200 Hicks Street (Casino Mansions)
200 Hicks Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201
Brooklyn Heights, Brooklyn
BBL 3002410001 · BIN 3001940
- Year built
- 1911
- Type
- Cooperative
- Floors
- 8
- Land
- Ground lease; the building sits on leased land
- The Roebling Team's building profile
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; in the Brooklyn Heights Historic District
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
- Subletting by shareholders
- Permitted with conditions
- Pied-à-terre
- Permitted with conditions
- Dogs
- Permitted with conditions
- Cats
- Not stated
- Maximum financing
- 50% of the purchase price
- Flip tax
- None
- Flip tax
- No flip tax appears in the proprietary lease or by-laws as filed; by-laws Art. V sec. 5.5 authorize the board to fix reasonable fees on assignment, and the shareholder-account balance (by-laws Art. III sec. 3.10) must be paid in full at transfer
- Financing
- 50 percent minimum down payment reported in building coverage; not document-verified
- Subletting
- Written Subletting Policy: corporation disfavors subletting; consent by majority of directors or, failing that, lessees holding at least 66-2/3 percent of shares (proprietary lease para. 15); term 6 months to 2 years; renewals refused absent extraordinary circumstances; $500 non-refundable application fee; monthly sublet fee of 5 percent of rent or maintenance, whichever is higher; 2-month deposit; NYC agent for service of process; sublessee net worth >= 30 months' rent, liquid assets >= 12 months' rent, income >= 4x annual rent; policy may be suspended by the board
- Pied-à-terre
- Proprietary lease para. 14 limits residential use to lessee, spouse, and their children; any other occupant subject to board approval; guests capped at one month absent written consent — pied-a-terre and co-purchase structures are board-dependent
- Pets
- House rule 14: no bird or animal kept without express written permission of the corporation, consent not to be unreasonably withheld and revocable; dogs carried or leashed in all public portions
Compiled by The Roebling Research Desk from the building’s offering plan, amendments, and related building documents (primary source dated By-laws 1991; purchase application package revised January 19, 2010; audited financials December 31, 2015). Reported and subject to confirmation. Board policies can change by amendment — confirm at the offer stage.
Every recorded sale at this building, 2004–2026
Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.
- Recent range
- $7.5M – $7.5M
- Listing discount
- 1.8%
- Recorded transfers
- 19
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Casino Mansions would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
Casino Mansions is the rarest thing in the Brooklyn Heights co-op market: a cooperative apartment corporation as old as its building. The Casino Mansions Company was incorporated in 1910, per its own audited financials, which places it among the earliest cooperative housing corporations in Brooklyn and in the first generation of the form anywhere in the city. The building does not appear to come out of the 1980s conversion wave that produced most of the district's inventory. The early incorporation date alone does not show the corporation's later history, so confirm from the corporate and offering records that no later sponsor holdings or regulated tenancies exist.
The architecture is equally particular. William A. Boring built the Heights Casino at 75 Montague Street in 1904, and when the club sold off its outdoor tennis court a few years later the deal carried a condition that whatever replaced it be built in sympathy with the clubhouse. Boring took that commission too, and the result is a Dutch Revival apartment house of the same brick, gables, and stone as the club it abuts, so that from Hicks Street the two read as one composition. His practice with Edward L. Tilton, both trained at the École des Beaux-Arts and seasoned at McKim, Mead & White, had already produced the Ellis Island Immigration Station; he ended his career as dean of Columbia's School of Architecture. Few Heights apartment houses carry an attribution of that weight.
The plan is the third distinction, and the one buyers feel. The building went up with one eight-room and one nine-room apartment per floor across eight stories and still runs at roughly that density: full-floor-scale prewar homes with libraries, wood-burning fireplaces, herringbone floors, maid's rooms turned fourth bedrooms, service entrances, and four exposures on the corner lines. The apartment type belongs to the Manhattan trophy prewar tradition more than to the Heights' six-story norm, and the market prices it accordingly. What follows is a small, closely held house that operates like a private club, and the governing documents say so: the lease limits occupancy to shareholder, spouse, and children, the by-laws require directors to live in the building, and the sublet policy opens by stating that the corporation disfavors subletting.
Architecture and unit composition
Boring's eight stories are faced in the brick and stone of the Casino next door, under the gabled Dutch Revival profile that gives the pair its street identity. The plan's virtue is scarcity of neighbors — two apartments per landing at the original layout, producing cross-ventilated homes of eight and nine rooms with the service circulation a 1910 luxury house was built with. Surviving interiors carry neo-Classical mantels, libraries that open through to adjoining rooms, herringbone flooring, deep foyers, and generous built-in storage.
The unit ledger is the item to reconcile. DOF carries 17 units at the Hicks Street lot, the audited statements describe 21 across both buildings on 2,292 shares, and a mid-1990s lender disclosure recorded 2,197. The by-laws expressly permit regrouping — subdivision, combination, absorption of former servants' rooms — with treasury shares issued to match, which is how a century-old ledger drifts. Price the shares, not the room count. Every exterior element, windows included, sits under LPC jurisdiction.
