- Year built
- 1907
- Type
- Condominium
- Units
- 8
- Floors
- 10
- Pets
- Not documented in the records available to us — confirm with the managing agent
- Landmark status
- Not an individual landmark; not in a historic district
- NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission and City Planning records, updated February 2026
- Doorman
- No doorman
Every recorded sale at this building, 2011–2024
Price-per-square-foot over time, the line- and floor-premium curves, and every recorded sale.
- Median $/sf, 2024
- $816
- 1 sale
- Listing discount
- 6.8%
- Recorded sales
- 7
- On record
- 2011–2024
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 291 Seventh Avenue would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.
Eight apartments in a ten-story 1907 loft building is the entire proposition. The residences occupy full-floor layouts on a 40-by-100 lot; the roughly 3,500-square-foot gross residential-area ratio is not a measured interior area, with light on the avenue and on the rear, and the building has no doorman, no amenity program and no shared corridors to speak of. Buyers who want a private-floor loft at Chelsea's northern edge without a new-development price and without cooperative board approval have a very short list, and this is on it.
The building's history is the more interesting half, and it is unusually well documented because the offering plan survives. Through the 1970s the loft floors filled with residential tenants in a manufacturing district where residential use was not permitted. In 1982, on the passage of Article 7-C — the Loft Law — the building became an interim multiple dwelling, and its owner registered it with the New York City Loft Board in 1983. When the sponsor bought the property in April 1998 and filed a conversion plan the following year, the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and tenth floors and the penthouse were occupied by tenants protected under Article 7-C. Those rights were purchased through buy-out agreements filed with the Loft Board, and in two cases the sponsor obtained Loft Board determinations that the units had been abandoned, which carries the same legal effect. Those floors were grandfathered for residential use under §281(4) of the Multiple Dwelling Law and could convert without further zoning relief.
The rear half of the seventh floor and the whole of the eighth and ninth floors had no prior residential occupancy and could not be grandfathered. In an M1-6 district, they could not lawfully become apartments without a use variance. So the plan offered five residences immediately and made three conditional on the Board of Standards and Appeals granting a variance, with the plain warning that no guarantee could be given. The board granted it: BSA calendar 120-99-BZ, filed May 20, 1999 and granted January 11, 2000, permits the conversion of the eighth and ninth floors and portions of the seventh floor to residential use (Use Group 2) in the M1-6 district. All eight residential unit lots later carried J-51 benefits and are recorded as residential in Department of Finance data, and the units transferred to separate buyers.
The zoning that made all of that necessary is gone. In August 2025 the City Council adopted the Midtown South Mixed-Use Plan, replacing the manufacturing districts across this part of Midtown South with the Special Midtown South Mixed-Use District. This lot is now mapped M1-8A/R11 with Mandatory Inclusionary Housing. Residential use here is now as of right — a quarter century after the sponsor had to litigate the point at the BSA. For an owner, that matters less as history than as context for what gets built on the neighboring lots.
Architecture and unit composition
The building is a ten-story-plus-penthouse loft of 1907, with a two-story stone base beneath a beige brick shaft that has been patched over the decades, a heavy bandcourse above the eighth floor and a lighter one above the second. It is a working loft elevation rather than a designed apartment-house facade, and the sidewalk-shed and parapet repair history in the Department of Buildings file — remedial work in 2000, 2007 and 2008, steel repairs to the water-tank dunnage in 2009, penthouse roof work in 2015 — is the maintenance record of a masonry loft carrying its second century.
Residences are full floors. Roughly 28,300 recorded residential square feet across eight units gives a gross-area ratio approaching 3,500 square feet per residence, not an interior measurement. Verify each unit’s area, two-exposure layout and any fireplace from its plans and inspection. The penthouse duplex occupies the top of the stack; the offering plan provided for a roof deck built out to the maximum area permitted, maintained by the penthouse owner. The lower floors and the cellar hold the four commercial units, which include retail on Seventh Avenue and storage below.
The commercial component is not incidental. Four of twelve unit lots and roughly 8,100 square feet of the building's 36,400 are commercial. Buyers should understand that this is a mixed-use condominium in which commercial owners hold real voting weight and real common-charge obligation, and that lenders assess commercial-area ratios when they underwrite a mortgage in a building like this.
