Manhattan condos $1,629/sf 2%Manhattan co-ops $283K/room 5%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $478K/room 19%CPW $350K/room 5%Fifth Ave $501K/room 19%Billionaires' Row $4,272/sf 24%FiDi $1,172/sf 2%
Full index →
Condominium · 1964
Dorchester Towers
155 West 68th Street, New York, NY 10023

155 West 68th Street (Dorchester Towers)

155 West 68th Street, New York, NY 10023

Lincoln Square, Upper West Side

BBL 1011407501 · BIN 1028950

At a glance
Year built
1964
Type
Condominium
Units
683
Floors
34
Landmark
No
Amenities
24-hour doorman and concierge, attended on-site garage with elevator access and a private driveway, fitness center, landscaped roof terrace, resident lounge, children's playroom, bike room, private storage, and laundry rooms distributed across the residential floors per listing records; live-in resident manager
Pets
Cats and dogs permitted per listing records
The Data Room

Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026

Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.

Median $/sf
$1,787
Listing discount
-0.1%
Recorded sales
470
On record
2003–2026

Dorchester Towers is the building that called Lincoln Square's bluff. When Lincoln Center's Title I clearance remade the blocks south of 66th Street, critics worried the campus would become an isolated cultural precinct; Paul Milstein bet the other way, and the full-block tower he and his brother Seymour opened in June 1965 was the first privately developed apartment building erected in the area after the performing-arts complex sent land values soaring. It was also the Milstein family's first major residential development — the start of one of New York's defining real estate dynasties — and the first of the white-brick towers that would define the 1960s Upper West Side. Architectural critics have never flattered S. J. Kessler & Sons' design (one famously dismissed it as undistinguished white brick), but the market has never much cared: the building's product is scale, light, and location, not facade.

The conversion story is what buyers need to understand structurally. Dorchester Towers went condominium in the mid-1980s through a non-eviction plan — sponsor Dorchester Associates, whose principal was also a principal of the One Lincoln Plaza sponsorship, per the offering-plan amendments on file in The Roebling Research Library. Because the plan was non-eviction, a large block of apartments stayed in rental hands for four decades: Ogden CAP Properties, the Milstein-family successor entity, held 324 of the roughly 683 units as rentals. In April 2024 it put the entire block on the market for $375 million — tenants first, then building residents, then the open market through Brown Harris Stevens Development Marketing, as reported by The Real Deal and the neighborhood press. That sellout is the single most important fact about this building's market today: it is releasing decades of never-sold inventory into the resale pool, which creates both opportunity and pricing pressure.

For buyers, the result is a rare configuration: a 1960s condominium — no board interview, condo transfer mechanics — at one of the Upper West Side's most connected corners, one block from Lincoln Center, two from Central Park, with the 1/2/3 at 72nd Street, during a supply event that favors negotiation.

Architecture and unit composition

The building rises 34 floors per city records across the entire Broadway–Amsterdam blockfront, its massing stepped back along Broadway in the pattern the 1961 zoning resolution rewarded. At roughly 683 units, it opened as one of the largest apartment buildings in the city — studios from $178 a month and three-bedrooms at $450, per neighborhood preservation histories citing the press of the era. The mix runs from studios and one-bedrooms through the convertible "junior four" layouts the 1960s did well, up to two- and three-bedroom lines; post-war floor plates give defined dining areas, big closet runs, and open light above the surrounding low-rise blocks, with select terraced units. Because hundreds of units were rentals until the 2024–26 sellout, condition varies widely: architect-renovated resales sit alongside first-sale sponsor units in original or lightly updated condition — a spread that matters more here than in almost any peer building.

Building operations

Full-service condominium: 24-hour doorman and concierge, live-in resident manager and large staff, attended garage with elevator access and a private driveway off-street — a genuine rarity at this price tier — plus fitness center, landscaped roof terrace, resident lounge, children's playroom, bike room, storage, and laundry rooms distributed across residential floors per listing records. The base carries roughly 27,000 square feet of retail per city records, anchoring the Broadway frontage. The ownership mix — resident owners, investor owners, and the legacy rental population — is a diligence point: lenders and attorneys will want current owner-occupancy figures and the condominium's financials, and the offering plan and amendments are on file with us.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$535,063/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $65
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
SWARMP
What this means for you

The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
SWARMP
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2028
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs required before the next inspection cycle.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent). Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Recent closings at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Apartment-level facts are independently verified before publishing; sale prices reflect the recorded transfer amount at the NYC Department of Finance.

