Manhattan condos · below 96th $1,632/sf ▴3%Manhattan co-ops · below 96th $271K/room ▴4%Central Park perimeterPark Ave $465K/room ▴3%CPW $355K/roomFifth Ave $501K/roomBillionaires' Row $4,313/sfMidtown East $1,279/sf ▾9%
Full index →
Rental · 1931
275 Central Park West
275 Central Park West, New York, NY 10024

275 Central Park West

275 Central Park West, New York, NY 10024

Upper West Side

BBL 1012010034 · BIN 1031465

At a glance
Year built
1931
Type
Rental
Units
114
Floors
18
Pets
Per current lease terms
Landmark status
Not an individual landmark; in the Upper West Side / Central Park West Historic District
NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission records, updated February 2026
Doorman
Full-time doorman

275 Central Park West is one of Emery Roth's lesser-known CPW commissions — a 1931 Neo-Renaissance apartment building completed in the same year as his Art Deco twin-tower masterworks (the Eldorado, 300 CPW; the Ardsley, 320 CPW) but in a fundamentally different architectural register. Where the Eldorado and Ardsley embraced full Art Deco, 275 CPW was a more restrained, traditionally-detailed pre-war composition in the Neo-Renaissance vocabulary that Roth had refined in his work for Bing & Bing (most notably the Alden at 225 CPW, 1925) earlier in the decade.

The building's persistent rental status is itself unusual. Most CPW pre-wars converted to cooperative or condominium ownership between 1958 and the 1990s; 275 CPW (along with 241 CPW and 295 CPW) is among a small set of CPW Park-facing buildings that have remained rental properties continuously since construction. This represents a meaningful institutional decision by the building's ownership — to hold the asset as a long-term rental rather than to pursue the financial benefits of conversion.

For prospective renters who want pre-war Park-facing CPW architecture in a Roth-designed building without the financial barriers of a co-op purchase, 275 CPW is one of the limited options.

Architecture and unit composition

The building's 114 apartments are distributed across 18 floors. Roth's Neo-Renaissance design produced gracious room proportions characteristic of his Bing & Bing-era work — high ceilings, formal entry galleries, and pre-war architectural detail in the apartment-house tradition rather than the more dramatic Art Deco vocabulary of his contemporaneous CPW landmarks.

Apartments have been renovated to varying degrees across the building's 94-year history. Park-facing apartments on the eastern flank offer direct Central Park views.

Building operations

275 CPW operates as a full-service rental building. The building maintains the pre-war service signature appropriate to its tier — full-time doorman, attended lobby, on-site superintendent — but as a rental property, operational details are subject to landlord control rather than board governance.

The building is not in a cooperative or condominium structure. There is no proprietary lease, no flip tax, no NYC stockholders' abatement, no board approval process. Resident-tenants hold leases rather than shares or units.

Building staffing and amenities

Doorman
Full-time doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Concierge
YesSource: recent listing records
Attended lobby
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Live-in superintendent
YesSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
Elevator
YesSource: NYC Department of City Planning records (PLUTO)

Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.

Local Law 97

Carbon-penalty exposure
🟡
Moderate — under today's cap; material modeled 2030 exposure
2024–2029 annual penalty
$0 (under cap)
2030–2034 annual penalty
$24,940/yr
Per unit / month range
$0 – $19
Modeled exposure split equally across 109 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; in a rental building the penalty is the owner's obligation, so this is a measure of scale only.

Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →

Facade safety — Local Law 11

Local Law 11 / FISP · last inspection 2020–25
Safe
What this means for you

The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. A filed Safe grade is not a guarantee of current condition: owners still maintain the facade and, where required, observe parapets each year. Future inspection timing (Local Law 49 of 2025 changed the cycle framework from October 1, 2026), repair and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.

Inspection history
2005–10
Safe
2010–15
Safe
2015–20
Safe
2020–25
Safe
2025–30
Due
Next report due
by Feb 2029
The three grades, in buyer terms
SafeLatest filing: Safe — no repairs required at that inspection.
SWARMPLatest filing: repairs are due by the deadline stated in the filing.
UnsafeLatest filing: unsafe conditions requiring corrective action.
How to read this, and where it comes from

QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).

Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.

See the full facade history →

Recent sales

Recent transfers at this building, sourced from NYC Department of Finance records. Apartment-level detail (line, condition, asking-price context) verified upon consultation request.

DateUnitPrice
Jan 17, 20259D$2,200,000

Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01201-0034). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price.

For owners

What would your apartment rent for?

Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 275 Central Park West and nearby.

What to know if you're researching 275 Central Park West as a renter

Roth-designed pre-war rental on CPW is rare. Most Roth CPW buildings converted to co-op decades ago; 275 CPW is one of the few opportunities to rent a Roth-designed Park-facing apartment without facing co-op board scrutiny or financial qualification.

Lease terms are landlord-controlled. Building ownership determines lease length, renewal terms, rent escalations (subject to applicable rent regulations on regulated units), and pet/sublet policies.

Some units may be rent-regulated; many are market-rate. The mix has shifted over decades. Prospective renters should ask explicitly about regulation status.

Daily-life convenience is upper-CPW. Between 88th and 89th, the building sits in the upper Park-facing residential corridor, with proximity to the Central Park Reservoir, the upper UWS retail and restaurant corridor, and Columbus Avenue.

What to know if you're a buyer researching CPW broadly

275 CPW is not currently a purchasable building. Understanding its rental status helps clarify the CPW market structure. Among Park-facing CPW buildings, 275 and 295 Central Park West are Roth commissions that remain rental, while Roth's better-known CPW co-ops (San Remo, Beresford, Eldorado, Ardsley, Alden) are all in ownership structures.

The building remains a rental. That is uncommon for a park-facing Central Park West building and worth noting when buyers compare alternatives on the avenue.

Comparable rental buildings on CPW

For renters considering CPW alternatives:

Comparable purchasable buildings on upper CPW (for buyers)

  • The Eldorado (300 CPW) — Roth Art Deco twin-tower co-op, immediately north
  • The Ardsley (320 CPW) — Roth Art Deco co-op, further north
  • The Bolivar (230 CPW) — Neo-Georgian co-op, south
  • The Alden (225 CPW) — Roth Bing & Bing pre-war apartment-hotel-turned-coop

More Central Park West buildings

The neighborhood

For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Central Park West — read The Roebling Team Guide to Central Park West.

Preparing a board package for this building?

The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.

How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.

Considering a move at 275 Central Park West?

Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.

Prefer to speak directly? Schedule a consultation →
Corey Cohen, Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker · The Roebling Team at Compass
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com