300 East 54th Street (Connaught Tower)
300 East 54th Street, New York, NY 10022
Sutton Place
BBL 1013460049 · BIN 1039846
- Year built
- 1977
- Type
- Condop
- Units
- 360
- Floors
- 34
- Landmark
- No
- Financing
- 70 percent maximum — a 30 percent minimum down payment
- Flip tax
- 3 percent of the sale price
Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026
Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.
- 1BR median
- $681K
- Recent range
- $558K – $2.4M
- Listing discount
- 2.7%
- Recorded transfers
- 325
Connaught Tower is the largest cooperative on the Midtown East grid and one of the very few buildings of its scale in Manhattan where a buyer of a modest apartment becomes a shareholder in a small commercial real estate business. That is the whole story of this building, and everything a buyer needs to underwrite follows from it.
The tower went up on a site the Benenson organization and the Tisch brothers had been assembling since 1966. Philip Birnbaum drew it — the architect whose reputation rested on getting the maximum number of workable apartments out of a site, and who by the late 1970s was the default choice for large developers building at volume. The result is 34 or 35 floors of rectilinear brick with columns of recessed balconies running the full height and a roofline that bulges over them, set back behind a landscaped base. It is not a subtle building. It is a very well-planned one.
What makes the site unusual is the base. The parcel is a through-block lot reaching from East 54th down to East 53rd, and the tower sits on it under a Board of Standards and Appeals variance that required the developer to build and maintain a public park — nearly 10,000 square feet of it, brick-paved, planted, benched, and anchored by Alexander Liberman's Accord, a red welded-steel sculpture installed in 1979 that is regularly mistaken for a Calder. A separate as-of-right plaza wraps the Second Avenue corner and produces the semicircular drop-off driveway that gives the building its entrance sequence. The two spaces are the reason the tower is built to a floor area ratio of about 12.1 on a lot zoned for 10.0 of residential use — and they are also a maintenance obligation the corporation carries in perpetuity.
The conversion came in November 1982, when the fee passed to Connaught Tower Corp. The sponsor is long gone; the questionnaire on file records zero sponsor-held shares, which for a building of this size and vintage is a meaningfully clean starting point. What the corporation retained instead of a sponsor is a commercial estate.
Architecture and unit composition
The apartment stock is Birnbaum at his most efficient: studios, one-bedrooms and two-bedrooms with tight circulation and no wasted floor area, on lettered lines running deep into the plan. Balconies are the building's signature and are distributed in vertical columns rather than across every line; whether an apartment has one is a real pricing variable. Exposures vary widely — Second Avenue and East 54th lines are bright and loud, south-facing lines over the park are quieter, and upper floors on the north and east open onto Midtown and, higher up, the river.
The single most consequential thing about the inventory is combination. DOB filings from 2001 onward are dominated by apartment combinations — 24H with 24J, 11C/D with 11E, 27F/G/H, 6K with 6L, 3K with 3L, 14K with 14L, 27K with 27L, 28B with 28C. Many were filed as legalizations of work done years earlier. The result is a building where the original 360 units have consolidated toward the roughly 288 combined apartments the managing agent counts, and where three- and four-bedroom apartments exist that were never built as such. Those combined units are the building's scarce product and price accordingly.
Windows and doors were replaced building-wide in a 2014 filing. The corporation is responsible for window repair and replacement where the window is original — a policy worth confirming against your specific apartment before you budget for it.
What the corporation owns
At 360 apartments, the difference between a co-op that owns income-producing property and one that does not is measured in hundreds of dollars a month on every shareholder's maintenance bill. Connaught Tower owns a substantial one.
City records put roughly 24,400 square feet of the building to non-residential use — about 9,800 square feet of retail along Second Avenue and East 54th, and about 14,600 square feet of parking garage. The questionnaire on file counts six commercial units. The garage is run by a third-party operator under lease, with no assigned spaces; a lease of the garage to an operating entity was recorded in 1992 and the arrangement has continued since. The Second Avenue retail has been actively re-tenanted — a first-floor change of use and new storefront was filed with DOB in 2008.
