Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomFifth Ave $501K/roomBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfHell's Kitchen $1,328/sf ▴0%
Full index →
Condominium · 2014
151 East 78th Street
151 East 78th Street, New York, NY 10075

151 East 78th Street

151 East 78th Street, New York, NY 10075

Lenox Hill, Upper East Side

BBL 1014137503 · BIN 1089818

At a glance
Year built
2014
Type
Condominium
Units
14
Floors
16
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; not in a historic district
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission and City Planning records, updated February 2026
Dogs and cats
Permitted with conditions
Doorman
Full-time doorman

151 East 78th Street sales history: 18 recorded sales

Own an apartment at 151 East 78th Street?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2012–2023

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf, 2023
$3,326
1 sale
Listing discount
-1.8%
Recorded sales
18
On record
2012–2023
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 151 East 78th Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As cited in The Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

151 East 78th Street is the clearest recent argument that a new Upper East Side apartment building can be built in the classical tradition without irony and without compromise. Peter Pennoyer Architects designed it for Spruce Capital Partners on a mid-block Lenox Hill lot; it rose sixteen stories in red brick and limestone with a rusticated base, a properly proportioned shaft and a set-back crown; and in 2016 it received the Stanford White Award from the Institute of Classical Architecture & Art. The award is a documented architectural credential, without establishing a national ranking or the frequency of awards to other condominiums.

Beneath the design, the building's founding condition is a zoning problem solved by assembly. The site is a 5,184-square-foot mid-block lot in a C1-8X district whose residential equivalent, R9X, permits 9.0 FAR. That would have produced a building roughly two thirds of the size actually built. Instead the sponsor entered into a Zoning Lot Development Agreement dated June 27, 2013 with a neighbouring landowner, creating a combined zoning lot so that excess floor area belonging to the neighbour could be used at 151 East 78th Street. Zoning lot instruments recorded with the City Register in August 2013 cover the development lot together with three adjacent properties — 149 East 78th Street, 157 East 78th Street and 1129 Lexington Avenue — along with light-and-air easements. That is why a building with roughly 11.2 FAR on its own tax lot is fully lawful, and it is the answer to the discrepancy anyone will find who compares PLUTO's built FAR to its residential FAR at this lot.

There is a quiet symmetry in the assembly worth noting: one of the contributing lots, 157 East 78th Street, is an individually designated New York City landmark — one of a row of 1861 vernacular Italianate houses that runs east from the building. Unused development rights over a landmark helped make the tower next door possible. From the residences' windows, the low houses to the east remain in view, though outlook depends on floor and no view is protected without a recorded instrument.

The residential program is the second argument. Fourteen residences in a sixteen-storey building means nine full floors of nearly 4,000 square feet each, a six-bedroom maisonette duplex with its own garden-level entry, and three penthouses at the top, two of them large duplexes with terraces. These are apartments sized to prewar cooperative expectations, in a new building, on a block where prewar cooperatives set the standard.

Architecture and unit composition

The building is 56 feet 8 inches wide on a 75-foot property line, and it runs to 170 feet at the roof, with terraces stepping back at the 12th, 14th and 15th floors. Sixteen stories on that frontage produces a tall, slender masonry building that reads as a well-mannered neighbour rather than an intrusion — the effect the classical vocabulary is there to achieve.

The offering plan's Schedule A sets out the composition precisely. Unit 1A is a 523-square-foot studio. The maisonette is a six-bedroom duplex of roughly 4,493 square feet with about 862 square feet of exterior space. Floors 3 through 11 are single full-floor residences of approximately 3,966 square feet, laid out as five-bedroom homes. At the top, PHB is a simplex of roughly 3,381 square feet; PHC is a duplex of roughly 6,924 square feet with terrace; PHA is a duplex of roughly 6,975 square feet with nearly 1,958 square feet of exterior space. The residential total is 57,990 square feet — and PLUTO's building-area figure for this lot matches that number exactly, which is a useful confirmation that at least one city field here is right.

The full-floor plates are the building's core inventory and they are unusually consistent: nine near-identical homes on floors 3 through 11 means that, unusually for a boutique building, there is a real comparable set inside the building itself. Differentiation runs on floor, light and condition rather than on layout.

Two structural points a buyer should register. First, some windows are lot-line windows, and the offering plan discloses that unit owners may lose the light and air they provide if an adjoining property builds, with no compensation payable. Second, the plan records that a chimney on the neighbouring landowner's building may require extension as a consequence of this building's construction. At the time of filing the sponsor did not anticipate that the extension would be required, and expected no ongoing financial obligation of the condominium — but the sponsor took on the obligation to construct and maintain it if needed, together with a chimney access easement, and that maintenance obligation passes to the Condominium. It is contingent, it may never bite, and it should still be confirmed as part of diligence.

