Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1964
Saxon Towers
201 East 83rd Street, New York, NY 10028

201 East 83rd Street (Saxon Towers)

201 East 83rd Street, New York, NY 10028

Yorkville, Upper East Side

BBL 1015290001 · BIN 1048692

At a glance
Year built
1964
Type
Cooperative
Units
115
Floors
18
Landmark
No
Flip tax
$3.50 per share, payable to the corporation by the seller — stated in both the cooperative's audited financial statements and its purchase application, both on file in The Roebling Research Library
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

1BR median
$708K
Recent range
$350K – $3M
Listing discount
5.2%
Recorded transfers
76

Third Avenue above 79th Street is where the Upper East Side stops being a landmarked grid of prewar cooperatives and becomes an ordinary working avenue: buses, retail, the Q at 86th Street, and a stock of 1960s brick towers built after the Third Avenue El came down. Saxon Towers is one of the larger and better-run of them — eighteen stories on the northwest corner of 83rd Street, 115 apartments as built, converted to cooperative ownership in January 1985.

The reason to look at it seriously is not the architecture. It is that this is one of the few buildings on the corridor where the underwriting facts are actually documented, and where the documented facts are mostly good. The cooperative carries modest underlying debt, has funded its capital work honestly through disclosed assessments rather than deferral, holds a long-term commercial lease that subsidizes the maintenance line, and runs a full-service staff under a union contract. Its flip tax, its sublet rule and its board process are all written down.

The two facts a buyer most needs to weigh are also documented. The first is that combinations have quietly reshaped the building: 115 apartments on paper are 99 apartments in fact, which is why the top of this building's market looks nothing like its bottom. Recorded share transfers on this lot include both studios and four-line combinations, and the price range between them is enormous. The second is sponsor concentration: at the most recent year-end covered by the financial statements on file, the original 1985 sponsor entity still held roughly nineteen percent of the corporation's shares, down modestly from the prior year. That is a real consideration for financing, and it is addressed below.

Architecture and unit composition

The building is a plain, well-proportioned 1964 tower: red brick over a one-story white brick base, a canopied residential entrance mid-block on East 83rd Street, and continuous retail wrapping the Third Avenue corner. It carries no landmark designation and sits in no historic district — verified by lot against the Landmarks Preservation Commission's database — which means window replacement, façade treatment and rooftop work here proceed as ordinary alterations rather than through a Certificate of Appropriateness. On a building facing a fifty-year cycle of envelope and energy work, that freedom is worth more than it sounds.

The original mix ran studios through three-bedrooms across A through G lines, with the larger lines at the corners. What exists today is the result of two decades of combining. The Department of Buildings record shows single-line combinations on nearly every floor and full-line combinations on the 14th, 16th, 17th and 18th floors, and the recorded share transfers carry designations like 14ABC, 16ABG, 9DEF and 8CD. The building therefore holds two distinct products: the original small lines, largely unchanged, and a set of large combined homes on the upper floors with open outlooks north, east and south over lower Yorkville rooftops. Upper-floor light is genuine here — at eighteen stories the building sits above most of its immediate neighbors.

Ceiling heights and finishes are postwar rather than prewar: efficient plans, real closets, no fireplaces, no moldings of consequence. What the building offers instead is central air conditioning through a chilled-water system rather than window units, which is uncommon in this vintage and which the building reinvested in as recently as 2017.

Building operations

Saxon Towers runs as a full-service cooperative: 24-hour doorman, live-in resident manager, a union staff under the Local 32BJ agreement, a renovated roof deck, basement laundry and bicycle storage. There is no garage and no fitness facility. Real estate taxes are by a wide margin the single largest line in the budget — larger than labor — which is characteristic of a converted postwar cooperative on a high-value commercial corner and which is why the tax abatement mechanics below matter.

