Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Condominium · 1907
135 West 3rd Street
135 West 3rd Street, New York, NY 10012

135 West 3rd Street

135 West 3rd Street, New York, NY 10012

Greenwich Village

BBL 1005437501 · BIN 1008769

At a glance
Year built
1907
Type
Condominium
Units
1002
Floors
7
Landmark
No
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2023

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,378
Listing discount
3.9%
Recorded sales
10
On record
2003–2023

Six full-floor homes in a 1907 store-and-loft building, on a block that has been loud and useful for a century and a half.

Henry H. Koch designed it in 1907 for Louise Gucker, at a moment when West 3rd Street was turning commercial. The elevated train along South Fifth Avenue took a sharp westward bend onto West 3rd before continuing north on Sixth, and the street filled in around it: a Fire Department repair shop at No. 130 in 1874–75, a horse stable at No. 122 in 1889, then this loft building. Koch's is a plain, competent piece of work — Landmarks classifies the style simply as Utilitarian — and its architectural interest is in the recessed bands of windows set between brick pilasters, which is what a loft façade does when the client wants floor plates and daylight rather than ornament.

The ground floor became a restaurant by 1923 and stayed a place of public assembly for most of the century. In the late 1940s and early 1950s it housed Mona's, one of the oldest lesbian bars in New York, and by the mid-1960s the same space was The Purple Onion, remembered for go-go dancers and volume. Both are recorded in the Landmarks Preservation Commission's designation report for the South Village Historic District, which cites Daniel Hurewitz's Stepping Out for the history. That lineage is a real part of the building's significance and part of why the block reads the way it does.

The residential building is comparatively young. The upper floors were converted between 1996 and 1998 under a single Department of Buildings alteration, and the condominium declaration was recorded on June 4, 1998, with the first unit deed two weeks later. This was a straightforward late-1990s loft conversion by a small sponsor, not a Loft Law legalization and not an artists' cooperative — a distinction that matters, because it means the occupancy question that dominates SoHo and NoHo loft diligence does not arise here. The lot is zoned R7-2 with a commercial overlay. Residential use is as-of-right. There is no JLWQA certification requirement and no interim multiple dwelling status documented.

What a buyer should think hardest about is the ground floor. The commercial unit was sold out of the sponsor in 2003 and has been owned by outside investors ever since, net-leased to a 7-Eleven under a lease recorded in November 2012 and carrying its own multi-million-dollar mortgage. That debt is not the residential owners' debt — the units are separately deeded and separately financed — but the tenant is a 24-hour convenience store directly beneath six apartments, on a stretch of West 3rd Street that carries Sixth Avenue's late-night traffic. It is not a defect. It is the trade the building makes, and it should be priced rather than discovered.

The last thing worth knowing is what the building sits against. It covers its entire 25-by-100-foot lot, so there is no rear yard. The west wall abuts a public playground and basketball court, which gives the building something almost no interior Village lot has — a permanently open flank — and gives it the sound that comes with one.

Architecture and unit composition

Twenty-five feet wide, one hundred feet deep, seven stories, full lot coverage. Brick with granite and limestone at the base per the original new-building application; recessed window bands offset by brick pilasters above. The storefront and entrance are replacements, the first story is painted, and the original cornice was taken down and replaced with a parapet — which the LPC record documents plainly and which any Landmarks application to restore would have to reckon with.

Six residences over roughly 10,560 residential square feet works out to about 1,760 gross square feet per home, one to a floor, running the full 25-foot width and close to the full depth. That is the classic loft-conversion product: floor-through, three exposures where the geometry allows, and no interior corridor once you are inside your own door. The penthouse is a separate unit lot and behaves as one; the record shows roof-deck work filed in 2007 and 2011.

There is one passenger elevator and an active dumbwaiter. Two older elevator devices are recorded as removed, which is the ordinary signature of a freight-to-passenger upgrade at conversion.

