315 East 68th Street
315 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065
Lenox Hill, Upper East Side
BBL 1014430001 · BIN 1044753
- Year built
- 1931
- Type
- Cooperative
- Units
- 289
- Floors
- 17
- Landmark
- No
- Amenities
- Attended lobby with a 24-hour desk, security officer at the service entrance, roof garden with private terraces at roof level, exercise room, central laundry, storage lockers, bike room, package room, landscaped front garden and courtyards, two service elevators (the west cab manually operated by staff), BuildingLink. Some apartments have wood-burning fireplaces — the house rules require chimney cleaning at least every two years
- Pets
- Permitted — dogs, cats, fish and birds only; no reptiles or undomesticated animals; all pets must be disclosed to management in writing
Every recorded sale at this building, 2003–2026
Bedroom-by-bedroom medians, the full transfer record, and how units trade against ask.
- 1BR median
- $735K
- Recent range
- $359K – $2.5M
- Listing discount
- 1.7%
- Recorded transfers
- 290
Second Avenue in the Sixties is not where buyers go looking for a 1931 apartment house of this scale. The prewar Upper East Side that people picture — limestone bases, Park and Fifth, twelve to fifteen storeys — stops several blocks west. What sits on the northeast corner of Second Avenue and East 68th Street is something else: a seventeen-storey brown-brick building covering a 123-by-250-foot corner site, with roughly 325,000 square feet above grade, a landscaped forecourt between the sidewalk and the entrance, and a full retail base running up the avenue.
That scale is the building's founding fact and it shapes everything downstream. A corporation that owns 325,000 square feet, a full commercial base, a union staff, two service elevators and a roof garden operates more like an institution than like a boutique prewar house. Its 2019 operating revenue exceeded $8.2 million, of which commercial rent supplied close to a million. That commercial stream is the single most underappreciated feature of the building for a buyer: it subsidises maintenance in a way a purely residential co-op of the same age cannot, and it is why the per-share maintenance on this building has historically compared favourably to prewar houses west of Third.
The building was built as a rental and converted to cooperative ownership in 1981 — the corporation took title in September of that year — which places it in the great wave of Manhattan conversions and explains the two-tier feel of its share structure and its long record of apartment combinations. It has 106,148 shares issued against 115,000 authorised. The apartment count is where the public record and the building's own books diverge sharply: city data carries 289 residential units, but the corporation's audited financial statements state that it contains 252. Forty years of merges, documented in Department of Buildings filings from 2000 onward, closed that gap. Buyers pulling city data on this building should expect the discrepancy and should not read 289 as the number of front doors.
The current operating story is a capital cycle. The board billed a capital assessment of $23.25 per share on September 1, 2019 to fund exterior restoration, carried roughly $1.6 million of remaining contract commitments on that project at the following year-end, and has since put a cogeneration plant, a window replacement programme, elevator upgrades and mechanical work into service. Façade work is live again as of 2026: Department of Buildings filings show façade repairs, a suspended scaffold and a heavy-duty sidewalk shed all filed during the first seven months of the year. A prewar building of this envelope will have a permanent Local Law 11 rhythm, and this one is in the loud part of it.
Architecture and unit composition
The elevation is brown brick with a recessed centre section and a regular fenestration grid, set back behind a planted forecourt that gives the entrance a depth unusual for an avenue corner. The setback and the garden are what most people register from the street; the seventeen-storey mass reads as considerably less imposing from the sidewalk than its bulk suggests.
Inside, the plan is a large prewar corridor building with two service elevators — one of them still manually operated by staff — and a passenger bank served from a 24-hour desk. Layouts run from studios and one-bedrooms through combined three- and four-bedroom apartments; the combinations are numerous enough that line letters do not reliably map to a fixed layout, and floor plans should be read individually rather than by line. A number of apartments have terraces at roof level, and some have wood-burning fireplaces — the house rules impose a two-year chimney cleaning obligation, which is a reliable tell for original flues.
Air conditioning is not central. Through-the-wall installations are treated as capital alterations requiring written board consent, and Department of Buildings filings show PTAC sleeve work continuing through 2026 — so the cooling arrangement in any given apartment is a condition item to inspect, not an assumed building system.
Building operations
Full service. A 24-hour attended lobby with a package room, a separate security officer posted at the service entrance, a live-in resident manager, and a union staff covered by the Local 32BJ collective bargaining agreement. Common facilities include a roof garden governed by written use rules and a party-reservation deposit, an exercise room accessed by apartment pass key, a central laundry, storage lockers, a bike room, and landscaped front gardens and courtyards. Building communications run through BuildingLink.
The corporation retains certiorari counsel on an ongoing basis to protest its assessed valuation — worth knowing, since real estate tax is by a wide margin the building's largest single expense line, running above $3.7 million in the most recent audited year on file.
