Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,600/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $270K/room 2%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $472K/room 18%CPW $355K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,313/sf 24%Greenwich Village $2,455/sf 10%
Full index →
Condominium · 1985
The Belgravia
124 East 79th Street, New York, NY 10075

124 East 79th Street (The Belgravia)

124 East 79th Street, New York, NY 10075

Lenox Hill, Upper East Side

BBL 1014137501 · BIN 1043270

At a glance
Year built
1985
Type
Condominium
Units
66
Floors
21
Landmark
No
Pets
Permitted under the house rules on file, with dogs and cats carried or leashed in public areas; the board reserves the right to limit the number of animals per residence or to prohibit an animal that interferes with other owners' use of the building
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2025

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,140
Listing discount
3.7%
Recorded sales
72
On record
2004–2025

The blocks between Park and Lexington in the East 70s are almost entirely prewar cooperative. That is not an accident of taste — it is a consequence of preservation law and of the fact that the land was fully built out by 1930. The Belgravia exists because one mid-block parcel on East 79th Street sat outside the Upper East Side Historic District line, and because in the early 1980s a developer was willing to assemble it and build to the full R10A envelope. There is very little else like it within walking distance, and the scarcity is structural rather than cyclical.

What the building offers, then, is a set of things the surrounding co-ops cannot offer at any price: condominium ownership, a purchase that closes on a right of first refusal rather than a board interview, permitted pied-à-terre and entity ownership, balconies and terraces, and a 1985 mechanical plant rather than a 1928 one. Against that, it gives up the ceiling heights, the room proportions and the address prestige that the prewar buildings on either side trade on. Buyers in this micro-market are usually choosing between those two things, and the choice is rarely close once they have named their priority.

The architecture is more considered than the vintage suggests. The Gruzen Partnership — a practice with a serious postwar institutional and housing record in New York — designed a red-brick tower with setbacks and angled corner bays rather than a flat slab, which multiplies corner exposures through the stack and gives the upper floors light on two sides. The base is granite. The most distinctive gesture is at the ground: an approximately 1,950-square-foot landscaped Japanese-style garden running the entire southern edge of the property, built with outdoor seating and held in the offering plan as a common element for the exclusive use of unit owners. It is a genuinely unusual amenity for a mid-block Upper East Side building, and it is the reason the low floors here are not the compromise they normally are.

Two facts about the building's economics deserve to be stated up front rather than discovered in diligence. First, there is no tax abatement. The sponsor did obtain a preliminary 421-a certificate of eligibility at construction — the offering plan projects both abated and unabated tax figures for the 1985–86 fiscal year and warns that the numbers would move as the exemption phased out — but that benefit ran off long ago, and current Department of Finance records carry no exemption on the billing lot or on any residential unit lot. Residences are taxed at full assessment. Second, the association charges a two percent transfer fee on the gross sale price at resale. Condominium buyers rarely expect a flip tax, and sellers who have not priced it are surprised by it at contract.

Architecture and unit composition

Twenty-one stories on a 66-by-102-foot interior lot produces a narrow, tall floor plate, and the plan responds by putting most residences on a corner. The unit lettering runs A through E on the low floors and narrows to A and B in the upper stack, which is the signature of a building that gets smaller as it steps back: the second through ninth floors carry four to five residences apiece, the tenth through twelfth carry four, the fourteenth through twentieth carry two, and the top is a pair of penthouses with roof terraces reached from inside the residence. Those terraces are Limited Common Elements of the units they serve, not shared roof deck.

Combination activity is heavy for a building of this size and should shape any comparable analysis. Department of Buildings filings record fourth-floor and second-floor A/B combinations, a twelfth-floor C/D combination, a fifteenth-floor A/B/F combination, a tenth-floor B/D combination, and a fourteenth-floor A/B combination — six documented combinations between 2005 and 2026. A building that started with 66 residences trades today with meaningfully fewer, and with a wider spread of unit sizes than the original Schedule A contemplated. Line-by-line analysis matters more here than a building average.