Building operations
The corporation runs as a staffed prewar house at unusually small scale: salaries, payroll taxes, employer health coverage, and uniforms against roughly two dozen apartments, a service ratio far heavier per shareholder than the district's six-story elevator buildings and a meaningful share of the monthly charge. Elevator service, a roof deck, and an attended lobby are the amenity set; there is no commercial space and no ground lease.
Two structural items belong in every diligence file. The underlying mortgage was refinanced in 2014 onto a ten-year term with a 2024 balloon, so current financing is newer than the last statements in our library. And the accountants' notes record that no study of the remaining useful lives of common components has been commissioned, meaning major repairs are met through cash, borrowing, assessment, or deferral rather than a funded schedule; the by-laws cap ordinary reserve accumulation at 5 percent of annual cash requirements, with a 20 percent ceiling, absent a two-thirds shareholder vote.
The by-laws also carry a feature buyers rarely meet: shareholder accounts. Capital-improvement borrowings are allocated pro rata across shareholders, each carrying an individual interest-bearing balance that must be discharged in full at transfer. Ask for the account statement on the specific apartment before modeling closing cash.
Policy framework
Subletting: Consent requires a majority of directors or, failing that, lessees holding at least 66⅔ percent of shares. The written policy adds a non-refundable application fee, a monthly sublet fee of 5 percent of rent or maintenance, a two-month deposit, and a New York City agent for service of process; proposed subtenants must show net worth of thirty months' rent, liquid assets of twelve months' rent, and income of four times the annual rent. The board may suspend the policy entirely.
Purchase approval: A full-dress prewar submission — four bound sets, two years of returns, six months of statements, employer and landlord references covering five years of residency, seven reference letters, credit report, and a board interview, with fees for application processing, credit, mortgage processing, recognition agreement, and closing services. Allow two to three weeks after a complete package before the interview.
Flip tax, financing, washer/dryer: No flip tax appears in the lease or by-laws as filed; the reported 50 percent minimum down payment (financing capped at 50 percent of the price) and any laundry-installation rules are board-set. Get all three in writing.
Application and transaction fees
Fees below are from building management's published schedule, as of July 2026. They are shown as published, item by item; no total is added because the total depends on the transaction. Deposits are listed apart from nonrefundable charges.
- Terms
- No flip tax appears in the proprietary lease or by-laws as filed; by-laws Art. V sec. 5.5 authorize the board to fix reasonable fees on assignment, and the shareholder-account balance (by-laws Art. III sec. 3.10) must be paid in full at transfer
Source: The Roebling Research Desk's building record
Purchase
4 items
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing FeeConditional | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $350 (if applicable) | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Credit Check FeePer applicant | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $50 per applicant | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Move-In Fee | Paid by Buyer | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Move-Out Fee | Paid by Seller | When With the application | Amount $500 | Refundable Non-refundable |
Refinance
3 items
Management's “less refinance” schedule
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $250 | Refundable Non-refundable |
Management's “more refinance” schedule
Fees and charges
| Item | Paid by | When | Amount | Refundable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing Fee | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $250 | Refundable Non-refundable |
| Credit Check FeePer applicant | Paid by Shareholder | When With the application | Amount $50 per applicant | Refundable Non-refundable |
Management updates its schedule without a public filing. The date is when management last updated the page, not when a rule changed. Confirm the current schedule with management before you apply.
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the building's costs and purchase requirements.
Own an apartment here? Request an apartment-specific pricing review.
Financing and purchase requirements
- Maximum financing
- 50% of the purchase price50 percent minimum down payment reported in building coverage; not document-verifiedSource: The Roebling Research Desk's building record
Sublet and pied-à-terre policy
A condominium owner leasing a unit and a co-op shareholder subletting are different rules, and a building-wide rule is different from a restriction on one apartment. This is the building's rule; confirm it for the specific apartment.
- Subletting by shareholders
- Permitted with conditionsWritten Subletting Policy: corporation disfavors subletting; consent by majority of directors or, failing that, lessees holding at least 66-2/3 percent of shares (proprietary lease para. 15); term 6 months to 2 years; renewals refused absent extraordinary circumstances; $500 non-refundable…Source: The Roebling Research Desk's building record
- Pied-à-terre ownership
- Permitted with conditionsProprietary lease para. 14 limits residential use to lessee, spouse, and their children; any other occupant subject to board approval; guests capped at one month absent written consent — pied-a-terre and co-purchase structures are board-dependentSource: The Roebling Research Desk's building record
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to discuss the sublet and pied-à-terre rules for that apartment.
