145 East 84th Street
145 East 84th Street, New York, NY 10028
Upper East Side
BBL 1015130020 · BIN 1047674
- Year built
- 1963
- Type
- Cooperative
- Units
- 96
- Floors
- 16
- Landmark
- No
- Amenities
- 24-hour doorman, resident superintendent, fitness center, children's playroom, roof deck, private storage, central laundry. No garage and no balconies; a small number of upper-floor units carry terraces
- Pets
- Permitted per listing records. Note that the house rules on file are written the older way: no animal may be kept without the lessor's express written permission, and that permission is revocable
Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026
Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.
- Studio median
- $598K
- Recent range
- $495K – $2.7M
- Listing discount
- 0.0%
- Recorded transfers
- 70
The Upper East Side blocks between Park and Lexington in the low 80s are almost entirely prewar. 145 East 84th Street is one of the few postwar buildings on the grid there, and it is on the corner — sixteen stories of white brick holding down the Lexington Avenue side of the block, with the prewar cooperatives of East 84th Street running west from it toward Park.
That corner position is the building's first structural advantage. A midblock building on this stretch has one exposure and a rear lot line. This one has a long Lexington Avenue elevation and a 102-foot East 84th Street frontage, which produces genuine corner apartments and cross-ventilation through a large share of the stack — and, at the top, a set of terraces that midblock prewar buildings on the same block simply cannot offer.
The second structural fact is the retail. The building's ground floor is leased under a twenty-year commercial lease running to May 21, 2029, with one five-year renewal option; Department of Buildings filings from 2009 identify the tenant as a CVS pharmacy. The economics of that lease dominate the cooperative's income statement: commercial rent at the most recent year-end on file exceeded total shareholder maintenance. In practical terms, roughly half of what it costs to run this building is paid by a national credit tenant rather than by shareholders, and maintenance per share sits below what a comparable full-service postwar co-op without commercial income would need to charge. That is the single most important thing a buyer here should understand — along with its corollary, that the lease's 2029 expiry and the underlying mortgage's 2030 maturity land within a year of each other.
The third fact is the ownership history. The partnership that built the building in 1963 owned it, unbroken, for twenty-two years before selling to the tenants' cooperative in December 1985. That is a long single-owner tenure by Manhattan standards, and it shows in the building's condition record: the co-op inherited a well-maintained postwar asset rather than a deferred-maintenance one, and its J-51 benefit — a modest 14-year abatement taken in 1990 against about $137,000 of qualifying alteration cost — was small precisely because the building did not need a gut renovation to convert.
Architecture and unit composition
The elevation is white glazed brick over a masonry base, laid up in the flat, evenly fenestrated postwar idiom that ran up Lexington and Third Avenues through the late 1950s and 1960s. There is no ornament to speak of; the interest is in the corner massing and in the setbacks at the top of the stack that produce the building's terraces. Retail occupies the base on both frontages. The building carries 116,824 square feet of gross area on a 10,267-square-foot lot, roughly 5,000 of it retail.
Inside, the plan was originally a large-count postwar mix — 95 apartments across 16 floors, lettered A through G on the typical plate, with studios and one-bedrooms at the small end and larger corner lines on the avenue side. What the building looks like today is different, and the difference is the point. Four decades of combinations have taken the effective count from 95 to seventy-nine per the most recent audited statement on file. The Department of Buildings record documents combinations at 2A/2G, 4E/4F, 6F/6G, 7F/7G, 8A/8B, 9A/9G, 9E/9F, 10E/10F, 11D/11F and 11E/11F/11G, among others, several of them under the Department's TPPN 3/97 combination protocol and at least one of them a vertical combination with a convenience stair between the 8th and 9th floors.
The consequence for buyers is that this building's inventory is bimodal. The unrenovated single lines are compact postwar apartments with modest room counts. The combined apartments are large — three- and four-bedroom homes with real entertaining space, in some cases with a fireplace and a terrace — and they trade in a different bracket entirely. Anyone underwriting the building from a PLUTO unit count or an average price per room will misprice both ends of it.
Building operations
Full service. The offering plan budgeted a staff of one resident superintendent, four doormen and two porters, and the building has run on that shape since; employees are covered by the Local 32BJ collective bargaining agreement, and the audited statements on file show the pension and benefit obligations that go with it. Amenities are the fitness center, the children's playroom, the roof deck, private storage and central laundry. There is no garage and there are no balconies.
Maintenance includes cable television, high-speed internet and telephone service — a bundled utility that shows up plainly as a cable line item in the audited financials and that materially changes any monthly carrying-cost comparison against buildings that bill those separately. Heat, gas, water and public-area electricity are corporation expenses; apartment electricity is not.
The capital record is active rather than deferred. The most recent statements on file show a completed exterior restoration, a completed lobby and hallway renovation, boiler upgrades, a window replacement program, electrical and air-conditioning upgrades, and an elevator modernization in progress with roughly $523,000 of contract commitment still outstanding. The corporation funds this partly out of an annual per-share capital assessment rather than out of maintenance, which is worth naming explicitly: the assessment is a recurring feature of the carrying cost here, not a one-time event, and it is not always disclosed on listing sheets.
Policy framework
Ownership form: Cooperative. Purchase requires a full board package and an interview. The proprietary lease and by-laws on file give the board — or a majority of directors, or shareholders holding a majority of outstanding shares — consent authority over both sale and sublet.
Financing: 25 percent minimum down per listing records. That is a middle-of-the-road ceiling by Upper East Side standards, more permissive than the Park and Fifth Avenue houses and less so than the Third Avenue postwar stock.