The operating budget on file makes the scale plain. Against total operating income of roughly $9.7 million in the most recent budget year on file, maintenance charges account for about $6.9 million and non-maintenance sources for the rest: commercial rent and escalations of roughly $1.08 million, garage rent of $500,000, pool fees of $60,000, laundry of $34,200, and storage and other charges of about $101,000, plus flip-tax receipts budgeted at $200,000 with a further $50,000 above the line. Something in the order of one dollar in six of the corporation's income comes from property rather than from shareholders, before flip tax.
That is the upside. The corresponding risk showed itself in 2020 and 2021, when the corporation levied an assessment specifically to cover lost commercial rent during the pandemic and took a federal payroll loan. A shareholder at a building with no commercial income would not have seen that assessment; a shareholder here also would not have seen the $1.5 million of annual commercial and garage income that has held maintenance down for four decades. Both facts belong in the same sentence.
The pool deserves its own note because the documents are not entirely consistent. Pool fees appear as a budgeted income line and pool maintenance as a budgeted expense; the capital plan on file carries pool locker rooms and pool clubhouse bathrooms as line items; DOB filings record structural work to the pool enclosure in 2016. The managing agent's questionnaire, however, records the pool and the fitness facility as subject to a separate agreement rather than as included amenities. The practical reading is that there is a pool on the property and that access to it is charged separately — confirm the current terms, fee and eligibility with the managing agent before you rely on it.
Building operations and capital posture
This is a full-service house with a resident manager, 24-hour doorman and concierge, a community room, a fitness facility, laundry, storage and bike storage. Heat runs on a dual oil-and-gas plant.
The capital record on file is one of steady, funded work rather than deferred maintenance. Recent and budgeted items include façade brick pointing, concrete patching, railing and brick replacement (2017, with sidewalk shed); reinforcement of the mechanical room floor and part of its façade (2018); building-wide window and door replacement (2014); an emergency generator support structure (2004); pool enclosure structural work (2016); and a capital plan on file carrying roughly $585,000 of improvements in the most recent budget year, including pool locker rooms, air-conditioning work, boiler and burner work, lobby work and electrical upgrades.
The façade compliance record is worth reading closely because it is not spotless. The building filed unsafe in the cycle beginning in 2017, amended to safe in September 2020, and filed safe again in November 2021. That is a resolved history, not a live problem, but it is the kind of thing a buyer's attorney should confirm is still current.
The underlying mortgage is the most important number in the building and it has recently changed. The questionnaire on file records an $11 million fixed, partially amortizing first mortgage at 3.08 percent with a maturity in 2022, carrying a monthly payment of roughly $76,000, alongside a $2 million secured credit line expiring with it. ACRIS shows the corporation refinanced on 25 August 2022 into a facility documented at $14 million, with a consolidated mortgage recorded at roughly $9.65 million. Debt service in the most recent budget on file rose to just over $1 million a year against roughly $827,000 the prior year — the visible cost of refinancing into a higher-rate environment, and the reason maintenance moved. Any buyer should ask the managing agent for the current rate, amortization schedule and maturity date in writing.
Maintenance itself has moved in disciplined increments: roughly $2.09 per share per month in one budget year on file and $2.15 the next, a 3.00 percent increase. Real estate taxes, at roughly $4.45 million, are the largest expense in the building and consume something close to half of all operating spending before debt service. There is also a recurring air rights expense of roughly $182,000 a year, unchanged across every year in the budget on file — an obligation a buyer's attorney should ask the corporation's counsel to explain, because it is not a line most cooperatives carry.
Separately, the corporation levies an operating assessment tied to the co-op and condo tax abatement — roughly $748,000 in the most recent budget year on file. A capital assessment was recorded as current at the time the questionnaire on file was completed, with none planned beyond it. Confirm what is running today.