Pets and in-unit washer/dryer
- Dogs
- Permitted with conditionsHouse rule 14: no bird or animal kept without express written permission of the corporation, consent not to be unreasonably withheld and revocable; dogs carried or leashed in all public portionsSource: The Roebling Research Desk's building record
- Cats
- Not statedThe source permits pets without naming cats. House rule 14: no bird or animal kept without express written permission of the corporation, consent not to be unreasonably withheld and revocable; dogs carried or leashed in all public portionsSource: The Roebling Research Desk's building record
- In-unit washer/dryer
- Not verified
Considering an apartment here? Send Corey the listing to confirm the pet and washer/dryer rules for that apartment.
Building staffing and amenities
- Attended lobby
- YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)
- Amenities noted
- Roof deckSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $13,082/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $64
- Modeled exposure split equally across 17 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; co-op shareholders are typically charged by share allocation.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed October 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. A filed Safe grade is not a guarantee of current condition: owners still maintain the facade and, where required, observe parapets each year. Future inspection timing (Local Law 49 of 2025 changed the cycle framework from October 1, 2026), repair and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed October 2026.
Recent sales
Recent transfers at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2026 | 6S | 3 BR · 3 BA · 3,000 sf | $7,500,000 | $2,500/sf | +0.0% |
| May 5, 2022 | 8S | 4 BR · 3 BA · 3,180 sf | $6,250,000 | $1,965/sf | +0.0% |
| Aug 10, 2021 | 1N | 3 BR · 2 BA | $3,300,000 | -17.5% | |
| Jun 14, 2021 | PHS | 2 BR · 1.5 BA | $1,450,000 | -3.2% | |
| Jun 1, 2020 | 5N | 2 BR · 2 BA · 1,697 sf | $2,375,000 | $1,400/sf | -11.9% |
| Mar 8, 2019 | PHN | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,908,000 | -2.2% | |
| Feb 20, 2019 | 6S | 4 BR · 3 BA · 2,935 sf | $5,295,000 | $1,804/sf | +0.0% |
| Jul 29, 2013 | 3N | 3 BR | $2,750,000 | +0.0% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2026 to date) cleared a median $2,500/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. Median listing discount 3.4% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 3-00241-0001). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at Casino Mansions and nearby.
Buying here? Co-op closing costs typically run 2 to 3% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with Casino Mansions and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like Casino Mansions. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
The corporation predates most conversions by seventy years. Diligence runs on by-laws, proprietary lease, sublet policy, house rules, financials, and board minutes. Ask the managing agent to confirm that no sponsor or holder of unsold shares, and no regulated tenancy, remains in either building.
Two buildings, one share ledger. Read the financials as a two-building enterprise and reconcile DOF's 17 units against the corporation's 21.
Ask for the shareholder-account balance in writing. The allocated capital-borrowing balance rides with the apartment and must be paid off at transfer.
The lease is occupancy-restrictive by design. If your plan involves anyone beyond shareholder, spouse, and children, or any rental use, raise it before contract.
Confirm the lease term and the mortgage. The lease runs to December 31, 2040 with a documented intent to extend, and the underlying mortgage passed a 2024 maturity.
What to know if you’re selling
Name Boring and name the Casino. An Ellis Island architect who designed the club next door and matched this building to it is provenance no competing Heights listing can claim.
Market the plan, not the square footage. Two homes per floor, eight and nine rooms, libraries and fireplaces and service entrances — the apartment type draws a townhouse-alternative buyer.
Prepare the buyer for the board. A four-binder package, seven reference letters, an interview, and a reported 50 percent minimum down payment screen out unprepared purchasers. Qualify early.
Assemble the corporate file before you list. Share allocation, shareholder-account balance, current mortgage, lease-extension status, and the latest financials protect the price where comparables are thin.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 200 Hicks Street, also evaluate:
- 1 Pierrepont Street — Caughey & Evans's 1924 co-op at the harbor end of Pierrepont; another original-era corporation with large apartments
- 62 Montague Street — Montrose W. Morris's 1888 apartment house one block west; the district's other architecturally consequential early building
- 1 Grace Court — boutique 1920s co-op at the end of the district's quietest cul-de-sac
- 35 Pierrepont Street — Mortimer E. Freehof's 1929 co-op; prewar peer with attended-service tradition
- 145 Hicks Street — the corridor's large 1930s Colonial Revival co-op; the scale alternative
- 130 Hicks Street — the corridor's postwar counterpoint, two blocks north
- 129 Columbia Heights — Frank L. Lowe's 1907 Beaux-Arts co-op; the district's other first-generation apartment house
- 160 Columbia Heights — A. Rollin Caughey's Art Moderne building on the bluff; the harbor-view alternative
- 100 Remsen Street — Caughey's postwar co-op nearby, structured as a leasehold
More Brooklyn Heights buildings
- 2 Montague Terrace — 1927 co-op
- 20 Henry Street — 1885 condominium
- 20 Pierrepont Street — 1934 co-op
- 205 Hicks Street — 1919 co-op
- 21 Monroe Place — 1899 co-op
- 22 Monroe Place — 1927 co-op
The neighborhood
For the full neighborhood — its buildings, character, and market — read The Roebling Team Guide to Brooklyn Heights.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at Casino Mansions?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com