Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $433K/room ▴3%CPW $482K/roomFifth Ave $529K/roomBillionaires' Row $3,350/sfHell's Kitchen $1,391/sf ▾1%
Full index →
Cooperative · 1830
155 Hicks Street
155 Hicks Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201
Buildings·Cooperative

155 Hicks Street

155 Hicks Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201

Brooklyn Heights, Brooklyn

BBL 3002360087 · BIN 3001851

At a glance
Year built
1830
Type
Cooperative
Floors
4
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; in the Brooklyn Heights Historic District
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
Subletting by shareholders
Permitted with conditions
Dogs
Permitted with conditions
Cats
Not stated
Flip tax
Tiered or formula; see fees

155 Hicks Street sales history: 10 recorded transfers

Own an apartment at 155 Hicks Street?
Enter your apartment to see its recorded sale history and today’s estimate.
Board & building profile
Flip tax
Corporate documents authorize a transfer fee not to exceed $500 on board approval of a sale or lease; sponsor and unsold-share transfers exempt. Current practice unconfirmed
Subletting
Board approval or, if refused, consent of tenant-shareholders holding at least 75 percent of outstanding shares, per the proprietary lease as filed
Pets
No animal without express written permission of the corporation, revocable; dogs carried or leashed in public portions; sponsor could grant original purchasers non-revocable consent

Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated 1984). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.

The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2025

Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.

1BR median, 2024–2025
$490K
2 qualifying sales
Recent range
$465K – $515K
Listing discount
0.4%
Recorded transfers
10
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 155 Hicks Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.

As seen inThe Wall Street Journal★ 92 reviews on Google

155 Hicks Street is one of the smallest ownership propositions in Brooklyn Heights: fourteen apartments across two adjoining buildings, 1,000 shares in total, run by the people who live there. That scale is the whole story. In a district where most co-op inventory sits in six-story interwar elevator buildings with resident superintendents and formal managing agents, 155-157 Hicks is a shareholder-run house — closer in operating character to a small Willow Street conversion than to the Montague Street corridor's full-service stock.

The architecture underneath it is the district's oldest layer. The Landmarks Preservation Commission's Brooklyn Heights records date 155 Hicks to 1830 and describe it as Federal, crediting David Kimberly as its builder. That places the house within a decade of the Heights' first speculative wave, when the ferry to Manhattan turned the bluff into America's earliest commuter suburb and builders put up brick-fronted houses on the newly cut streets. The adjoining 157 Hicks carries a 1900 date in the same records — a later building absorbed into the same ownership, and eventually into the same cooperative corporation, so that a buyer today is purchasing shares in an entity that owns a Jacksonian-era house and its turn-of-the-century neighbor together.

The conversion paperwork records a specific moment in the Heights' history. David Khteeb and Jehuda Teichman bought the property in 1981 and filed a non-eviction plan on the last day of 1982, at the height of the borough's conversion wave. What the plan shows is a building caught mid-transition: at 155, ten apartments carrying a mix of rent-controlled and rent-stabilized tenancies; at 157, four apartments standing vacant and under rehabilitation, including a six-room duplex that was priced at $250,000 — more than four times the $60,000 asked for the smallest tenanted unit next door. The plan was declared effective in March 1984 on three sales, and the earliest closings recorded in the affidavit ran from $50,000 to $153,000.

Two structural features distinguish the building from its peers. The first is the six indoor parking spaces the sponsor carried into the cooperative as commercial income — genuinely rare in the historic district, where off-street parking is close to unobtainable and where a leased space is a valuable amenity; whether a current lease is assignable or transfers with an apartment depends on the plan and the corporation's current rules. The second is the self-managed operating model: the conversion budget provided for a visiting superintendent at $75 a month and explicitly contemplated shareholders handling billing, collections, and routine supervision themselves. The conversion budget does not establish today’s staffing, overhead or shareholder duties; confirm the present management arrangement and budget.