Electricity is sub-metered and re-billed by the association rather than bundled, which matters when comparing monthly carrying cost against prewar co-ops on the same block that fold utilities into maintenance.

Building operations

The Belgravia runs as a full-service condominium with an attended lobby and concierge, a residents' lounge with kitchenette, an exercise facility, a package room, central laundry, and the ground-floor garden. Staff are covered by the SEIU Local 32BJ collective bargaining agreement, and payroll and benefits together are the dominant line in the operating budget — the ordinary shape of a 66-unit full-service house.

The capital record in the audited financial statements on file is worth reading closely. The building has been through a long façade and roof cycle: Department of Buildings filings show façade repair work in 2011, 2013, 2018 and 2022, roof replacement in 2022, and sidewalk sheds in each of those cycles. More consequentially, the association undertook an elevator modernization financed with a bank construction facility of up to $1.1 million drawn from September 2021, converting on completion into a nine-year term loan, alongside a special assessment levied in 2021. Common charges rose eight percent for 2021 and a further six percent for 2022.

Two things follow. The building has been willing to fund its capital work rather than defer it, which is the right posture. But it has funded a meaningful share of that work with borrowed money and assessments rather than from reserves, and the auditor's report on file notes that the association had not commissioned a formal reserve study and had omitted the supplementary disclosure on future major repairs that the accounting standards call for. The most recent audited statements located in The Roebling Research Library cover the year ended December 31, 2021; a buyer should ask for the current year's audit, the current budget, and the outstanding balance and amortization schedule on the elevator loan before contract.

Policy framework

Ownership form: Condominium. Resales close on the board's right of first refusal rather than a cooperative approval, which produces the faster, more predictable timeline that draws many buyers to this building in the first place.

Pets: Permitted under the house rules on file, carried or leashed in public areas, subject to the board's reserved right to limit numbers or to remove a nuisance animal.

Subletting: Permitted, with a sublet fee charged by the association. Transient, hotel and motel use is expressly prohibited, which forecloses short-term rental.

Pied-à-terre, LLC, trust and foreign ownership: Permitted under the standard condominium framework.

Home office: Permitted to the extent the certificate of occupancy and zoning allow, with no clients waiting in common areas and no illuminated signs.

Alterations: Construction noise is limited to weekdays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Exterior installations, including air-conditioning devices, window treatments visible from 79th Street, and anything projecting from a window, require prior written board approval.

Terraces: No charcoal or propane grills, under an April 2014 amendment carrying a $1,000 fine. Terrace and balcony plantings must sit in raised, lined, drained containers.

Flip tax: Two percent of the gross sale price on resale, per the audited financial statements on file. Confirm the current rate and the payer with the managing agent before pricing a sale.

Real estate taxes: Full unabated assessment. No 421-a, 485-x or J-51 benefit appears on the billing lot or any residential unit lot in current Department of Finance records.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟢
Strong — under cap in both periods
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
Per unit / month range

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
SWARMP
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
Assessed · 2005–10 to 2020–25
$22,400 in filing penalties
payment status not in the record
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

The Belgravia occupies a specific slot in the Upper East Side market: contemporary condominium ownership inside the prewar co-op grid, at a price well below the recent ground-up condominium product a few blocks in any direction. Per-square-foot pricing here sits materially under 109 East 79th Street, 150 East 78th Street and 135 East 79th Street, and above the surrounding prewar cooperatives on a monthly-carry basis once full unabated taxes and the two percent transfer fee are counted.

The right comparable set is small. There are only a handful of 1980s-vintage Upper East Side condominiums with a full staff and a real amenity program, and the building's own resale record — thin in any given year, and distorted by the combination history — carries as much signal as the neighborhood average. Indexed to the last complete year, the useful frame is that condominium product of this vintage between Park and Lexington trades on light, exposure and outdoor space far more than on finishes, because almost every residence has been renovated at least once since 1985.

Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Jun 25, 2025PHB
2 BR · 3 BA · 2,250 sf
$3,850,000$1,711/sf-30.0%
Jun 20, 20258D
2 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,400 sf
$2,100,000$1,500/sf-4.5%
May 28, 20257A
1 BR · 1.5 BA · 718 sf
$790,000$1,100/sf-1.3%
Jan 8, 202510BD
4 BR · 4 BA · 2,404 sf
$2,550,000$1,061/sf-8.8%
Jun 20, 20245B
1 BR · 1.5 BA · 822 sf
$990,000$1,204/sf-7.0%
Dec 21, 20236D
2 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,345 sf
$1,795,000$1,335/sf-3.0%
May 2, 20232AB
3 BR · 2.5 BA · 1,150 sf
$1,350,000$1,174/sf+0.0%
May 2, 20232B
1 BR · 1.5 BA · 800 sf
$800,000$1,000/sf-5.9%

Market read. Most recent trades (2025) cleared a median $1,140/sf across 3 sales. Median listing discount 3.7% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

7A · 718 sf+76%
$450,000 ($628/sf) 2004$790,000 ($1,100/sf) 2025
15A · 1,300 sf+46%
$1,995,000 ($1,535/sf) 2005$2,825,000 ($2,018/sf) 2015$2,910,000 ($2,238/sf) 2017
12B · 910 sf+29%
$1,050,000 ($1,154/sf) 2012$1,350,000 ($1,484/sf) 2017
7C · 704 sf+24%
$800,000 ($1,143/sf) 2005$992,500 ($1,410/sf) 2014
7D · 1,264 sf+18%
$1,675,000 ($1,325/sf) 2006$1,885,000 ($1,491/sf) 2012$1,975,000 ($1,563/sf) 2018
View all 72 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01413-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

Do not confuse this with 120 East 79th Street. The building immediately to the west is a separate 1947 cooperative on its own tax lot, with roughly 78 apartments and an entirely different ownership form, policy stack and price basis. Same block, same street, different building. Automated valuation tools conflate them.

Underwrite full taxes and the two percent flip tax together. There is no abatement, and there is a transfer fee on the way out that most condominium buyers do not model. Run both through the True Monthly Carrying Cost analysis before you set a number.

Ask for the elevator loan. The association borrowed against a nine-year term facility to fund the modernization and assessed owners in 2021. Get the outstanding balance, the annual debt service inside the common charge, and the maturity date. That is the single most useful document in the building's file.

Ask what happened after 2021. The most recent audited statements located in our library close at December 31, 2021. Five years of façade cycle, energy compliance and cost inflation have run since. The current audit and budget are the documents that matter.

Verify the unit's combination history. Six documented combinations mean floor plans in circulation may not match the recorded unit lot or the certificate of occupancy. Confirm what the deed conveys against what you are walking through.

Buy the exposure, not the floor. Because of the setbacks, the low floors here are unusually good — the garden runs the whole south edge of the property — and the mid-floors on the north face East 79th Street. Walk the specific line at the specific hour.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with what the co-ops cannot sell. Condominium ownership, no board interview, permitted entity and pied-à-terre purchase, private outdoor space, and a garden common element — inside a block that is otherwise entirely prewar cooperative. That is the argument, and no neighbor can copy it.

Disclose the transfer fee early. A two percent flip tax on a condominium is unexpected. Buyers who find it in diligence renegotiate; buyers who are told at the outset price around it.

Present the capital work as completed, not pending. The façade cycle, the roof and the elevator modernization are done or funded. Packaged with the financials, that reads as stewardship. Left unexplained, the assessment and the loan read as risk.

Price against the vintage, not against the corridor. Comparables should come from 1980s and postwar Upper East Side condominium stock — not from the new ground-up product to the north and not from the prewar co-ops next door, whose buyer pools barely overlap with this one.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering The Belgravia, also evaluate:

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper East Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper East Side.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.

Considering a move at The Belgravia?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at The Belgravia would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.