeded parking is a material and durable component of value.

The building's second defining fact is less flattering and equally important to state plainly: in 2012 the condominium sued its sponsor and other parties over the design, construction, sales and marketing of the building, seeking reimbursement for capital work to the common elements. The board engaged an engineer to survey the building's major components and prepare a construction-defect report, which was incorporated into the complaint. The matter was still open as a contingency in the audit for the year ended December 31, 2020, some identified items repaired and others held for the litigation's outcome. Sponsor litigation is common in the 2005–2010 Brooklyn condominium cohort, but it is a reason to look closely at the reserve position and the capital plan.

Architecture and unit composition

The condominium consists of 86 residential units across six stories, plus 51 parking spaces, 27 cabanas and 8 storage lockers, per the audited financial statements. The two connected structures read as one building from North 10th Street; the below-grade garage runs beneath, and the roof carries a planted terrace whose landscaping is a recurring line in the operating budget.

Unit inventory runs from studios through three-bedroom layouts, with ceiling heights and window walls that were the sales argument at launch and remain the building's interior identity. The most consequential distinction across the inventory is not bedroom count but appurtenance: whether a residence conveys with a parking space, a cabana, a storage locker, terrace access, or some combination. With 51 spaces and 27 cabanas against 86 apartments, two apartments with identical floor plans can be materially different assets.

Cabanas deserve particular attention. They are a Northside product of this era — roof-level private enclosures serving individual units — and their status varies. Establish whether the cabana appurtenant to a unit is separately transferred, licensed, or a limited common element, and how the condominium allocates roof-work responsibility for it.

Building operations

The condominium runs a full-service operating profile for a mid-rise. In the year ended December 31, 2020, payroll and related costs were roughly 56 percent of total expenses — the signature of attended-lobby staffing rather than a part-time superintendent arrangement — with maintenance, operations and utilities at roughly 27 percent. Total common charges ran a little over $1.1 million against total expenses of roughly $1.14 million, the gap closed by move-in fees, working capital contributions and other income. Two items in that record are the ones we would put in front of any buyer.

Reserves are structurally thin, by design. The governing documents do not require that funds be accumulated for future major repairs and replacements, and no reserve study has been conducted. The board has instead transferred discretionary amounts year to year — roughly $90,500 in 2019 and roughly $44,900 in 2020 — with reserve cash of roughly $79,700 at the end of 2020. When capital needs exceed that, the board's stated options are raising common charges, levying a special assessment, or deferring the work.

There is a building loan outstanding. In May 2020 the condominium arranged a $500,000 facility with a commercial bank to fund capital improvements and drew approximately $485,400 in May 2021. Principal and interest run from June 2021 to maturity in May 2030 at a fixed 3.75 percent, collateralized by future assessments. That debt sits behind the common charge and should be read alongside the reserve position.

A smaller item illustrates the block's continued development: in May 2019 the condominium licensed limited access to an adjacent building's owner for protective structures during construction next door, at $3,000 a month; they went up in June 2020 and came down in May 2021. Adjacent-site construction is a live feature of the Northside and worth checking at the moment of any transaction.

Policy framework

Pets: Not documented in the material we can verify. Confirm current house rules with management.

Pied-à-terre, LLC purchases, foreign buyers, trusts: Permitted (standard NYC condominium).

Subletting: Permitted under standard condominium rules; transfers are subject to the board's right of first refusal.

Working capital contribution: A one-time, non-refundable contribution equal to two months of the then-current common charges is due from every new owner on acquisition of title, per the audited financials. It applies on resale, not only on sponsor sales, and it is the most commonly missed line in a buyer's closing budget here.

Move-in / move-out deposits: Refundable deposits are collected against move damage. Flip tax: none documented. Property taxes: the Department of Finance exemption roll records a fifteen-year Section 421-a benefit from 2010 through 2025, carried live through the 2024 roll; the term has run out, so model the fully taxed bill on the specific unit.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$12,190/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $12

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

421-a Tax Abatement

421-a exemption · full taxation began FY2025
Abatement ended
Abatement ended after FY2024
Last year of benefit
FY2024
Fully taxed from
FY2025 (2024–25)
Program
421-a (15-year)
What this means for you

The 421-a benefit has run its term. Taxes on these units have stepped up toward the full assessed amount, so the low carrying cost this building once carried is no longer available. Price from the current tax bill, and treat any comparable sale made while the abatement was still running as a different asset.

