- Year built
- 1920
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 4
- Floors
- 5
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; not in a historic district
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission and City Planning records, updated February 2026
- Leasing by owners
- Requires confirmation
- Doorman
- No doorman
Every recorded sale at this building, 2013–2025
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf, 2024
- $1,472
- 1 sale
- Recorded sales
- 6
- On record
- 2013–2025
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 18 Orchard Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
This is one of the smallest ownership buildings on Orchard Street: four apartments, one per floor, over a commercial unit at grade. It was made in a single move. An Alteration Type 1 permit was issued in October 1998, the condominium declaration was recorded in August 1999, and by that November all four residences had gone to four separate buyers. Current records still carry four residences, without establishing every intervening configuration; later filings cover roof, terrace, penthouse, sprinkler and facade work, set out under Building operations.
The consequence is a market that barely exists. In more than twenty-five years ACRIS records only a handful of priced resales: unit 3 in 2013 and again in June 2024 ($2,650,000), unit 5 in 2014 and again in July 2023 ($4,000,000), and unit 2 in November 2025, after a 2022 transfer of that unit into its owner's living trust. The rest of the recorded activity is mortgages and refinancings. Two of the four original 1999 purchasers or their estates were still on title well into the 2020s. That is not a defect; it is what a four-unit full-floor condominium looks like. But it means there is no reliable price series for this address, and any valuation has to be built from the surrounding Orchard, Ludlow and Canal Street loft conversions rather than from the building itself.
The second thing worth knowing is what is absent. There is no J-51 here — there never was. Most Lower East Side loft conversions of this vintage carry a J-51 abatement that steps down over a decade and then expires, and buyers underwriting them have to model the burn-off. This building was converted without one. There is no benefit to phase out, but the bill still changes with assessments, rates and any other benefits. Neighboring lots on the same block do carry J-51 histories, which is why it is worth checking rather than assuming.
Architecture and unit composition
The building is an early-twentieth-century Lower East Side loft-and-store type — masonry, roughly 25 feet wide, five floors over a cellar on a lot about 89 feet deep, with commercial space at grade and workshop floors above. PLUTO dates it to 1920 and listing records to 1915; neither is documented by a filing available online, and the exact year is unresolved.
The 1998–99 conversion produced full-floor residences reached by a keyed elevator — roughly 7,535 residential square feet across four apartments, so plates in the neighborhood of 1,800 square feet each, with the top residence larger because it takes in the penthouse level. Because they are full-floor and were never marketed as a standardized line, layouts and areas differ meaningfully and should be verified per unit. The commercial unit at grade and cellar is a separate tax lot in separate ownership and has traded independently of the residences since 1999 — a detail that matters, because the residential owners do not control it.
Building operations
There is no staff, no doorman and no amenity program. The capital record is what a four-unit building's record looks like: interior partition and plumbing work in 2000 and 2004, a roof catwalk and terrace structure in 2003, a parapet railing in 2008, sprinkler modifications on the fifth floor and penthouse in 2010, bulkhead, skylight and exterior restoration in 2011, and a sidewalk shed, scaffold and hoist for facade work in 2013 and again in 2021.
Those facade cycles are the operative item for a buyer. The five- versus six-level descriptions do not establish height above six stories, the FISP/Local Law 11 threshold. Confirm the approved height before asserting a filing cycle. Ask for façade inspection and maintenance records, reserves and assessments, and the declaration’s allocation of costs to the four residential units and commercial unit; five units do not establish equal shares or five distinct owners.
Policy framework
No offering plan for this condominium was located in the Compass Offering Plan Library or in The Roebling Research Library, and the building has no management-sourced policy record. The pet policy, any pied-à-terre restriction, subletting rules and minimum lease term, financing limits, and any flip tax or transfer fee cannot be stated here and must be obtained in writing from the managing agent before an offer is made. What the public record does establish: units here have been owned by an individual, by limited liability companies and by a living trust, so entity and trust ownership have been accommodated. Read the recorded declaration, amendments, bylaws and current house rules together to establish rights of first refusal, permitted uses, voting rights and expense allocations. Four residential units do not establish four equal votes or four distinct owners.
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Leasing by owners
- Requires confirmationSources differ. Confirm with building management.
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- No doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
This building is below the 25,000 sq ft threshold at which LL97 limits apply to a building on its own. It is still covered if it shares a tax lot or condominium board with buildings totaling over 50,000 sq ft; confirm on DOB’s covered-buildings list.
See full Local Law 97 analysis →Recent sales
Compare this Lower East Side loft condominium with relevant converted and infill homes on Orchard, Ludlow, Essex and lower Broome, supplementing with other sales where necessary. Account for full-floor layouts with elevator access, verified interior areas, condition, services and actual monthly costs. The limited recorded sales sample requires careful adjustments; it does not establish a scarcity premium or a price ranking among blocks. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2024 | 3 | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,800 sf | $2,650,000 | $1,472/sf | -11.7% |
Market read. $/sf is measured on the latest sales with reliable square footage (2024): a median $1,472/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. The building has traded as recently as 2025.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00298-7502; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 18 Orchard Street and nearby.
Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with 18 Orchard Street and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 18 Orchard Street. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Get the offering plan from the managing agent — we could not locate one. Neither document library carries it. Until you have it you do not have the policy stack, the common-interest schedule or the original unit areas.
There is no J-51 and never was. Do not model a burn-off. Start from the current tax bill on your unit lot; it still changes with assessments, rates and any other benefits.
Understand the commercial unit. Separate tax lot, separate owner, its own common-interest share. Ask how its charges are allocated and what use is permitted.
Confirm the floor count against the plan. City records say five stories; some filings and listing records describe six levels. For the top residence in particular, verify what you are buying.
Underwrite five-unit governance and the facade cycle. Four apartments and one store, no staff. Read the last two audits for the reserve balance and any assessments, read the minutes, and confirm façade condition, planned work and whether the approved height triggers FISP before contract.
What to know if you’re selling
Assemble the document file before you list. With no plan located in the two libraries reviewed, the buyer's attorney will ask for the declaration, by-laws, house rules, the last two audits and the facade file. Having them ready can reduce document requests, but it does not establish a four- or ten-week contract timeline.
Document the tax position. The roll shows no J-51 or other exemption, so there is no scheduled step-up; confirm on the unit's tax bill. Total cost still depends on each unit's charges, taxes, financing and assessments.
Price against the corridor, not against the building — there is no usable price series at this address — and do not let buyers conflate this with the larger Orchard Street condominiums. 48 Orchard is a 26-unit 2003 building and 196 Orchard is a 94-unit 2018 tower. This is four apartments over a store.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 18 Orchard Street, also evaluate:
- 21 Ludlow Street — 23-residence prewar loft conversion around the corner; the closest comparison on building type
- 48 Orchard Street — 26-unit 2003 condominium a few blocks north on the same street; the newer, larger alternative
- 196 Orchard — the 94-unit 2018 Orchard Street condominium; the full-amenity comparison
- 133 Essex Street — 16-residence mid-2000s condominium on Essex Street
- 202 Broome Street — Broome Street condominium to the north
- 242 Broome Street — newer Broome Street condominium in the Essex Crossing footprint
- 38 Delancey Street — larger Delancey Street condominium with retained commercial floors; the mixed-use comparison
- 61 Rivington Street — 11-residence adaptive reuse of a 1905 library; the small-building conversion peer
- 100 Norfolk Street — 38-residence 2016 condominium north of Delancey
- 150 Rivington Street — 45-residence 2018 condominium; the new-development benchmark for the corridor
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at 18 Orchard Street?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com