Building operations
There is no resident staff. The offering plan provided for a visiting superintendent with an office and bathroom in the cellar, and garbage chutes accessed from within each residential unit — a design choice that follows directly from having one apartment per floor. Common charges reflect that: the condominium's audited statements show a small operating budget carried by twelve units, with no doorman payroll and no resident-manager payroll in those statements; confirm current staffing and costs.
Capital posture in a building this size is assessment-driven. The condominium's audited financial statements on file record a $100,000 special assessment imposed in October 2015 to fund a new boiler system, billed from December 2015 through April 2016 and then maintained through 2016 in lieu of a common-charge increase. The auditors noted that the condominium has not commissioned a study of the remaining useful lives of the common property and has no funding plan for future major repairs, and that when funds are required the board expects to levy special assessments. That is normal for a twelve-unit building and it is exactly why a buyer here should ask for the most recent financial statements and the minutes rather than relying on the common charge alone. The statements on file with us are several years old; obtain current ones.
Policy framework
Ownership form: Condominium. No co-op board approval or interview — but the condominium board holds a right of first refusal on any sale or lease, and can match a bona fide offer. In an eight-residence building, that provision has teeth and should be understood before a contract is signed.
Pied-à-terre, subletting, LLC, trust and foreign ownership: Not documented; confirm in the declaration, bylaws and house rules; leases are subject to the right of first refusal.
Pets: Not documented in the records available to us. Confirm with the managing agent.
Flip tax: None documented. The working capital contribution at the initial closings was $1,500 per purchaser; confirm what, if anything, applies on resale.
Real estate taxes: The profile reports that the J-51 benefit beginning in 2004 has expired. Reconcile its exemption and abatement components and any other current benefits with the specific unit’s tax bill; an older tax figure may describe a different benefit period.
Building staffing and amenities
- Doorman
- No doormanSource: The Roebling Team's building profile
- Elevator
- YesSource: NYC Department of Buildings elevator records
Staffing and amenities as our building profile and recent listing records describe them. A feature not listed is not confirmed absent. Outdoor space, parking and some facilities can belong to particular apartments or to a separate owner; confirm access for the specific apartment.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $419/yr
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $36,130/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $4 – $376
- Modeled exposure split equally across 8 units (the residential count on the city's lot record). Not an assessed amount; condominium owners are typically charged by each unit's common-interest percentage.
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. A filed Safe grade is not a guarantee of current condition: owners still maintain the facade and, where required, observe parapets each year. Future inspection timing (Local Law 49 of 2025 changed the cycle framework from October 1, 2026), repair and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — a licensed professional engineer or registered architect who meets DOB’s FISP qualifications and signs the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City data last refreshed September 2026.
Recent sales
The building trades as boutique full-floor loft product on the Chelsea–Midtown South seam. With eight residences and a sellout that ran from 2000 into 2002, same-building comparables are thin by construction — resale volume across the entire building has averaged well under one trade a year since conversion. Pricing is therefore established by the Chelsea and Flatiron full-floor loft set rather than by an internal average, and it moves with renovation condition more than with floor.
Compare Chelsea loft condominium sales from the last complete year with new-development and prewar cooperative sales using reliable measured area, total price and adjustments for tenure, condition and charges; no price hierarchy follows from building type alone. The absence of a tax abatement and the absence of amenity payroll pull in opposite directions on the monthly number, and the net result should be modeled on the specific unit. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent closings at this building, from The Roebling Research Library. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2024 | 3 | 2 BR · 2 BA · 3,370 sf | $2,750,000 | $816/sf | -6.8% |
| Sep 6, 2023 | 5 | 3 BR · 2.5 BA · 3,370 sf | $3,830,000 | $1,136/sf | -6.6% |
| Nov 4, 2022 | 7 | 3,370 sf | $3,650,000 | $1,083/sf | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | 8 | 3 BR · 2.5 BA · 3,370 sf | $3,850,000 | $1,142/sf | -10.4% |
| Nov 30, 2015 | 4 | 2 BR · 3,370 sf | $3,750,000 | $1,113/sf | -6.3% |
| Jan 31, 2014 | PH10 | 5 BR · 4,900 sf | $4,600,000 | $939/sf | -7.1% |
| Apr 15, 2011 | 4 | 1 BR · 3,370 sf | $3,250,000 | $964/sf | — |
Market read. Most recent trades (2024) cleared a median $816/sf (recorded) across 1 sale. Median listing discount 6.8% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-00802-7502; each condominium apartment is its own tax lot). Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified in The Roebling Research Library. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage from recorded condo declarations and offering plans.