Post-closing liquidity: Not published. Assume a board expectation of meaningful liquid reserves after closing and prepare accordingly; the specific standard is set by the board and available only from the managing agent.
Flip tax: 1 percent of gross sale price, per the audited financial statements on file. The proceeds are segregated for capital purposes. Sellers should carry this in the net-proceeds calculation from the outset.
Subletting: Permitted with board consent under the governing documents. No published seasoning requirement, duration cap or sublet fee. Do not assume a two-year-in, two-year-out framework here without confirming it — get the current policy in writing from the managing agent before signing a contract that depends on it.
Pets: Permitted per listing records. The house rules on file use the older formulation — no animal without the lessor's express written permission, revocable at any time — so the practical policy is board discretion rather than an entitlement.
Pied-à-terre: Permitted per listing records. Confirm current board practice, which can differ from a decades-old published position.
Trusts, LLCs, co-purchase and guarantors: Not documented in any public source. Cooperatives on this corridor commonly permit trust ownership with a personal guarantee and personal occupancy covenants, and commonly refuse LLC ownership outright, but that is a corridor pattern and not a statement about this building. Ask the managing agent.
Professional use: The house rules on file contemplate doctors and other professionals with offices in the building — the two non-residential units in the 98-unit PLUTO total. Any buyer contemplating professional use should treat that as a historical accommodation to verify, not a live entitlement.
Real estate taxes: No abatement. The 1990-vintage J-51 was fully exhausted in tax year 2001, and the exemption roll for this lot shows nothing building-wide since. Underwrite the full tax line.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $22,123/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $19
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
Recent sales
Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2026 | 10G | 1 BA · 500 sf | $495,000 | $990/sf | +2.1% |
| Oct 17, 2024 | 4F | 3 BR · 3 BA | $2,670,000 | +0.0% | |
| Sep 13, 2023 | 15D | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,300 sf | $1,450,000 | $1,115/sf | -3.3% |
| Jun 28, 2023 | 11DEFG | 6 BR · 6 BA · 3,285 sf | $4,975,000 | $1,514/sf | +8.3% |
| Jun 3, 2022 | 4D | 1 BR · 775 sf | $695,000 | $897/sf | -7.2% |
| Oct 14, 2021 | 5D | 1 BR · 1 BA | $785,000 | -1.3% | |
| Oct 23, 2019 | 14B | 1 BR · 1 BA | $800,000 | +6.7% | |
| Nov 30, 2017 | 8F | 2 BR | $1,465,239 | +2.8% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,062/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 0.9% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Other recent transfers
| Date | Unit | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2004 | 12G | $235,000 |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PHC | $899,000 |
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01513-0020) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What to know if you’re buying
Read the commercial lease before you read anything else. The ground-floor retail lease runs to May 21, 2029 with one five-year option, and the rent it produces exceeds total shareholder maintenance. Your attorney should confirm the option status and the renewal economics. A favorable renewal keeps maintenance where it is; an unfavorable one is the largest single risk to the carrying cost in this building — and note that the lease expiry and the underlying mortgage's September 1, 2030 maturity, with its roughly $3.72 million balloon, land within a year of each other. The 3.27 percent coupon on that loan is a legacy rate; ask what the board is modelling for the refinancing.
The assessment is recurring. The corporation has been running a per-share capital assessment annually alongside maintenance. Add it to the monthly number before you compare this building to anything else.
Ignore the PLUTO unit count when you value a combined apartment. The city says 96 units; the audited statement says seventy-nine. The combinations are documented in the DOB record, and the large apartments in this building are genuinely large.
Confirm the sublet rules in writing. They are not published anywhere, and the governing documents leave them to board discretion. If your plan involves ever renting the apartment, resolve this before contract.
Underwrite full taxes. The J-51 is long gone and nothing replaced it.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the corner and the bundled utilities. The Lexington Avenue exposure, the corner lines and the cable-and-internet-inclusive maintenance are the three things that distinguish this building from the midblock postwar co-ops buyers will see the same weekend — and the last of them is routinely missed on listing sheets.
Present the commercial income as the balance-sheet fact it is. A national credit tenant paying more than the shareholders do is an unusual and favorable structure. Say it plainly, and be equally plain about the 2029 lease expiry; sophisticated buyers' counsel will find it either way.
Price combined apartments against prewar three-bedrooms, not against the building's own averages. The combined lines here are a different product from the single lines, and a per-room building average will underprice them.
Budget the 1 percent flip tax into your net. Run the Seller Closing Cost Calculator with it included rather than discovering it at contract.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 145 East 84th Street, also evaluate:
- 125 East 84th Street (The Girard) — cooperative on the same block, the closest like-for-like on the street
- 124 East 84th Street — cooperative directly across East 84th Street
- 144 East 84th Street and 148 East 84th Street — the cooperatives immediately opposite toward Lexington
- 119 East 84th Street — cooperative converted in 1984, one conversion cycle earlier
- 1223 Lexington Avenue — cooperative one block south on the same avenue; the closest avenue-frontage comparison
- 151 East 83rd Street — 1986 rental-to-cooperative conversion; the nearest peer by conversion vintage
- 201 East 83rd Street (Saxon Towers) — larger full-service postwar cooperative two blocks south
- 1230 Third Avenue (Tower East) — the marquee postwar cooperative on the corridor; the architectural step-up
- 55 East 86th Street — rental-to-condominium conversion nearby; the condominium alternative with different policy and financing rules
- 126 East 86th Street (ARLOPARC) — new-construction condominium two blocks north; the modern alternative at a different price tier
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper East Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper East Side.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.
Considering a move at 145 East 84th Street?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 145 East 84th Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.