Building operations

The offering plan's first-year budget documents the service model: a resident manager, a 24-hour, seven-day concierge, and a daytime porter, projected as a non-union staff. The cellar houses a fitness room, a private storage room for each residence, a package room and the resident manager's apartment, the latter a general common element. Published records add a resident library and a landscaped garden.

The budget also sets out what common charges actually cover. Heat and hot water are supplied by an oil-fired plant burning number 2 fuel oil, with consumption projected at roughly 21,000 gallons a year at the plan's filing — worth noting, because oil-fired heat carries fuel-price exposure and, in a fourteen-unit building, a conversion decision is a large per-unit number. Cooking gas is not separately metered to the residences and is carried as a common expense. Common-area electricity, water and sewer, repairs and maintenance, services and supplies, insurance, management, legal and audit, administration, a reserve fund line and a contingency complete the budget. Residences are separately metered for their own electricity.

The building is now roughly a decade old and its capital posture is the thing to underwrite. Its Cycle 9 façade report was filed on February 20, 2024 with a status of SWARMP — safe, with a repair and maintenance programme outstanding. Ask for the qualified inspector's report, the scope and cost of the programme, whether the work has been completed, and whether it was funded from reserves or by assessment. Ask also for the current reserve position against the plan's original reserve line, the boiler service history, and any resolution on the neighbouring chimney.

Landmark status — checked by lot

The lot is not designated, and the surrounding designations make that easy to misread.

LPC's own designated-building database, queried by tax lot, shows two clusters on Manhattan block 1413. At the western end, toward Park Avenue, the Upper East Side Historic District covers 111 through 127 East 78th Street and 885, 891 and 895 Park Avenue. At the eastern end, four individually designated houses — 157, 159, 161 and 163–165 East 78th Street, all built in 1861 — carry landmark status in their own right. Former lot 23, now condominium lot 7503, appears in neither group. The offering plan's own zoning analysis records the same conclusion, and the Department of Buildings new-building application carries landmark status "N."

The practical consequences are the usual ones: no LPC permit is required for exterior work at this building, and its own alteration path runs through DOB alone. The neighbours are a different matter. The landmarked houses immediately east are protected in perpetuity, and the lots contributing development rights to this building's zoning lot have given up the floor area that would have allowed them to grow. Both facts materially reduce the risk to the building's eastern light — which, on an interior Manhattan lot, is worth more than it sounds.

Policy framework

Purchaser approval. There is none. The plan states expressly that the Condominium Board has no right to approve or disapprove potential purchasers, and that the Board cannot therefore limit the number of units bought for investment or resale. This is the ordinary condominium bargain and it is the building's principal structural difference from the prewar cooperatives around it.

Right of first refusal. The by-laws give the Board a right of first refusal to lease or purchase a unit. During the sponsor's initial control period the Board required the sponsor's written consent to exercise it. That control period ran, on the plan's terms, until the latest of ninety-five per cent of units closing, three years after the final temporary certificate of occupancy, and issuance of the final certificate of occupancy — which places its expiry in 2019. Confirm current practice, notice periods and documentation requirements with the managing agent before signing a lease or a contract.

Pets. Dogs, caged birds, cats, small reptiles and fish are permitted under the by-laws subject to written permission, with no more than two pets in a residence without Board or sponsor consent, a pet agreement indemnifying the condominium, and a requirement that animals use designated elevators rather than the public portions of the building.

Leasing, flip tax and house rules. Not established by the plan sections reviewed for this page. Confirm with the managing agent.

Alterations. The plan requires unit owners undertaking construction to work under a form Construction Agreement annexed to the plan. Any buyer planning a renovation should read that agreement before contract, not after.

Pets and in-unit washer/dryer

Dogs and cats
Permitted with conditionsDogs, cats, caged birds, small reptiles and fish permitted under the by-laws, subject to the Board's written permission and a pet agreement; no more than two pets per residence without Board consent; animals restricted to designated elevators and out of the public portions of the buildingSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
In-unit washer/dryer
Not verified

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.

Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Building staffing and amenities

Doorman
Full-time doormanSource: recent listing records
Concierge
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Attended lobby
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Live-in superintendent
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Package room
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
Amenities noted
Fitness room, garden, storageSource: The Roebling Team's building profile

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$33,945/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $202
Modeled exposure split equally across 14 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; condominium owners are typically charged by each unit's common-interest percentage.

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the inspector (QEWI) identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair, with repairs due by the deadline stated in the filing. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The recorded initial conveyances were concentrated in roughly nine weeks. The offering plan was accepted for filing in March 2014 and declared effective on June 2, 2015, with twelve of fourteen units — about 86 per cent — under signed contract with bona fide purchasers. All fourteen residences then closed from the sponsor to separately named buyers between February 16 and April 19, 2016 — a complete sellout in roughly nine weeks. Every transfer is recorded as a condominium deed under ACRIS property type SC. The recorded names alone do not establish unrelated beneficial ownership or current sponsor-affiliated holdings. Confirm the current ownership crosswalk before certifying the sponsor’s position.