Capital posture, from the audited financial statements on file. The cooperative funds major work by assessment rather than from a large reserve, and it has said so plainly. The auditor's report notes that the governing documents do not require the accumulation of reserve funds and that no reserve study has been performed; invested reserves at the most recent year-end on file stood in the low six figures against operating cash of several hundred thousand dollars. Against that, the assessment record is disciplined and disclosed:

  • A capital assessment approved in January 2018 at approximately $9.00 per share, payable over twelve months, funding the gas conversion project.
  • A capital assessment approved in August 2020 at approximately $10.36 per share, payable over fifteen months, funding the exterior and roof project — a project to which the corporation was committed at roughly $1.29 million.
  • A supplemental assessment approved in March 2021 at approximately $4.36 per share, payable over nine months, funding the continuation of that same exterior and roof project.
  • A recurring operating assessment in the range of $1.60 per share. The board's stated policy is to refund the New York City cooperative/condominium tax abatement to shareholders at approximately the same time the operating assessment is charged — so the two roughly offset for an abatement-eligible primary resident, and do not offset for a purchaser who is not.

The envelope is not finished. The Department of Buildings record shows façade and roof repairs permitted in 2020, a sidewalk shed installed in 2025, and a new façade repair filing covering floors one through eighteen permitted in 2026, with suspended scaffold outriggers and supported pipe scaffold. Any buyer in 2026 should assume a live capital cycle and ask directly whether a further assessment has been approved or is contemplated.

Underlying debt. The financial statements on file record a first mortgage originally $2,500,000 at 3.66 percent, maturing July 1, 2023 with a balloon of roughly $1,967,000, alongside a $1,000,000 revolving credit line that had not been drawn. ACRIS shows the cooperative refinanced ahead of that maturity: the prior debt was satisfied in November 2022 and replaced with a $2,100,000 first mortgage and a $500,000 credit line. Both the mortgage and the line came down. For a building of this size that is conservative leverage, and it is the strongest single item on the balance sheet.

Commercial income. The entire commercial and professional space is let under a single master commercial lease that commenced January 10, 1985 at an annual rent of $139,000 with two percent annual increases. The lessee exercised the first ten-year renewal option effective January 10, 2015, and a 2017 amendment created a third five-year option in exchange for $300,000 of additional rent paid in installments through 2019. Commercial income runs a bit above a tenth of total revenue. The first renewal term ran through January 2025, at which point the second ten-year option came up for decision — a buyer today should ask the managing agent whether that option was exercised, at what rent, and whether the tenancy or the sublets beneath it have changed.

Policy framework

Everything below is taken from the cooperative's purchase application, house rules and audited financial statements on file in The Roebling Research Library.

Board package. The application requires the contract of sale; the bank commitment letter, loan application and recognition agreement where there is financing; two years of income tax returns; reference letters from the current landlord, from the employer stating base salary and position, and from banks; at least two personal references; and business and professional references. Two collated sets are required, with social security numbers redacted on the board's set. The application is circulated to an Admissions Committee.

Background screening. The board requires a criminal background search on all applicants and reserves the right to obtain a consumer and tenant screening report. Both are disclosed in the application. This is more screening than most postwar Upper East Side cooperatives run, and applicants should expect the process to take longer accordingly.

Flip tax. $3.50 per share, payable to the corporation by the seller. Because the flip tax is share-based rather than price-based, it is a fixed dollar amount per apartment that does not move with the sale price — favorable in a strong market, less so in a weak one. Get your share count and multiply.

Subletting. Prohibited for two years from the closing of title, by board resolution, with the purchaser acknowledging the restriction in the application itself. Sublet terms after that period are not stated in the materials on file.

Pets. Permitted only with the express written permission of the corporation, revocable at any time, under house rule 15. Do not treat a neighbor's dog as evidence of a pet-friendly policy.

House rules of practical consequence. Construction and repair work is confined to weekdays, excluding legal holidays, between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Window air-conditioning units and ventilators require express approval. Terrace and balcony plantings are governed by a detailed containment and drainage rule. Deliveries and heavy items move through the service entrance.

Not documented, and required before offering: the maximum financing percentage; the post-closing liquidity requirement; the pied-à-terre position; whether trusts, limited liability companies, guarantors and co-purchasers are entertained; and the alteration agreement terms. Ask for all of them in writing.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$24,935/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $18

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2025–30
Unsafe
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as Unsafe — conditions requiring corrective action, which under FISP means a protective sidewalk shed and repairs. Review the subsequent filings, the repair status, and the building’s board and financial materials — we pull the repair scope and funding picture for you.

