Manhattan condos $1,629/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops $283K/room 5%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $478K/room 19%CPW $350K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,272/sf 24%Tribeca $1,941/sf 2%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1856
138 Remsen Street
138 Remsen Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201
Buildings·Cooperative

138 Remsen Street

138 Remsen Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201

Brooklyn Heights, Brooklyn

BBL 3002540079 · BIN 3002238

At a glance
Year built
1856
Type
Cooperative
Units
10
Floors
3
Landmark
Designated
Board & building profile
Flip tax
$20.00 per share payable to the cooperative at closing
Subletting
Board authorization required. Written board policy effective July 1, 1997: a shareholder may sublet up to 18 months in any continuous five-year period, with one year required to elapse before a new five-year cycle begins. Sublet charges are billed by the corporation and must be current before a sale application is reviewed
Pets
All pets require board approval (purchase application); house rules require express written permission of the corporation, revocable at will, with dogs carried or leashed in public portions

Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 2009 (fee schedule and application); 1997 (sublet policy)). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.

138 Remsen Street is an 1856 brownstone that has spent four decades as half of a two-address cooperative, and the pairing is the first thing a buyer needs to understand. 13438 Homes Corp. owns 134–136 and 138 Remsen on two separate tax lots, and the sponsor's 1982 engineer described them as one Class "A" multiple dwelling in two sections, with a single boiler in the western cellar serving both. Buy here and your roof, heating plant and reserve exposure extend next door.

The house itself is better preserved than its neighbors, and the Landmarks Preservation Commission's own file says so. The district record for this row reads like a catalogue of nineteenth-century houses reworked in the twentieth — stoop removed and a fourth story added at 134, stoop gone at 132 and 140, original details and stoop removed at 128. Against that, No. 138 carries no alteration note at all. On a block where most façades come with a caveat, that is a marketable distinction.

The 1982 inspection report describes what survives: a front elevation primarily of brownstone with decorative ornamental stone bordering the first- through third-floor windows, red brick from the base of the penthouse floor to the parapet, wood-frame windows in two-over-two, one-over-one and six-over-one, a small railed front garden, and a ceramic-tiled vestibule with the mailboxes set into the party wall. The 1946 alteration that produced today's layout — new plumbing, added bathrooms, kitchen recesses and foyers, a sprinkler system, dormers removed and the front roof raised — is why a single-family house from the Pierce administration now holds ten apartments.

The conversion is a period document of a kind that has since disappeared. The Bassuk brothers, owners since 1958 and managers through their own firm, filed an eviction plan in April 1982 — the harder-edged form, with statutory carve-outs for senior and disabled tenants, that New York effectively retired later that decade. Eighteen of the nineteen apartments were occupied and every occupied unit was rent-stabilized. The plan's own risk factors warned that the $300,000 mortgage carried a balloon eight years out, roughly $59.88 per share, with no assurance of refinancing. That risk resolved: by 2003 the corporation had refinanced onto a fifteen-year self-liquidating mortgage, and it has run since as a small, plainly managed co-op with a modest debt load.

Architecture and unit composition

Two sections, twenty apartments, one corporation. The 1982 engineer counted ten apartments and twenty-four residential rooms at No. 138 by Department of Buildings method, against ten apartments and eighteen rooms next door at 134–136 — meaning the 138 side holds the larger apartments of the two, a fact worth naming in any listing. In each section the basement holds two apartments and the first through fourth floors hold two each.

Construction is Class III non-fireproof: brick and stone foundation, two-by-eight wood floor beams roughly sixteen inches on center, brick exterior walls with the decorative brownstone confined to the front, fire-resistant enclosure of the stairs and halls but a non-fire-resistant staircase, sprinklers throughout. There is no elevator and no service entrance; the house rules are a standard prewar form that still carries incinerator and service-elevator provisions the building has never had. Read them for what they bind, not for what they describe.

The rear yard holds a parking space the corporation rents, generating income that appears on its own line in the audited statements — a small but real offset in a ten-unit building, and a detail that never reaches a listing description. Exterior work runs through Landmarks under the district designation.

Building operations

13438 Homes Corp. was incorporated on January 22, 1982 and has run both buildings since closing, with Adventure Properties, Inc. as managing agent. The model is small-building standard: outside management, a superintendent, basement laundry, one gas plant serving both sections.

The financial record in The Roebling Research Library runs from the late 1990s forward. Its shape is consistent: real estate taxes are the largest single expense by a wide margin, fuel, water and sewer next, management fees modest, with parking and occasional fuel refunds offsetting at the margin. Two structural facts deserve attention. The corporation refinanced its underlying mortgage in August 2003 onto a fifteen-year self-liquidating term, so the debt has amortized substantially since — a favorable position at this size. And the accountants have repeatedly noted that no reserve study has been performed; there is no estimate on file of remaining useful lives or replacement costs. For an 1856 masonry envelope with a 1946 roof alteration, that is the first gap to probe: ask for the FISP/Local Law 11 cycle, the roof and boiler history, and the assessment record. Note also that in at least one year the board voted to "assess back" the New York City co-op tax abatement rather than pass it through — a common way to fund capital work that changes net maintenance. Confirm current practice.

Recent sales

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

2B+43%
$700,000 2008$675,000 2010$998,500 2018

Recent transfers at this building, sourced from NYC Department of Finance records. Apartment-level detail (line, condition, asking-price context) verified upon consultation request.

DateUnitPrice
Feb 11, 20252/3B$3,151,000
May 12, 20225A$700,000
Feb 14, 20192B$998,500
Feb 4, 20133B$695,000
Jul 23, 20102B$675,000
Aug 21, 20082B$700,000

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-00254-0079) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price.

What to know if you’re buying

You are buying into a two-building corporation. One heating plant, two lots. Review both sections' condition, not just yours.

Model the flip tax. Twenty dollars per share at closing, on the specific apartment's allocation.

Ask about the reserve study — because there isn't one. The accountants say so. Request the assessment history, FISP status, and roof and boiler ages instead.

Understand the sublet ceiling. Eighteen months in five years. Adequate for a relocation; useless as an investment thesis.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the LPC record. Most of this row carries an alteration note. No. 138 does not — a credential no neighbor can copy.

Name the room count. Twenty-four residential rooms in ten apartments at 138, against eighteen in ten next door. That is the building's strongest quantitative claim.

Disclose the paired corporation early. It surfaces in attorney review regardless; up front it reads as transparency.

Price against converted row houses, not elevator co-ops. The right set is brownstone-scale walk-ups with small share bases, not the staffed buildings on Montague and Clinton.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 138 Remsen Street, also evaluate:

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

Considering a move at 138 Remsen Street?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 138 Remsen Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.