Policy framework
Everything below comes from the managing agent's questionnaire, the by-laws, the proprietary lease and the house rules on file in The Roebling Research Library. None of it is published anywhere, and all of it should be re-confirmed with the managing agent at offer stage.
Financing: 70 percent maximum, meaning a 30 percent minimum down payment. This is the ceiling that decides most deals here.
Flip tax: 3 percent of the sale price. Confirm in writing which side pays; the corporation budgets flip-tax receipts as a meaningful income line, so it is enforced.
Subletting: Permitted with board approval. The house had no sublets and no investor owners at the date of the questionnaire on file, which tells you how the board exercises that discretion.
Pied-à-terre: At the board's discretion rather than prohibited — but discretion at a building with a full owner-occupancy record should be read conservatively.
Structures: LLCs and trusts are permitted subject to board review and fees. Corporations are not permitted. Co-purchasers and parents purchasing for children must all be on the stock and lease — the board does not accept a non-occupying owner off the lease. Gifts are permitted, but the purchaser must have income of their own.
Pets: One per apartment. Subtenants may not keep dogs.
Washer/dryer: Permitted subject to architectural review. This is genuinely unusual in a 1970s tower and is a real marketing point.
House rules: Standard but enforced — 80 percent floor covering in every room except kitchens, baths, closets and foyers; construction and noisy work weekdays only, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; no window air-conditioning units or awnings without approval; terrace and balcony plantings require prior written approval and must sit in properly drained containers; and a full smoke-free policy covering every common area, including the pool and roof deck, and extending twenty-five feet beyond the entrances.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $156,465/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $36
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available FISP filing classified the facade as Safe — no repairs were required at that inspection. Facade inspections run on a fixed five-year cycle; future inspection, repair, and any assessment decisions remain building-specific.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Penalties shown are amounts DOB assessed against filings on record across 2005–10 to 2020–25. The FISP dataset does not record whether they were paid, contested or remain open, so treat the figure as history rather than a current balance and confirm the building’s standing with the managing agent.
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
Recent sales
Connaught Tower trades as the scale option in Midtown East: a full-service, doorman, pool-and-garage cooperative where the carrying cost per room is held down by commercial income and where the entry price sits below the prewar Sutton and Beekman cooperatives to the east. Co-op pricing here is best read per room rather than per square foot, and the building's spread runs from small studios and one-bedrooms on interior lines through the combined three- and four-bedroom apartments that have no equivalent elsewhere on the block.
Indexed to the last complete year, the Midtown East cooperative market has been rewarding buildings with documented financial discipline and penalising buildings with unresolved capital or debt questions. Connaught Tower sits in the first group, with the caveat that its 2022 refinancing raised debt service and its taxes are unabated. Buyers comparing this building against condominium inventory nearby should model the whole monthly figure — maintenance, the abatement assessment, garage and pool charges if used — rather than the headline. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | 24L | 2 BR · 1 BA | $900,000 | -2.7% |
| Jul 20, 2026 | 6C | 1 BR · 1 BA | $557,837 | +1.4% |
| Jul 17, 2026 | 23E | 1 BR · 1 BA | $665,000 | -1.5% |
| Jun 23, 2026 | 3H | 1 BR · 1.5 BA | $950,000 | -3.9% |
| Jun 18, 2026 | 29H | 1 BR · 1.5 BA | $1,125,000 | -2.2% |
| Jun 10, 2026 | 34GF | 3 BR · 3 BA | $1,915,000 | +2.4% |
| May 12, 2026 | 2G | 1 BR · 1 BA | $630,000 | -2.9% |
| Mar 12, 2026 | 7B | 1 BR · 1 BA | $695,000 | +0.0% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $830/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 2.6% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Other recent transfers
| Date | Unit | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2009 | 32J | $530,000 |
| Jun 27, 2005 | 31H | $849,000 |
| Oct 15, 2003 | 32BCD | $1,395,000 |
| Jul 29, 2003 | 20A | $342,500 |
| Jul 9, 2003 | 9G | $340,000 |
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01346-0049) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price.