Policy framework
The documented policy stack is unusually well evidenced for a building of this size, because the audited financial statements and the house rules are both on file.
Flip tax: 2 percent of gross consideration on the transfer of shares, adopted effective January 8, 2018, and recognised by the corporation as contributed capital.
Subletting: permitted only in particular circumstances, with prior board approval and subject to board-set guidelines. The rules do not publish a seasoning period, a maximum term or a fee — all three exist in practice at buildings structured this way, and all three must be obtained from the managing agent.
Notice before listing: a shareholder must give the managing agent at least fourteen days' notice of an intent to offer the apartment for sale, and the agent circulates that notice to other shareholders. Failure to give notice does not bar the sale but is a factor the board may weigh in consenting to it. This is an unusual rule and it should be calendared at the start of a listing, not at contract.
Showings: open houses require three days' advance notice to the managing agent, and no prospective buyer may go beyond the lobby unaccompanied.
Pets: dogs, cats, fish and birds; no reptiles or undomesticated animals; written disclosure to management required.
Washer/dryer: board permission required.
Smoking: all interior and exterior common areas are non-smoking under the August 2018 policy; apartments and private terraces remain permitted subject to a nuisance standard.
Not documented anywhere public: the maximum financing percentage, the post-closing liquidity requirement, the board's posture on pied-à-terre purchases, and its treatment of trusts, limited liability companies, co-purchasers and guarantors. Every one of those is board-set and unwritten. Ask for them in writing from the managing agent before you write an offer.
Local Law 97
- 2024–2029 annual penalty
- $0 (under cap)
- 2030–2034 annual penalty
- $156,344/yr
- Per unit / month range
- $0 – $45
Source: NYC LL84 benchmarking and PLUTO · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
See full Local Law 97 analysis — emissions history, scenarios, methodology →Facade safety — Local Law 11
The latest available filing classified the facade as SWARMP — Safe With A Repair and Maintenance Program: the engineer identified conditions requiring monitoring or repair before the next inspection cycle. The scope, timeline, and how the building funds the work are building-specific — we review the filings and board materials for you.
How to read this, and where it comes from
QEWI = Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector — the licensed engineer the city requires to sign the report (the independent expert, not the managing agent).
Source: NYC DOB facade filings (FISP) · The Roebling Research Library. City record last verified September 2026.
Recent sales
This is a share-ownership building, so pricing is best read per room and per share rather than per square foot, and the share count matters: with 106,148 shares outstanding across roughly 252 apartments, the share-per-apartment ratio is high, and maintenance comparisons against smaller prewar co-ops need to be normalised before they mean anything. The commercial rent stream and the absence of any current tax abatement are the two structural inputs a buyer should carry into the carrying-cost math — the first suppresses maintenance, the second means there is no benefit scheduled to expire and reprice the monthly. Combined apartments and original estate-condition units trade as different products in this building and should not be compared to one another. Unit-level transaction history is maintained in The Roebling Research Library and shared with clients during diligence.
Recent transfers at this building, curated by The Roebling Team research desk. Prices are the transfer amounts recorded with the NYC Department of Finance; apartment-level detail is checked against the building’s own file in The Roebling Research Library before publishing.
| Date | Unit | Apartment | Price | PPSF | vs. Ask |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2026 | 13F | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,400,000 | -9.7% | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 3P | 1 BR · 1 BA | $775,000 | +3.3% | |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 15J | 1 BR · 1 BA · 843 sf | $710,000 | $842/sf | -2.1% |
| Nov 25, 2025 | 14K | 2 BR · 3 BA | $2,500,000 | -3.8% | |
| Oct 15, 2025 | 3J | 1 BR · 1 BA | $730,000 | -2.0% | |
| Sep 11, 2025 | 6R | 1 BR · 1 BA · 869 sf | $830,000 | $955/sf | +0.0% |
| Sep 4, 2025 | 7K | 2 BR · 2 BA | $1,380,000 | -1.4% | |
| Jul 3, 2025 | 5C | 1 BR · 1 BA | $620,000 | -8.8% |
Market read. Most recent trades (2026) cleared a median $906/sf across 1 sale. Median listing discount 2.0% from the last ask — a recurring negotiation gap worth pricing into any offer or listing strategy.
The retrade record
Lines that have traded more than once in the public record — the building’s appreciation arc, apartment by apartment.
Other recent transfers
| Date | Unit | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2011 | 5N | $345,000 |
| Nov 23, 2005 | 4F | $992,000 |
| Jun 6, 2004 | 9D | $219,000 |
| Oct 15, 2003 | 12D | $235,000 |
Full closing history with price-per-square-foot over time, the complete retrade record, and every line that has traded.