DateUnitApartmentPricePPSFvs. Ask
Jul 7, 20261807
1 BA · 550 sf
$720,000$1,309/sf+0.0%
Jun 23, 2026904
1 BR · 1 BA · 874 sf
$1,277,903$1,462/sf+2.2%
Jun 22, 20262107
1 BA · 546 sf
$809,508$1,483/sf+1.8%
Jun 22, 2026819
1 BA · 583 sf
$743,322$1,275/sf+1.8%
Jun 19, 20262102
2 BR · 2 BA · 975 sf
$1,500,000$1,538/sf-7.1%
Jun 18, 20261202
1 BR · 1 BA · 651 sf
$927,000$1,424/sf+4.3%
Jun 15, 2026804
2 BR · 1 BA · 874 sf
$1,150,000$1,316/sf-8.0%
Jun 15, 20261819
1 BA · 583 sf
$789,143$1,354/sf+1.8%

Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $1,787/sf across 3 sales. Median listing discount -0.1% over ask.

The retrade record

Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.

1127 · 671 sf+156%
$850,000 ($1,267/sf) 2014$2,180,000 ($3,249/sf) 2019
325 · 603 sf+75%
$425,000 ($702/sf) 2004$745,000 ($1,235/sf) 2015
1905 · 2,126 sf+71%
$2,000,000 ($1,010/sf) 2006$3,426,000 ($1,611/sf) 2014
2102 · 975 sf+60%
$940,000 ($983/sf) 2006$1,335,000 ($1,368/sf) 2021$1,500,000 ($1,538/sf) 2026
907 · 550 sf+53%
$375,000 ($682/sf) 2004$555,500 ($1,010/sf) 2007$575,000 ($1,045/sf) 2011
View all 470 recorded sales, sortable

Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01140-7501) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.

What to know if you’re buying

The sellout is your leverage. With first-sale sponsor units and ordinary resales competing in the same lines, same-line comparison shopping is unusually possible here. Sponsor units may carry different closing-cost allocations and condition profiles than resales — model both before offering, and run the Buyer Closing Cost Calculator on each scenario.

Condition spread is the building's pricing engine. Four decades of rental stewardship means original-condition units trade at meaningful discounts to renovated ones. If you are buying to renovate, price the work honestly — the Renovation Cost Calculator is the starting point — and confirm current alteration rules with the managing agent.

Condo mechanics, with a condo's diligence burden. No board interview, and pieds-à-terre and flexible structures are workable here in ways the surrounding co-op stock will not allow. The trade is that your attorney must read the financials and the owner-occupancy picture carefully during the sellout transition.

The location does real work. Lincoln Center one block south, Central Park two blocks east, the 72nd Street express station minutes away, and an attended garage with a private driveway in the building. For performing-arts professionals, commuters, and pied-à-terre buyers, the convenience case is unusually concrete.

Verify the fee stack. Common charges, taxes, move fees, and any sellout-related assessments should be confirmed against current condominium documents at offer stage.

What to know if you’re selling

You are competing with the sponsor — position against it. A renovated resale should not price like a first-sale unit in original condition, and vice versa. The winning strategy is explicit differentiation: condition, line, floor, and outfitting, documented in the marketing rather than implied.

Same-line history is deep — use it. With this many units, line-specific closed comparables exist in volume. Building-average pricing is noise here; we anchor to the line.

Time the inventory. Listing into a heavy-supply window costs real money in this building. We track active and shadow inventory by line from the sellout and advise on timing accordingly.

Comparable buildings

If you're considering 155 West 68th Street, also evaluate:

  • One Lincoln Plaza (20 West 64th Street) — the sponsor family's sibling project; the closest conceptual peer in scale and era
  • The Copley (2000 Broadway) — post-war-adjacent condo directly across Broadway
  • Nevada Towers (2025 Broadway) — the neighboring 1970s tower at 70th Street
  • 200 Amsterdam Avenue — the new-development condo benchmark one block north; the price-ceiling alternative
  • 165 West 66th Street — full-service co-op alternative by Lincoln Center
  • 50 West 66th Street — the corridor's top-tier new condo; the trophy alternative
  • 30 West 60th Street — post-war co-op alternative at Columbus Circle pricing
  • One West End — Riverside Center new development; the amenity-program alternative
  • Lincoln Towers (West End Avenue, 66th–70th) — the value-tier post-war co-op complex west of Amsterdam

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper West Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper West Side.

Considering a move at Dorchester Towers?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Principal · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com
Considering a sale?

Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.

A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Dorchester Towers would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.