What to know if you’re buying
You are buying shares, not real estate. Title is a stock certificate and a proprietary lease running to 31 December 2082, not a deed. Your lender makes a share loan, your closing is a UCC filing rather than a recording, and the corporation — not you — owns the apartment.
The 30 percent minimum down payment is the gate. At 70 percent maximum financing the board's ceiling, not your lender's, sets the deal. Structure the offer against it from the beginning; a contract written at 80 percent financing will not survive board review here.
Post-closing liquidity is where boards of this size say no. The building publishes no post-closing liquidity requirement, and boards at this scale rarely do. Expect the package to be read for reserves after closing measured in years of maintenance and debt service, not months. Run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before you offer, and be honest with yourself about the debt-to-income line.
The board package and interview are real. Prepare a complete financial statement, two to three years of returns, employment and bank verifications, and personal and professional references. Everyone taking the shares must be on the stock and lease. Corporate purchases are refused outright; LLC and trust purchases go to board review with fees attached.
Budget the 3 percent flip tax into your exit, not just your entry. On a building where flip tax is a budgeted income line, it will be collected. Model it now.
Ask three questions in writing. What is the current rate, amortization and maturity of the underlying mortgage after the 2022 refinancing? What assessments are running, at what monthly rate, and until when? What is the air rights obligation and how long does it run? None of the three is answerable from public sources and all three affect what you will pay every month.
Verify the pool and fitness terms. The corporation's own questionnaire treats them as subject to a separate agreement. If the pool is part of why you are buying, get the terms before contract.
Sublet policy is permissive on paper and conservative in practice. If your plan involves renting the apartment at any point, raise it with the managing agent before you sign, not after.
What to know if you’re selling
Lead with the commercial base. Most buyers comparing cooperatives do not know how to read a budget. Show them, plainly, that commercial rent, garage rent, pool fees, laundry and storage carry roughly a sixth of the corporation's income — and that this is why the maintenance number they are looking at is what it is.
Document the discipline. Maintenance increases of 3 percent, an orderly capital plan, a resolved façade history and zero sponsor shares are all provable from documents we hold. A seller who supplies them converts a diligence problem into a selling point.
Be straightforward about the refinancing and the taxes. The 2022 refinancing raised debt service and there is no abatement. Sophisticated buyers will find both. Disclosing them first is worth more than the delay of having them discovered.
Price the combination premium. Combined three- and four-bedroom apartments here are scarce and are not comparable to the original two-bedroom stock. Use same-configuration comparables, not building averages.
Prepare the buyer for the package. Deals in this building fail at the board more often than at the appraisal. Screening for the 30 percent down payment and for post-closing liquidity before accepting an offer is the highest-value thing a seller can do.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 300 East 54th Street, also evaluate:
- 320 East 54th Street — immediate neighbour on the same block; the smaller-building comparison
- 321 East 54th Street — across the street on East 54th; a different scale at similar carry
- 345 East 54th Street — full-service building further east on the same street
- 300 East 55th Street — the tower one block north at Second Avenue; the closest like-for-like on scale and corner position
- 333 East 55th Street — large Midtown East cooperative; the direct co-op peer
- 250 East 54th Street — the condominium alternative on the same street; the tenure comparison
- 245 East 54th Street — full-service building west toward Third Avenue
- 415 East 54th Street — the East 54th Street stretch toward the river; the value comparison
- 220 East 54th Street — smaller building west of Second Avenue
- 400 East 51st Street (The Grand Beekman) — the contemporary condominium alternative three blocks south, with a permissive policy framework
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Midtown East — read The Roebling Team Guide to Midtown East.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.
Considering a move at Connaught Tower?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at Connaught Tower would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.