Architecture and unit composition

155 Hicks reads from the street as what it is — a low-scaled Federal-period brick house on a block face otherwise dominated by the Mansion House's 1930s Colonial Revival bulk to the north. Its value is in the block, the light, and the interior volumes rather than in ornament; the district’s 1965 designation subjects proposed exterior alterations to LPC review, with specified maintenance exemptions; it does not freeze the exterior permanently.

The plan's share schedule is the clearest available guide to the apartment mix. At 155, the ten apartments are paired A and B on each level, numbered 1 through 5 — consistent with four stories over a garden floor, though the specific level nomenclature should be checked against the current certificate of occupancy. Share allocations run from 32 shares on the smallest unit to 72 shares on the larger line, a roughly two-to-one spread that maps to studio-and-one-bedroom through two-bedroom scale. At 157, the four apartments are materially larger: three at 95 shares each and the six-room duplex at 125 shares, the single largest block in the corporation. That duplex is the building's headline apartment and will always price on a different curve from the 155 side.

Because shares were allocated in 1982 on "number of rooms, square footage, cubic content, locational factors and additional amenities," and because four decades of alteration have followed, line-to-line comparison inside the building is weaker guidance than it would be in a purpose-built elevator co-op. Inspect the specific apartment.

Building operations

155-157 Hicks Street Housing Corporation has operated the property since the 1984 closing. The conversion-era model was deliberately lean: self-management, a visiting superintendent, no service contracts, oil heat, and a working capital fund of $2,000 against a first-year budget of roughly $67,000. Commercial income came from the six parking spaces; everything else came from maintenance at $64 per share per year.

Confirm the current operating structure rather than treating the conversion budget as current. A small, self-managed corporation has no managing agent absorbing capital planning, insurance renewals, or ordinary façade maintenance — those land on a volunteer board. Review present management costs, reserves and the capital plan to determine how work will be funded; self-management alone establishes neither low expenses nor an assessment requirement. The plan's own special-risk disclosures made that arithmetic explicit at conversion, quantifying four purchase-money mortgage balloons in per-share assessment terms. Check the current debt and funding arrangements rather than assuming those historical mortgages were resolved; any per-share allocation should follow the current governing documents.

The Roebling Research Library holds the building's offering plan, both early amendments, the proprietary lease and house rules, the bylaws, and audited financial statements running from the late 1990s through 2011 — enough history to trend maintenance growth and capital practice before you sign a contract. For an 1830 masonry structure inside a historic district, façade cycles, roof, and any water-infiltration history are the diligence items that matter most.

Policy framework

Subletting: Under the proprietary lease as filed, a sublet requires the consent of the board or, if the board refuses, of tenant-shareholders holding at least 75 percent of the outstanding shares. That is a higher override threshold than the 65 percent common in neighboring Heights conversions, and in a 1,000-share corporation it is a demanding standard. Confirm the board's current written policy and any term limits.

Pets: The house rules as filed require the corporation's express written permission for any animal, revocable at any time, with dogs carried or leashed in public areas. The plan carved out an exception allowing the sponsor to grant original purchasers non-revocable consent — a conversion-era artifact. Ask for the board's current pet policy in writing.

Transfer fee: The corporate documents permit the board to impose a transfer fee capped at $500 on approval of a sale or lease. Whether it is charged today, and whether the board has since adopted a percentage-based flip tax, should be confirmed at offer stage.

Parking: Six indoor spaces are leased to residents under the plan structure, with rents escalating alongside maintenance increases. Availability, current rent, and whether a space transfers with a unit are all deal-relevant questions.

Financing, pied-à-terre, washer/dryer: Not documented in the materials reviewed. Confirm against the current house rules and purchase application.

Application and transaction fees

Flip tax (transfer fee on resale)
Terms
Corporate documents authorize a transfer fee not to exceed $500 on board approval of a sale or lease; sponsor and unsold-share transfers exempt. Current practice unconfirmed

Source: The Roebling Research Desk's building record, 1984

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.

Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Sublet and pied-à-terre policy

A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.