Inspection history
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
SWARMP
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Unsafe
2030–35
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2032
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2025–30
$7,000 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2025–30. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

This is one of the most actively traded cooperatives on the Third Avenue corridor — roughly ninety recorded share transfers on this lot since the mid-2000s, covering most of the building at least once and several apartments more than once. That depth is genuinely useful: unlike a small building, Saxon Towers supports real internal comparable analysis, and a well-chosen comparable here is usually a same-line trade rather than an estimate.

The distribution matters more than the average. The building's small original lines and its large upper-floor combinations trade in effectively different markets, and any building-wide average sits between two clusters rather than describing either. Combined homes on the upper floors — the ABC and ABG lines — clear at multiples of what an unrenovated G-line apartment clears, and they compete with condominium inventory rather than with the rest of the corridor's cooperative stock.

Value within each cluster is set by floor, exposure and renovation depth in that order, and by whether the apartment sits in a combined footprint. Buyers comparing carrying costs against neighboring buildings should note that a share of this building's assessment history is capital rather than operating, and that the operating assessment is largely offset by the abatement refund for an eligible resident. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricevs. Ask
Jul 9, 202616ABG
3 BR · 3 BA
$2,975,000-3.3%
Jun 1, 202614E
1 BR · 1 BA
$745,000-6.3%
May 6, 202510G
1 BA
$435,000-3.3%
Feb 26, 20252G
1 BA
$445,000-6.3%
Aug 22, 20242E
1 BR · 1 BA
$670,000+3.1%
Aug 1, 202416ABG
3 BR · 3 BA
$2,550,000-5.6%
Feb 5, 20247A
1 BA
$365,000-5.2%
Oct 5, 202314G
1 BA
$350,000-9.1%

Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2022): a median $888/sf across 2 sales. The building has traded as recently as 2026. Median listing discount 3.5% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

15F+86%
$365,000 2004$680,000 2018
3EF+85%
$974,000 2009$1,800,000 2015
16ABG+70%
$1,750,000 ($833/sf) 2012$2,550,000 2024$2,975,000 2026
15E+56%
$436,000 ($623/sf) 2006$620,000 ($886/sf) 2008$679,000 2022
18E · 725 sf+40%
$510,000 ($703/sf) 2007$715,000 ($986/sf) 2016
View all 76 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01529-0001) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price.

What to know if you’re buying

Ask about sponsor-held shares first. At the most recent year-end covered by the financial statements on file, the original sponsor entity still held roughly nineteen percent of the corporation's shares. Sponsor concentration affects lender eligibility — some agency and portfolio programs cap sponsor-held units — and it affects governance. Ask the managing agent for the current sponsor share count and unit list before you apply for financing, not after.

Assume the façade project is live. There is a permitted façade repair filing covering all eighteen floors dated 2026, on top of the 2020 exterior and roof project and the assessments that funded it. Ask what has been approved, what remains, and how it will be funded.

Understand the flip tax math now. $3.50 per share is a fixed cost per apartment. On a small line it is nominal; on a large combined apartment carrying several thousand shares it is a real number, and it is the seller's to pay — which means it will show up in your own eventual exit math.

Two years before you can sublet. If your plan involves flexibility, this building is the wrong one. The restriction is a board resolution acknowledged in writing at application.

Budget the extra screening time. Criminal background search plus tenant screening plus an Admissions Committee is a longer process than a standard postwar board. Build the timeline into your contract.

The tax line is the building's biggest expense. Real estate taxes exceed labor here. Model the carrying cost against the current bill, and run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator rather than the maintenance figure alone.

What to know if you’re selling

Sell the systems, not the vintage. Central chilled-water air conditioning, a 2017 plant replacement, a completed gas conversion and a funded exterior and roof program are a better story than a 1964 build date. The assessment history is evidence of stewardship, not of trouble, and it should be presented that way.

Lead with the combination if you have one. A combined upper-floor apartment here belongs in a different comparable set than the rest of the building. Market it against condominium and larger cooperative inventory on the corridor, not against the building average.

Present the flip tax up front. It is yours to pay, it is fixed per share, and buyers' attorneys will find it. Disclose it with the share count attached.

Have the diligence file ready. Financial statements, the assessment history, the current façade scope and the sponsor share position will all be requested. Assembling them before listing shortens contract-to-close materially in a building with an Admissions Committee.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering Saxon Towers, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper East Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper East Side.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at Saxon Towers?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Saxon Towers would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.