Building operations

A small condominium with a professional managing agent and no residential staff of record. The capital history since conversion is the normal sequence for a century-old loft: parapet replacement and façade repairs in the early 2000s with a sidewalk shed in 2005; replacement of the structural sidewalk vault ceiling and remediation of a corroded steel beam in 2013; a manual and automatic smoke detection and sprinkler alarm system installed under a job that stayed open into 2025. Vault work under a Manhattan sidewalk is expensive and rarely optional, and the fact that it was done is worth crediting.

Because the building has six residential units, the arithmetic of any shared cost is unforgiving: a façade cycle, a roof, an elevator modernization or a Local Law 11 finding divides six ways. ACRIS also shows a lien for common charges filed against one unit in 2012 and discharged in 2014 — an ordinary collection step, but in a six-unit budget a single delinquency is a meaningful share of the year. Ask the managing agent for the current arrears position and the reserve balance.

Policy framework

We located no offering plan for this building in either document library, and we do not carry unsourced policy. What that means practically:

Ask for, in writing, before you offer: the current common charge and what it includes; the reserve balance and any assessment history; the board's position on subletting, pets and short-term occupancy; whether the by-laws carry a right of first refusal (common in small condominiums and consequential in a six-unit one); the Local Law 11 cycle status and the elevator's remaining service life; and the terms and remaining term of the ground-floor lease, because the retail tenant is a fixture of daily life here.

What you do not have to ask about: artist certification, Loft Board status and J-51 burn-off. None of the three applies. The conversion was a filed alteration in a residence district, and the building has never carried a tax benefit.

Local Law 97

Compliance status
Not subject to Local Law 97

This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 emissions caps apply. No regulatory capital pressure from this law specifically, current or 2030.

See full Local Law 97 analysis →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$6,000 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Six apartments means resale supply is close to zero in most years, and the building's pricing is driven by the individual home — floor, ceiling height, the condition of the conversion-era work, and whether the unit has outdoor space — far more than by any building-level average. The competitive set is the other small South Village and Greenwich Village loft conversions of the 1990s and 2000s, plus boutique full-floor condominiums on Sullivan, Thompson and Bleecker. Condominium ownership is the building's main structural advantage over the neighborhood's many small cooperatives: no board package, no interview, financing set by the lender rather than by a house rule, and a straightforward path for a foreign buyer, an entity or a pied-à-terre owner unless the by-laws say otherwise.

The offsetting factors a buyer's attorney will find are the six-unit budget, the absence of any tax benefit, and the ground-floor tenancy. All three are answerable. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Dec 11, 20234
2 BR · 2 BA · 2,250 sf
$3,100,000$1,378/sf-4.6%
Nov 29, 20212
2 BR · 2 BA · 2,250 sf
$2,699,000$1,200/sf-5.3%
Jul 8, 20213
2 BR · 2 BA · 2,250 sf
$2,900,000$1,289/sf-3.2%
Feb 6, 20154
2 BR · 2 BA · 2,250 sf
$2,995,000$1,331/sf+0.0%
Aug 24, 20121
2,870 sf
$3,150,000$1,098/sfoff-mkt
Jul 5, 20071
2,870 sf
$3,250,000$1,132/sfoff-mkt
Dec 15, 2004PH
2 BR · 2,250 sf
$2,485,000$1,104/sf-0.4%
Jan 16, 20045
2 BR · 2,250 sf
$1,275,000$567/sf-5.6%

Market read. Most recent trades (2023) cleared a median $1,378/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 3.9% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

4 · 2,250 sf+4%
$2,995,000 ($1,331/sf) 2015$3,100,000 ($1,378/sf) 2023
PH · 2,250 sf+1%
$2,450,000 ($1,089/sf) 2003$2,485,000 ($1,104/sf) 2004
1 · 2,870 sf-3%
$3,250,000 ($1,132/sf) 2007$3,150,000 ($1,098/sf) 2012
View all 10 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00543-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 135 West 3rd Street, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Greenwich Village — read The Roebling Team Guide to Greenwich Village.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at 135 West 3rd Street?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 135 West 3rd Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.