Subletting by shareholders
Permitted with conditionsBoard approval or, if refused, consent of tenant-shareholders holding at least 75 percent of outstanding shares, per the proprietary lease as filedSource: The Roebling Research Desk's building record, 1984
Pied-à-terre ownership
Not verified

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Pets and in-unit washer/dryer

Dogs
Permitted with conditionsNo animal without express written permission of the corporation, revocable; dogs carried or leashed in public portions; sponsor could grant original purchasers non-revocable consentSource: The Roebling Research Desk's building record, 1984
Cats
Not statedThe source permits pets without naming cats. No animal without express written permission of the corporation, revocable; dogs carried or leashed in public portions; sponsor could grant original purchasers non-revocable consentSource: The Roebling Research Desk's building record, 1984
In-unit washer/dryer
Not verified

Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.

The Roebling Team at Compass is a brokerage. We are not the building’s management or its application office.

Local Law 97

Compliance status
Below the individual-building threshold

This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 limits apply to a building on its own. It is still covered if it shares a tax lot or condominium board with buildings totaling over 50,000 sq ft; confirm on DOB’s covered-buildings list.

See full Local Law 97 analysis →

Recent sales

Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.

DateUnitApartmentPricevs. Ask
Apr 23, 20253A
1 BR · 1 BA
$515,000-1.9%
Feb 5, 20245A
1 BR · 1 BA
$465,000+6.9%
Mar 11, 20223B
1 BR · 1 BA
$750,000+0.0%
Dec 10, 20193B
1 BR · 1 BA
$660,000-0.8%
Apr 25, 20181A
$350,000-17.6%
Apr 25, 20141A
$325,000+10.2%
Mar 11, 20081A
1 BA
$370,000+0.3%

Market read. Median listing discount 0.0% from the last ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

3B+14%
$660,000 2019 → $750,000 2022
1A-5%
$370,000 2008 → $325,000 2014 → $350,000 2018
View all 10 recorded transfers, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-00236-0087). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 155 Hicks Street and nearby.

Buying here? Co-op closing costs typically run 2 to 3% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.

The Roebling Report

Keep up with 155 Hicks Street and its market

The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 155 Hicks Street. Unsubscribe anytime.

We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.

What to know if you’re buying

Diligence the self-management model first. A 14-apartment corporation without a managing agent is only as strong as its board's record. Ask for the last several years of financial statements, the assessment history, the insurance placement, and the current façade condition and maintenance plans before contract; the recorded four-story building is below FISP’s higher-than-six-story threshold.

Confirm which building your apartment is in. The plan's narrative and its Schedule A disagree about which address holds ten units and which holds four. Schedule A and city records point the same way; your attorney should verify the specific unit, its share count, and its building against the current ledger.

Ask about the parking. Six indoor spaces in the Heights are a real asset. Find out whether one is available, what it costs, and how transfers are handled.

The sublet standard is strict. Board approval, or a 75 percent shareholder override, is a genuine constraint. Buy this building as a primary residence, not as a flexible asset.

Review capital funding and share allocations. In the 1,000-share corporation, assess any proposed roof or façade work against the current reserves, financing and assessment terms before calculating apartment exposure.

What to know if you’re selling

Lead with the 1830 date and the district. Most Heights listings at this scale are undated and unattributed. A Federal-period house credited to a named builder in the LPC's own district records is a differentiator competitors cannot manufacture.

Position against small co-ops, not elevator buildings. The right comparable set is the district's shareholder-run houses and small conversions. Pricing against Montague-corridor full-service inventory invites the wrong objection.

Present the actual carrying costs. Use current maintenance and assessments rather than inferring a cost advantage from the staffing model. Present the full monthly carry — maintenance, which already includes the building's property tax, plus any separately billed utilities — rather than letting buyers assume a self-managed building is a liability.

Document the alteration file. In a landmarked house, clean Landmarks and Buildings Department paperwork on any renovation is a price-maker and a closing accelerator.

Market the parking space if one conveys. It is the rarest thing the building owns.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 155 Hicks Street, also evaluate:

More Brooklyn Heights buildings

The neighborhood

For the full neighborhood — its buildings, character, and market — read The Roebling Team Guide to Brooklyn Heights.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at 155 Hicks Street?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com