Since 2016 the recorded activity divides into two kinds. There have been a handful of genuine arm's-length resales, including full-floor residences in 2022 and the combined maisonette position in 2023. There has also been a run of no-consideration transfers into and among family trusts — several on a single unit — which appear in a raw deed count but are not sales. Anyone reading a transaction count on this building from public records without separating those two categories will materially overstate its turnover. The honest description is that the building has traded lightly since sellout, based on the recorded arm’s-length resales, rather than the unit count or an assumption about owners’ holding intentions.

Pricing here is best read against the internal comparable set. Floors 3 through 11 are the same plate, so floor height, light and renovation condition drive almost the entire spread among them; the maisonette, the studio and the three penthouses each sit in a category of one and have to be valued on their own terms. Against the surrounding market, the building's position is the new-construction premium over prewar cooperative stock on the same blocks, set against a roll that shows no tax exemption — check the apartment's tax bill, and model the carry rather than the headline. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Feb 1, 2023MAIS1ASponsor Sale
7 BR · 7 BA · 4,300 sf
$14,300,000$3,326/sf—
Feb 14, 20226
5 BR · 5 BA · 3,966 sf
$11,300,000$2,849/sf-9.6%
Apr 19, 20168Sponsor Sale
3,966 sf
$11,149,837$2,811/sf—
Apr 19, 20169Sponsor Sale
3,966 sf
$11,404,400$2,876/sf—
Apr 14, 2016PHBSponsor Sale
3 BR · 3,381 sf
$10,800,000$3,194/sf-0.5%
Apr 14, 20163Sponsor Sale
5 BR · 3,966 sf
$10,182,500$2,567/sf+1.8%
Apr 1, 2016MAISSponsor Sale
6 BR · 4,493 sf
$13,135,687$2,924/sf+3.0%
Apr 1, 20161ASponsor Sale
523 sf
$1,236,300$2,364/sf+3.0%

Market read. Most recent trades (2023) cleared a median $3,326/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. Median listing discount -1.8% over ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

6 · 3,966 sf+3%
$10,997,100 ($2,773/sf) 2016 → $11,300,000 ($2,849/sf) 2022
View all 18 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01413-7503; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 151 East 78th Street and nearby.

Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with 151 East 78th Street and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 151 East 78th Street. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

The assessment roll shows no exemption. Zero exemption in every assessment roll since FY2016/17. That does not rule out a bill-level abatement; check the apartment's tax bill, and underwrite the monthly number, not the price.

The façade programme is live. The Cycle 9 filing carries a SWARMP status as of February 2024. Establish the scope, the cost, whether it is complete, and how it was funded before you commit.

Ask about the chimney. The zoning lot agreement contemplates a possible chimney extension on the neighbour's building whose maintenance obligation would fall to the condominium. It may be moot. Confirm that it is.

The zoning lot is bigger than the tax lot. That is why the building is the size it is. Whether it limits what the eastern neighbours can build depends on the zoning lot development agreement and any light-and-air easements; ask counsel to review both as part of title.

Lot-line windows carry risk. The plan discloses that light and air from lot-line windows can be lost without compensation. Identify which windows in the specific residence are lot-line windows.

Read the Construction Agreement before you plan a renovation. Alteration work at this building is governed by a form agreement annexed to the offering plan.

Mansion tax applies at $1 million or more. Run pricing through the Mansion Tax Calculator and the full carry through the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the architecture, and lead with the award. The Stanford White Award is an outside verdict from a body with no commercial interest in the building. Describe the award accurately alongside the building’s design and construction history.

Then lead with the plate. Roughly 3,966 square feet on a single full floor, five bedrooms, private elevator landing, in a new building on a Lenox Hill mid-block. That specification competes directly with prewar cooperative classic sixes and sevens and wins on systems, ceiling condition and the absence of a board interview.

Explain the light. The landmarked houses to the east and the exhausted development rights on the contributing lots mean the eastern exposure is unusually secure. That is a documented argument, not a sales line.

Get the capital picture straight before listing. A SWARMP façade status is a normal condition of a ten-year-old building, but a buyer who discovers it in diligence reads it as a surprise. Present it with the scope and the funding plan attached.

Closings follow the condominium process. No co-op board interview; purchases run through the condominium's application and right-of-first-refusal process. Confirm its requirements and timing in the declaration and bylaws.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 151 East 78th Street, also evaluate:

More Upper East Side buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Upper East Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper East Side.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at 151 East 78th Street?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com