Sales sourced from NYC Department of Finance recorded transfers (BBL 1-01443-0001) and verified listing data. Apartment-level facts (line, condition, asking-price context) curated and cross-verified by The Roebling Team research desk. Not all transactions cross-verify with ACRIS records — sponsor and LLC purchases sometimes record at stipulated values rather than market price; square footage on co-ops is not officially recorded, figures shown are approximate.
What to know if you’re buying
The board package is the transaction. In a share purchase the contract is the easy part. Assume a full financial disclosure package, tax returns, reference letters and a board interview, and assume the board can decline without stating a reason. Build the timeline for it — run the Co-op Board Qualification Calculator before you bid, not after.
Get the four unpublished numbers in writing. Maximum financing, minimum down, post-closing liquidity, and the debt-to-income ceiling the board applies. None of these appear in any document available to the public. They determine whether your offer is viable, and they change over time. The managing agent will provide the current requirements.
Ask directly about pied-à-terre, trusts and entities. Cooperatives set these individually. A buyer purchasing through a trust, buying for a child, or intending secondary-residence use should establish the board's posture before spending money on diligence.
Underwrite the capital cycle, not the snapshot. The 2019 exterior restoration assessment, the current façade filings, the cogeneration plant and the elevator programme are all real and documented. Your attorney should read the two most recent audited statements and the last twelve months of board minutes, and should ask specifically whether any further assessment has been voted or contemplated.
Confirm the underlying mortgage terms as they stand today. ACRIS shows a September 2021 consolidation to $15,000,000. Rate, amortisation and maturity as refinanced are not public; the managing agent has them, and they drive the corporation's fixed cost for the next cycle.
Inspect the air conditioning and the fireplace. Neither is a building system here. Both are apartment-by-apartment conditions with alteration consequences.
What to know if you’re selling
Start with the fourteen-day notice rule. The house rules require notice to the managing agent before you offer the apartment for sale. It costs nothing and it removes a discretionary factor from the board's consent decision. Handle it on day one.
Explain the commercial income. Buyers comparing this building to prewar co-ops west of Third will look at maintenance and stop there. The corporation's retail base is why the number reads the way it does, and it is a genuine, documented advantage. Say so with the financials in hand.
Correct the unit count before a buyer's attorney does. City data says 289; the audited statements say 252. A seller who surfaces that first looks prepared; a seller who is asked about it looks otherwise.
Price combinations on their own merits. A merged apartment in this building is a different asset from a single line, with a different renovation history and a different buyer. Run the Renovation Cost Calculator against the condition story before setting an asking price.
Be straightforward about the façade work. Sheds and scaffolds are visible and buyers price them. The honest framing is that the corporation is funding and executing the work rather than deferring it, and the financial statements support that framing.
Comparable buildings
If you're considering 315 East 68th Street, also evaluate:
- 333 East 68th Street — the 1928 prewar cooperative a block east; the closest like-for-like in age and tenure
- 359 East 68th Street — the 1984 condominium on the same block; the deed-ownership alternative on the same street
- 301 East 69th Street — the Mayfair, a condop where co-op mechanics apply against a condominium wrapper
- 333 East 69th Street — the Premier, a 1963 full-service cooperative of comparable scale
- 220 East 67th Street — early-1960s cooperative in the same pocket of Lenox Hill
- 200 East 65th Street — Bristol Plaza; the amenity-heavy condominium comparison two blocks south
- 220 East 65th Street — the Concorde; the large postwar condominium alternative with a garage and rooftop club
- 205 East 78th Street — late-1920s prewar cooperative converted in the 1980s; a similar conversion-era share structure
- 400 East 67th Street — the Laurel; the new-construction condominium alternative in the neighbourhood
The neighborhood
For the full corridor — architecture, schools, transit, and pricing across Upper East Side — read The Roebling Team Guide to Upper East Side.
The full playbook — what goes in the package, how boards read your financials, the interview, and the timeline — plus sample cover, reference, and personal letters you can adapt.
How to read the facts on this page. Items attributed to an offering plan describe the building as it was offered at that filing — unit mix, square footage, the amenity program as planned. They are not a statement about how the building operates today. Tax and compliance figures are sourced separately to current City records and carry their own dates. House rules, staffing and fee policy can change by board resolution without any public filing: treat every policy line here as a starting point for diligence and confirm it with the managing agent.
Considering a move at 315 East 68th Street?
Request a private building brief with the relevant comparable sales, current and off-market availability, and an apartment-specific view of value.
Own an apartment here? See what it would sell for.
A Private Pricing Opinion — what your apartment at 315 East 68th Street would likely sell for today, what it costs to sell, and what you’d walk away with — reviewed personally against condition, exposures, renovation quality, and the competition actually on the market.