Source: NYC Dept. of Finance property-tax exemption records (421-a), refreshed 2026-09-06 · The Roebling Research Library. Confirm the exact step-up schedule on the building’s DOF tax bill. Years shown are NYC tax years, which start July 1 — FY2025 runs July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025. The benefit last appears on the 2024 assessment roll, which is what dates the end of the term.

Recent sales

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Jul 8, 2026S4A
1 BR · 1 BA · 873 sf
$1,242,500$1,423/sf-4.3%
Jul 8, 2026P26
153 sf
$125,000$817/sfoff-mkt
Jun 22, 2026SGG
1 BR · 1 BA · 762 sf
$1,095,000$1,437/sf+0.0%
Jun 12, 2026NGE
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,090 sf
$1,875,000$1,720/sf-1.3%
May 13, 2026S2D
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,048 sf
$1,675,000$1,598/sf+5.0%
Feb 26, 2026N2C
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,090 sf
$1,565,000$1,436/sf-1.9%
Feb 24, 2026S5G
1 BR · 1 BA · 810 sf
$1,197,500$1,478/sf-7.9%
Aug 29, 2025N2D
2 BR · 2 BA · 1,090 sf
$1,575,000$1,445/sf+0.0%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,437/sf across 7 sales. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

NGE · 1,090 sf+144%
$767,760 ($704/sf) 2010$1,875,000 ($1,720/sf) 2026
S2D · 1,048 sf+137%
$706,156 ($674/sf) 2010$649,000 ($619/sf) 2010$1,675,000 ($1,598/sf) 2026
N2D · 1,090 sf+119%
$717,866 ($659/sf) 2010$1,175,000 ($1,078/sf) 2014$1,575,000 ($1,445/sf) 2025
S4F · 779 sf+118%
$620,000 ($821/sf) 2009$1,350,000 ($1,733/sf) 2024
S5D · 778 sf+118%
$631,315 ($811/sf) 2009$1,375,000 ($1,767/sf) 2023
View all 212 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-02297-7502) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

Confirm exactly what conveys. Parking, cabana and storage are the value drivers here, and they do not attach to every apartment. Get the appurtenance package in writing before you negotiate price.

Budget the working capital contribution. Two months of common charges, one-time and non-refundable, due at closing on a resale — documented in the condominium's own financial statements and routinely omitted from buyer estimates.

Read the capital picture as one item. The $485,400 building loan amortizing to May 2030, reserve cash under $80,000 at the end of 2020, and governing documents that do not require reserve funding only make sense together. Ask for the current financials, the current budget, and the board's capital plan.

Ask where the sponsor litigation landed, and model taxes at the current bill. The 2012 action was still an open contingency in the 2020 audit, and its resolution changes how you read both the reserve position and the repair history. No tax abatement is documented.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the appurtenances. If your apartment carries a deeded parking space, that is the headline, not the finishes. Northside buyers with cars have a short list and this building is on it.

Have the documents assembled before you list. Current financial statements, current budget, the status of the building loan, and the current position of the sponsor litigation. Buyers' attorneys ask for all four; supplying them proactively converts a potential objection into a demonstration of a well-run building.

Price on the line and the package, not the building average. With 86 units and roughly half carrying parking, average figures mislead in both directions. Recent same-line closings with the same appurtenances are the anchor, and the working capital contribution is better disclosed early than discovered at contract stage.

Position against the interior blocks, not the waterfront. The service level, garage and roof terrace read strongly against the smaller Northside condominiums; marketing that claims parity with the towers on amenity depth invites an unfavorable comparison.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 125 North 10th Street, also evaluate:

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at 125 North 10th Street?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com