What would your apartment rent for?
Enter your apartment and I'll send you what it would rent for, from comparable closed leases at 291 Seventh Avenue and nearby.
Buying here? Condo closing costs with a mortgage typically run 3 to 6% of the price. See NYC co-op and condo closing costs, line by line.
Keep up with 291 Seventh Avenue and its market
The Roebling Report, monthly: Manhattan sales data and analysis, including buildings like 291 Seventh Avenue. Unsubscribe anytime.
We’ll use your email for The Roebling Report and note your interest in this building. See our privacy policy.
What to know if you’re buying
Read the right of first refusal clause. It applies to leases as well as sales. If your plan involves renting the apartment, resolve the mechanics and the notice period with the managing agent and your attorney before contract.
This is a mixed-use condominium with four commercial units. Ask for the common-interest schedule, the commercial owners' arrears history, and how the board is constituted. Some lenders apply commercial-area limits that can complicate financing.
Underwrite assessments, not common charges. A twelve-unit building with no reserve study funds capital work by assessment. Ask what has been assessed in the last five years and what the board expects next — the facade and the roof are the obvious candidates in a 1907 masonry loft.
Confirm the full-floor access arrangement. Review the actual elevator landing, corridor and delivery arrangements for the apartment. One apartment per floor does not by itself establish direct elevator entry or the absence of common facilities or staff.
The tax abatement is gone. Model the full unabated number, not a historical bill. Run the True Monthly Carrying Cost Calculator against the current statement.
What to know if you’re selling
Sell the floor plate. Market the verified interior area and the full-floor loft layout with its actual exposures; the building’s gross-area ratio does not establish a 3,500-square-foot interior. Comparables should be drawn from Chelsea and Flatiron loft conversions of similar format, not from the smaller-unit condominium inventory on the avenue.
Get ahead of the diligence questions. The commercial units, the right of first refusal and the absence of a reserve study will all come up. Answering them with the condominium's own documents up front removes the friction; letting a buyer's attorney find them creates it.
Condominium transfer is your advantage. There is no co-op board admission or interview; purchases run through the right of first refusal. Say so plainly in the marketing, after confirming financing rules in the declaration and bylaws.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 291 Seventh Avenue, also evaluate:
- 144 West 27th Street — loft condominium on the same tax block; the closest comparable by vintage and format
- 146 West 26th Street — Chelsea loft conversion one block south; similar plate, different policy stack
- 128 West 26th Street — prewar loft building on the same corridor
- 250 West 27th Street — larger Chelsea loft building; more units, more staff, different economics
- 233 West 26th Street — Chelsea conversion at smaller scale
- 245 Seventh Avenue — condominium on the same avenue to the south
- 252 Seventh Avenue — full-service Chelsea condominium; the amenity alternative
- 315 Seventh Avenue — Seventh Avenue conversion to the north
- 121 West 19th Street — Chelsea loft condominium further south; larger building, comparable product
More Chelsea buildings
- The Seymour (261 West 25th Street) — 2015 condominium
- 263 Ninth Avenue — 1913 condominium
- 270 West 19th Street (The Sedona) — 2004 condominium
- 300 West 30th Street — 2020 condominium
- 305 West 18th Street — 1950 condominium
- 306 Eighth Avenue — 2011
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, transit, and pricing across Chelsea — read The Roebling Team Guide to Chelsea.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent. Where this page compares one building or neighborhood to another, that is our analysis of the recorded record — it names the measure, the period and the sample it rests on, and it is an observation about medians rather than a prediction about any particular apartment.
Considering a move at 291 Seventh Avenue?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
646.939.7375 · c.cohen@compass.com